Robotic surgical procedures

机器人外科手术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the application of a rehabilitation management protocol for urinary incontinence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 114 patients who underwent RALP between August 2021 and November 2021 as the control group and a prospective analysis of 114 patients who underwent RALP between May 2022 and August 2022 as the experimental group. The rehabilitation management protocol focused on preoperative stage, postoperative care, day of catheter removal, 1 month postoperative, 3 months postoperative, 6 months postoperative, and 12 months or more postoperative.
    RESULTS: The 24-h pad test was significantly lower in the experimental group compared with the control group at 2 and 6 months after RALP (both P < 0.01). The scores of the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire-short form (ICIQ-SF) in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group at 1 month after RALP (P < 0.01).The scores of quality of life in the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group at 1, 2, and 6 months after RALP (all P < 0.01).The scores of Broome Pelvic Muscle Self-efficacy Scale (BPMSES) were lower than those of the control group at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after RALP (all P < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: The application of the rehabilitation management protocol had significant beneficial effects on urinary functions and quality of life in patients with prostate cancer after RALP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is the most common robotic procedures performed in urologic oncology. The Hugo Robot-Assisted Surgery (RAS) System (Medtronic, USA©) has recently been launched on the market and is characterized by the modularity of four different independent arm carts. The aim of this study is to describe and evaluate safety and feasibility of three-arms setting for RARP using the Hugo RAS™ System in a large case series.
    METHODS: Between October 2022 and December 2023, a large case series of patients from two tertiary referral center who underwent RARP through HUGO™ RAS were prospectively enrolled. Informed written consent was obtained before the procedure and a three-arms setting was used in every case. Follow-up was scheduled according to EAU guidelines.
    RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were included in this study and underwent RARP with Hugo™ RAS System. Median Console time time was 114 min (IQR, 75-150), median docking time 4 min (IQR, 3-5). Lymphadenectomy was successfully performed when indicated in 19 patients (22.1%). A vesicourethral anastomosis using the modified Van Velthoven technique was successfully achieved in all cases. No post-operative complications > Clavien II up to 30 post-operative days were reported. In all patients, catheter was removed on the 7th postoperative day.
    CONCLUSIONS: We conducted the first large case series of RARP through the novel Hugo™ RAS System using a three-arms configuration. This innovative robotic platform showed an easily accessible docking system, providing excellent perioperative outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective treatment for early-stage gastrointestinal cancers. However, traditional surgical instruments lack accuracy and force-sensing.
    METHODS: A new type of continuum robot for ESD is designed. An accurate static model of the proposed continuum robot is established, considering cases where the robot bends into C-shapes and S-shapes. A force estimation method based on an accurate static model is proposed. Then, the accuracy of the static model and force estimation is verified through experiments. Finally, an ex-organ experiment is carried out.
    RESULTS: The average position error of the proposed static model is 0.72 mm, accounting for 2.57% of the total robot length. The average error of force estimation is 19.53 mN. By gripping and cutting ex-porcine gastric mucosa, the robot\'s functionality is validated.
    CONCLUSIONS: This paper contributes to precise control and safe interaction of continuum robots.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Introduction Patients with localized high-risk urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract are advised radical nephroureterectomy, the surgical removal of the kidney and ureter, utilizing robot-assisted versus laparoscopic methods. This study aims to compare the surgical and oncological results of robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. Methods An observational retrospective cohort study compared 14 patients who had robotic-assisted nephroureterctomy (RAN) to 16 patients who had laparoscopic assisted nephroureterctomy (LAN). Results There was no significant difference in age, sex, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), creatinine, Charlson comorbidity score, length of hospital stays, or the need to convert to an open approach. However, there was a statistical difference between the two procedures in terms of lymph dissection (p-value of 0.037) and the length of the procedure (p-value of 0.09). Conclusions The robotic approach has significantly higher use for lymph node dissection, while laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy has a shorter operation time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:胸内副神经节瘤通常在与椎骨相邻的复杂的后纵隔区域内发现,经常呈现大量的。此类肿瘤的手术切除提出了巨大的挑战,并且通常通过开放外科手术进行。
    方法:在本报告中,我们介绍了一例53岁女性患者,该患者在大约1个月前的常规体检中发现了左胸内包块.她抱怨胸闷和胸痛。
    方法:她主诉胸闷和胸痛。胸部和臂丛神经的磁共振成像显示左上肺门附近有一个肿块,测量约78×63×72毫米。最初的怀疑倾向于良性病变。值得注意的是,左第一胸神经根轻微受压,左臂丛神经中下干轻度受压。根据肿瘤的形态学特征和影像学表现,我们怀疑它的良性性质。
    方法:我们选择了机器人辅助胸外科手术切除纵隔肿瘤。
    结果:术后病理证实诊断为副神经节瘤。患者在手术后没有出现任何明显的并发症,6个月的随访显示没有复发的迹象。
    结论:机器人辅助胸外科手术技术的成功应用强调了其在微创切除位于后纵隔的相当大的胸内肿瘤中的有效性。
    BACKGROUND: Intrathoracic paragangliomas are typically found within the intricate posterior mediastinal region adjacent to the vertebrae, often presenting with substantial volume. Surgical excision of such tumors presents formidable challenges and is conventionally performed via open surgical procedures.
