Risk perceptions

风险认知
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    儿童早期开始使用药物对公共卫生构成重大风险。研究表明,小学生对物质使用的早期积极看法和认知可能会预测青春期以后的使用。青少年人群中的研究表明,物质使用与风险认知之间存在反比关系。为了深入了解酒精,烟草,和大麻在青春期之前的风险认知,我们分析了智利儿童早期纵向调查(ELPI)的数据.在5278个家庭的样本中(青春期前的平均年龄10.63岁,SD=.64;50.5%男性),我们的研究结果表明,智利10岁的人中有很大一部分人没有偶尔吸烟,酒精,或使用大麻是高风险活动。然而,大多数受访者确实认为日常使用药物是高风险活动,物质之间有一些差异。总的来说,与稍年轻的青少年相比,年龄较大的青少年更有可能认为药物使用风险较小。我们的分析还表明,护理人员过去一个月使用的物质都被发现可以预测接受调查的青春期前的中低风险认知,而反过来,照顾者发现他们的孩子使用了一种物质后的负面反应降低了持有低-中风险认知的可能性。与同龄人相比,单亲家庭的个人不太可能将药物使用视为高风险。护理人员平均收入较高的青少年也更有可能对偶尔使用药物的风险较低。讨论了防止青春期前人群使用药物的公共政策的含义。
    Early substance use initiation among children represents a significant risk to public health. Research suggests that early positive perceptions and cognitions of elementary students toward substance use may predict later use during adolescence. Studies among adolescent populations have shown an inverse relationship between substance use and risk perceptions. To gain insight into alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana risk perceptions prior to adolescence, we analyzed data from the Chilean Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey (ELPI). In a sample of 5,278 families (mean age of preadolescents 10.63 years, SD = .64; 50.5% males), our findings showed that an important proportion of Chilean 10 years old did not perceive occasional tobacco, alcohol, or marijuana use to be high-risk activities. However, the majority of respondents did consider daily substance use to be a high-risk activity, with some variation across substances. Overall, older preadolescents were more likely to consider substance use to be less risky compared to their slightly younger counterparts. Our analysis also demonstrated that past month substances use by caregivers were all found to be predictive of low-medium risk perceptions among preadolescents surveyed, while conversely, caregivers\' negative reactions to finding out their child had used a substance decreased the likelihood of holding low-medium risk perceptions. Individuals from single-parent households were less likely to consider substance use as being high-risk compared to their peers. Preadolescents with caregivers reporting higher average incomes were also more likely to hold lower risk perceptions of occasional substance use. Implications for public policies to prevent substance use in the pre-adolescent population are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:研究已经确定了恋爱关系对个体发病率和死亡率的影响。然而,关系运作之间的相互作用,情感过程,健康行为研究相对不足。在COVID-19大流行期间,关系过程可能会影响新的健康行为,如社交距离和掩蔽。
    目的:我们描述了设计,招募,以及关系的方法,风险认知,以及COVID-19大流行研究期间与癌症相关的行为。这项研究旨在了解关系和情感过程如何影响浪漫伴侣参与癌症预防行为以及COVID-19大流行引入或加剧的健康行为。
    方法:关系,风险认知,在COVID-19大流行研究期间,癌症相关行为使用在线调查方法招募和招募2组参与同居浪漫关系的个体,包括1组成组(n=223)和1组癌症幸存者(n=443)。调查评估在平均间隔5.57(SD3.14)周的2个时间点完成。评估的健康行为包括COVID-19疫苗接种和社交距离,身体活动,饮食,睡眠,酒精使用,和吸烟行为。我们还检查了关系因素,心理困扰,家庭混乱。
    结果:数据收集发生在2021年10月至2022年8月之间。在此期间,共有926名参与者参加,其中约三分之二来自英国(n=622,67.8%),三分之一来自美国(n=296,32.2%);约三分之二已婚(n=608,66.2%),三分之一是未婚夫妇(n=294,32%).在队列1和2中,平均年龄分别约为34岁和50岁。在队列1的478名参与者中,有19名(4%)被确定为西班牙裔或拉丁裔/a,79(17%)为非西班牙裔亚洲人,40(9%)是非西班牙裔黑人或非裔美国人,和306(64%)为非西班牙裔白人;62(13%)参与者确定他们的性取向为双性恋或泛性,359(75.1%)为异性恋或异性恋,和53(11%)为同性恋。在队列2中,在440名参与者中,13(3%)被确定为西班牙裔或拉丁裔/a,8(2%)为非西班牙裔亚洲人,5(1%)是非西班牙裔黑人或非裔美国人,和398(90.5%)为非西班牙裔白人;41(9%)参与者确定他们的性取向为双性恋或泛性,384(87.3%)为异性恋或异性恋,13(3%)是同性恋。个人的总体入学率为66.14%,总体完成率为80.08%。
