Response selection

响应选择
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心理不应期(PRP)效应发生在两个需要单独反应的刺激依次出现时,特别是它们之间的时间间隔短且可变。疲劳是一种次优的心理生理状态,会导致策略的变化。近年来,许多研究已经研究了经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对运动控制的影响。本研究旨在探讨两种tDCS方法的效果,阳极和阴极,在非疲劳和精神疲劳条件下,在10种不同的刺激开始异步(SOA)条件下对PRP进行研究。参与者涉及39名19至25岁的男性大学生。在预测试,在非疲劳和精神疲劳两种情况下使用PRP测量工具进行评估.精神疲劳是由30分钟的Stroop任务引起的。测试包括具有不同SOA的两个刺激(50、75、100、150、300、400、600、900、1200和1500ms)。第一个是有三个选择的视觉刺激(字母A,B,andC).在随机SOA之后,第二个刺激,有三种选择的视觉刺激(红色,黄色,和蓝色),被介绍了。随后,参与者被随机分配到阳极,Cathodal,和假刺激组,并接受连续四次tDCS刺激。在阳极和阴极刺激组中,每次对PLPFC区域施加20分钟的tDCS刺激,而在假组里,刺激是人为施加的。所有参与者都使用与预测测试阶段相同的测量工具进行评估。在最后一次刺激后一天的测试后阶段,在四天后的后续阶段。推理统计包括混合方差分析,单向方差分析,独立,和依赖的t检验。研究结果表明,在较低的SOA下,对第二次刺激的响应时间更长。然而,两组在这方面没有显著差异.此外,疲劳和非疲劳条件对第二次刺激的响应时间没有显着差异,或群体之间。因此,tDCS无显著影响。心理不应期精神疲劳与非疲劳状态存在显著差异。此外,在较低的SOA,PRP比更高的SOA更长。在疲劳的情况下,在较高的SOA下,主动刺激组(阳极和阴极)的表现优于假刺激组。考虑到不同SOA对两种刺激的反应差异,响应的一些中心方面可以同时平行。疲劳也影响并行处理。本研究支持PRP中的响应整合现象,预测随着两种刺激的呈现之间的间隔增加,对第一刺激的响应时间将增加。这一发现与瓶颈模型相矛盾。在这项研究中,发现阴极和阳极tDCS对第二次刺激和PRP的响应时间的有效性非常小。
    The psychological refractory period (PRP) effect occurs when two stimuli that require separate responses are presented sequentially, particularly with a short and variable time interval between them. Fatigue is a suboptimal psycho-physiological state that leads to changes in strategies. In recent years, numerous studies have investigated the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor control. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of two tDCS methods, anodal and cathodal, on PRP in ten different conditions of stimulus-onset asynchronies (SOAs) under non-fatigue and mental fatigue conditions. The participants involved 39 male university students aged 19 to 25 years. In the pre-test, they were assessed using the PRP measurement tool under both non-fatigue and mental fatigue conditions. The mental fatigue was induced by a 30-min Stroop task. The test consisted of two stimuli with different SOAs (50, 75, 100, 150, 300, 400, 600, 900, 1200, and 1500 ms). The first was a visual stimulus with three choices (letters A, B, and C). After a random SOA, the second stimulus, a visual stimulus with three choices (colors red, yellow, and blue), was presented. Subsequently, participants were randomly assigned to the anodal, cathodal, and sham stimulation groups and underwent four consecutive sessions of tDCS stimulation. In the anodal and cathodal stimulation groups, 20 min of tDCS stimulation were applied to the PLPFC area in each session, while in the sham group, the stimulation was artificially applied. All participants were assessed using the same measurement tools as in the pre-test phase, in a post-test phase one day after the last stimulation session, and in a follow-up phase four days after that. Inferential statistics include mixed ANOVA, one-way ANOVA, independent, and dependent t-tests. The findings indicated that the response time to the second stimulus was longer at lower SOAs. However, there was no significant difference between the groups in this regard. Additionally, there was no significant difference in response time to the second stimulus between the fatigue and non-fatigue conditions, or between the groups. Therefore, tDCS had no significant effect. There was a significant difference between mental fatigue and non-fatigue conditions in the psychological refractory period. Moreover, at lower SOAs, the PRP was longer than at higher SOAs. In conditions of fatigue, the active stimulation groups (anodal and cathodal) performed better than the sham stimulation group at higher SOAs. Considering the difference in response to both stimuli at different SOAs, some central aspects of the response can be simultaneously parallel. Fatigue also affects parallel processing. This study supports the response integration phenomenon in PRP, which predicts that there will be an increase in response time to the first stimulus as the interval between the presentation of the two stimuli increases. This finding contradicts the bottleneck model. In this study, the effectiveness of cathodal and anodal tDCS on response time to the second stimulus and PRP was found to be very small.