UNASSIGNED: Periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFFs) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) have increased in the past decade as the demand for primary surgery continues to grow. Although there is now more evidence to describe the treatment of Vancouver B fractures, there is still limited knowledge regarding factors that cause surgeons to perform either an open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or revision THA (rTHA). The purpose of this study was to determine what type of surgeons treat Vancouver B PPFFs at 11 major academic institutions and if there are trends in treatment decision-making regarding the use of ORIF or rTHA based on surgical training or patient factors.
UNASSIGNED: This multicenter retrospective study evaluated patients surgically treated for Vancouver B PPFF after THA between 2014 and 2019. Patients from 11 academic centers located in the United States were included in this study. Surgical outcomes and patient demographics were evaluated based on surgeon training, surgical treatment type, and institution.
UNASSIGNED: Presence of Vancouver B2 (odds ratio [OR]: 0.02, P < .001) or B3 (OR: 0.04, P < .001) fractures were independent risk factors for treatment with rTHA. Treatment by a trauma (OR: 12.49, P < .001) or other-specified surgeon (OR: 13.63, P < .001) were independent risk factors for ORIF repair of Vancouver B fractures. There were no differences in outcomes based on surgeon subspecialty training.
UNASSIGNED: This study showed the trends in surgeons who surgically manage Vancouver B fractures at 11 major academic institutions and highlighted that regardless of surgical training or surgical treatment type, postoperative outcomes following management of PPFF were similar.

UNASSIGNED: Two-stage exchange arthroplasty remains the gold standard for treating chronic hip periprosthetic joint infections. However, controversy remains regarding the optimal spacer type, particularly among patients with increased dislocation risk. This study reports on the outcomes of articulating hip spacers utilizing a single constrained-liner design.
UNASSIGNED: All patients who underwent treatment for hip periprosthetic joint infection at a single institution were screened. Patients were included if they received an articulating spacer utilizing a constrained liner of a single manufacturer design. Indications for constrained liner, demographic variables, and surgical variables were recorded. Patients were assessed for dislocation and component loosening prior to the second stage or at the final follow-up if the second stage was not undertaken. Comparative analysis was performed.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, 26 constrained liners were utilized in 25 patients. Indications for constrained liner included history of dislocation (n = 14), massive proximal femoral bone loss (n = 14), greater trochanteric deficiency (n = 12), and absent abductors (n = 7). Many patients had more than one indication. In total, 9 hips (34.6%) underwent a second stage at an average of 7.4 months, while 17 hips never underwent a second stage with an average follow-up of 27.6 months. One patient experienced failure of their constrained liner prior to the second stage due to pelvic discontinuity and massive acetabular bone loss.
UNASSIGNED: Utilization of a constrained liner as an articulating spacer is a viable option for patients at high risk of instability. Meticulous cement technique, appropriate component position, and implant selection are crucial in achieving successful outcomes.

BACKGROUND: This study used finite element analysis (FEA) to compare the biomechanical stability of bispherical metal augment (BA) and wedge-shaped trabecular-metal augment (TA) in different acetabular defect reconstruction models, thereby explaining the application value of this novel bispherical augment in complex hip revision.
METHODS: Three different acetabular defect pelvis models originating from three representative patients with different types of severe acetabular defects (Paprosky IIC, IIIA, and IIIB) were constructed and reconstruction with BA and TA technique was simulated. Based on the FEA models, the displacement of reconstruction implants, relative displacement of bone implants, and hemi-pelvic von Mises stress were investigated under static loads.
RESULTS: BA acquired smaller reconstruction system displacement, less relative displacement of bone implants, and lower pelvic von Mises stress than TA in all Paprosky IIC, IIIA, and IIIB defect reconstructions.
CONCLUSIONS: The FEA results show that BA could acquire favourable biomechanical stability in severe acetabular defect reconstruction. This technique is a reliable method in complex hip revision.

There are instances where a patient\'s prosthetic hip is unable to be dislocated intraoperatively during a conversion or revision arthroplasty, despite scar removal and standard dislocation maneuvers. We describe a technique that involves an in situ disassociation of the femoral head component from the trunnion without the need for additional osteotomies. This maneuver may be beneficial in cases of protrusio, muscular stiffness, high soft tissue tension, arthrofibrosis, and ankylosis due to heterotopic ossification, as well as cases that involve a large femoral head or acetabular constraint. We also present a case of a 61-year-old male with a chronic prosthetic hip infection who underwent a two-stage revision surgery where this technique was utilized.

