OBJECTIVE: The patient being minimally conscious state (MCS) may benefit from wake-up interventions aimed at improving quality of life and have a higher probability of recovering higher level of consciousness compared to patients with the unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS). However, differentiation of the MCS and UWS poses challenge in clinical practice. This study aimed to explore glucose metabolic pattern (GMP) obtained from 18F-labeled-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) in distinguishing between UWS and MCS.
METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with disorders of consciousness (21 cases of UWS and 36 cases of MCS) who had undergone repeated standardized Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) evaluations were enrolled in this prospective study. 18F-FDG-PET was carried out in all patients and healthy controls (HCs). Voxel-based scaled subprofile model/principal component analysis (SSM/PCA) was used to generate GMPs. The expression score of whole-brain GMP was obtained, and its diagnostic accuracy was compared with the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR). The diagnostic efficiency was validated by one-year later clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: UWS-MCS GMP exhibited hypometabolism in the frontal-parietal cortex, along with hypermetabolism in the unilateral lentiform nucleus, putamen, and anterior cingulate gyrus. The UWS-MCS-GMP expression score was significantly higher in UWS compared to MCS patients (0.90 ± 0.85 vs. 0 ± 0.93, p < 0.001). UWS-MCS-GMP expression score achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77 to distinguish MCS from UWS, surpassing that of SUVR based on the frontoparietal cortex (AUC = 0.623). UWS-MCS-GMP expression score was significantly correlated with the CRS-R score (r = -0.45, p = 0.004) and accurately predicted the one-year outcome in 73.7% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: UWS and MCS exhibit specific glucose metabolism patterns, the UWS-MCS-GMP expression score significantly distinguishes MCS from UWS, making SSM/PCA a potential diagnostic methods in clinical practice for individual patients.

Brain imaging with [18F]FDG-PET can support the diagnostic work-up of patients with α-synucleinopathies. Validated data analysis approaches are necessary to evaluate disease-specific brain metabolism patterns in neurodegenerative disorders. This study compared the univariate Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) single-subject procedure and the multivariate Scaled Subprofile Model/Principal Component Analysis (SSM/PCA) in a cohort of patients with α-synucleinopathies.
We included [18F]FDG-PET scans of 122 subjects within the α-synucleinopathy spectrum: Parkinson\'s Disease (PD) normal cognition on long-term follow-up (PD - low risk to dementia (LDR); n = 28), PD who developed dementia on clinical follow-up (PD - high risk of dementia (HDR); n = 16), Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB; n = 67), and Multiple System Atrophy (MSA; n = 11). We also included [18F]FDG-PET scans of isolated REM sleep behaviour disorder (iRBD; n = 51) subjects with a high risk of developing a manifest α-synucleinopathy. Each [18F]FDG-PET scan was compared with 112 healthy controls using SPM procedures. In the SSM/PCA approach, we computed the individual scores of previously identified patterns for PD, DLB, and MSA: PD-related patterns (PDRP), DLBRP, and MSARP. We used ROC curves to compare the diagnostic performances of SPM t-maps (visual rating) and SSM/PCA individual pattern scores in identifying each clinical condition across the spectrum. Specifically, we used the clinical diagnoses (\"gold standard\") as our reference in ROC curves to evaluate the accuracy of the two methods. Experts in movement disorders and dementia made all the diagnoses according to the current clinical criteria of each disease (PD, DLB and MSA).
The visual rating of SPM t-maps showed higher performance (AUC: 0.995, specificity: 0.989, sensitivity 1.000) than PDRP z-scores (AUC: 0.818, specificity: 0.734, sensitivity 1.000) in differentiating PD-LDR from other α-synucleinopathies (PD-HDR, DLB and MSA). This result was mainly driven by the ability of SPM t-maps to reveal the limited or absent brain hypometabolism characteristics of PD-LDR. Both SPM t-maps visual rating and SSM/PCA z-scores showed high performance in identifying DLB (DLBRP = AUC: 0.909, specificity: 0.873, sensitivity 0.866; SPM t-maps = AUC: 0.892, specificity: 0.872, sensitivity 0.910) and MSA (MSARP: AUC: 0.921, specificity: 0.811, sensitivity 1.000; SPM t-maps: AUC: 1.000, specificity: 1.000, sensitivity 1.000) from other α-synucleinopathies. PD-HDR and DLB were comparable for the brain hypo and hypermetabolism patterns, thus not allowing differentiation by SPM t-maps or SSM/PCA. Of note, we found a gradual increase of PDRP and DLBRP expression in the continuum from iRBD to PD-HDR and DLB, where the DLB patients had the highest scores. SSM/PCA could differentiate iRBD from DLB, reflecting specifically the differences in disease staging and severity (AUC: 0.938, specificity: 0.821, sensitivity 0.941).
SPM-single subject maps and SSM/PCA are both valid methods in supporting diagnosis within the α-synucleinopathy spectrum, with different strengths and pitfalls. The former reveals dysfunctional brain topographies at the individual level with high accuracy for all the specific subtype patterns, and particularly also the normal maps; the latter provides a reliable quantification, independent from the rater experience, particularly in tracking the disease severity and staging. Thus, our findings suggest that differences in data analysis approaches exist and should be considered in clinical settings. However, combining both methods might offer the best diagnostic performance.

Behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is common among young-onset dementia patients. While bvFTD-specific multivariate metabolic brain pattern (bFDRP) has been identified previously, little is known about its temporal evolution, internal structure, effect of atrophy, and its relationship with nonspecific resting-state networks such as default mode network (DMN). In this multicenter study, we explored FDG-PET brain scans of 111 bvFTD, 26 Alzheimer\'s disease, 16 Creutzfeldt-Jakob\'s disease, 24 semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (PPA), 18 nonfluent variant PPA and 77 healthy control subjects (HC) from Slovenia, USA, and Germany. bFDRP was identified in a cohort of 20 bvFTD patients and age-matched HC using scaled subprofile model/principle component analysis and validated in three independent cohorts. It was characterized by hypometabolism in frontal cortex, insula, anterior/middle cingulate, caudate, thalamus, and temporal poles. Its expression in bvFTD patients was significantly higher compared to HC and other dementia syndromes (p < .0004), correlated with cognitive decline (p = .0001), and increased over time in longitudinal cohort (p = .0007). Analysis of internal network organization by graph-theory methods revealed prominent network disruption in bvFTD patients. We have further found a specific atrophy-related pattern grossly corresponding to bFDRP; however, its contribution to the metabolic pattern was minimal. Finally, despite the overlap between bFDRP and FDG-PET-derived DMN, we demonstrated a predominant role of the specific bFDRP. Taken together, we validated the bFDRP network as a diagnostic/prognostic biomarker specific for bvFTD, provided a unique insight into its highly reproducible internal structure, and proved that bFDRP is unaffected by structural atrophy and independent of normal resting state networks loss.

OBJECTIVE: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) combined with principal component analysis (PCA) has been applied to identify disease-related brain patterns in neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson\'s disease (PD), Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) and Alzheimer\'s disease (AD). These patterns are used to quantify functional brain changes at the single subject level. This is especially relevant in determining disease progression in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD), a prodromal stage of PD and DLB. However, the PCA method is limited in discriminating between neurodegenerative conditions. More advanced machine learning algorithms may provide a solution. In this study, we apply Generalized Matrix Learning Vector Quantization (GMLVQ) to FDG-PET scans of healthy controls, and patients with AD, PD and DLB. Scans of iRBD patients, scanned twice with an approximate 4 year interval, were projected into GMLVQ space to visualize their trajectory.
METHODS: We applied a combination of SSM/PCA and GMLVQ as a classifier on FDG-PET data of healthy controls, AD, DLB, and PD patients. We determined the diagnostic performance by performing a ten times repeated ten fold cross validation. We analyzed the validity of the classification system by inspecting the GMLVQ space. First by the projection of the patients into this space. Second by representing the axis, that span this decision space, into a voxel map. Furthermore, we projected a cohort of RBD patients, whom have been scanned twice (approximately 4 years apart), into the same decision space and visualized their trajectories.
RESULTS: The GMLVQ prototypes, relevance diagonal, and decision space voxel maps showed metabolic patterns that agree with previously identified disease-related brain patterns. The GMLVQ decision space showed a plausible quantification of FDG-PET data. Distance traveled by iRBD subjects through GMLVQ space per year (i.e. velocity) was correlated with the change in motor symptoms per year (Spearman\'s rho =0.62, P=0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: In this proof-of-concept study, we show that GMLVQ provides a classification of patients with neurodegenerative disorders, and may be useful in future studies investigating speed of progression in prodromal disease stages.

BACKGROUND: 2-Deoxy-2-[18F]fluoroglucose (FDG) PET is an important tool for the identification of Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) patients through the characteristic neurodegeneration pattern that these patients present. Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) images derived from dynamic 11C-labelled Pittsburgh Compound B (PIB) have been shown to present a similar pattern as FDG. Moreover, multivariate analysis techniques, such as scaled subprofile modelling using principal component analysis (SSM/PCA), can be used to generate disease-specific patterns (DP) that may aid in the classification of subjects. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare rCBF AD-DPs with FDG AD-DP and their respective performances. Therefore, 52 subjects were included in this study. Fifteen AD and 16 healthy control subjects were used to generate four AD-DP: one based on relative cerebral trace blood (R1), two based on time-weighted average of initial frame intervals (ePIB), and one based on FDG images. Furthermore, 21 subjects diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment were tested against these AD-DPs.
RESULTS: In general, the rCBF and FDG AD-DPs were characterized by a reduction in cortical frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes. FDG and rCBF methods presented similar score distribution.
CONCLUSIONS: rCBF images may provide an alternative for FDG PET scans for the identification of AD patients through SSM/PCA.

