Inguinal hernias present a significant healthcare burden globally, necessitating effective surgical management. This comprehensive review evaluates two primary surgical techniques for managing bilateral inguinal hernias: bilateral open inguinal hernia and Rives-Stoppa repair. This review aims to provide insights into optimal surgical approaches through a comparative analysis of these techniques, including examining advantages, disadvantages, outcomes, and factors influencing technique selection. Bilateral open inguinal hernia repair offers simplicity and familiarity, while Rives-Stoppa repair may provide advantages such as reduced recurrence rates and postoperative complications. The findings underscore the importance of considering patient-specific factors, surgeon expertise, and hospital resources when selecting the optimal approach. Further research is warranted to conduct long-term comparative studies and explore innovations in surgical techniques and materials, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes and advancing inguinal hernia repair practices.

Background Primary ventral hernias are abnormal protrusions of abdominal viscera through the areas of weakness in the fascia of the abdominal wall. The aim of this study was to compare the benefits and complications, and the overall outcome in the Extended-View Totally Extraperitoneal Rives-Stoppa (eTEP-RS) repair versus Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM Plus) repair in the management of primary ventral hernias. Methods After obtaining institutional ethical committee clearance, this prospective comparative study between IPOM Plus and eTEP-RS was conducted in a tertiary care hospital from December 2020 to January 2022. A total of 50 patients presenting with primary ventral hernias were included in the study, of whom 25 underwent IPOM Plus and 25 underwent eTEP-RS repairs. Group selection was done by simple randomization using the lottery method. Patients more than 18 years of age with primary ventral hernias presenting with a hernial defect width less than 6 cm, consenting to the study, were included in the study. Patients who did not fulfill the inclusion criteria, strangulated/obstructed hernias, recurrent/incisional hernias, connective tissue disorders, skin infections, enterocutaneous fistulas, pregnancy, morbid obesity, and parastomal hernias were exclusion factors. Results The mean intraoperative duration in the eTEP-RS group (192.3 ± 16.20 min) was significantly higher than in the IPOM Plus group (102.6 ± 16.78min, p=0.001). The mean duration of hospital stay in the IPOM Plus group (5.9 ± 2.19 days) was longer than in the eTEP-RS group (4.6 ± 3.17 days, p=0.02). The mean postoperative pain scores, from the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), on days 1, 7, and 90 were 3.2 ± 1.11, 2.64 ± 1.11, and 1.68 ± 1.46 in the IPOM Plus group and 1.84 ± 0.688, 0.76 ± 0.66 and 0.08 ± 0.40 in the eTEP-RS group, respectively (p=0.001). Conclusion Despite being a technically easy procedure requiring less intraoperative time, IPOM Plus had several disadvantages, such as increased postoperative pain, longer duration of hospital stays, higher chances of wound site seromas, and higher rates of postoperative paralytic ileus. On the other hand, eTEP-RS was a more challenging procedure requiring more intraoperative time; however, it had several advantages: less postoperative pain, less duration of hospital stay, early recovery, and fewer chances of seromas and paralytic ileus. However, more robust data is required to compare and validate the differences between both procedures\' short- and long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Ventral hernia is one of the common surgical conditions that can significantly impact a patient\'s quality of life (QoL). Open ventral hernia repair using the Rives-Stoppa (RS) and Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR) procedures has gained recognition for its effectiveness in achieving hernia repair and reducing the risk of further recurrence. However, limited research has been performed to explore the short-term outcomes and QoL assessment following these two surgical techniques. The aim of this study was to know the result after RS and TAR methods of hernia repair in terms of short-term recurrences, pain, postoperative complications, and QoL.