    结论:我们讨论了收集在线调查数据的最佳实践,用于研究人际关系和健康,与COVID-19大流行有关的挑战,招募代表性不足的人口,和二元组的注册。建议包括进行试点研究,为边缘化或服务不足的人群提供额外的数据收集时间,盈余筛选,以说明二元组合内的预期减员,以及计划dyad特定的数据质量检查。
    DERR1-10.2196/48516。
    BACKGROUND: Research has established the effects of romantic relationships on individuals\' morbidity and mortality. However, the interplay between relationship functioning, affective processes, and health behaviors has been relatively understudied. During the COVID-19 pandemic, relational processes may influence novel health behaviors such as social distancing and masking.
    OBJECTIVE: We describe the design, recruitment, and methods of the relationships, risk perceptions, and cancer-related behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic study. This study was developed to understand how relational and affective processes influence romantic partners\' engagement in cancer prevention behaviors as well as health behaviors introduced or exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
    METHODS: The relationships, risk perceptions, and cancer-related behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic study used online survey methods to recruit and enroll 2 cohorts of individuals involved in cohabiting romantic relationships, including 1 cohort of dyads (n=223) and 1 cohort of cancer survivors (n=443). Survey assessments were completed over 2 time points that were 5.57 (SD 3.14) weeks apart on average. Health behaviors assessed included COVID-19 vaccination and social distancing, physical activity, diet, sleep, alcohol use, and smoking behavior. We also examined relationship factors, psychological distress, and household chaos.
    RESULTS: Data collection occurred between October 2021 and August 2022. During that time, a total of 926 participants were enrolled, of which about two-thirds were from the United Kingdom (n=622, 67.8%) and one-third were from the United States (n=296, 32.2%); about two-thirds were married (n=608, 66.2%) and one-third were members of unmarried couples (n=294, 32%). In cohorts 1 and 2, the mean age was about 34 and 50, respectively. Out of 478 participants in cohort 1, 19 (4%) identified as Hispanic or Latino/a, 79 (17%) as non-Hispanic Asian, 40 (9%) as non-Hispanic Black or African American, and 306 (64%) as non-Hispanic White; 62 (13%) participants identified their sexual orientation as bisexual or pansexual, 359 (75.1%) as heterosexual or straight, and 53 (11%) as gay or lesbian. In cohort 2, out of 440 participants, 13 (3%) identified as Hispanic or Latino/a, 8 (2%) as non-Hispanic Asian, 5 (1%) as non-Hispanic Black or African American, and 398 (90.5%) as non-Hispanic White; 41 (9%) participants identified their sexual orientation as bisexual or pansexual, 384 (87.3%) as heterosexual or straight, and 13 (3%) as gay or lesbian. The overall enrollment rate for individuals was 66.14% and the overall completion rate was 80.08%.