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究调查了双任务处理中两个任务之间的干扰是否源于瓶颈限制或由于资源共享而导致的认知资源不足。实验1以声调判别为任务1,以单词或伪词分类为任务2,评估不同SOA条件下自动与受控处理对双任务干扰的影响。实验2颠倒了任务顺序。结果表明,无论任务类型或顺序如何,双重任务干扰都会持续存在。这两个实验都没有发现自动任务可以消除干扰的证据。这表明资源有限,而不是瓶颈,可以更好地解释双重任务成本。具体来说,当任务争夺有限的资源时,这两个任务的处理效率显著降低。未来的研究应该探索认知资源如何在任务之间动态分配,以更好地考虑双重任务干扰效应。
    This study investigated whether the interference between two tasks in dual-task processing stems from bottleneck limitations or insufficient cognitive resources due to resource sharing. Experiment 1 used tone discrimination as Task 1 and word or pseudoword classification as Task 2 to evaluate the effect of automatic versus controlled processing on dual-task interference under different SOA conditions. Experiment 2 reversed the task order. The results showed that dual-task interference persisted regardless of task type or order. Neither experiment found evidence that automatic tasks could eliminate interference. This suggests that resource limitations, rather than bottlenecks, may better explain dual-task costs. Specifically, when tasks compete for limited resources, the processing efficiency of both tasks is significantly reduced. Future research should explore how cognitive resources are dynamically allocated between tasks to better account for dual-task interference effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在潜在行为之间进行选择的能力对于工具使用的复杂过程至关重要。左半球中风后,具有肢体失用症的个体在手势使用具有相互矛盾的手部动作的工具进行抓握以移动和使用时,会出现更多的手部动作错误(例如,螺丝刀)相对于抓握以移动并以相同的手动作使用的工具(例如,锤子)。先前的研究表明,这种掌握-使用干扰效应是由竞争行为选择过程中的异常驱动的。该项目的目标是确定共同机制和神经底物是否支持在工具和非工具领域中竞争性选择适合任务的响应。如果是,工具使用手势任务中的抓取-使用干扰效应应与经典Eriksen侧翼和Simon任务中的响应干扰效应相关,并且至少部分重叠的神经区域应服务于这3个任务。64名左半球卒中幸存者(33名失用症)参加了工具和非工具干扰任务,并接受了T1解剖MRI检查。存在强大的抓握-使用干扰效应(抓握-使用冲突测试)和响应干扰效应(埃里克森侧翼和西蒙任务),但这些影响并不相关。病变-症状作图分析显示,左侧下顶叶小叶的病变,腹侧运动前皮质,和脑岛与抓握-使用干扰有关。左侧下顶叶小叶病变,中央后回,脑岛,尾状,和壳核与Eriksen侧翼任务中的反应干扰有关。左尾状和壳核的病变也与Simon任务中的反应干扰有关。我们的结果表明,使用工具的手姿势的选择是由不同的认知机制和部分不同的神经解剖基础介导的,这些神经解剖基础将刺激映射到非工具域中的适当运动反应。
    The ability to select between potential actions is central to the complex process of tool use. After left hemisphere stroke, individuals with limb apraxia make more hand action errors when gesturing the use of tools with conflicting hand actions for grasping-to-move and use (e.g., screwdriver) relative to tools that are grasped-to-move and used with the same hand action (e.g., hammer). Prior research indicates that this grasp-use interference effect is driven by abnormalities in the competitive action selection process. The goal of this project was to determine whether common mechanisms and neural substrates support the competitive selection of task-appropriate responses in both tool and non-tool domains. If so, the grasp-use interference effect in a tool use gesturing task should be correlated with response interference effects in the classic Eriksen flanker and Simon tasks, and at least partly overlapping neural regions should subserve the 3 tasks. Sixty-four left hemisphere stroke survivors (33 with apraxia) participated in the tool- and non-tool interference tasks and underwent T1 anatomical MRI. There were robust grasp-use interference effects (grasp-use conflict test) and response interference effects (Eriksen flanker and Simon tasks), but these effects were not correlated. Lesion-symptom mapping analyses showed that lesions to the left inferior parietal lobule, ventral