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of primary hip arthroplasty has led to a parallel rise in revision cases. Femoral revision often entails compromised bone integrity, requiring consideration of various solutions for optimal reconstructive options. Despite technological advancements, there is limited evidence on the clinical outcomes of the latest modular revision stems. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and survival rates of next generation uncemented modular revision stem in patients undergoing hip revision surgery.
METHODS: This retrospective single-center study assessed the survival and failure causes of a specific uncemented modular stem in 48 patients undergoing hip revision surgery between 2012 and 2022. Data included preoperative parameters, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes measured through clinical and radiographic assessments. Forty-eight patients (25 males, 23 females; mean age 72 years) were included, with a mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 5. Preoperative diagnoses varied, with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) being the most common (45.8%), followed by periprosthetic fractures (27.1%). Partial revisions occurred in 60.4%, total revisions in 39.6%. According to Paprosky classification of femoral bone loss, type II and III were the most represented, respectively 35.4% and 50%.
RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 4.6 years, stem survival was 92.5%. Complications (20%) included dislocation, PJI, fracture, and loosening; the overall reoperation rate was 12.5%. The SF-12 physical score was 43.6, while the mental score was 51.1. The HOOS score was 71.8, and the HHS score was 71.4. Radiographic analysis identified nonprogressive osteolysis in 15.1% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This study on this uncemented modular revision stem demonstrated favorable outcomes in an elder fragile population with moderate to severe femoral bone loss. The implant\'s modularity provides versatility in addressing various defects, without any implant breakage observed during the study period. Literature comparison highlighted similar outcomes despite sample size differences. The promising results warrant continued investigation into the long-term survivorship of this modular stem system.

UNASSIGNED: The outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) have become increasingly important as their volume increases. Computer navigation, a reliable method to improve component positioning during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), is not well studied in the rTHA setting. Given that dislocation rates following rTHA are significantly higher than those of primary THA, component positioning becomes paramount in these cases.
UNASSIGNED: Here, we present two case reports and surgical techniques, one of a 77-year-old man undergoing rTHA for recurrent hip instability following primary THA, and one of a 61-year-old woman undergoing rTHA for severe iliopsoas bursitis who was at increased risk for instability and dislocation given her history of large segment spinal fusion.
UNASSIGNED: Both patients achieved optimal acetabular component positioning after rTHA with imageless computer navigation.
UNASSIGNED: The use of imageless computer navigation in rTHA provides accurate and reproducible component positioning during acetabular rTHA.

BACKGROUND: Along with the advent of newer bearings, hip resurfacing (HR) is gaining renewed interest as a bone sparing alternative to conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients. However, the outcome of conversion of failed HR to THA (HRc) remains sparsely described. This study aimed to compare the outcomes and complication rates of HRc to those of primary (pTHA) and revision THA (rTHA) to find out to which group HRc is most comparable.
OBJECTIVE: The study hypothesis was that the outcomes and complications rates of HRc were closer to those of pTHA than rTHA.
METHODS: Between 2001 and 2011, a continuous series of 207 HR were prospectively included in our institutional registry and retrospectively analyzed. Out of them, 17 HR (8%) were converted to THA. Propensity scores were used to match patients in the HRc group to the pTHA and the rTHA groups using a greedy 1:3 matching procedure (51 pTHA and 51 rTHA). Clinical and radiographic outcomes, perioperative data and complications were analyzed and compared between the three groups.
RESULTS: No significant difference between HRc and pTHA was observed in terms of clinical and functional outcomes, duration of surgery, acetabular component diameter and length of hospital stay (p = 0.13 to 0.94). Perioperative blood loss was significantly lower for pTHA than for HRc (p = 0.01). HRc demonstrated significantly higher HHS and HOOS scores than for rTHA at one year (p = 0.03 and p < 0.01, respectively). Duration of surgery was significantly lower in HRc compared to rTHA (p = 0.02) while length of hospital stay was similar (p = 0.84). Complication rate was significantly higher in the rTHA group, compared to HRc and pTHA groups (37.3 vs. 29.4 vs. 11.8%, p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the clinical and functional outcomes of HRc were closer to those of pTHA than those of rTHA, though complication rate was higher than for pTHA.
METHODS: III; Retrospective comparative study.