    CONCLUSIONS: We discuss best practices for collecting online survey data for studies examining relationships and health, challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic, recruitment of underrepresented populations, and enrollment of dyads. Recommendations include conducting pilot studies, allowing for extra time in the data collection timeline for marginalized or underserved populations, surplus screening to account for expected attrition within dyads, as well as planning dyad-specific data quality checks.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/48516.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    乐观偏见在健康风险评估中很常见,包括枪支伤害风险,并可能产生行为后果。使用2018年加州安全和福祉调查的数据,我们通过比较这些特征来检验乐观偏见是否会影响枪支伤害预防实践和政策支持,行为,以及认为在家中拥有枪支的枪支拥有者的观点比对其他类似的人(乐观偏见小组)相对更安全,(1)那些明确相信枪支为自己和他人增加安全性的人(始终更安全的小组),和(2)那些说他们\“不知道\”或\“它取决于\”在自我和其他情况下(不确定组)。加权多项逻辑回归结果表明,乐观偏见组中的枪支拥有者更多是女性,少数种族或族裔群体的成员,和新的枪支拥有者比永远更安全和不确定的团体;他们还表现出对5个枪支伤害预防政策/干预措施中的4个的更大支持。尽管拥有枪支进行保护也很普遍,与“始终更安全”组相比,“乐观偏见”组中的枪支拥有者较少携带装载枪支或以不安全的方式存放枪支。研究结果表明,枪支拥有者以乐观偏见为特征,他承认与枪支相关的一些风险,即使只是为了别人而不是为了自己,可能代表一个“可移动的中间”,更容易接受枪支伤害预防工作。强调其他导向的公共卫生信息(vs.个人)风险和集体责任可能被视为对枪支对个人身份的象征意义的威胁较小,从而提高有效性。
    Optimism bias is common across health risk assessments, including firearm injury risk, and can have behavioral consequences. Using data from the 2018 California Safety and Wellbeing Survey, we examine whether optimism bias influences firearm injury prevention practices and policy support by comparing the characteristics, behaviors, and opinions of gun owners who believed having a gun at home is comparatively safer for themselves than for similar others (Optimism Bias group) with (1) those who unequivocally believe guns increase safety for themselves and others (Always Safer group), and (2) those who said they \"don\'t know\" or \"it depends\" in both the self and other scenarios (Uncertain group). Weighted multinomial logistic regression results indicated that gun owners in the Optimism Bias group were more often female, members of minoritized racial or ethnic groups, and new gun owners than the Always Safer and Uncertain groups; they also demonstrated greater support for 4 of 5 firearm injury prevention policies/interventions. Despite similar prevalence of owning a gun for protection, gun owners in the Optimism Bias group less often carried a loaded firearm or stored a gun in an unsecure way compared with the Always Safer group. Findings suggest that gun owners characterized by optimism bias, who acknowledged some risk associated with firearms, even if only or more so for others than for themselves, may represent a \"movable middle\" that is more receptive to firearm injury prevention efforts. Public health messages emphasizing other-oriented (vs. personal) risk and collective responsibility may be perceived as less threatening to the symbolic significance of guns to individual identity, thus enhancing effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究是对各种危险和目的地的担忧和风险感知的横断面调查,之前测量,during,在COVID-19大流行之后。
    问卷数据收集了2012年夏季在挪威的游客(N=2,669),2019年(N=1,666),和2022(N=956),以及2020年挪威人的代表性样本(N=1,003)。
    结果显示,与大流行前相比,大流行后的担忧和风险认知水平普遍下降,除了传染病,其感知风险在2022年略有增加。
    结果强调了采用横截面或纵向数据来调查风险感知随时间变化的重要性。调查结果还表明,对旅游业持续下降的悲观预测似乎是没有根据的。
    UNASSIGNED: The present study is a cross-sectional investigation of worry and risk perceptions regarding various hazards and destinations, measured before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
    UNASSIGNED: Questionnaire data were collected from tourists in Norway during the summer seasons of 2012 (N = 2,669), 2019 (N = 1,666), and 2022 (N = 956), and from a representative sample of Norwegians in 2020 (N = 1,003).
    UNASSIGNED: The results show a general decline in the level of worry and risk perceptions post-pandemic compared to those pre-pandemic, with the exception of infectious diseases, whose perceived risk slightly increased in 2022.
