SDOH

SDOH
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    越来越多的文献将健康的社会决定因素(SDoH)确定为儿科危重病中健康差异的潜在贡献者。儿科重症监护提供者应使用经过验证的筛查工具来识别未满足的社会需求,并通过多部门伙伴关系确保适当的转诊。儿科重症监护研究人员应考虑种族和保险状况以外的因素,并探讨危重病期间邻里水平因素与不同健康结果之间的关联。在个体和邻里水平上测量和解决SDoH是减轻危重儿科患者健康差异的重要下一步。
    A growing body of literature has identified social determinants of health (SDoH) as potential contributors to health disparities in pediatric critical illness. Pediatric critical care providers should use validated screening tools to identify unmet social needs and ensure appropriate referral through multisector partnerships. Pediatric critical care researchers should consider factors outside of race and insurance status and explore the association between neighborhood-level factors and disparate health outcomes during critical illness. Measuring and addressing the SDoH at the individual and neighborhood level are important next steps in mitigating health disparities for critically ill pediatric patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于各种社会健康决定因素(SDOH)有可能影响肩袖修复(RCR)的使用和术后结果,有必要对文献进行回顾。因此,本系统综述的目的是评估SDOH对RCR利用和术后结局的影响,以识别可能影响患者获得RCR和最佳临床结局的外部因素.
    与RCR相关的搜索词,利用率,结果,和SDOH用于确定报告任何SDOH(由世界卫生组织定义)与RCR利用之间关联的研究,access,成本,或术后结果。不分离RCR或不评价SDOH的制品被排除。使用非随机研究方法学指数评分评估非随机研究的研究质量。由于报告数据的异质性,只有定性分析是可能的。
    总的来说,842篇文章被考虑纳入,14项研究被纳入定性分析。纳入研究的非随机研究的平均方法学指数评分为14.1±5.0。最常评估的SDOH是保险状况和种族/民族。非白人种族与较低的手术和物理治疗(PT)利用率相关,以及延迟治疗。同样,公共保险与较低的PT和手术使用率以及术后PT接受度降低相关。术后,公共保险与较差的患者报告结局评分和较低的复工率相关.
    各种SDOH都会影响访问,利用率,以及RCR的结果。骨科医生应该意识到种族和保险类型因素如何影响RCR后患者的治疗和恢复。
    UNASSIGNED: Since various social determinants of health (SDOH) have the potential to impact the utilization and postoperative outcomes of rotator cuff repair (RCR), a review of the literature is warranted. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of SDOH on RCR utilization and postoperative outcomes in order to recognize external factors that may influence patients\' access to RCR and optimal clinical outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Search terms related to RCR, utilization, outcomes, and SDOH were used to identify studies that reported associations between any SDOH (as defined by the World Health Organization) and RCR utilization, access, cost, or postoperative outcomes. Articles that did not isolate RCR or did not evaluate an SDOH were excluded. Nonrandomized studies were evaluated for study quality using the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies score. Due to the heterogeneity of the reported data, only qualitative analysis was possible.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, 842 articles were considered for inclusion and 14 studies were included in qualitative analysis. The average Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies score of included studies was 14.1 ± 5.0. The SDOH most frequently evaluated were insurance status and race/ethnicity. Non-White race is associated with lower odds of surgery and physical therapy (PT) utilization, as well as delayed treatment. Similarly, public insurance is associated with lower PT and surgery utilization rates and decreased acceptance for postoperative PT. Postoperatively, public insurance is associated with worse patient-reported outcome scores and lower return to work rates.
