Residual excessive daytime sleepiness

剩余的白天过度嗜睡
  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    未经证实:尽管有足够的夜间气道正压治疗或有效的替代治疗,6-10%的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者仍有残留的白天过度嗜睡(rEDS)。rEDS的鉴别诊断是临床实践中的跨学科挑战。
    UNASSIGNED:制定明确的检测指南,鉴别诊断注意事项,以及在临床实践中继续治疗rEDS的选择。
    UNASSIGNED:基于MeSH分析的研究和内科和肺炎专家的跨学科共识,神经学,以及精神病学和心理治疗。
    UNASSIGNED:用于对rEDS进行系统鉴别诊断探索的SPAIN清单,其参数为:Sleep行为,P心理原因,药物的命名,I内部原因和N欧洲逻辑原因。
    未经证实:rEDS应被认为是值得治疗的症状。这需要进行跨学科评估,并根据受影响者的需求对治疗进行个人调整。
    UNASSIGNED: Six to ten percent of patients with obstructive sleep apnea suffer from residual excessive daytime sleepiness (rEDS) despite adequate nocturnal positive airway pressure therapy or effective alternative treatment. The differential diagnosis of rEDS is an interdisciplinary challenge in clinical practice.
    UNASSIGNED: Development of a clear guideline for the detection, differential diagnostic considerations, and options for the continuing treatment of rEDS in clinical practice.
    UNASSIGNED: MeSH analysis-based research and interdisciplinary consensus among specialists in internal medicine and pneumology, neurology, as well as psychiatry and psychotherapy.
    UNASSIGNED: The SPAIN checklist for systematic differential diagnostic exploration of rEDS with the parameters: S leep behavior, P sychological causes, A namesis of medication, I nternal causes and N eurological causes.
    UNASSIGNED: rEDS should be recognized as a symptom worthy of treatment. It requires an interdisciplinary assessment and the individual adaptation of the treatment to the needs of the affected person.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Although excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) attributable to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) can be resolved by consistent usage of and effective treatment (often with the use of continuous positive airway pressure therapy), 12-58% of patients report residual EDS (REDS). While REDS is difficult to treat, a proportion of cases are possibly due to reversible issues, and wake-promoting medications can prove useful for the remaining cases. Given the challenges associated with effective management of REDS and its relationship to multiple comorbidities, multidisciplinary management of patients with REDS is often recommended. Here we aim to bridge the knowledge gap on the burden, risk factors, prevalence, and potential pathophysiologic mechanisms of REDS in patients with OSA after first-line treatment. The roles of primary care physicians and sleep specialists, as well as the importance of the use of objective assessment tools for the evaluation of REDS and the effective management of comorbidities, are discussed. An update of approved treatments and emerging candidate treatments is also presented.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in individuals with OSA syndrome persisting despite good adherence to CPAP is a disabling condition. Pitolisant is a selective histamine H3-receptor antagonist with wake-promoting effects.
    Is pitolisant effective and safe for reducing daytime sleepiness in individuals with moderate to severe OSA adhering to CPAP treatment but experiencing residual EDS?
    In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized (3:1), placebo-controlled, parallel-design trial, pitolisant was titrated individually at up to 20 mg/day and taken over 12 weeks. The primary end point was change in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score in the intention-to-treat population. Key secondary end points were maintenance of wakefulness assessed by the Oxford Sleep Resistance Test, Clinical Global Impressions scale of severity, the patient\'s global opinion, EuroQoL quality-of-life questionnaire score, Pichot fatigue questionnaire score, and safety.
    Two hundred forty-four OSA participants (82.8% men; mean age, 53.1 years; mean Apnea Hypopnea Index with CPAP, 4.2/h; baseline ESS score, 14.7) were randomized to pitolisant (n = 183) or placebo (n = 61). ESS significantly decreased with pitolisant compared with placebo (-2.6; 95% CI, -3.9 to -1.4; P < .001), and the rate of responders to therapy (ESS ≤ 10 or change in ESS ≥ 3) was significantly higher with pitolisant (71.0% vs 54.1%; P = .013). Adverse event occurrence (mainly headache and insomnia) was higher in the pitolisant group compared with the placebo group (47.0% and 32.8%, respectively; P = .03). No cardiovascular or other significant safety concerns were reported.
    Pitolisant used as adjunct to CPAP therapy for OSA with residual sleepiness despite good CPAP adherence significantly reduced subjective and objective sleepiness and improved participant-reported outcomes and physician-reported disease severity.
    ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01071876; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov; EudraCT N°: 2009-017248-14; URL: eudract.ema.europa.eu.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Sleep-related painful erection (SRPE) is a rare sleep disorder characterized by recurrent, painful penile erections occurring when awakening from rapid eye movement sleep, while erections are painless during wakefulness. Almost 35 cases have been reported worldwide, and only two of them had an associated obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). We report a new case of a 61-year-old man suffering from SRPE associated with OSAS. The adequate treatment of respiratory events with continuous positive airway pressure did not alleviate the SRPE symptoms and excessive daytime sleepiness. The SRPE diagnosis was made by polysomnography coupled with video surveillance when the patient was referred to the sleep laboratory for residual excessive daytime sleepiness. The patient had 2-4 episodes of SRPE/night. Beta-blocker did not alleviate the SRPE, but a transient improvement was noted when the patient was treated with paroxetine. In contrast with the two previously published cases of SRPE plus OSAS, continuous positive airway treatment did not improve SRPE symptoms in our patient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号