Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the main opportunistic infection observed after kidney transplantation. Despite the use of prevention strategies, CMV disease still occurs, especially in high-risk patients (donor seropositive/recipient seronegative). Patients may develop complicated CMV, i.e. recurrent, refractory or resistant CMV infection. CMV prevention relies on either universal prophylaxis or preemptive therapy. In high-risk patients, universal prophylaxis is usually preferred. Currently, valganciclovir is used in this setting. However, valganciclovir can be responsible for severe leucopenia and neutropenia. A novel anti-viral drug, letermovir, has been recently compared to valganciclovir. It was as efficient as valganciclovir to prevent CMV disease and induced less hematological side-effects. It is still not available in France in this indication. Recent studies suggest that immune monitoring by ELISPOT or Quantiferon can be useful to determine the duration of prophylaxis. Other studies suggest that prophylaxis may be skipped in CMV-seropositive kidney-transplant patients given mTOR inhibitors. Refractory CMV is defined by the lack of decrease of CMV DNAemia of at least 1 log10 at 2 weeks after effective treatment. In case of refractory CMV infection, drug resistant mutations should be looked for. Currently, maribavir is the gold standard therapy for refractory/resistant CMV. At 8 weeks therapy and 8 weeks later, it has been shown to be significantly more effective than other anti-viral drugs, i.e. high dose of ganciclovir, foscarnet or cidofovir. However, a high rate of relapse was observed after ceasing therapy. Hence, other therapeutic strategies should be evaluated in order to improve the sustained virological rate.
L’infection à cytomégalovirus (CMV) est la principale infection opportuniste après transplantation rénale. Malgré les stratégies préventives, il persiste des maladies à CMV, notamment chez les patients à haut risque (donneur séropositif/receveur séronégatif). Certains patients présentent des formes complexes avec des récurrences et des infections réfractaires et/ou résistantes aux antiviraux. La prévention de l’infection à CMV repose soit sur une prophylaxie universelle, soit sur une stratégie préemptive. Chez les patients à haut risque, la stratégie prophylactique est le plus souvent utilisée. Elle repose sur l’utilisation du valganciclovir, qui peut être responsable de leucopénies et de neutropénies sévères. Un nouvel antiviral, le létermovir, qui n’est pas encore disponible sur le marché en France dans cette indication, a montré une efficacité similaire au valganciclovir avec peu d’effets secondaires hématologiques. Des études récentes suggèrent l’intérêt de l’immuno-surveillance par ELISPOT ou Quantiféron pour guider la durée de la prophylaxie. D’autres études suggèrent également la possibilité de se passer d’un traitement prophylactique anti-CMV chez des transplantés rénaux CMV-séropositifs recevant des inhibiteurs de la mTOR. Le CMV réfractaire est défini par une absence de baisse de la charge virale d’au moins 1 log10 après deux semaines de traitement efficace. En cas d’absence de baisse de la charge virale, une recherche de mutations de résistance aux antiviraux doit être effectuée. Actuellement, le maribavir constitue le traitement de référence pour les formes réfractaires et résistantes. La clairance virale à la fin du traitement, ou huit semaines plus tard, est significativement supérieure à celle observée avec les autres antiviraux tels que le ganciclovir donné à forte dose, le foscarnet, ou le cidofovir. Cependant, le taux de rechute à l’arrêt du traitement par maribavir reste important. D’autres stratégies thérapeutiques doivent être évaluées pour améliorer ce taux de réponse virologique soutenue.

It has been reported that Mizoribine is an immunosuppressant used to suppress rejection in renal transplantation, nephrotic syndrome, lupus nephritis, and rheumatoid arthritis. The molecular chaperone HSP60 alone induces inflammatory cytokine IL-6 and the co-chaperone HSP10 alone inhibits IL-6 induction. HSP60 and HSP10 form a complex in the presence of ATP. We analyzed the effects of Mizoribine, which is structurally similar to ATP, on the structure and physiological functions of HSP60-HSP10 using Native/PAGE and transmission electron microscopy. At low concentrations of Mizoribine, no complex formation of HSP60-HSP10 was observed, nor was the expression of IL-6 affected. On the other hand, high concentrations of Mizoribine promoted HSP60-HSP10 complex formation and consequently suppressed IL-6 expression. Here, we propose a novel mechanism of immunosuppressive action of Mizoribine.