    UNASSIGNED: Various SDOH can influence access, utilization, and outcomes of RCR. Orthopedic surgeons should be aware of how factors of race and insurance type can influence a patient\'s treatment and recovery after RCR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2021年,疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)国家慢性病预防和健康促进中心(NCCDPHP)资助社区卫生工作者(CHW)进行COVID反应和弹性社区(CCR)。CCR是3年,3.5亿美元实施CHW战略,旨在减少COVID-19的影响,建筑弹性,并通过解决与健康相关的社会需求来改善健康公平。本文介绍了CCR的倡议和迄今为止的经验,强调CHWs在CDC大流行应对中的关键作用。CCR为67个接受者提供资金,以接触受长期健康差异影响不成比例的社区(以下,优先人群)。CCR旨在减少COVID-19的影响,并提高社区应对COVID-19和未来突发公共卫生事件的韧性。收件人实施三种策略:培训CHW以支持COVID-19响应,增加CHW的劳动力来管理疾病的传播,并提高社区和临床资源的利用率,让CHW参与进来,帮助加强社区的抵御能力,以减轻COVID-19的影响。我们资助了另外三个组织,为CCR接受者提供技术援助,并与我们合作对该计划进行国家评估。CCR接受者雇用了大约950名CHW,并将这些CHW整合到1000多个组织和护理团队中。在第二个项目年结束时,CHWs向社会服务机构推荐了超过25万次,并为解决特定的健康状况提供了超过15万次推荐。CCR表明,CHWs可以迅速动员起来参与突发公共卫生事件,并接触到受COVID-19影响最严重的人群。
    In 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention\'s (CDC) National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP) funded community health workers (CHWs) for COVID Response and Resilient Communities (CCR). CCR is a 3-year, $350 million initiative to implement CHW strategies aimed at reducing COVID-19 impacts, building resilience, and improving health equity by addressing health-related social needs. This paper describes the CCR initiative and experiences to date, underscoring CHWs\' critical role in CDC\'s pandemic response. CCR funds 67 recipients to reach communities who are disproportionately affected by long-standing health disparities (hereafter, priority populations). CCR aims to decrease the impact of COVID-19 and increase community resilience to respond to COVID-19 and future public health emergencies. Recipients implement three strategies: train CHWs to support the COVID-19 response, increase the workforce of CHWs to manage the spread of the disease, and improve utilization of community and clinical resources to engage CHWs to help strengthen communities\' resilience to mitigate the impact of COVID-19. We funded three additional organizations to provide technical assistance to CCR recipients and collaborate with us on a national evaluation of the program. CCR recipients hired about 950 CHWs and integrated these CHWs into over 1,000 organizations and care teams. At the end of the second program year, CHWs made over 250,000 referrals to social services and over 150,000 referrals to address specific health conditions. CCR demonstrates that CHWs can be quickly mobilized to participate in a public health emergency and reach those most affected by COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童可能遭受狗咬伤,但频率及其临床影响尚不清楚。我们试图评估(1)受试者特征;(2)损伤类型;(3)提供的临床护理;(4)遭受狗咬伤的ASD儿童的死亡率。我们假设患有ASD的儿童比没有ASD的儿童死亡率更高,需要更多的临床护理。
    方法:这是一项回顾性观察性队列研究,利用TriNetX®EHR数据库,对0至18岁的狗咬伤诊断代码受试者进行研究。数据进行了人口统计学分析,诊断,药物,程序代码,和死亡率。
    结果:我们分析了38,337名受试者(n,%)编码为狗咬伤[619(1.6%)与ASD和37718(98.4%)没有ASD]。患有ASD的儿童头部外伤的几率更高[1.34(1.15,1.57),p<0.0001]与没有的相比。重症监护服务没有区别,住院治疗,机械通气,和狂犬病疫苗管理。1年全因死亡率较低,ASD队列中无死亡报告,无ASD队列中报告有37例(0.1%)死亡。
    结论:患有狗咬伤的ASD儿童与没有ASD的儿童具有相似的临床需求,但更有可能遭受头部外伤。需要进一步的研究来更好地了解该人群中伤害的煽动因素。
    OBJECTIVE: Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may suffer a dog bite injury, but the frequency and its clinical impact is unknown. We sought to evaluate the (1) subject characteristics; (2) injury type; (3) clinical care provided; and (4) mortality in children with ASD who suffer a dog bite injury. We hypothesized that children with ASD have higher mortality and require more clinical care than children without ASD.
    METHODS: This is a retrospective observational cohort study utilizing the TriNetX ® EHR database of subjects aged 0 to 18 years with dog bite diagnostic codes. Data were analyzed for demographics, diagnostic, medication, procedural codes, and mortality.
    RESULTS: We analyzed 38,337 subjects (n, %) coded for a dog bite injury [619 (1.6%) with ASD and 37718 (98.4%) without ASD]. Children with ASD had a higher odds of a traumatic injury to the head [1.34 (1.15, 1.57), p < 0.0001] compared to those without. There was no difference in critical care services, hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, and rabies vaccine administration. All-cause mortality at 1 year was low with no deaths reported within the ASD cohort and 37 (0.1%) deaths reported within the no ASD cohort.
