BACKGROUND: There are concerns regarding the adequacy of applying the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) payment system for multiple traumas (i.e., major diagnostic category 24, MDC-24) patients in Taiwan. Therefore, this study used a multi-center dataset to assess the influence of the DRG payment system on the cost and outcome of multiple trauma care.
METHODS: We collected data of all multiple trauma patients from the Trauma Registry of three hospitals from 2014 - 2017. Next, we selected patients who met the criteria of MDC-24 and calculated the corresponding DRG payment. Subsequently, we combined the clinical care information with health insurance information to analyze the problems of applying the DRG payment system to multiple trauma care.
RESULTS: Overall, of 465 cases, 367 met the criteria of MDC-24, and the mean injury severity score (ISS) was high (average 20.1). The total deficit of the polytrauma DRG cases amounted to 131,445 USD, and the average deficit in each case was 397 USD. In the multivariable analysis, higher revised trauma score and specific lower abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) scores in certain body regions resulted in profits, while increased length of stay in intensive care units, longer operative time, and higher AIS score in the thorax were significantly correlated with deficits in medical costs.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that the current DRG payment system results in financial losses for hospitals. Further, the payment grouping of MDC-24 should consider adding more disease severity factors to reduce the financial constraints faced by trauma centers.

BACKGROUND: Trauma is one of the common reasons for emergency department (ED) presentations. Specifically, severe-trauma patients often present with mortal complications, including traumatic shock or respiratory or multiorgan failure/dysfunction, and these situations cause high-mortality risk. Scoring systems in the triage of trauma patients can help determine the injury\'s severity and the patient\'s prognosis.
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to compare Early-Warning Score (EWS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and CRAMS to predict the severity and prognosis of damage among high-energy-trauma patients.
METHODS: This retrospective study included adult high-energy-trauma patients (> 18 years of age) assessed in our emergency department (ED) from April 1, 2020, to September 31, 2020. We included a total of 177 high-energy-trauma patients in the study. We compared the effectiveness of EWS; RTS; and circulation, respiration, abdomen, motor, and speech (CRAMS) in predicting mortality. The primary outcome of this study was mortality.
RESULTS: We included 67 females and 110 males with a mean age of 39.2 in our study. Of those patients, 6 died during ICU hospitalization and 104 were discharged from the ward. RTS (AUC: 0.978, CI: 0.945-0.994, p < 0.001) and CRAMS (AUC: 0.978, CI: 0.944-0.994, p < 0.001) had the same AUC values, but the AUC value of EWS (AUC: 0.966, CI: 0.927-0.987, p < 0.001) was lower. Sensitivity of EWS was 93.1 (CI: 77.2-99.2%), and sensitivity of RTS was 96.55 (CI: 82.2-99.9) and CRAMS\' sensivity was 96.55% (CI: 82.2-99.9). RTS showed the highest specivity level (96.62%, CI: 92.3-98.9).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, RTS and CRAMS better predicted mortality in high-energy-trauma patients than EWS.

BACKGROUND: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is one of the most commonly used trauma scores and is a good predictor of outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. There are other more complex scores with additional physiological parameters. Whether they discriminate better than GCS in predicting mortality in TBI patients is debatable. The aim of this study was to compare the discrimination of GCS with that of MGAP, GAP, RTS and KTS for 24-hour and 30-day in-hospital mortality in adult TBI patients, in a resource limited LMIC setting.
METHODS: We analysed data from the multicentre, observational trauma cohort Towards Improved Trauma Care Outcome (TITCO) in India. We included all patients 18 years or older, admitted from the emergency department with TBI. The Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) curve was used to quantify and compare the discrimination of all scores: GCS; Revised Trauma Score (RTS); mechanism, GCS, age, systolic blood pressure (MGAP); GCS, age, systolic blood pressure (GAP) and Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) in the prediction of 24-hour and 30-day in-hospital mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 3306 TBI patients were included in this study. The majority were within the GCS range 3-8. The commonest mechanism of injury was road traffic injuries [1907(58.0%)]. In-hospital mortality was 27.2% (899). There was no significant difference in discrimination in 24-hour in-hospital mortality when comparing GCS with MGAP and GAP. While GCS performed better than KTS, RTS performed better than GCS. For 30-day in-hospital mortality, GCS discriminated significantly better compared with KTS, but there was no significant difference when compared to MGAP and RTS. GAP discriminated significantly better when compared with GCS.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the discrimination of GCS is comparable to that of more complex trauma scores in predicting 24-hour and 30-day in-hospital mortality in adult TBI patients in a resource limited LMIC setting.