Effective treatment of large acetabular defects remains among the most challenging aspects of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), due to the deficiency of healthy bone stock and degradation of the support columns. Generic uncemented components, which are favored in primary THA, are often unsuitable in revision cases, where the bone-implant contact may be insufficient for fixation, without significant reaming of the limited residual bone. This study presents a computational design strategy for automatically generating patient-specific implants that simultaneously maximize the bone-implant contact area, and minimize bone reaming while ensuring insertability. These components can be manufactured using the same additive manufacturing methods as porous components and may reduce cost and operating-time, compared to existing patient-specific systems. This study compares the performance of implants generated via the proposed method to optimally fitted hemispherical implants, in terms of the achievable bone-implant contact surface, and the volume of reamed bone. Computer-simulated results based on the reconstruction of a set of 15 severe pelvic defects (Paprosky 2A-3B) suggest that the patient-specific components increase bone-implant contact by 63% (median: 63%; SD: 44%; 95% CI: 52.3%-74.0%; RMSD: 42%), and reduce the volume of reamed bone stock by 97% (median: 98%; SD: 4%; 95% CI: 95.9%-97.4%; RMSD: 3.7%).

BACKGROUND: Acetabular reconstruction in the context of massive acetabular bone loss is challenging. Achieving implant stability in these situations requires special considerations. The cup-cage construct is a treatment option that addresses this issue. This study evaluates survivorship, complications, and functional outcomes using the cup-cage construct.
METHODS: A total of 131 cup-cage implants (129 patients) were identified from our retrospective review of revision total hip arthroplasties from January 2003 to January 2022. Among these cases, 100 (76.3%) were women, the mean age at the time of surgery was 68 years (range, 29 to 92; SD [SD], 12.4), and the mean follow-up was 7.7 years (range, 0.02 to 20.3; SD, 5.1). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was conducted with failure defined as revision surgery and/or failure of the cup-cage reconstruction.
RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 7.7 years, the cup-cage construct survivorship due to all-cause failure was 83.9% (95% CI [confidence interval]: 77.6 to 90.2) at 5 years with 88 hips at risk, 74.8% (95% CI: 66.2 to 83.4) at 10 years with 38 hips at risk, and 69.8% (95% CI: 59.4 to 80.2) at 15 years with 11 hips at risk. The survivorship due to failure from aseptic loosening was 96.7% (95% CI: 93.6 to 99.8) at 5 years with 88 hips at risk and 95.5% (95% CI: 91.6 to 99.4) at 10 and 15 years with 38 and 11 hips at risk, respectively. The revision rate for aseptic loosening of the cup and/or cage, infection, dislocation, and aseptic loosening of the femoral stem was 5 of 131 (3.8%), 12 of 131 (9.1%), 10 of 131 (7.6%), and 2 of 131 (1.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: The cup-cage construct is a reliable treatment option for the treatment of various acetabular defects. There are favorable survivorship, clinical, and radiographic outcomes, with a satisfactory complication rate.

Large acetabular bone defects are challenging in hip revision surgery. Clinical assessment is crucial to evaluate modern technologies in surgical reconstruction. We aimed to better understand the bone remodeling that occurs following acetabular reconstruction. Our objectives were: (1) To characterize changes in the shape of the pelvis by studying sequential computed tomography (CT) scans collected immediately and 1-year postoperatively and (2) to identify which part of the pelvis is most susceptible to remodeling. We used the CT scans taken at two timepoints, of 24 patients with acetabular bone defects classified as Paprosky IIIB, treated with three-dimensional (3D)-printed custom-made acetabular implants. Segmented 3D models of the bony pelvis were co-registered using three different techniques. A global co-registration of the full pelvis was conducted, followed by the co-registration of the innominate bone and then ilium only, on the ipsilateral reconstructed side. The relative movements of the ilium, ischium, and pubis were analyzed from visual inspection and using co-registration metrics (root mean square error and intersection over union). No bone remodeling was found in 14/24 patients (58%). The co-registration of the innominate bone indicated bone remodeling in five cases (21%), while the remaining five cases (21%) presented remodeling in the global co-registration but not the innominate bone co-registration, suggestive of changes occurring at the sacroiliac joint. Changes in the pelvic shape were greatest at the pubis and ischium. Bone remodeling may occur in complex cases of Paprosky type IIIB defects, after acetabular reconstruction (occurrence of 21%, 5/24 cases). Surgeons and engineers should consider this when monitoring implant migration.