    CONCLUSIONS: Children with ASD that suffer dog bite injuries have similar clinical needs to children without ASD but are more likely to suffer a traumatic injury to the head. Future studies are needed to better understand inciting factors for injuries in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HR/HER2-)转移性乳腺癌(MBC)中,细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6is)已取代单独的内分泌治疗成为治疗标准;然而,开始治疗的几个障碍仍然存在。我们评估了医疗保险人群中健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)和与启动HR/HER2-MBC的CDK4/6i相关的其他因素。使用回顾性队列设计,我们从SEER-Medicare数据库中选择年龄≥65岁并在2015-2017年期间确诊的患者.从MBC诊断到第一次CDK4/6i开始的时间是研究结果。使用多变量精细和灰色危险模型评估了SDOH措施和其他预测因子对结果的影响。752名合格妇女中,352(46.8%)在MBC诊断后启动CDK4/6i(中位启动时间:27.9个月)。在调整后的分析中,与CDK4/6i启动显着相关的SDOH因素包括家庭收入中位数(HHI)高与低(风险比[HR]=1.70;95%CI=1.03-2.81)以及仅医疗保险覆盖率高与低的人群百分比(HR=1.54;95%CI=1.04-2.27)。总之,在HHI中位数较高且仅Medicare覆盖率较高的地区,HR+/HER2-MBC的老年Medicare患者的CDK4/6i起始率较高,暗示对这些小说的不公平访问,有效的治疗和政策干预的需要。
    In hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) have replaced endocrine therapy alone as the standard of care; however, several barriers to treatment initiation still exist. We assessed social determinants of health (SDOH) and other factors associated with the initiation of CDK4/6i for HR+/HER2- MBC in the Medicare population. Using a retrospective cohort design, patients aged ≥65 years and diagnosed during 2015-2017 were selected from the SEER-Medicare database. Time from MBC diagnosis to first CDK4/6i initiation was the study outcome. The effect of SDOH measures and other predictors on the outcome was assessed using the multivariable Fine and Gray hazard modeling. Of 752 eligible women, 352 (46.8%) initiated CDK4/6i after MBC diagnosis (median time to initiation: 27.9 months). In adjusted analysis, SDOH factors significantly associated with CDK4/6i initiation included high versus low median household income (HHI) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.70; 95% CI = 1.03-2.81) and the percentage of population with high versus low Medicare-only coverage (HR = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.04-2.27). In summary, older Medicare patients with HR+/HER2- MBC residing in areas with high median HHI and a high proportion of Medicare-only coverage had higher rates of initiating CDK4/6i, suggesting inequitable access to these novel, effective treatments and a need for policy intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性疼痛和阿片类药物滥用是一种常见的合并症,具有有害的健康后果。越来越多的工作表明,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)会增加慢性疼痛,阿片类药物滥用和依赖的风险。然而,人们对健康的社会决定因素(SDoH)知之甚少,这些因素可能解释了PTSD与慢性疼痛、阿片类药物误用和依赖的相互关系.健康素养是一种相关的SDoH结构,反映了收集的能力,process,并理解参与医疗保健环境所需的健康相关信息。
    本横断面研究的目的是研究健康素养在创伤后应激障碍和阿片类药物滥用之间的间接影响,阿片类药物依赖,疼痛强度,疼痛残疾。
    样本包括142名成年人(Mage=35.2,SD=9.9;67.4%的女性;70.1%的白人/白种人),自我报告慢性疼痛和可能的PTSD正在使用阿片类药物。
    结果表明,PTSD症状的严重程度通过健康素养对阿片类药物滥用和阿片类药物依赖有小的间接影响;对疼痛强度和残疾没有明显的间接影响。
    本调查提供了证据,表明健康素养可能是PTSD症状严重程度与阿片类药物滥用和依赖性之间关联的重要解释因素。
    UNASSIGNED: Chronic pain and opioid misuse are a prevalent comorbidity with deleterious health outcomes. Growing work indicates that posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can increase the risk for chronic pain and opioid misuse and dependence. However, there is little understanding of social determinants of health (SDoH) that may account for interrelations of PTSD with chronic pain and opioid misuse and dependence. Health literacy is one relevant SDoH construct, reflecting the ability to gather, process, and comprehend health-related information required to engage in a healthcare setting.