premotor cortex, and insula were associated with grasp-use interference. Lesions to the left inferior parietal lobule, postcentral gyrus, insula, caudate, and putamen were associated with response interference in the Eriksen flanker task. Lesions to the left caudate and putamen were also associated with response interference in the Simon task. Our results suggest that the selection of hand posture for tool use is mediated by distinct cognitive mechanisms and partly distinct neuroanatomic substrates from those mapping a stimulus to an appropriate motor response in non-tool domains.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    停止信号任务(SST)广泛用于研究潜在的响应抑制过程的速度。SST模式通常由具有假定的Go和Stop过程的赛马模型(HRM)来解释。然而,HRM与响应控制的顺序阶段模型不一致。因此,反应选择之间的确切关系,响应执行阶段,停止过程仍不清楚。我们建议响应选择发生在停止信号延迟(SSD)周期内,以及Go和Stop进程之间的竞争发生在响应执行期内。为了证实这一点,我们进行了两个实验。在实验1中,参与者进行了修改的SST任务,并增加了刺激类别-Cued-Go。在Cued-Go试验中,提示之后是命令式Go信号。根据反映个体响应选择持续时间的响应时间,通过自适应算法动态调整Cue-Go周期持续时间。在实验2中,在一半的试验中,Cued-Go刺激之后是停止信号,并计算了反应抑制效率。实验1的结果表明,SSD反映了响应选择过程的持续时间。实验2的结果表明,该过程对目标反应的受控抑制的有效性具有独立且小的影响。根据我们的发现,我们提出了SST反应抑制的两阶段模型,第一阶段包括反应选择过程,第二阶段包括SS呈现后的反应抑制。
    The stop-signal task (SST) is widely used for studying the speed of the latent process of response inhibition. The SST patterns are typically explained by a horse-race model (HRM) with supposed Go and Stop processes. However, HRM does not agree with the sequential-stage model of response control. As a result, the exact relationship between the response selection, the response execution stages, and the Stop process remains unclear. We propose that response selection occurs within the stop-signal delay (SSD) period, and that the competition between the Go and Stop processes occurs within the response execution period. To confirm this, we conducted two experiments. In Experiment 1, participants carried out a modified SST task with an additional stimulus category - Cued-Go. In the Cued-Go trials, cues were followed by imperative Go signals. The Cue-Go period duration was dynamically adjusted by an adaptive algorithm based on the response times reflecting the individual response selection duration. In Experiment 2, Cued-Go stimuli were followed by Stop Signals in half of the trials and response inhibition efficiency was calculated. The results of Experiment 1 indicate that SSD reflects the duration of the response selection process. The results of Experiment 2 show that this process has an independent and small effect on the effectiveness of controlled inhibition of the target response. Based on our findings, we propose a two-stage model of response inhibition in SST, with the first stage including response selection process and the second stage response inhibition following the SS presentation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    当人们根据任意规则对传入的刺激做出反应时,通常会出现双重任务干扰,例如在驾驶时选择油门踏板和刹车。来自反应选择的严重干扰产生了短暂的“心理不应期”,\",在此期间,并发任务被搁置。这里,我们表明,一个任务中的响应选择并不总是妨碍第二个任务的处理。响应目标可能矛盾地增强次要任务的处理,即使目标需要复杂的响应选择。在三个实验中,参与者将常见对象的图像编码到内存中,同时监视字符或颜色的快速串行视觉呈现(RSVP)。一些RSVP刺激是目标,要求参与者按下两个按钮之一来报告他们的身份;其他人则是参与者忽略的干扰因素。尽管对目标试验的反应选择要求增加,用RSVP目标编码的图片比用RSVP干扰物编码的图片记住得更好。与以前的报告和来自双重任务干扰的预测相反,目标检测的注意力增强克服了响应选择带来的干扰。
    Dual-task interference often arises when people respond to an incoming stimulus according to an arbitrary rule, such as choosing between the gas pedal and the brake when driving. Severe interference from response selection yields a brief \"Psychological Refractory Period,\" during which a concurrent task is put on hold. Here, we show that response selection in one task does not always hamper the processing of a secondary task. Responding to a target may paradoxically enhance the processing of secondary tasks, even when the target requires complex response selection. In three experiments, participants