Cobalamin (vitamin B12, herein referred to as B12) is an essential cofactor for most marine prokaryotes and eukaryotes1,2. Synthesized by a limited number of prokaryotes, its scarcity affects microbial interactions and community dynamics2-4. Here we show that two bacterial B12 auxotrophs can salvage different B12 building blocks and cooperate to synthesize B12. A Colwellia sp. synthesizes and releases the activated lower ligand α-ribazole, which is used by another B12 auxotroph, a Roseovarius sp., to produce the corrin ring and synthesize B12. Release of B12 by Roseovarius sp. happens only in co-culture with Colwellia sp. and only coincidently with the induction of a prophage encoded in Roseovarius sp. Subsequent growth of Colwellia sp. in these conditions may be due to the provision of B12 by lysed cells of Roseovarius sp. Further evidence is required to support a causative role for prophage induction in the release of B12. These complex microbial interactions of ligand cross-feeding and joint B12 biosynthesis seem to be widespread in marine pelagic ecosystems. In the western and northern tropical Atlantic Ocean, bacteria predicted to be capable of salvaging cobinamide and synthesizing only the activated lower ligand outnumber B12 producers. These findings add new players to our understanding of B12 supply to auxotrophic microorganisms in the ocean and possibly in other ecosystems.

UNASSIGNED: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a serious opportunistic infection in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Traditional anti-CMV drugs are limited by toxicities and the development of resistance. Letermovir and maribavir are newly approved antivirals for the prevention and treatment of CMV.
UNASSIGNED: Prior reviews have discussed use of letermovir for prevention of CMV after HCT and maribavir for resistant or refractory (R/R) CMV post HCT or SOT. Subsequent data have expanded their use including letermovir for primary CMV prophylaxis in high-risk renal transplant recipients and new recommendations for extending prophylaxis through day + 200 in certain HCT patients. Data on the use of maribavir for first asymptomatic CMV infection post-HCT has also been published. This review compares the pharmacology of anti-CMV agents and discusses the updated literature of these new drugs in the prevention and treatment of CMV.
UNASSIGNED: Letermovir and maribavir are much needed tools that spare toxicities of ganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir. High cost is a challenge preventing their integration into clinical practice in resource-limited countries. Transplant centers need to exercise restraint in overuse to avoid resistance, particularly in the setting of high viral loads.

Cytomegalovirus infection (CMV) can be fatal for organ transplant recipients as shown in this case report. Maribavir is a recently approved drug, which can be used for therapy-refractory CMV infection or when other treatment options cannot be used. The patient in this case report was a CMV-infected liver transplant recipient, who developed a severe erythema and high CMV DNA during valganciclovir therapy. Toxic epidermal necrolysis was suspected. The patient was treated with maribavir, and both CMV DNA and the skin normalised. This case illustrates that maribavir is a useful alternative to other antiviral drugs for CMV infection.

Modern, highly evolved nucleoside-processing enzymes are known to exhibit perfect regioselectivity over the glycosylation of purine nucleobases at N9. We herein report an exception to this paradigm. Wild-type nucleoside phosphorylases also furnish N7-xanthosine, a \"non-native\" ribosylation regioisomer of xanthosine. This unusual nucleoside possesses several atypical physicochemical properties such as redshifted absorption spectra, a high equilibrium constant of phosphorolysis and low acidity. Ultimately, the biosynthesis of this previously unknown natural product illustrates how even highly evolved, essential enzymes from primary metabolism are imperfect catalysts.