BACKGROUND: The preventable death rate (PDR) is an important parameter in the quality assurance of traumatic care. Medical errors or untimely management may occur during stressful trauma care, resulting in preventable deaths. We aimed to develop an applicable PDR model in a trauma center in middle Taiwan.
METHODS: We identified adult trauma-related deaths which occurred from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019 at our hospital. Patients with a trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) <75% or ≥75% but with a chance of preventability, as determined by a trauma surgeon, were discussed by a panel comprising an emergency physician and surgeons specializing in different fields of medicine. Deaths were subsequently classified as definitely preventable (DP), potentially preventable (PP), or non-preventable (NP). Causes of DP or PP deaths were categorized as delayed diagnosis, delayed treatment, technical error, or inadequate infection prevention/control. The relationship between the time and cause of preventable deaths was also analyzed.
RESULTS: This study included 127 trauma-related deaths, of which 39 were discussed by the panel. Eight patients (6.3%) were categorized as DP, eight (6.3%) as PP, and 111 (87.4%) as NP. Among patients with preventable deaths, inadequate infection prevention/control, delayed treatment, delayed diagnosis, and technical error were identified in six (37.5%), five (31.2%), three (18.8%), and two (12.5%) patients, respectively. Four patients in the inadequate infection prevention/control group (4/6, 66.7%) died of aspiration pneumonia during the recovery phase.
CONCLUSIONS: A PDR evaluation model was developed and revealed that postoperative care is as important as a timely diagnosis and treatment to avoid preventable deaths following trauma.

BACKGROUND: Children are prone to unintentional injuries and various scoring systems have been used to triage these injuries. The aim of this study is to determine the associations between paediatric trauma score (PTS), revised trauma score (RTS) and the length of hospital stay as an indicator of injury severity.
METHODS: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar and National Orthopaedic Hospital, Enugu from February 2018 to March 2020. A structured questionnaire was used to collect personal, injury-specific and treatment-specific data. The relationship between PTS, RTS and the length of hospital stay was evaluated using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
RESULTS: A total of 212 patients were included in the study. Majorities (129, 60%) of the injured children were male and most of the injuries were due to falls from height (54%). The mean PTS was 5.36 ± 1.9, while the mean RTS was 7.10 ± 0.9. The Pearson\'s product momentum correlation coefficient shows that there was weak but statistically significant correlation between the PTS and the RTS (r = 0.22, P = 0.02). The one-way ANOVA showed a statistically significant decrease in the RTS with increasing duration of hospital admission (F-statistic = 6.654, df = 3, P = 0.000). The PTS showed a less obvious decrease with no trend.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the RTS showed an inverse relationship with the length of hospital stay.

UNASSIGNED: Revised Trauma Score (RTS) is a validated tool in assessing patients in a pre-hospital setting. There are limited data describing its potential use in guiding referral to intensive care.
UNASSIGNED: Trauma scoring systems require appropriate validation in a local setting before effective application. This work examines the applicability of RTS to a paediatric intensive care trauma population.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective record review of trauma patients admitted to the paediatric intensive care unit at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital between 2011 and 2013 was performed.
UNASSIGNED: The cohort was arbitrarily split into three subgroups based on RTS using the 33rd and 66th percentile values and groups compared. Outcome measures examined included mortality, age, gender, length of stay (LoS), duration of ventilation (DoV) and change in Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) from admission to discharge.
UNASSIGNED: Categorical values examined with Fisher\'s exact test. Non-categorical values examined with the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn\'s multiple comparisons tests.
UNASSIGNED: Of 919 children admitted, 165 admissions were secondary to trauma. Data necessary for calculation of RTS were available in 91 patients. The mean RTS was 5.3, 33rd percentile was 4.7 and 66th was 5.9. DoV (P = 0.0104) and LoS (P = 0.0395) were significantly different between intermediate- and low-risk groups as was change in GCS between low-risk and both other groups (P < 0.0001).
UNASSIGNED: RTS is not predictive of mortality between high-risk (RTS < 4.09) and low-risk patients (RTS > 5.67) in this population. It may be useful in predicting other outcomes such as DoV and LoS.

UNASSIGNED: Traumatic injuries are proportionally higher in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) than high-income counties. Data on trauma epidemiology and patients\' outcomes are limited in LMICs.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective review of medical records was performed for trauma admissions to the Princess Marina Hospital general surgical (GS) wards from August 2017 to July 2018. Data on demographics, mechanisms of injury, body parts injured, Revised Trauma Score, surgical procedures, hospital stay, and outcomes were analysed.
UNASSIGNED: During the study period, 2610 patients were admitted to GS wards, 1307 were emergency admissions. Trauma contributed 22.1% (576) of the total and 44.1% of the emergency admissions. Among the trauma admissions, 79.3% (457) were male. The median[interquartile range(IQR)](range) age in years was 30[24-40](13-97). The main mechanisms of injury were interpersonal violence (IPV), 53.1% and road traffic crashes (RTCs), 23.1%. More females than males suffered animal bites (5.9% vs. 0.9%), and burns (8.4% vs. 4.2%), while more males than females were affected by IPV (57.8% vs. 35.3%) and self-harm (5.5% vs. 3.4%). Multiple body parts were injured in 6.6%, mainly by RTCs. Interpersonal violence (IPV) and RTCs resulted in significant numbers of head and neck injuries, 57.3% and 22.2% respectively. More females than males had multiple body-parts injury 34.5% vs. 18.5%. Revised Trauma Score (RTS) of ≤11 was recorded in IPV, 38.4% and RTCs, 33.6%. Surgical procedures were performed on 44.4% patients. The most common surgical procedures were laparotomy (27.8%), insertion of chest tube (27.8%), and craniotomy/burr hole(25.1%). Complications were recorded in 10.1% of the patients(58) including 39 deaths, 6.8% of the 576.
UNASSIGNED: Trauma contributed significantly to the total GS and emergency admissions. The most common mechanism of injury was IPV with head and neck the most frequently injured body part. Further studies on IPV and trauma admissions involving paediatric and orthopaedic patients are warranted.