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of the present cross-sectional study was to examine the indirect effect of health literacy in the association between PTSD and opioid misuse, opioid dependence, pain intensity, and pain disability.
    UNASSIGNED: The sample included 142 adults (Mage = 35.2, SD = 9.9; 67.4% female; 70.1% White/Caucasian) with self-reported chronic pain and probable PTSD who were using opioid medication.
    UNASSIGNED: Results demonstrated that PTSD symptom severity had a small indirect effect on opioid misuse and opioid dependence via health literacy; no indirect effects were evident for pain intensity and disability.
    UNASSIGNED: The present investigation provides evidence that health literacy may serve as an important explanatory factor in associations between PTSD symptom severity and opioid misuse and dependence among adults with co-occurring probable PTSD and chronic pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    黑人和拉丁裔社区在健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)和慢性疾病的高发病率方面存在不平等[例如,心血管疾病(CVD),艾滋病毒]。COVID-19大流行放大了这些长期存在的SDOH差异。然而,人们很少关注与大流行有关的经历,这些经历与结构性不平等有关。
    使用半结构化面试指南,对黑人和拉丁裔艾滋病毒感染者(PLWH)和心血管疾病风险进行了60次深入电话采访,以评估:(1)对COVID-19的个人和社区风险;(2)对COVID-19公共卫生信息的了解和获取;(3)对COVID-19公共卫生建议和疫苗接种的障碍;(4)对艾滋病毒的认知,CVD,和COVID-19。面试被专业地转录成英语或西班牙语。西班牙语成绩单被翻译成英文。快速定性分析用于将每个成绩单汇总为与采访指南领域相对应的结构化模板。摘要被组合成矩阵,用于识别和比较不同领域的主题。
    参与者报告了由于免疫功能受损和SDOH而导致的COVID-19风险,包括交通,暴露于他人赋予的风险,生活在资源不足的社区,住房不安全。参与者通过遵守公共卫生任务从事保护性对策。与供应商的关系,参加社区支持小组,在COVID-19信息的传播和疫苗接种方面,数字包容和识字是显著的。管理慢性病的经验促进了疫苗的接受。参与者描述了语言障碍,歧视的经验,以及历史上对医疗系统和疫苗缺乏信任。
    这项研究提供了在COVID-19大流行期间易感的PLWH和CVD风险的实时叙述。影响包括需要与提供者和已建立的社区网络保持连续性,增加互联网接入和数字健康素养,并解决医疗环境中遭受的历史创伤。至关重要的是要了解传统的SDOH对慢性病患者的影响以及其他社会决定因素,这些因素有助于获取公共卫生信息,遵守公共卫生建议,以及暴露于结构性不平等的人群的疫苗摄取。
    UNASSIGNED: Black and Latinx communities experience inequities in the social determinants of health (SDOH) and high rates of chronic illnesses [e.g., cardiovascular disease (CVD), HIV]. The COVID-19 pandemic amplified these long-standing SDOH disparities. However, scant attention has been paid to the pandemic-related experiences of populations exposed to structural inequities.
    UNASSIGNED: Using a semi-structured interview guide, 60 in-depth telephone interviews were conducted with Black and Latinx people living with HIV (PLWH) and CVD risks to assess: (1) perceived personal and community risk for COVID-19; (2) knowledge of and access to COVID-19 public health information; (3) barriers to COVID-19 public health recommendations and vaccine uptake; and (4) perceptions of HIV, CVD, and COVID-19. Interviews were professionally transcribed into either English or Spanish. Spanish transcripts were translated into English. Rapid qualitative analysis was used to summarize each transcript into a structured templaicte corresponding to interview guide domains. Summaries were combined into matrices for identification and comparison of themes across domains.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants reported risks for COVID-19 due to being immunocompromised and SDOH, including transportation, exposure to risks conferred by others, living in under-resourced neighborhoods, and housing insecurity. Participants engaged in protective countermeasures by adhering to public health mandates. Relationships with providers, participating in community support groups, and digital inclusion and literacy were salient with respect to dissemination of COVID-19 information and vaccine uptake. Experiences with managing a chronic illness facilitated vaccine acceptance. Participants described language barriers, experiences of discrimination, and a historical lack of trust in medical systems and vaccines.
