RhD antigen

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:供者和受者之间的ABO血型不匹配会影响移植的成功以及异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)过程中的红细胞问题。然而,恒河猴(Rh)D错配对同种异体HCT移植结局的影响尚不清楚.
    方法:我们使用日本注册数据库回顾性评估了2000年至2021年间接受同种异体HCT的64,923例患者中RhD错配对移植后结局的影响。
    结果:在整个小组中,当受体或供体与(+/+)RhD不匹配时,进行了64,293、322、270和38个HCTs,(-/+),(+/-)或(-/-)组合。接受者/捐赠者之间的RhD差异(-/+),(+/-)和(-/-)不影响造血恢复,急性和慢性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD),总生存期(OS),在多变量分析中,将RhD(+/+)用作参照组时,非复发死亡率(NRM)或复发.
    结论:我们基于注册的研究表明,受体和供体之间的RhD不匹配并没有显著影响造血恢复,GVHD,操作系统,同种异体HCT后NRM或复发。这些数据表明,对于同种异体HCT中的受体和供体组合,可能不需要避免RhD错配。
    OBJECTIVE: ABO blood group mismatch between the donor and the recipient can affect the success of the transplant as well as problems with the red blood cells during allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, the impact of the Rhesus (Rh) D mismatch on transplant outcomes in allogeneic HCT has been poorly elucidated.
    METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the impact of the RhD mismatch on post-transplant outcomes in 64,923 patients who underwent allogeneic HCT between 2000 and 2021 using a Japanese registry database.
    RESULTS: Out of the whole group, 64,293, 322, 270 and 38 HCTs were done when the recipient or donor was RhD-mismatched with (+/+), (-/+), (+/-) or (-/-) combinations. The difference in RhD between recipient/donor (-/+), (+/-) and (-/-) did not affect haematopoietic recovery, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), overall survival (OS), non-relapse mortality (NRM) or relapse when RhD (+/+) was used as the reference group in multivariate analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our registry-based study demonstrated that RhD mismatch between recipient and donor did not significantly impact haematopoietic recovery, GVHD, OS, NRM or relapse after allogeneic HCT. These data suggest that RhD mismatches may not need to be avoided for recipient and donor combinations in allogeneic HCT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:最近的几项研究已经调查了ABO类型和RhD抗原在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)严重程度中的作用。因此,本研究的目的是确定ABO和RhD类型与有症状的COVID-19疾病的关系,并确定与住院风险增加相关的组.
    方法:这项观察性病例对照研究是在530名患有COVID-19的伊拉克库尔德人患者中进行的。其中,184例需要住院治疗的重症病例,346例轻度至中度病例在家中接受治疗。在大流行前1年的病例和1698个对照记录之间比较ABO和RhD抗原组。COVID-19的诊断基于实时聚合酶链反应测试和具有典型临床表现的高分辨率胸部计算机断层扫描。
    结果:COVID-19病例和非COVID对照组的ABO和RhD抗原分布无显著差异。没有ABO组与住院风险相关,作为感染严重程度的标志。
    结论:有症状的COVID-19疾病与任何ABO组或RhD抗原类型之间没有显着关联。没有记录到ABO组对住院的影响。
    OBJECTIVE: The role of ABO types and RhD antigen in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity has been investigated in several recent studies. Thus, the objective of this study was to identify the relationship of ABO and RhD types with symptomatic COVID-19 disease and determine the groups associated with an increased risk of hospitalization.
    METHODS: This observational case-control study was performed in 530 Iraqi-Kurdish patients with COVID-19. Among them, 184 were severe cases that required hospitalization, while 346 were mild to moderate cases that were treated at home. ABO and RhD antigen groups were compared between cases and 1698 control records from 1 year before the pandemic. The diagnosis of COVID-19 was based on real-time polymerase chain reaction tests and high-resolution chest computed tomography scans with the typical clinical presentation.
    RESULTS: There were no significant differences in ABO and RhD antigen distributions between the COVID-19 cases and non-COVID controls. No ABO group was associated with the risk of hospitalization as a marker of the severity of infection.
    CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant association between symptomatic COVID-19 disease and any ABO group or RhD antigen type. No impact of ABO groups on hospitalization was documented.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    ABO血型与某些微生物感染的易感性有关,包括冠状病毒.我们检查了感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的个体的血型与临床结局之间的关系,并将其血型分布与普通人群进行了比较。
    大流行开始时,在科威特,所有SARS-CoV-2检测呈阳性的个体均被纳入一家指定的2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)医院,并纳入前瞻性登记.2020年2月24日至5月27日收治的患者根据血型进行分层。作为一种控制,代表几乎科威特的整个人口的3,730,027名匿名个体的血型是从国家数据库获得的。
    在3305名SARS-CoV-2阳性患者中,37.1%,25.5%,28.9%,8.5%是O组,A,B,AB,分别。单变量分析显示各血型间严重临床结局或死亡无显著差异。然而,多变量分析表明,与非A组相比,A组个体发生肺炎的几率更高(校正比值比1.32,95%置信区间1.02-1.72,p<.036)。与普通人群相比,COVID-19队列中O组的频率较低,A的等效频率,B和AB的频率更高。在RhD组中没有发现显著差异。
    这项研究支持ABO血型系统在未选择的人群中可能参与SARS-CoV-2的感染。有必要检查血型与COVID-19之间的机制联系及其对控制当前大流行的意义。
    ABO blood groups have been linked to susceptibility to infection with certain microorganisms, including coronaviruses. We examined the relationship between blood group and clinical outcomes in individuals infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and compared their blood group distribution with the general population.
    At the inception of the pandemic, all individuals testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 in Kuwait were admitted to one designated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospital and enrolled in a prospective registry. Patients admitted from February 24 to May 27, 2020, were stratified according to blood group. As a control, blood groups of 3,730,027 anonymized individuals representing almost Kuwait\'s entire population were obtained from a national database.
    Of 3305 SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, 37.1%, 25.5%, 28.9%, and 8.5% were groups O, A, B, and AB, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed no significant differences in severe clinical outcomes or death among the blood groups. However, multivariable analysis demonstrated that group A individuals had higher odds of developing pneumonia compared with non-group A (adjusted odds ratio 1.32, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.72, p < .036). Compared with the general population, the COVID-19 cohort had a lower frequency of group O, equivalent frequency of A, and higher frequency of B and AB. No significant difference in the RhD group was found.
    This study supports potential involvement of the ABO blood group system in predisposing to infection with SARS-CoV-2 in an unselected population. Examination of the mechanistic link between blood group and COVID-19 and its implications on controlling the current pandemic is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号