    UNASSIGNED: The results highlight the importance of employing cross-sectional or longitudinal data to investigate changes in risk perceptions over time. The findings also indicate that pessimistic predictions of a continued decline in tourism appear to be unwarranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    气候变化对阿肯色州的小农构成健康风险。农民面临与热有关的疾病的风险增加(例如,中暑,脑血管意外,和心血管问题)和工伤,死亡,以及气候变化导致的心理健康状况。这项横断面调查采用了健康信念模型(HBM)作为其理论框架。本研究旨在评估小农的健康状况,气候变化的信念,适应性农业实践,以及气候变化对健康的感知影响。研究数据是使用非概率抽样方法从农场总收入<250,000美元的小农(n=72)收集的。研究结果显示,93%的参与者报告称健康状况良好,69%的人认为气候正在变化和变暖,58.3%的人认为人们对我们的气候变化负责。75%的人认为气候变化会影响农民。在HBM预测变量中,参与者报告了自我效能感(50%),感知易感性(48.6%),和感知的严重程度(43%)。只有16.7%的农民报告认为他们拥有应对气候相关健康影响所需的所有信息。这项研究表明,小农具有保护因素和适应能力,包括健康状况,收入,和教育水平,但相信他们缺乏必要的信息来保护他们的健康免受气候变化。
    Climate change poses health risks to Arkansas small farmers. Farmers face an increased risk of heat-related illnesses (e.g., heat exhaustion, cerebral vascular accidents, and cardiovascular issues) and work-related injuries, death, and mental health conditions due to climate change. This cross-sectional survey employed the health belief model (HBM) as its theoretical framework. This study aimed to assess the health status of small farmers, climate change beliefs, adaptive agricultural practices, and the perceived effects of climate change on health. Study data were collected using non-probability sampling methods from small farmers (n = 72) with a gross farm income of < USD 250,000. The study findings show that 93% of participants reported good-excellent health, 69% believe the climate is changing and getting warmer, 58.3% believe people are responsible for the changes in our climate, and 75% believe the changing climate impacts farmers. Among the HBM predictive variables, participants reported self-efficacy (50%), perceived susceptibility (48.6%), and perceived severity (43%). Only 16.7% of farmers reported believing they have all the information needed to prepare for climate-related health impacts. This study suggests small farmers have protective factors and adaptive capacity, including health status, income, and education levels, but believe they lack the information necessary to protect their health from climate change.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究调查了2019年冠状病毒病接触者追踪披露个人信息时,影响公众舒适度的因素。这是美国趋势小组的二次分析,一个全国性的基于概率的美国成年人在线小组,皮尤研究中心在2020年7月13日至19日收集的数据。基于隐私管理理论,有序逻辑回归分析检查了三种类型的信息披露:访问地点,联系人姓名,和手机的位置数据。关键独立变量衡量了对利益相关者保护数据的能力以及对健康和财务的感知风险的信任。研究结果表明,对实体数据安全能力的更高水平的信任可以预测个人披露个人数据时的舒适度。此外,参与者对非商业数据的使用更满意,特别是当它被研究人员和州和地方官员使用。然而,财务威胁表明,在共享某些类型的数据方面存在差异。随着对个人财务的担忧增加,个人不太可能轻松分享联系人追踪数据。同样,当个人意识到美国经济面临威胁时,他们不太愿意从手机上分享他们的位置数据,这可能被认为是侵入性的。公共卫生外展工作应考虑个体差异以及商业和非商业背景下所需信息的性质。未来的研究可以通过纳入其他相关的上下文和环境变量来增强数据披露模型的解释能力。
    This study investigates the factors influencing the comfort level of the general public when disclosing personal information for the coronavirus disease 2019 contact tracing. This is a secondary analysis of the American Trends Panel, a national probability-based online panel of American adults, with data collected by the Pew Research Center between July 13 and 19, 2020. Grounded in privacy management theories, ordered logistic regression analyses examined three types of information disclosure: places visited, names of contacts, and location data from cell phones. Key independent variables measured trust in the stakeholders\' ability to protect data and perceived risks to health and finances. The findings suggest that higher levels of trust in entities\' data security capabilities can predict individuals\' comfort levels when disclosing personal data. Additionally, the participants were more comfortable with noncommercial data use, especially when it was used by researchers and state and local officials. However, financial threats showed variations in sharing certain types of data. Individuals were less likely to feel at ease sharing contact tracing data as concerns about personal finances increased. Similarly, when individuals perceived threats to the U.S. economy, they were less likely to feel comfortable sharing their location data from cell phones, which might have been perceived as intrusive. Public health outreach efforts should account for individual differences and the nature of the information requested in commercial and noncommercial contexts. Future studies can enhance the explanatory capacity of data disclosure models by incorporating additional relevant contextual and environmental variables.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:选择性基因组测试(EGT)在临床上越来越可用。关于EGT接受者的态度和知识的现实世界证据有限。
    方法:在基于网络的教育之后,在农村非营利性医疗保健系统参加EGT计划的患者完成了一项评估态度的调查,知识,和风险观念。
    结果:从2020年8月到2022年4月,有5,920名患者完成了调查并接受了测试。患者最常将学习个人疾病风险的兴趣作为主要动机。患者最常期望结果指导药物管理(74.0%),预防未来疾病(70.4%),并提供有关后代风险的信息(65.4%)。患者“非常关注”最常见的是遗传信息的隐私(19.8%)以及检测对疾病风险的预测(18.0%)。平均而言,患者正确回答了11项知识项目中的6.7项(61.3%).他们更经常将结肠癌和乳腺癌的风险评价为低于普通人,而不是高于普通人。但更经常将他们心脏病发作的风险评估为高于而不是低于普通人(所有p<0.001)。
    结论:患者追求EGT是因为效用期望,但经常误解了测试的能力。
    BACKGROUND: Elective genomic testing (EGT) is increasingly available clinically. Limited real world evidence exists about attitudes and knowledge of EGT recipients.