    METHODS: In this report, we present the case of a 53-year-old female patient who presented with the discovery of a left intrathoracic mass during a routine physical examination approximately 1 month prior. She complained of chest tightness and chest pain.
    METHODS: She complained of chest tightness and chest pain. Magnetic resonance imaging of the chest and brachial plexus revealed a mass adjacent to the left upper lung hilum, measuring approximately 78 × 63 × 72 mm. The initial suspicion leaned towards a benign lesion. Notably, there was slight compression of the left first thoracic nerve root and mild compression of the middle and lower trunks of the left brachial plexus. Based on the morphological features of the tumor and imaging findings, we suspected its benign nature.
    METHODS: We opted for robot-assisted thoracic surgery to resect the mediastinal tumor.
    RESULTS: Subsequent postoperative pathology confirmed the diagnosis as a paraganglioma. The patient did not experience any notable complications post-surgery, and a 6-month follow-up revealed no signs of recurrence.
    CONCLUSIONS: The successful application of the robot-assisted thoracic surgery surgical technique underscores its efficacy in minimally invasive resection of sizable intrathoracic tumors situated in the posterior mediastinum.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:开放部分肾切除术(OPN)以前被认为是治疗T1局部肾肿瘤的金标准。在引入机器人辅助肾部分切除术(RAPN)作为OPN的替代方法之后,OPN在我们部门逐渐被抛弃。该研究的目的是回顾性比较OPN或RAPN治疗可疑肾癌的患者的结果。
    方法:在2010年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间接受开放或机器人辅助肾部分切除术的患者被回顾性纳入研究。每个接受手术的肿瘤在术前通过RENAL肾病评分进行评分。根据Clavien-Dindo分类系统评估30天内的并发症。
    结果:共有197例患者接受了肾部分切除术;75例接受了OPN治疗,122例接受了RAPN治疗。两组之间在年龄方面没有显着差异(OPN:63岁±11,RAPN:62岁±10),性别(OPN:71/29%,RAPN:67/33%),体重指数(OPN:28±5,RAPN:28±5),ASA评分(OPN:2.4±0.6,RAPN:2.2±0.5),或肾脏计评分(OPN:6.6±1.7,RAPN:6.9±1.7,p=0.2)。OPN组的手术时间(81分钟)明显短于RPN组(144.5分钟,p<0.001)。OPN组的围手术期平均失血量为227±162ml,而RAPN组为189±152ml(p=0.1)。与OPN组相比,RPN组(3天)的平均住院时间较短(6天,p<0.001)。OPN组的手术切缘阳性率(21.6%)明显高于RPN组(4.2%,p<0.001)。两组Clavien-Dindo分级并发症的数量没有差异(p=0.6)。
    结论:在我们部门引入RPN导致住院时间缩短和手术切缘阳性减少,不会增加并发症。
    BACKGROUND: Open partial nephrectomy (OPN) has previously been considered the gold standard procedure for treatment of T1 localized renal tumors. After introduction of robot assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) as an alternative method to OPN, OPN was gradually abandoned at our department. The aim of the study was to retrospectively compare the results of patients treated with either OPN or RAPN for suspected renal carcinoma.
    METHODS: Patients who underwent either open or robotic assisted partial nephrectomy between January 1st 2010 and December 31st 2020 were retrospectively included in the study. Each tumor subjected to surgery was scored preoperatively by the RENAL nephrometry score. Complications within 30 days were assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system.
