BACKGROUND: Current guidelines do not recommend routine sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), except in the setting of mastectomy or microinvasive disease. This study aimed to evaluate national SLNB utilization in women undergoing upfront mastectomy for DCIS, identify predictors of SLNB utilization, and determine the percentage with a positive SLNB.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using the NCDB of women with clinical DCIS who underwent upfront mastectomy between 2012 and 2017. Demographic and clinicopathologic variables were compared between patients who underwent SLNB and those who did not. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with SLNB utilization and positive SLNB.
RESULTS: About 38,973 patients met inclusion criteria: 34,231 (88%) underwent SLNB and 4742 (12%) had no surgical axillary staging. Most patients were age 50-69 (51%), non-Hispanic White (71%), with private insurance (66%). On multivariate analysis, older patients were less likely to receive SLNB (P < .01), while patients with higher grade DCIS were more likely to undergo SLNB (P < .01). In those who underwent SLNB (n = 34,231), only 1,149 (3.4%) had nodal involvement. Non-Hispanic Black patients had increased odds of a positive SLNB (P < .01), while those with estrogen receptor positive disease were less likely to be node positive (OR 0.68, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: While 88% of patients had a SLNB, only 3.4% were found to be node positive. Given this low rate, it is reasonable to consider SLNB omission in select patients with low grade, hormone receptor positive DCIS undergoing upfront mastectomy.

UNASSIGNED: In this study, we collected perioperative and postoperative follow-up data from patients with endometrial cancer (EC) at different stages to evaluate the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in endometrial cancer surgery.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 186 endometrial cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy from January 2018 to April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into four groups. Group A comprised patients diagnosed with stage IA grade 1 and 2 endometrioid EC who underwent SLNB. Group B comprised patients with stage IA grade 1 and 2 endometrioid EC who did not undergo SLNB. Group C comprised patients with higher-grade endometrioid EC, wherein systematic lymph node dissection was performed based on SLNB results. Group D comprised patients with higher-grade endometrioid EC who did not undergo SLNB and instead underwent direct systematic lymph node dissection. Clinical, pathological data, and follow-up information for all patients were collected.
UNASSIGNED: In Group A and B, SLNB was performed on 36 out of 67 patients with IA stage 1 and 2 endometrial cancer, yielding a SLN positivity rate of 5.6%. There were no significant differences observed between the two groups regarding perioperative outcomes and postoperative follow-up. Conversely, among 119 patients with higher-grade endometrial cancer, 52 underwent SLNB, with 20 patients exhibiting SLN positivity, resulting in a SLN positivity rate of 38.4%. However, the decision to undergo SLNB did not yield significant differences in perioperative outcomes and postoperative follow-up among these patients.
UNASSIGNED: For stage IA grade 1 and 2 endometrioid EC, the incidence of lymph node positivity is low, omitting SLNB in this subpopulation is a feasible option. In other stages of endometrioid EC, there is no significant difference in perioperative and postoperative follow-up data between patients undergoing routine systematic lymphadenectomy and those undergoing systematic lymphadenectomy based on SLNB results. Therefore, if SLNB is not available, the standard procedure of PLND remains an option to obtain information about lymph node status, despite the surgical complications associated with this procedure.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) poses a significant risk following sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), particularly affecting ethnic minorities, with a twofold increased risk. Axillary reverse mapping (ARM), a novel technique, shows potential in reducing BCRL rates, yet its utility in ethnic minorities lacks sufficient exploration. Therefore, our study aims to investigate the utility and outcomes of ARM on BCRL in an ethnic diverse group.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of ARM patients from January 2019 to July 2022 was conducted, monitoring patients over 24 months at 3-month intervals using SOZO® scores, with comparisons with preoperative baselines.
RESULTS: Of the 212 patients, 83% belonged to ethnic minorities. SLNB was performed in 83%, ALND in 17%, and 62.3% underwent radiation therapy. Positive lymph nodes were found in 31.6%, with 22.2% exhibiting blue nodes and 25.9% exhibiting blue lymphatics. Of identified blue nodes, 70.2% were excised, including 51.5% crossover nodes. Lymphedema occurred in 3 patients, resulting in a BCRL rate of 1.4%. Compared with an historical BCRL incidence of 40.4% following ALND in ethnic minorities, our study reported a significantly lower rate of 8% (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The ARM procedure can significantly lower BCRL in ethnic minority groups. The combination of ARM and bioimpedance spectroscopy led to a remarkably low BCRL rate of 1.4%. Notably, none of the patients in our study developed an axillary recurrence at 24-month follow-up. Nevertheless, future studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to better understand the utility of the ARM technique in this population.

Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) for treatment of melanoma offers several advantages over wide local excision (WLE), including complete histologic margin evaluation, same-day resection and closure, and sparing of healthy tissue in critical anatomic sites. Recently, a large volume of clinical data demonstrating efficacy in MMS treatment of melanoma was published, leading to emerging patient safety considerations of incurred treatment costs, risk of tumor upstaging, and failure of care coordination for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). MMS offers a safe, effective, and value-based treatment for both melanoma in situ (MIS) and invasive melanoma (IM), particularly with immunohistochemistry use on frozen sections. Compared to wide local excision, MMS treatment demonstrates similar or improved outcomes for local tumor recurrence, melanoma-specific survival, and overall survival at long-term follow-up. Tumor upstaging risk is low, and if present, alteration to clinical management is minimal. Discussion of SLNB for eligible head and neck IM cases should be done prior to MMS. Though challenging, successful multidisciplinary coordination of SLNB with MMS has been demonstrated. Herein, we provide a detailed clinical review of evidence for MMS treatment of cutaneous melanoma and offer recommendations to address current controversies surrounding the evolving paradigm of surgical management for both MIS and invasive melanoma (IM).

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to show the feasibility and surgical outcome of vNOTES retroperitoneal dissection and isolation of sentinel lymph nodes in overweight and obese patients with endometrial cancer.
METHODS: Four patients had undergone pelvic lymphadenectomy with a sentinel lymph node. Three patients were overweight, and one was obese with a BMI of 34.6 kg/m2. By using NMR mode sentinel lymph node was visualized, excised and marked separately for pathohistological analysis from the rest of the visualized lymph nodes that were then consecutively excised.
RESULTS: The mean number of overall excised lymph nodes was 12.5, and the mean number on the right side was 5.75 and 6.25 on the left side. There were no metastases verified in the pathohistological evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: vNOTES retroperitoneal isolation of sentinel lymph nodes is good alternative and has its benefits, especially in overweight and obese patients with satisfying low intra- and postoperative complications.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is the most powerful prognostic indicator to date for cutaneous melanoma. Even though elderly patients have a lower incidence of sentinel node involvement, its results are still necessary for access to adjuvant therapies. This is highly relevant considering that the Western population shows an aging trend, and the incidence of melanoma has grown exponentially over the years, making elderly patients more likely to die from melanoma than younger ones. We performed a systematic review to investigate the prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in elderly patients with melanoma. The systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. The authors searched the Cochrane Database, EMBASE, PubMed, and WOS. Eligible studies for the systematic review were clinical trials, observational population studies, clinical or hospital-based cohort studies, and case-control studies. The meta-analysis was conducted using the R software program applying the meta package. Six reports were identified to meet the inclusion criteria. All studies were retrospective, non-randomized cohorts. The results obtained in this systematic review show a statistically significant influence of sentinel lymph node biopsy on disease-specific survival (HR = 2.87; 95% CI: 1.73-4.74) but also suggest that a positive result negatively impacts disease-free survival (HR = 3.41; 95% CI: 0.96-12.11). This meta-analysis shows that a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy does not imply differences in overall survival but significantly influences disease-specific survival and suggests an unfavorable impact on disease-free survival.

BACKGROUND: The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the older population, defined as those over 70 years old, has been debated since the adoption of SLNB into routine practice. Interestingly, there remains a paucity of evidence, especially regarding the rates of SLNB positivity, complications, and subsequent adjuvant therapy in those with node positivity.
METHODS: Data on patient\'s comorbidities, positivity rates, complication rates, and subsequent adjuvant treatments were collected prospectively from 998 patients (644 patients < 70 and 354 patients ≥ 70 years old) between 2016 and 2022.
RESULTS: Patients aged ≥ 70 were found to have a higher prevalence of comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes and hyperlipidaemia. The mean Breslow thickness was 2.2 and 2.5 in the under and over 70 groups respectively (p = 0.03). The mean mitotic rate was found to be 3.3 in the under 70 s and 4.1 in the over 70 s (p = 0.02). Despite these results, no significant differences were observed in the positivity rates of sentinel lymph node biopsies or in the treatment options selected for positive results. The under 70 s were more likely to experience loss of sensation (p < 0.01), but no difference was found in the total number of complications between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Although patients aged 70 and above had a greater incidence of comorbidities, the study revealed that they had lower complications rates and there was no significant variation in the SLNB positivity rate or chosen treatment options between the two age groups. This study supports the move to physiological rather than chronological age assessments in SLNB of the elderly.