encoded pictures of common objects to memory while simultaneously monitoring a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) of characters or colours. Some of the RSVP stimuli were targets, requiring participants to press one of the two buttons to report their identity; others were distractors that participants ignored. Despite the increased response selection demands on target trials, pictures encoded with the RSVP targets were better remembered than those encoded with the RSVP distractors. Contrary to previous reports and predictions from dual-task interference, the attentional boost from target detection overcomes increased interference from response selection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    纤维增强编织复合材料的组成材料的力学性能在制造过程后不可避免地会发生变化。提出了一种编织复合材料组成参数识别的方法,以获得复合材料的基本信息,用于结构分析。组成参数的识别被转化为优化问题,采用敏感性分析方法解决了这一问题,迭代地最小化数值计算的位移场和测量的位移场之间的差异。首次基于本构材料模型直接推导了位移相对于组成参数的灵敏度矩阵。考虑到参数之间的大幅度差异将导致灵敏度矩阵的不适定问题,识别易受实验数据噪声的影响,采用了相对灵敏度,并应用基于条件数的响应点选择来提高参数识别的鲁棒性。通过与有限差分法的比较,采用2.5维编织复合材料来说明组成参数识别方法。此外,讨论了所选择的测点和测量误差对该方法的影响。结果表明,该方法能有效、准确地识别出各组成参数。当测量的位移被噪声污染时,灵敏度矩阵的条件数是前文信息的有效指标,以提高识别精度。
    Mechanical properties of the constituent material of fiber-reinforced braided composites will inevitably change after the manufacturing process. An approach to constituent parameters\' identification of braided composites was proposed to obtain the basic information of composites for structural analysis. Identification of the constituent parameters was transformed as an optimization problem, which was solved by adopting the sensitivity analysis method, iteratively minimizing the discrepancies between the numerically calculated displacement field and the measured displacement field. The sensitivity matrix of displacements with respect to the constituent parameters was directly derived based on the constitutive material model for the first time. Considering that the large magnitude differences between parameters will lead to an ill-posed problem of the sensitivity matrix, the identification was susceptible to noise from the experimental data, the relative sensitivity was adopted, and a condition number-based response point selection was applied to improve the robustness of the parameter identification. A 2.5-dimensional braided composite was employed to illustrate the constituent parameter identification method by comparing with the finite difference method. In addition, the influence of selected measuring points and measuring errors on the proposed method were discussed. The results showed that the proposed method can be used to identify the constituent parameters efficiently and accurately. When the measured displacements are polluted by noise, the condition number of the sensitivity matrix is an effective indicator of preceding information to enhance the identification accuracy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先前的研究表明,响应代码的空间数字关联(SNARC)效应的处理阶段是灵活的。最近的两项研究使用相同的实验范式来检查SNARC效应是否发生在语义表示阶段,但得出了矛盾的结论。表明SNARC效应在幅度比较任务中受幅度Stroop效应的影响,而在平价判断任务中不受平价Stroop效应的影响。这两个研究有两个不同的操作因素:任务类型(大小比较任务或平差判断任务,具有与任务相关或与任务无关的数值幅度信息)和与语义表示阶段相关的干扰信息(幅度或奇偶校验Stroop效应,与干扰信息大小相关或大小无关)。为了确定影响SNARC效应的因素,在本研究中,在先前研究的基础上,在两项任务中切换了Stroop效应。四个实验的结果一致表明,SNARC效应在量级比较任务中不受奇偶Stroop效应的影响,但在奇偶判断任务中受量级Stroop效应的影响。结合这两个相互矛盾的研究结果,研究结果表明,无论任务类型或数量信息的任务相关性如何,幅度相关干扰信息是影响SNARC效应的主要因素.此外,提出并讨论了一个两阶段处理模型,该模型解释了观察到的SNARC效应的灵活性。