    RESULTS: A total of 197 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy were identified; 75 were subjected to OPN and 122 were treated with RAPN. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to age (OPN: 63 years ± 11, RAPN: 62 years ± 10), gender (OPN: 71/29%, RAPN: 67/33%), body mass index (OPN: 28 ± 5, RAPN: 28 ± 5), ASA score (OPN: 2.4 ± 0.6, RAPN: 2.2 ± 0.5), or nephrometry score (OPN: 6.6 ± 1.7, RAPN: 6.9 ± 1.7, p = 0.2). The operative time was significantly shorter in the OPN group (81 min) compared to the RAPN group (144.5 min, p < 0.001). Mean perioperative blood loss was 227 ± 162 ml in the OPN group compared to 189 ± 152 ml in the RAPN group (p = 0.1). Mean length of stay was shorter in the RAPN group (3 days) compared to the OPN group (6, days, p < 0.001). Positive surgical margin rate was significantly higher in the OPN group (21.6%) compared to the RAPN group (4.2%, p < 0.001). There were no differences in the number of Clavien-Dindo graded complications between the groups (p = 0.6).
    CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of RAPN at our department resulted in shorter length of stay and fewer positive surgical margins, without increasing complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在结直肠手术中广泛采用了微创手术技术。新的技术突破导致了更少的侵入性替代方案,如单端口手术,但是这受到了技术挑战的阻碍,例如在有限的空间内机械臂的碰撞。直观的达芬奇单端口机器人平台是一个新颖的系统,克服了这些挑战。
    本研究旨在评估IntuitivedaVinci单端口机器人平台在成年患者右节段结肠切除术中的安全性和可行性。这些发现可能会为更广泛地使用单端口机器人手术奠定基础。
    直观的达芬奇单端口机器人是专为单端口机器人手术而设计的系统。该平台使用单个C形臂实现灵活的端口位置和有效的内部和外部运动范围。在本研究中,在2022年5月至2022年11月期间,使用该平台对成年患者进行了右结肠切除术,并将其与在2019年1月至2022年12月期间使用标准多端口平台进行的成年患者的右结肠切除术进行了比较.主要结局指标是安全性和质量事件发生率。
    结果:在30名患者中,16.7%的患者(n=5)接受了单口机器人右结肠切除术,83.3%(n=25)接受了多口右结肠切除术。在单端口组中,40%的患者(n=2)发生了安全性/质量事件(术后门静脉血栓形成和术后过度疼痛)。在多端口组中,32%的患者(n=8)发生1次安全/质量事件,8%(n=2)发生1次以上事件。
    结论:这项初步研究,第一个食品和药物管理局批准的,研究者在结直肠手术中使用这个平台,表明该平台是正确的结肠切除术的安全可行的选择。初步评估,在相关安全/质量事件方面,它似乎与多端口平台相当。
    背景:Clinicaltrials.govNCT05321134。
    BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgical techniques have been widely adopted in colorectal surgery. New technological breakthroughs have led to even less invasive alternatives like single-port surgery, but this has been hindered by technical challenges such as the collision of robotic arms within a limited space. The Intuitive da Vinci Single-Port robotic platform is a novel system that overcomes some of these challenges.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of the Intuitive da Vinci Single-Port robotic platform in right segmental colectomies among adult patients. These findings may set the stage for more widespread use of single-port robotic surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: The Intuitive da Vinci Single-Port robot is a system designed specifically for single-port robotic surgery. This platform enables flexible port location and efficient internal and external range of motion using a single C-shaped arm. In the present study, right colectomies were performed in adult patients using this platform between May 2022 and November 2022, and they were compared to right colectomies in adult patients performed using the standard multiport platform between January 2019 and December 2022. The main outcome measure was safety and quality event rates.
    RESULTS: Of 30 patients, 16.7% of patients (n = 5) underwent single-port robotic right colectomy and 83.3% (n = 25) underwent multiport right colectomy. In the single-port group, 40% of patients (n = 2) developed a safety/quality event (postoperative portal vein thrombosis and excessive postoperative pain). In the multiport group, 32% of patients (n = 8) developed 1 safety/quality event and 8% (n = 2) had more than 1 event.
    CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study, one of the first Food and Drug Administration-approved, investigator-initiated uses of this platform in colorectal surgeries, shows that this platform is a safe and feasible option for right colectomies. On preliminary evaluation, it appears comparable in terms of relevant safety/quality events to the multiport platform.