    UNASSIGNED: This study provides a real-time narrative from PLWH and CVD risks who were vulnerable during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. Implications include the need for continuity with providers and established community networks, increasing internet access and digital health literacy, and addressing historical trauma incurred in medical settings. It is critical to understand the impact of traditional SDOH on those living with chronic illness as well as other social determinants that shed light on access to public health information, adherence to public health recommendations, and vaccine uptake among populations exposed to structural inequities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阿巴拉契亚居民的发病率和死亡率高于全国平均水平,这些差异与人口健康各种决定因素的不公平暴露有关。健康的社会和环境决定因素是制定和评估减轻区域健康差异的计划的有用镜头。
    这项2023年范围审查是对将阿巴拉契亚健康的决定因素与区域死亡率和发病率的主要原因联系起来的研究。搜索策略采用关键字搜索,其中包括阿巴拉契亚地区的地理术语和该地区的主要不良健康结果。对符合以下纳入标准的研究进行了综述:原创文章,在过去的五年里,涉及阿巴拉契亚人,包括对人口健康决定因素与阿巴拉契亚发病率和死亡率的一个或多个主要原因之间的关联的严格评估。
    搜索返回了221篇研究文章,包括30项介入研究。前三个健康结果包括癌症(43.59%),绝望的疾病(23.08%),糖尿病(12.82)。获得护理的机会(27.3%),乡村(18.9%),和教育(14.8%)是最常见的人群健康决定因素。介入研究按项目类型分类:教育,技术,伙伴关系,多层次干预。由于研究类型的异质性,这些研究使用叙事综合进行了综合。
    这项工作的结果可以为促进阿巴拉契亚人口健康的其他计划的开发和评估提供信息。我们的研究团队将利用这些结果为社区讨论提供信息,制定战略计划,以减轻中部和南中部阿巴拉契亚弗吉尼亚州的健康差距。
    UNASSIGNED: Residents of Appalachia experience elevated rates of morbidity and mortality compared to national averages, and these disparities are associated with inequitable exposures to various determinants of population health. Social and environmental determinants of health are a useful lens through which to develop and evaluate programs to mitigate regional health disparities.
    UNASSIGNED: This 2023 scoping review was conducted of studies linking determinants of Appalachian health with leading causes of regional mortality and morbidity. The search strategy employed a keyword search that included geographic terms for the Appalachian Region and the primary adverse health outcomes in that region. Studies meeting the following inclusion criteria were reviewed: original article, published in the last five years, involving an Appalachian population, and includes a rigorous assessment of an association between a population health determinant and one or more leading causes of Appalachian morbidity and mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: The search returned 221 research articles, including 30 interventional studies. The top three health outcomes included cancer (43.59%), diseases of despair (23.08%), and diabetes (12.82). Access to care (27.3%), rurality (18.9%), and education (14.8%) were the most common population health determinants identified. Interventional studies were categorized by program types: education, technology, partnerships, and multilevel interventions. Due to the heterogeneity of study types, the studies were combined using a narrative synthesis.
    UNASSIGNED: The results of this work can inform the development and evaluation of additional programs to promote Appalachian population health. Our study team will use these results to inform community-based discussions that develop strategic plans to mitigate health disparities in Central and Southcentral Appalachian Virginia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们调查了健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)的影响,医疗保健服务,以及健康行为对COVID-19大流行的第一个冬季至随后的疫苗后夏季之间癌症患者身心健康结果的影响。在2020年11月至2021年8月之间,在俄亥俄州东北部进行了一项针对2019年1月至2020年1月期间被诊断患有癌症的个人的三波在线调查。进行描述性分析和混合效应回归分析。共有322名新诊断的癌症患者,有40名非洲裔美国人和282名白人(215名来自大都市地区和67名非大都市地区)回答了调查问题。在2021年8月结束的第3波中,调查受访者报告了汉密尔顿抑郁量表上的抑郁显着减少(p=.019),并在PROMIS上改善了全球健康状况(p=.036)。随着年龄的增长,合并症,以及分析中控制的其他人口统计学和医学变量,孤独感(p<.001)和拥挤的生活空间(p=.001,p=.015)是与抑郁相关的两个最突出的因素,烦躁,基线时全球健康状况不佳,p值最低,效果持久。采取预防措施的自我效能感与抑郁降低(p=.001)和全球健康改善(p=.029)相关。获得医疗服务的增加(p<.01)和对远程医疗预约的满意度(p<.01)与更好的全球健康状况和减少的易怒性显着相关。有私人健康保险的受访者报告说,他们的健康状况比仅有医疗保险的受访者更好(p<.05)。这个纵向,观察性研究表明SDOH对癌症患者健康结局的影响.生活条件不达标,造成孤独和拥挤,医疗质量(例如,高质量的远程医疗和获得药物),和个人行为(例如,自我效能)与大流行期间新诊断的癌症患者的健康结果显着相关,应充分考虑以改善临床护理。