    Previous studies have shown that the processing stage of the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect is flexible. Two recent studies used the same experimental paradigm to check whether the SNARC effect occurred in the semantic-representation stage but reached contradictory conclusions, showing that the SNARC effect was influenced by a magnitude Stroop effect in a magnitude comparison task but not by a parity Stroop effect in a parity judgment task. Those two studies had two distinct operational factors: the task type (magnitude comparison task or parity judgment task, with the numerical magnitude information task-relevant or task-irrelevant) and the semantic representation stage-related interference information (magnitude or parity Stroop effect, with the interference information magnitude-relevant or magnitude-irrelevant). To determine which factor influenced the SNARC effect, in the present study, the Stroop effect was switched in the two tasks based on the previous studies. The findings of four experiments consistently showed that the SNARC effect was not influenced by the parity Stroop effect in the magnitude comparison task but was influenced by the magnitude Stroop effect in the parity judgment task. Combined with the results of those two contradictory studies, the findings indicated that regardless of the task type or the task relevance of numerical magnitude information, magnitude-relevant interference information was the primary factor to affect the SNARC effect. Furthermore, a two-stage processing model that explained the observed flexibility of the SNARC effect was proposed and discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    行动可能会失败-即使这是众所周知的,关于错误和正确行为之前的神经生理过程的区别知之甚少。在这项研究中,依靠事件编码理论,我们测试了这样一个假设,即只有脑电图活动中编码的信息的特定方面与理解导致响应错误的过程相关。我们检查了N=69名健康参与者,他们执行了心理旋转任务,并将时间EEG信号分解与多变量模式分析(MVPA)和源定位分析相结合。我们证明了EEG信号的分数,主要表示刺激-反应转换(事件文件)过程和运动反应表示,是必不可少的。刺激表示不太重要。源定位结果揭示了包括额极在内的结构中广泛的活动调制,额叶中部和上部,前扣带皮质,阴户,下顶叶皮质,和腹侧溪流区域。这些与正确/错误响应之前的神经动力学的差异效应有关。时间泛化MVPA表明,事件文件表示和运动反应的表示在刺激出现后200毫秒已经不同,并且持续到700毫秒左右。这种代表性内容的稳定性可以预测后错误减缓的程度,当与正确或错误反应相关的事件文件表示的神经活动特征之间没有明确的区别时,这一点特别强。该研究提供了对动力学的详细分析,从而导致与动作控制总体框架相关的错误/正确响应。
    Actions can fail - even though this is well known, little is known about what distinguishes neurophysiological processes preceding errors and correct actions. In this study, relying on the Theory of Event Coding, we test the assumption that only specific aspects of information coded in EEG activity are relevant for understanding processes leading to response errors. We examined N = 69 healthy participants who performed a mental rotation task and combined temporal EEG signal decomposition with multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) and source localization analyses. We show that fractions of the EEG signal, primarily representing stimulus-response translation (event file) processes and motor response representations, are essential. Stimulus representations were less critical. The source localization results revealed widespread activity modulations in structures including the frontopolar, the middle and superior frontal, the anterior cingulate cortex, the cuneus, the inferior parietal cortex, and the ventral stream regions. These are associated with differential effects of the neural dynamics preceding correct/erroneous responses. The temporal-generalization MVPA showed that event file representations and representations of the motor response were already distinct 200 ms after stimulus presentation and this lasted till around 700 ms. The stability of this representational content was predictive for the magnitude of posterror slowing, which was particularly strong when there was no clear distinction between the neural activity profile of event file representations associated with a correct or an erroneous response. The study provides a detailed analysis of the dynamics leading to an error/correct response in connection to an overarching framework on action control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    成功的衰老取决于维持执行功能,实现灵活的响应协调。尽管手和脚都需要灵活的反应,就像开车一样,很少有研究检查老年人的执行功能和大脑活动,就脚的反应而言。在这项研究中,年龄较小(平均年龄=20.8)和年龄较大(平均年龄=68.7)的参与者执行了一项新开发的双足/双足反应-位置选择相容性任务,同时我们使用功能性近红外光谱法测量了他们的大脑活动.参与者必须使用左脚或右脚(或手)按左或右按钮,由二维线索信号指示。他们执行直线或对角的按压响应,模仿踩下汽车的加速器或制动踏板。脚的反应产生了更多的错误,反应时间较长,和比手部反应更大的大脑激活。在不一致的情况下观察到左背外侧前额叶皮层(BA46)的大脑激活更大(即,对角线)比在足反应的一致(直线)试验中,但不是为了回应,表明参与者很难执行对角脚反应(如在汽车中制动),但不是对角的手反应。年龄较大的参与者在整个PFC中表现出比年轻参与者更大的大脑激活,表明老年人激活额外的大脑回路来补偿执行功能的下降。我们讨论了老年人执行功能下降与频繁发生车祸之间的潜在关系(即,失误)。