    BACKGROUND: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05321134.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在前瞻性分析使用咪唑芬沙星的抗胆碱能治疗对机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(RARP)后逼尿肌过度活动的影响。
    方法:在手术后2-4周(第2次就诊)对患者进行门诊随访,以确认是否存在尿失禁。被证实患有尿失禁的患者以1:1的比例随机分配到抗胆碱能药物组(咪唑芬沙星0.1mg,每天两次)或对照组。术后1、3和6个月对患者进行观察性评估。包括国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)和膀胱过度活动症评分(OABSS)。
    结果:共49例患者(治疗组25例,对照组24例)被随机分组用于本研究。在年龄方面,两组之间没有观察到差异,合并症,前列腺大小,或病理分期。根据IPSS问卷结果,药物组和对照组之间没有统计学上的显著差异(p=0.161)。然而,当分别比较储存和排尿症状时,储存症状评分有统计学显著改善(p=0.012).OABSS还显示,从术后3个月起,症状有统计学意义的改善(p=0.005),持续到术后6个月(IPSS存储:p=0.023,OABSS:p=0.013)。
    结论:在RARP后发生尿失禁的情况下,即使内在括约肌的功能被充分保留,如果由于膀胱的变化而导致尿失禁持续存在,使用咪唑那星的药物治疗可有益于控制尿失禁.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to prospectively analyze the effects of anticholinergic therapy using imidafenacin on detrusor overactivity occurring after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
    METHODS: Patients were followed-up at outpatient visits 2-4 weeks post-surgery (visit 2) to confirm the presence of urinary incontinence. Those confirmed with urinary incontinence were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the anticholinergic medication group (imidafenacin 0.1 mg twice daily) or the control group. Patients were followed-up at 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery for observational assessments, including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS).
    RESULTS: A total of 49 patients (25 in the treatment group and 24 in the control group) were randomized for the study. There were no differences observed between the groups in terms of age, comorbidities, prostate size, or pathological staging. According to the IPSS questionnaire results, there was no statistically significant difference between the medication and control groups (p=0.161). However, when comparing storage and voiding symptoms separately, there was a statistically significant improvement in storage symptom scores (p=0.012). OABSS also revealed statistically significant improvement in symptoms from 3 months post-surgery (p=0.005), which persisted until 6 months post-surgery (IPSS storage: p=0.023, OABSS: p=0.013).
    CONCLUSIONS: In the case of urinary incontinence that occurs after RARP, even if the function of the intrinsic sphincter is sufficiently preserved, if urinary incontinence persists due to changes in the bladder, pharmacological therapy using imidafenacin can be beneficial in managing urinary incontinence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们评估了可行性,安全,以及腹膜外单端口机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(SP-RARP)的学习曲线,并引入了创新的手术技术以在手术过程中保持器械位置。
    方法:从2021年12月至2023年4月,在我们机构接受腹膜外SP-RARP治疗的100例患者队列。该程序由经验丰富的泌尿外科医生使用两种手术技术解剖前列腺的后部-“改变仪器角色”和“使用相机倒置”-以防止相机和仪器之间的位置偏移。
    结果:SP-RARP的平均手术时间为93.58分钟,平均控制台时间为65.16分钟。手术期间的平均估计失血量为109.30mL。没有必要转换为多端口机器人,腹腔镜检查,或者开腹手术,在住院期间或短期随访中没有出现重大并发症。根治性前列腺切除术后的早期结果表明,在6.40个月的平均随访期间,生化复发率为4.0%。节制和效能恢复率为92.3%和55.8%,分别。学习曲线分析显示手术时间无显著差异,控制台时间,初始和后50例之间的阳性手术切缘率。
    结论:腹膜外SP-RARP是熟练技术人员治疗局部前列腺癌的可行且安全的选择。继续累积案例对于将来将SP-RARP与多端口方法进行比较至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the feasibility, safety, and learning curve of extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) and introduced innovative surgical techniques to maintain the instrument positions during the procedures.
    METHODS: A cohort of 100 patients underwent extraperitoneal SP-RARP at our institution from December 2021 to April 2023. The procedures were performed by an experienced urology surgeon utilizing two surgical techniques for dissecting the posterior aspect of the prostate-\"changing instrument roles\" and \"using camera inversion\"-to prevent positional shifts between the camera and instruments.
    RESULTS: The mean operation time for SP-RARP was 93.58 minutes, and the mean console time was 65.16 minutes. The mean estimated blood loss during the procedures was 109.30 mL. No cases necessitated conversion to multi-port robot, laparoscopy, or open surgery, and there were no major complications during the hospital stay or in the short-term follow-up. Early outcomes of post-radical prostatectomy indicated a biochemical recurrence rate of 4.0% over a mean follow-up duration of 6.40 months, with continence and potency recovery rates of 92.3% and 55.8%, respectively. Analysis of the learning curve showed no significant differences in operation time, console time, and positive surgical margin rates between the initial and latter 50 cases.
    CONCLUSIONS: Extraperitoneal SP-RARP is a feasible and safe option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer in skilled hands. Continued accrual of cases is essential for future comparisons of SP-RARP with multiport approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号