    We investigated the influence of social determinants of health (SDOH), healthcare services, and health behaviors on mental and physical health outcomes of cancer patients between the first winter and the following post-vaccine summer of the COVID-19 pandemic. A three-wave online survey of individuals diagnosed with incident cancer between January 2019 and January 2020 was conducted between November of 2020 and August of 2021 in northeast Ohio. Descriptive analysis and mixed-effect regression analyses were performed. A total of 322 newly diagnosed cancer patients, with 40 African Americans and 282 Whites (215 from metropolitan areas and 67 nonmetropolitan) responded to the survey questions. In Wave 3 ending in August 2021, the survey respondents reported significantly reduced depression (p = .019) on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and improved global health (p = .036) on PROMIS. With age, comorbidity, and other demographic and medical variables controlled in the analyses, the feeling of loneliness (p < .001) and crowded living space (p = .001, p = .015) were the two most prominent factors associated with depression, irritability, and poor global health at baseline, with the lowest p values and persistent effect. Self-efficacy of taking preventive measures was associated with reduced depression (p = .001) and improved global health (p = .029). Increasing access to medicine (p < .01) and satisfaction with telehealth appointments (p < .01) were significantly associated with better global health and reduced irritability. Respondents who had private health insurance reported better health than those that had Medicare coverage only (p < .05). This longitudinal, observational study demonstrated the impact of SDOH on health outcomes of cancer patients. Substandard living conditions resulting in loneliness and crowdedness, quality of medical care (e.g., quality telehealth and access to medicine), and personal behaviors (e.g., self-efficacy) were significantly associated with health outcomes in newly diagnosed cancer patients during the pandemic and should be given adequate consideration for the purpose of improving clinical care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心规定,医院必须采取措施筛查健康的社会决定因素(SDoH)。我们试图报告可用的SDoH筛查工具。PubMed,Scopus,WebofScience,以及灰色文献进行了搜索(1980年至2023年11月)。纳入的研究以美国为基础,用英语写的,并检查了评估SDoH的筛选工具。30项研究纳入分析队列。任何给定的SDoH评估工具中的问题数量变化很大,范围从5到50(平均值:16.6)。检查了总共19个SDoH结构域。住房(n=23,92%)和安全/暴力(n=21,84%)是最频繁评估的领域。食物/营养(n=17,68%),收入/财务(n=16,64%),交通运输(n=15,60%),家庭/社会支持(n=14,56%),公用事业(n=13,52%),教育/识字(n=13,52%)也通常包括在大多数筛查工具中。18项研究提出了解决SDoH的具体干预措施。SDoH筛查工具对于识别各种社会需求和漏洞至关重要,以帮助制定干预措施来满足患者需求。此外,SDoH筛选工具存在明显的异质性,以及通过当前可用的筛选工具评估的SDoH域的显着变异性。
    The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services have mandated that hospitals implement measures to screen social determinants of health (SDoH). We sought to report on available SDoH screening tools. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, as well as the grey literature were searched (1980 to November 2023). The included studies were US-based, written in English, and examined a screening tool to assess SDoH. Thirty studies were included in the analytic cohort. The number of questions in any given SDoH assessment tool varied considerably and ranged from 5 to 50 (mean: 16.6). A total of 19 SDoH domains were examined. Housing (n = 23, 92%) and safety/violence (n = 21, 84%) were the domains assessed most frequently. Food/nutrition (n = 17, 68%), income/financial (n = 16, 64%), transportation (n = 15, 60%), family/social support (n = 14, 56%), utilities (n = 13, 52%), and education/literacy (n = 13, 52%) were also commonly included domains in most screening tools. Eighteen studies proposed specific interventions to address SDoH. SDoH screening tools are critical to identify various social needs and vulnerabilities to help develop interventions to address patient needs. Moreover, there is marked heterogeneity of SDoH screening tools, as well as the significant variability in the SDoH domains assessed by currently available screening tools.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号