    METHODS: After web-based education, patients who enrolled in an EGT program at a rural nonprofit healthcare system completed a survey that assessed attitudes, knowledge, and risk perceptions.
    RESULTS: From August 2020 to April 2022, 5,920 patients completed the survey and received testing. Patients most frequently cited interest in learning their personal disease risks as their primary motivation. Patients most often expected results to guide medication management (74.0%), prevent future disease (70.4%), and provide information about risks to offspring (65.4%). Patients were \"very concerned\" most frequently about the privacy of genetic information (19.8%) and how well testing predicted disease risks (18.0%). On average, patients answered 6.7 of 11 knowledge items correctly (61.3%). They more often rated their risks for colon and breast cancers as lower rather than higher than the average person, but more often rated their risk for a heart attack as higher rather than lower than the average person (all p<0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients pursued EGT because of the utility expectations, but often misunderstood the test\'s capabilities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们评估了使用FDA授权的改良风险烟草产品(MRTP)声明的成年人对产品的相对伤害和成瘾性以及与使用MRTPs意图的关联。
    方法:数据来自美国18-45岁成年人(n=2964)的2022年5月RutgersOmnibus研究,由罗格斯尼古丁和烟草研究所(INTS)收集。结果是相对于典型香烟的相对伤害和成瘾性,以及使用说明减少伤害索赔(一般Snus)或减少暴露索赔(VLNKing)的产品的意图。我们对感知的相对伤害和成瘾性以及使用每种产品的意图之间的关联进行了回归分析,按吸烟状况分层。
    结果:少数参与者认为危害减少的产品的危害与危害较小香烟(21%,19%,7%,每天吸烟的人占8%,抽了几天烟,以前吸烟,和从未吸烟)和暴露减少的产品声称成瘾性比香烟(24%,26%,14%,分别为20%)。在所有吸烟状态下,感知到的相对伤害和成瘾性较低与使用说明伤害减少或暴露要求减少的产品的较高意图显着相关,只有一个例外(相对成瘾与使用说明以前吸烟的人中伤害要求减少的产品的意图无关)。
    结论:目前FDA授权的两个MRTP声明不能有效地传达MRTPs对大多数参与者的危害或成瘾性低于香烟。认为产品危害较小或成瘾性与使用MRTPs的意图显着相关。
    BACKGROUND: We assessed adults\' perceived relative harm and addictiveness of products using FDA-authorized modified risk tobacco products (MRTP) claims and associations with intentions to use MRTPs.
    METHODS: Data were from the May 2022 Rutgers Omnibus study among US 18-45-year-old adults (n=2964), collected by the Rutgers Institute for Nicotine and Tobacco Studies (INTS). Outcomes were perceived relative harm and addictiveness versus a typical cigarette and intentions to use a product stating a reduced harm claim (General Snus) or a reduced exposure claim (VLN King). We conducted regression analyses of associations between perceived relative harm and addictiveness and intentions to use each product, stratified by smoking status.