BACKGROUND: The study addresses the challenge of identifying RNA post-transcriptional modifications when commercial standards are not available to generate reference spectral libraries. It proposes employing homologous nucleobases and deoxyribonucleosides as alternative reference spectral libraries to aid in identifying modified ribonucleosides and distinguishing them from their positional isomers when the standards are unavailable.
METHODS: Complete sets of ribonucleoside, deoxyribonucleoside and nucleobase standards were analyzed using high-performance nano-flow liquid chromatography coupled to an Orbitrap Eclipse Tribrid mass spectrometer. Spectral libraries were constructed from homologous nucleobases and deoxyribonucleosides using targeted MS2 and neutral-loss-triggered MS3 methods, and collision energies were optimized. The feasibility of using these libraries for identifying modified ribonucleosides and their positional isomers was assessed through comparison of spectral fragmentation patterns.
RESULTS: Our analysis reveals that both MS2 and neutral-loss-triggered MS3 methods yielded rich spectra with similar fragmentation patterns across ribonucleosides, deoxyribonucleosides and nucleobases. Moreover, we demonstrate that spectra from nucleobases and deoxyribonucleosides, generated at optimized collision energies, exhibited sufficient similarity to those of modified ribonucleosides to enable their use as reference spectra for accurate identification of positional isomers within ribonucleoside families.
CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates the efficacy of utilizing homologous nucleobases and deoxyribonucleosides as interchangeable reference spectral libraries for identifying modified ribonucleosides and their positional isomers. This approach offers a valuable solution for overcoming limitations posed by the unavailability of commercial standards, enhancing the analysis of RNA post-transcriptional modifications via mass spectrometry.

This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of maribavir versus investigator-assigned therapy (IAT; valganciclovir/ganciclovir, foscarnet, or cidofovir) for post-transplant refractory cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection with or without resistance. A two-stage Markov model was designed using data from the SOLSTICE trial (NCT02931539), real-world multinational observational studies, and published literature. Stage 1 (0-78 weeks) comprised clinically significant CMV (csCMV), non-clinically significant CMV (n-csCMV), and dead states; stage 2 (78 weeks-lifetime) comprised alive and dead states. Total costs (2022 USD) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated for the maribavir and IAT cohorts. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated to determine cost-effectiveness against a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY. Compared with IAT, maribavir had lower costs ($139 751 vs $147 949) and greater QALYs (6.04 vs 5.83), making it cost-saving and more cost-effective. Maribavir had higher acquisition costs compared with IAT ($80 531 vs $65 285), but lower costs associated with administration/monitoring ($16 493 vs $27 563), adverse events (AEs) ($11 055 vs $16 114), hospitalization ($27 157 vs $33 905), and graft loss ($4516 vs $5081), thus making treatment with maribavir cost-saving. Maribavir-treated patients spent more time without CMV compared with IAT-treated patients (0.85 years vs 0.68 years), leading to lower retreatment costs for maribavir (cost savings: -$42 970.80). Compared with IAT, maribavir was more cost-effective for transplant recipients with refractory CMV, owing to better clinical efficacy and avoidance of high costs associated with administration, monitoring, AEs, and hospitalizations. These results can inform healthcare decision-makers on the most effective use of their resources for post-transplant refractory CMV treatment.

Molnupiravir is an oral prodrug of the broadly active, antiviral ribonucleoside analog N-hydroxycytidine (NHC). The primary circulating metabolite NHC is taken up into cells and phosphorylated to NHC-triphosphate (NHC-TP). NHC-TP serves as a competitive substrate for viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), which results in an accumulation of errors in the viral genome, rendering virus replication incompetent. Molnupiravir has demonstrated activity against SARS-CoV-2 both clinically and preclinically and has a high barrier to development of viral resistance. Little to no molnupiravir is observed in plasma due to rapid hydrolysis to NHC. Maximum concentrations of NHC are reached at 1.5 h following administration in a fasted state. The effective half-life of NHC is 3.3 h, reflecting minimal accumulation in the plasma following twice-daily (Q12H) dosing. The terminal half-life of NHC is 20.6 h. NHC-TP exhibits a flatter profile with a lower peak-to-trough ratio compared with NHC, which supports Q12H dosing. Renal and hepatic pathways are not major routes of elimination, as NHC is primarily cleared by metabolism to uridine and cytidine, which then mix with the endogenous nucleotide pools. In a phase III study of nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19 (MOVe-OUT), 5 days of treatment with 800 mg molnupiravir Q12H significantly reduced the incidence of hospitalization or death compared with placebo. Patients treated with molnupiravir also had a greater reduction in SARS-CoV-2 viral load and improved clinical outcomes, compared with those receiving placebo. The clinical effectiveness of molnupiravir has been further demonstrated in several real-world evidence studies. Molnupiravir is currently authorized or approved in more than 25 countries.

暂无摘要。