METHODS: This was a prospective, interventional study, which included 30 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria. The study group was subjected to posterior component separation (PCS)-TAR and RS repair as per surgical indication (RS if defect size 4-10cm; PCS-TAR if defect size >10cm and RESULTS: Not a single recurrence was observed till POD 180 in either of the repair methods. The mean operative time for RS repair was 170.47 ± 15.08 minutes while for TAR repair was 188.8 ± 22.04 (p-value= 0.013). Surgical site infection (SSI) was reported in 14.28% of RS repair cases and 11.11% of TAR repair cases. Seroma formation was observed in 9.5% of RS repair cases. RS repair has less mean CCS score than TAR. The one-way ANOVA showed f-ratio=421.43 and p-value=0.00001 for RS repair while f-ratio= 298.05 and p-value=0 .00001 for TAR repair at POD seven, POD 30, and POD 90. Both RS and TAR repair markedly reduced mean scores in all three domains on POD 90.
CONCLUSIONS: Both RS and TAR had no recurrence in a short period of six months. The intraoperative time taken in TAR was less than in earlier studies. QoL improved postoperatively in both the repairs with RS repair having better QoL than TAR repair.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of life (QoL), early post-operative complications, and hernia recurrence rate following laparoscopic enhanced-view Totally Extra-Peritoneal (eTEP) Rives-Stoppa (RS) for incisional and primary ventral hernia repair. Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing eTEP-RS between 2017 and 2020. Data retrieved included demographics, and clinical and operative variables. QoL was assessed using the EuraHS-QoL scale prior to- and following eTEP-RS. During the study period, 61 patients met the inclusion criteria. Age and BMI were 62 (60.4 ± 13.8) years and 29.7 (30.4 ± 6) kg/m2, respectively. Incisional hernia was the most common pathology (n = 40, 65%) followed by primary ventral hernia (n = 21, 35%), with 24 patients (39%) having a previous hernia repair. Diastasis-recti repair was undertaken in 34 patients (55%), a concomitant inguinal hernia was repaired in 6 patients (10%), and 13 patients (21%) underwent transversus abdominis release (TAR). Median follow-up time was 13 months and 15 patients (25%) had at least 2 years of follow-up. Hernia recurrence was found in 4 patients (6.5%). Pre-operative and post-operative EuraHS-QOL questionnaire scores were available for 46 patients (75%) and showed significant improvement in pain (7 vs. 0.5, p < 0.0001; 5 vs. 0.5, p < 0.0001; 5 vs. 1.5; p < 0.006), restrictions (median of 5 vs. 0.5, p < 0.0001; 5 vs. 0, p < 0.0001; median of 5 vs. 1, p < 0.0001, of 6.5 vs. 1.5, p < 0.0001), and cosmetic appearance (8 vs. 4, p < 0.0001). Abdominal wall repair using the eTEP-RS approach significantly improves subjective QoL variables with an acceptable post-operative complications and hernia recurrence rates in a short-term follow-up.

UNASSIGNED: To estimate the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) and to assess the clinical outcomes in two different types of mesh in robotic Rives-Stoppa (rRS) ventral hernia repair (VHR).
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective analysis of a robotic VHR database between February 1, 2013 and May 31, 2022. Patients who underwent a rRS VHR were included in this study and separated into two groups depending on the mesh used: SynecorTM Preperitoneal Biomaterial (SynecorTM Pre) and Bard™ Soft. Through propensity score and inverse-probability-treatment-weighting, the ATT was estimated for two scenarios; the first with the treated target having used the SynecorTM Pre, the second having used the Bard™ Soft mesh. Adjusted linear regression models, including lingering imbalanced variables, were used for both the primary outcome of the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®), and the secondary outcome of the hospital cost.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 186 patients who underwent rRS were separated into the two groups (SynecorTM Pre mesh, n = 85; Bard™ Soft mesh, n = 101). Adjusted linear regression models for the CCI showed no statistical difference between both groups (p > 0.05), whereas ATT on hospital cost was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the SynecorTM Pre group in both scenarios [(95% confidence interval) = 3882 (2352, 5413) and -5185 (-8213, -2157), respectively].
UNASSIGNED: Both mesh materials provided excellent outcomes with no difference in complications or recurrence rates. However, hospital cost was found to be higher in the hybrid mesh group. Long-term follow-up is needed to fully assess the performance of both mesh types in rRS.

BACKGROUND: Retromuscular mesh hernia repair using Rives-Stoppa technique has demonstrated the best results when it comes to repairing large midline hernias. We present the first pediatric case successfully treated with this technique.