    RESULTS: The minority of participants perceived products with a reduced harm claim as much less harmful vs. cigarettes (21 %, 19 %, 7 %, and 8 % among persons who smoked daily, smoked some days, formerly smoked, and never smoked respectively) and products with a reduced exposure claim as much less addictive vs. cigarettes (24 %, 26 %, 14 %, 20 % respectively). Perceived lower relative harm and addictiveness were significantly associated with higher intentions to use products stating reduced harm or reduced exposure claim across all smoking statuses with one exception (relative addictiveness was not associated with intention to use products stating the reduced harm claim among persons who formerly smoked).
    CONCLUSIONS: Two current FDA-authorized MRTP claims were not effective in conveying that MRTPs were less harmful or addictive than cigarettes to most participants. Perceiving products as less harmful or addictive were significantly associated with intentions to use MRTPs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    “不可控的死亡率风险假说”采用了人类健康行为的行为生态学模型来解释健康中社会梯度的存在。它指出,那些更有可能因无法控制的因素而死亡的人应该不那么有动力投资于预防性健康行为。我们概述了该假设的理论假设,并强调了将进化观点纳入公共卫生的重要性。我们解释了测量感知的不可控死亡风险如何有助于理解预防性健康行为中的社会经济差异。我们强调解决风险暴露中的结构性不平等的重要性,并认为公共卫生干预措施应考虑各领域的总体死亡风险水平与健康行为之间的关系。我们建议,衡量对不可控死亡风险的看法可以捕捉结构性风险干预的意外健康益处,以及帮助评估不同干预方法的适当性。
    The \'Uncontrollable Mortality Risk Hypothesis\' employs a behavioural ecological model of human health behaviours to explain the presence of social gradients in health. It states that those who are more likely to die due to factors beyond their control should be less motivated to invest in preventative health behaviours. We outline the theoretical assumptions of the hypothesis and stress the importance of incorporating evolutionary perspectives into public health. We explain how measuring perceived uncontrollable mortality risk can contribute towards understanding socioeconomic disparities in preventative health behaviours. We emphasize the importance of addressing structural inequalities in risk exposure, and argue that public health interventions should consider the relationship between overall levels of mortality risk and health behaviours across domains. We suggest that measuring perceptions of uncontrollable mortality risk can capture the unanticipated health benefits of structural risk interventions, as well as help to assess the appropriateness of different intervention approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    共享的社会身份和社会规范通常在群众聚会健康文献中得到认可,然而,它们可以通过激励人们从事冒险行为来增加传染病的传播。在三个实验中(Ntotal=1551),我们调查了如何共享社会身份,感知的资源共享规范,和共享的感知风险相互作用来塑造可能导致疾病传播的决策。在实验1中(N=528),我们研究了共享的社会认同和感知的描述性规范如何影响人群成员共享可能导致疾病传播的资源的可能性.然后,我们使用感知的禁令规范在实验2(N=511)中重复了这一点。在实验3(N=512)中,我们探索了社会认同有多高,感知规范,和感知的资源共享的健康风险影响共享的可能性,反过来,在大规模集会上增加传染病的传播。我们发现,高度共享的社会认同与感知的描述性和禁令规范相互作用,和低健康风险认知,增加在群众集会上接受资源和给予资源的可能性。我们讨论了对研究人员的理论和实践意义,从业者,和政策制定者制定有效的策略,以减轻大规模聚会上的传染病传播。
    Shared social identity and social norms are often un(der)recognized within mass gatherings health literature, yet they can increase infectious disease transmission by motivating people to engage in risk-taking behaviours. Across three experiments (Ntotal = 1551), we investigated how shared social identities, perceived norms of resource-sharing, and perceived riskiness of sharing interact to shape decisions that can lead to disease transmission. In Experiment 1 (N = 528), we examined how shared social identity and perceived descriptive norms affect the likelihood of crowd members sharing resources that may contribute to disease spread. We then replicated this in Experiment 2 (N = 511) using perceived injunctive norms. In Experiment 3 (N = 512), we explored how high shared social identity, perceived norms, and perceived health risks of resource-sharing impact the likelihood of sharing that may, in turn, increase infectious disease transmission at mass gatherings. We found that high shared social identity interacts with perceived descriptive and injunctive norms, and low health risk perceptions, to increase the likelihood of accepting resources and giving resources at mass gatherings. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to build effective strategies to mitigate infectious disease transmission at mass gatherings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号