    Successful aging depends upon maintaining executive functions, which enable flexible response coordination. Although flexible responses are required for both hands and feet, as in driving, few studies have examined executive functions and brain activity in older adults, in terms of foot responses. In this study, younger (mean age = 20.8) and older participants (mean age = 68.7) performed a newly developed bimanual/bipedal response-position selection compatibility task while we measured their brain activity using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Participants had to press either a left or right button using either their left or right foot (or hand), as directed by a two-dimensional cue signal. They executed either a straight or diagonal press response that mimicked stepping on the accelerator or brake pedal in a car. Foot responses produced more errors, longer reaction times, and greater brain activation than hand responses. Greater brain activation in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (BA 46) was observed in incongruent (i.e., diagonal) than in congruent (straight) trials for foot responses, but not for hand responses, suggesting that participants had difficulty executing a diagonal foot response (as braking in a car), but not a diagonal hand response. Older participants exhibited greater brain activation across the PFC than younger participants, indicating that older adults activate additional brain circuits to compensate for declining executive functions. We discuss potential relationships between declining executive functions of older adults and the frequent automobile accidents (i.e., missteps) in which they are involved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然过去关于人们如何优化双任务的工作侧重于战略时机(即,何时选择响应),关于人们可以通过照顾他们选择的响应来优化双任务的程度知之甚少。在这里,我们测试空间(in)一致性是否会影响自由选择试验中的反应选择。在两个实验中,我们结合了两个具有空间刺激和反应特征的视觉手动任务:参与者在强制选择任务中对刺激词“左”和“右”做出反应,并回答“向上”,\"down\",\"left\"或\"right\"用箭头键指向自由选择提示或位于相应位置的X。在实验1中,参与者减少了不一致的反应对的比例(即,在一个任务中左,在另一个任务中右)。在实验2中,我们发现响应选择的这种灵活性也适用于更受限制的环境:在四次试验中,根据已经给出的响应,自由选择选项不断减少。实验1和2的组合结果表明,自由选择试验中的反应选择是由超越反应冲突的性能优化驱动的。
    While past work on how people can optimize dual-tasking has focused on strategic timing (i.e., when to select responses), little is known about the extent to which people can optimize dual-tasking by taking care of which responses they select. Here we test whether spatial (in)congruency influences response selection in free-choice trials. In two experiments, we combined two visual-manual tasks with spatial stimulus- and response characteristics: Participants responded to the stimulus words \"left\" and \"right\" in a forced choice task and responded \"up\", \"down\", \"left\" or \"right\" with an arrow-key to either a free choice prompt or an X located at the respective position. In Experiment 1, participants reduced the proportion of incongruent pairs of responses (i.e., left in one and right in the other task). In Experiment 2, we found that such flexibility in response selection also holds in more constrained environments: Within runs of four trials the free-choice options were continuously reduced based on the responses already given. The combined results of Experiments 1 and 2 suggest that response selection in free choice trials is driven by performance optimization beyond response conflict.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号