UNASSIGNED: Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement is emerging as a noninvasive method to estimate raised ICP. It is helpful in situations where imaging of brain or direct ICP monitoring is not available or feasible. Use of ONSD is still limited, so this study was planned to determine whether the bedside sonographic measurement of ONSD can reliably predict elevated ICP in neuro-trauma patients.
UNASSIGNED: After approval from Hospital Ethics Committee, this cross-sectional study was conducted in hundred traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with suspected elevated ICP, admitted to neurosurgical ICU. The severity of brain injury was assessed according to Glasgow coma scale (GCS), initial CT scan findings, and revised trauma score (RTS). All patients underwent ONSD sonography of the eye and CT scan subsequently. ONSD of ≥5.0 mm was considered as a benchmark of raised ICP.
UNASSIGNED: Mean ONSD of the study group with ONSD ≥5.0 mm was 5.6 ± 0.3 mm. ONSD was raised in 46% of patients, more so in patients with low GCS (3-6). The relationship of ONSD with GCS, CT scan findings, and RTS was highly significant. The sensitivity of the bedside sonographic measurement ONSD to detect raised ICP was 93.2% and specificity was 91.1% when compared with CT scan. Positive Predictive Value of the ONSD measurement was 89.1% and the negative predictive value was 94.4%.
UNASSIGNED: Ultrasonographic assessment of ONSD is a reliable modality to detect raised ICP in neurotrauma patients. It can be helpful in the early initiation of treatment of elevated ICP, thus preventing secondary brain damage.

UNASSIGNED: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is the preferred surgical management option for lowering refractory intracranial pressure in cases of traumatic brain injury (TBI). A number of randomized controlled trials have demonstrated decreased mortality but increased morbidity following DC for TBI patients. Here, we reviewed the frequency of postoperative hemorrhagic complications following DC correlating with poor outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who presented with TBI and underwent DC during the years 2015-2017. The frequency and characteristics of hemorrhagic complications were correlated with the patients\' outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: There were 74 patients with TBI included in the study who underwent DC. Of these, 31 patients developed expansion of existing hemorrhagic lesions, 13 had new contusions, three developed new extradural hemorrhages, two developed new subdural hematomas, and one patient developed an intraventricular hemorrhage. Those who developed expansion of existing hemorrhagic lesions following DC had longer ICU stays and poorer outcomes (Glasgow outcome scale).
UNASSIGNED: After 74 DC performed in TBI patients, 67% developed new hemorrhagic lesions or expansion of previously existing hemorrhages. This finding negatively impacted clinical outcomes, including mortality.

BACKGROUND: This study was aimed to assess if combining the evaluation of blood glucose level (BGL) and the Triage Revised Trauma Score (T-RTS) may result in a more accurate prediction of the actual clinical outcome, both in general adult population and in elderly patients with trauma.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study, conducted in the emergency department (ED) of an urban teaching hospital, with an average ED admission rate of 75,000 patients per year. Those excluded: known diagnosis of diabetes, age <18 years old, pregnancy, and mild trauma (classified as isolate trauma of upper or lower limb, in absence of exposed fractures). A combined Revised Trauma Score Glucose (RTS-G) score was obtained adding to T-RTS: two for BGL <160mg/dL (8.9mmol/L); one for BGL ≥160mg/dL and < 200mg/dL (11.1mmol/L); and zero for BGL ≥ 200mg/dL. The primary outcome was a composite of patient\'s death in ED or admission to intensive care unit (ICU). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the overall performance of T-RTS and of the combined RTS-G score.
RESULTS: Among a total of 68,933 traumas, 9,436 patients (4,407 females) were enrolled, aged from 18 to 103 years; 4,288 were aged ≥65 years. A total of 577 (6.1%) met the primary endpoint: 38 patients died in ED (0.4%) and 539 patients were admitted to ICU. The T-RTS and BGL were independently associated to primary endpoint at multivariate analysis. The cumulative RTS-G score was significantly more accurate than T-RTS and reached the best accuracy in elderly patients. In general population, ROC area under curve (AUC) for T-RTS was 0.671 (95% CI, 0.661 - 0.680) compared to RTS-G ROC AUC 0.743 (95% CI, 0.734 - 0.752); P <.001. In patients ≥65 years, T-RTS ROC AUC was 0.671 (95% CI, 0.657 - 0.685) compared to RTS-G ROC AUC 0.780 (95% CI, 0.768 - 0.793); P <.001.
CONCLUSIONS: Results showed RTS-G could be used effectively at ED triage for the risk stratification for death in ED and ICU admission of trauma patients, and it could reduce under-triage of approximately 20% compared to T-RTS. Comparing ROC AUCs, the combined RTS-G score performs significantly better than T-RTS and gives best results in patients ≥65 years.