Gut-brain crosstalk has been demonstrated previously. However, brain metabolic patterns of colorectal cancer and chronic enteritis remain unclear. A better understanding of gut-brain crosstalk from a radiological perspective is necessary. We conducted a retrospective study in which we acquired 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in 45 colorectal cancer cases, 45 age- and sex-matched chronic enteritis patients, and 45 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. We calculated a scaled sub-profile pattern based on principal component analysis and metabolic connectivity to explore the brain metabolic model and analyzed correlations between various brain regions and cancer to identify potential neuroimaging markers for non-pharmaceutical therapies. We found a characteristic cerebral metabolic pattern in colorectal cancer patients, which mainly involved visceral sensation and both affective and cognitive psychological processes. The metabolic patterns of patients with colorectal cancer and chronic enteritis were similar but not identical. The metabolic connectivity of the postcentral gyrus and paracentral lobule was found to be significantly different between the controls and patients with colorectal cancer (p < 0.05, false discovery rate correction). The maximal standard uptake value of the cancer focus in colorectal cancer patients was negatively correlated with the dorsolateral superior frontal gyrus (p < 0.05). Patients with colorectal cancer may show abnormal glucose cerebral metabolism characterized by \"point-line-surface.\" This preliminary study revealed the cerebral metabolic characteristics and neurobiological mechanisms of colorectal cancer and chronic enteritis (ChiCTR2000041020; registered December 16, 2020).

Scaled subprofile model using principal component analysis (SSM/PCA) is a multivariate analysis technique used, mainly in [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) PET studies, for the generation of disease-specific metabolic patterns (DP) that may aid with the classification of subjects with neurological disorders, like Alzheimer\'s disease (AD). The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of using quantitative parametric images for this type of analysis, with dynamic [11C]-labelled Pittsburgh Compound B (PIB) PET data as an example. Therefore, 15 AD patients and 15 healthy control subjects were included in an SSM/PCA analysis to generate four AD-DPs using relative cerebral blood flow (R1), binding potential (BPND) and SUVR images derived from dynamic PIB and static FDG-PET studies. Furthermore, 49 new subjects with a variety of neurodegenerative cognitive disorders were tested against these DPs. The AD-DP was characterized by a reduction in the frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes voxel values for R1 and SUVR-FDG DPs; and by a general increase of values in cortical areas for BPND and SUVR-PIB DPs. In conclusion, the results suggest that the combination of parametric images derived from a single dynamic scan might be a good alternative for subject classification instead of using 2 independent PET studies.

Tau protein aggregations are a hallmark of amyloid-associated Alzheimer disease and some forms of non-amyloid-associated frontotemporal lobar degeneration. In recent years, several tracers for in vivo tau imaging have been under evaluation. This study investigated the ability of 18F-flortaucipir PET not only to assess tau positivity but also to differentiate between amyloid-positive and -negative forms of neurodegeneration on the basis of different 18F-flortaucipir PET signatures. Methods: The 18F-flortaucipir PET data of 35 patients with amyloid-positive neurodegeneration, 19 patients with amyloid-negative neurodegeneration, and 17 healthy controls were included in a data-driven scaled subprofile model (SSM)/principal-component analysis (PCA) identifying spatial covariance patterns. SSM/PCA pattern expression strengths were tested for their ability to predict amyloid status in a receiver-operating-characteristic analysis and validated with a leave-one-out approach. Results: Pattern expression strengths predicted amyloid status with a sensitivity of 0.94 and a specificity of 0.83. A support vector machine classification based on pattern expression strengths in 2 different SSM/PCA components yielded a prediction accuracy of 98%. Anatomically, prediction performance was driven by parietooccipital gray matter in amyloid-positive patients versus predominant white matter binding in amyloid-negative patients. Conclusion: SSM/PCA-derived binding patterns of 18F-flortaucipir differentiate between amyloid-positive and -negative neurodegenerative diseases with high accuracy. 18F-flortaucipir PET alone may convey additional information equivalent to that from amyloid PET. Together with a perfusion-weighted early-phase acquisition (18F-FDG PET-equivalent), a single scan potentially contains comprehensive information on amyloid (A), tau (T), and neurodegeneration (N) status as required by recent biomarker classification algorithms (A/T/N).