METHODS: This is the case of a 9-year-old male patient with hernia following urgent midline laparotomy. Basic repair principles included opening of the hernia sac and adhesiolysis, longitudinal incision on the posterior sheath of the rectus muscle and division of the retromuscular space, closure of the posterior sheath, placement of a mesh on this plane in the brand-new retromuscular space, and tension-free closure of the anterior musculo-aponeurotic flap, thus reconstructing the midline. No recurrences have been noted after a 2-year follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Rives-Stoppa technique allows for a more anatomical layered reconstruction, which helps restore the anatomical and physiological properties of the abdominal wall. In our view, this could be a useful alternative for pediatric hernia treatment.
UNASSIGNED: La eventroplastia con malla retromuscular de Rives-Stoppa ha demostrado en adultos tener los mejores resultados en la reparación de las grandes eventraciones de la línea media. Presentamos el primer caso pediátrico tratado exitosamente con esta técnica.
UNASSIGNED: Varón de 9 años con eventración tras laparotomía media urgente. Los principios básicos de la corrección fueron: apertura del saco herniario y adhesiolisis, incisión longitudinal sobre la vaina posterior del músculo recto y tallado del espacio retromuscular, cierre de la vaina posterior, colocación de una malla sobre este plano alojándola en el espacio retromuscular creado y cierre sin tensión del colgajo musculo-aponeurótico anterior, reconstruyendo así la línea media. No recidiva tras 2 años de seguimiento.
UNASSIGNED: La técnica de Rives-Stoppa implica una reconstrucción por planos más anatómica que restaura las propiedades anatomofisiológicas de la pared abdominal. Consideramos que puede ser una alternativa útil en el tratamiento de las eventraciones pediátricas.

BACKGROUND: The Enhanced-View Totally Extra Peritoneal Rives-Stoppa (e-TEP-RS) Technique for the repair of large, complex, ventral abdominal hernias has gained popularity especially in overcoming the disadvantages with Intra Peritoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) repairs and to enable siting of a large prosthetic mesh in an anatomical plane distinct from the abdominal cavity and its contents. Evolving variations of the original technique have allowed the definitive repair of such defects in a reproducible manner. We present our initial experience of this approach and detailed steps of our native technical modifications in overcoming the challenges in performing this complex and potentially challenging procedure.
METHODS: This is a retrospective review of the clinical data of midline, large, complex, ventral abdominal hernia patients who underwent e-TEP-RS with and without Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR). Patients, with or without Diastasis of Rectus Abdominis Muscle (DRAM) were included. Key outcomes measured were post-operative pain, operative morbidity, readmission, Quality of Life (QoL), hernia recurrence.
RESULTS: A total of 58 midline, ventral abdominal hernia patients who underwent e-TEP-RS with and without Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR), between March 2018 and December 2019 were studied. Mean defect area was 41.0 ± 28 cm2 and the mean mesh surface area was 473.5 ± 165 cm2. e-TEP-RS was done in 35 cases, e-TEP RS TAR in 15 cases and e-TEP-RS with e-TEP inguinal in 08 cases. There was no intraoperative morbidity. Mean duration of surgery was 156.2 ± 40 min and mean blood loss was 40.5 ± 26 cc. The CCS QoL scores improved from 34.6 (± 2) pre-operatively to 27.2 (± 4) at the end of 6 months. One patient had a supra-umbilical recurrence following bilateral TAR over the superior edge of the mesh. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 22 months, with a mean of 14 months. Major complications (n = 12; 20.7%) were seroma formation and prolonged ileus.
CONCLUSIONS: The e-TEP-RS technique for large, complex, midline, ventral abdominal hernias can be used with excellent results and acceptable morbidity. This technique is technically challenging and should be mastered in relatively smaller ventral hernias to achieve good results before attempting it in larger, complex ones.

BACKGROUND: Multiple minimally invasive techniques have been described for ventral hernia repair. The recently described enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) ventral hernia repair seems an appealing option since it allows to address midline and lateral hernias, placing the mesh in the retromuscular position without the use of traumatic fixation.