Purpose: To explore the clinical application value of indocyanine green (ICG)-rituximab in sentinel lymph node biopsy. Methods: This study included 156 patients with primary breast cancer: 50 patients were enrolled in dose-climbing test, and 106 patients were enrolled in verification test. This was to compare the consistency of ICG-rituximab and combined method in the detected lymph nodes. Results: According to the verification test, the imaging rate of ICG-rituximab was 97.3%. Compared with the combined method, the concordance rate of fluorescence method was 0.991 (28 + 78/107; p < 0.001). Conclusion: For ICG-rituximab as a fluorescent targeting tracer, the optimal imaging dose of ICG 93.75 μg/rituximab 375 μg can significantly reduce the imaging of secondary lymph nodes. Compared with the combined method, it has a higher concordance rate.

Background and Objectives: The careful selection of adequate SLNB candidates not only aims at reducing the surgical risk while identifying SLN metastasis, but also plays a crucial role in identifying the patients eligible for adjuvant therapy. Objectives: The purpose of our study was to investigate the clinical and histologic aspects of primary melanomas that correlate with the likelihood of a positive SLNB result. Materials and Methods: A total of 101 primary melanoma patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsies were included in the study. General patient demographics were obtained as well as localization and melanoma-specific characteristics of primary melanoma from histologic reports in addition to data derived from SLNB melanoma histopathology reports. Results: The patients with positive SLN results had a statistically significant increased Breslow thickness (3.8 mm vs. 1.97 mm, p = 0.002), higher mitotic index rate (5/mm2 vs. 2/mm2, p = 0.009), as well as the presence of ulceration (68.4% vs. 31.6%, p = 0.007). Univariate regression analysis showed the Breslow thickness (p = 0.008), the mitotic index rate (p = 0.054), the presence of ulceration (p = 0.009), as well as the pT3-4 stage (p = 0.009) to be significant predictors of SLN positivity. The optimal cut-off values for Breslow thickness and the number of mitoses scores were determined based on ROC curve analysis. Using the Breslow thickness, mitotic index rate, presence of ulceration, and pT3-4 stage significant coefficients from the univariate regression model, a chance prediction score was developed. Conclusions: The newly developed and proposed scoring system can aid in patient selection for SLN biopsy by facilitating a more efficient risk assessment in the detection of lymph node metastases in melanoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Most patients diagnosed with breast cancer present with a node-negative disease. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is routinely used for axillary staging, leaving patients with healthy axillary lymph nodes without therapeutic effects but at risk of morbidities from the intervention. Numerous studies have developed nodal status prediction models for noninvasive axillary staging using postoperative data or imaging features that are not part of the diagnostic workup. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a top-ranked predictor of nodal metastasis; however, its preoperative assessment is challenging.
OBJECTIVE: This paper aimed to externally validate a multilayer perceptron (MLP) model for noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) in a large population-based cohort (n=18,633) and develop a new MLP in the same cohort. Data were extracted from the Swedish National Quality Register for Breast Cancer (NKBC, 2014-2017), comprising only routinely and preoperatively available documented clinicopathological variables. A secondary aim was to develop and validate an LVI MLP for imputation of missing LVI status to increase the preoperative feasibility of the original NILS model.
METHODS: Three nonoverlapping cohorts were used for model development and validation. A total of 4 MLPs for nodal status and 1 LVI MLP were developed using 11 to 12 routinely available predictors. Three nodal status models were used to account for the different availabilities of LVI status in the cohorts and external validation in NKBC. The fourth nodal status model was developed for 80% (14,906/18,663) of NKBC cases and validated in the remaining 20% (3727/18,663). Three alternatives for imputation of LVI status were compared. The discriminatory capacity was evaluated using the validation area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) in 3 of the nodal status models. The clinical feasibility of the models was evaluated using calibration and decision curve analyses.
RESULTS: External validation of the original NILS model was performed in NKBC (AUC 0.699, 95% CI 0.690-0.708) with good calibration and the potential of sparing 16% of patients with node-negative disease from SLNB. The LVI model was externally validated (AUC 0.747, 95% CI 0.694-0.799) with good calibration but did not improve the discriminatory performance of the nodal status models. A new nodal status model was developed in NKBC without information on LVI (AUC 0.709, 95% CI: 0.688-0.729), with excellent calibration in the holdout internal validation cohort, resulting in the potential omission of 24% of patients from unnecessary SLNBs.
CONCLUSIONS: The NILS model was externally validated in NKBC, where the imputation of LVI status did not improve the model\'s discriminatory performance. A new nodal status model demonstrated the feasibility of using register data comprising only the variables available in the preoperative setting for NILS using machine learning. Future steps include ongoing preoperative validation of the NILS model and extending the model with, for example, mammography images.