OBJECTIVE: To report on the mid-term result of a series of patients with ventral hernias repaired by the eTEP approach.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of our case series between June 2017 and December 2019. Demographic and clinical data were gathered. Hernia characteristics, surgical details, hernia recurrences, and complications are reported.
RESULTS: 66 patients were included in the study. Median follow-up was 22 months (interquartile range 12-26). 60% of patients were male. Mean age, BMI, % of Type-2 diabetes and % of smoking were 59 ± 12 years, 30 kg/m2, 24% and 23%, respectively. Mean hernia defect size was 5.5 ± 2.9 cm. Forty-three eTEP Rives-stoppa and 23 eTEP-Transversus abdominis release (14 unilateral, 9 bilateral) were performed. 22 inguinal hernias and 15 lateral defects were simultaneously repaired. We report 1 recurrence (1.5%) and 10 surgical site occurrences (15%; 6 seromas, 2 hematomas and 2 surgical site infections). Four patients required reinterventions (6%).
CONCLUSIONS: eTEP is a promising approach to treat midline hernias and allows the simultaneous treatment of lateral and inguinal defects, keeping the mesh in the retromuscular position. However, comparative studies must be performed to know its real benefit in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Background: Robotic Rives-Stoppa ventral hernia repair (rRS-VHR) is a minimally invasive technique that incorporates extraperitoneal mesh placement, using either transabdominal or totally extraperitoneal access. An understanding of its learning curve and technical challenges may guide and encourage its adoption. We aim at evaluating the rRS-VHR learning curve based on operative times while accounting for adverse outcomes. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing rRS repair for centrally located ventral and incisional hernias. A single surgeon operative time-based cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis learning curve was created, and a composite outcome was used for risk-adjusted CUSUM (RA-CUSUM). Results: Eighty-one patients undergoing rRS-VHR were included. A learning curve was created by using skin-to-skin times. Accordingly, patients were grouped into three phases. The mean skin-to-skin time was 72.2 minutes, and there was a significant decrease in skin-to-skin times throughout the learning curve (Phase-I: 86.4 minutes versus Phase-III: 63.8 minutes; P = .001), with a gradual decrease after 29 cases. Eleven patients experienced adverse composite outcomes, which were used to create a RA-CUSUM graph. Results showed the highest adverse outcome rates in Phase-II, with a gradual decrease in risk-adjusted operative times after 51 cases. Conclusions: Consistently decreasing operative times and adverse outcome rates in rRS-VHR was observed after the completion of 29 and 51 cases, respectively. Future studies that provide group learning curves for this procedure can deliver more generalizable results in terms of its performance rates.

After years of playing second-fiddle to laparoscopic underlay repairs, the retro-muscular Rives-Stoppa repair is rapidly gaining popularity thanks to the endoscopic eTEP approach. It extends all the advantages of a retro-muscular mesh placement-increased tolerance for infection, mechanical robustness, reduced need for mesh fixation-in an ergonomically acceptable system.
The eTEP technique described by Belyansky\'s group requires a \"crossover\" from one retro-rectus space to the other. The aim of the crossover is to safely amalgamate the retro-rectus spaces for placement of a large extra-peritoneal prosthesis. By salvaging peritoneum in the midline and operating in the extra-peritoneal plane, one can avoid large defects in the posterior rectus sheath (PRS)-peritoneum complex which need closure. Correct identification of anatomical landmarks is imperative to safely perform the surgery.
The \"lamppost sign\" signals the lateral limit of retro-rectus dissection, preventing iatrogenic injury to the neurovascular bundles and linea semilunaris. After crossover has been safely achieved, the medial edges of the divided posterior rectus sheaths are found connected to each other by a strip of pre-peritoneal fat and peritoneum in the midline. These structures, along with the neck of hernia constitute the \"volcano sign\". For inferior defects, the vas deferens, the inferior epigastric and gonadal vessels form a triradiate conformation termed the \"Mercedes-Benz sign\".
These signs serve as tools to identify the composition of the surgical field, avoiding iatrogenic injury to the linea alba and linea semilunaris, while reducing the time taken for posterior closure.