Residual Risk

剩余风险
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性冠脉综合征(CCS)患者持续性低度炎症对预后的影响研究不足。REAL-CAD(冠状动脉疾病中使用匹伐他汀的积极或适度降脂治疗的随机评估)研究证明了更高强度匹伐他汀对日本CCS患者的益处。
    这项对REAL-CAD研究的预设亚分析旨在评估CCS患者高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)所代表的持续性低度炎症的预后效果。
    本分析涉及随机分组后6个月无事件发生的患者,其hs-CRP水平在基线和6个月时可获得(n=10,460)。主要终点是心血管死亡率的复合,心肌梗塞,中风,不稳定型心绞痛住院。Landmark分析根据基线和6个月时hs-CRP的中位数水平(均为0.5mg/L)评估了4组持续炎症对预后的影响。这4组包括持续低的患者,升高(增加),减少,和持续高的hs-CRP。
    调整后的Cox比例风险分析表明,与以hs-CRP持续低作为参考的组相比,hs-CRP持续高的组的主要终点风险增加(调整后的HR:1.48,95%CI:1.18-1.89;P=0.001),但在升高(HR:1.07,95%CI:0.77-1.49,P=0.68)和降低(HR:0.92;95%CI:0.66-1.27;P=0.60)hs-CRP组中的风险相似。
    该研究表明,持续的低度炎症与不良预后相关,并强调需要解决CCS患者的残余炎症风险。(在冠状动脉疾病中使用匹伐他汀的积极或适度降脂治疗的随机评价[REAL-CAD];NCT01042730)。
    UNASSIGNED: The prognostic implications of persistent low-grade inflammation in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) are underexplored. The REAL-CAD (Randomized Evaluation of Aggressive or Moderate Lipid Lowering Therapy with Pitavastatin in Coronary Artery Disease) study demonstrated the benefit of higher intensity pitavastatin in Japanese patients with CCS.
    UNASSIGNED: This prespecified subanalysis of the REAL-CAD study aimed to assess the prognostic effect of the persistent low-grade inflammation represented by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in CCS patients.
    UNASSIGNED: The present analysis involved patients without events until 6 months after randomization and whose hs-CRP levels were available at baseline and 6 months (n = 10,460). The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and unstable angina hospitalization. Landmark analyses evaluated the prognostic impact of continuous inflammation in 4 groups based on the median levels of hs-CRP (0.5 mg/L for both) at baseline and 6 months. The 4 groups included patient with persistently low, elevated (increased), reduced, and persistently high hs-CRP.
    UNASSIGNED: Adjusted Cox proportional hazard analyses demonstrated an increased risk of the primary endpoint in the group with persistently high hs-CRP when compared to the group with persistently low hs-CRP as a reference (adjusted HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.18-1.89; P = 0.001), but with a similar risk in the group with elevated (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.77-1.49, P = 0.68) and reduced (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.66-1.27; P = 0.60) hs-CRP.
    UNASSIGNED: The study shows that persistent low-grade inflammation is associated with poor outcomes and underscores the need to address residual inflammatory risk in CCS patients. (Randomized Evaluation of Aggressive or Moderate Lipid Lowering Therapy With Pitavastatin in Coronary Artery Disease [REAL-CAD]; NCT01042730).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2型糖尿病(T2D)和动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)患者的脂质相关风险和残余心血管风险仍然很高。在实施降低这些风险的多能有效疗法方面存在显著的治疗差距。
    这项研究评估了专门的,旨在通过简化管理和优化治疗策略解决治疗差距的独立心脏代谢诊所.
    我们回顾性地收集了前400例T2D和ASCVD患者的数据,这些患者在诊所接受了治疗,并进行了至少一次随访。这些患者主要针对其心脏代谢风险进行管理,并接受强化降脂治疗。包括非他汀类药物的辅助治疗。
    显著发现包括增加胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP1RA)和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)的使用至84%和65%,分别,94%的患者最终接受一种治疗,55%的患者接受双重治疗。降脂治疗的增加导致89%的患者达到低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平低于患者特定的强化阈值。
    这种护理模式有效地管理高风险患者的需求,实现显著强化降脂治疗和广泛使用心脏代谢药物,并强调了该诊所作为类似高危人群模型的潜力。
    UNASSIGNED: Lipid-related risk and residual cardiovascular risk remain high in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Significant treatment gaps exist in implementation of pluripotent and effective therapies that reduce these risks.
    UNASSIGNED: This study evaluates the efficacy and impact of a dedicated, standalone cardiometabolic clinic designed to address treatment gaps through streamlined management and optimization of treatment strategies.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively collected data from the first 400 patients with T2D and ASCVD who underwent treatment at the clinic and presented for at least one follow-up visit. These patients were primarily managed for their cardiometabolic risks and received intensified lipid-lowering therapies, including adjunct non-statin therapies.
    UNASSIGNED: Significant findings included increased use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) to 84 % and 65 %, respectively, with 94 % of patients eventually on one therapy and 55 % on dual therapy. Increases in lipid-lowering therapies led to 89 % of patients achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels below patient-specific thresholds for intensification.
    UNASSIGNED: This care model effectively manages high-risk patient needs, achieving significant intensification of lipid-lowering therapies and broad use of cardiometabolic drugs, and highlights the clinic\'s potential to serve as a model for similar high-risk populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    分析了9个月以上主要来源地区的生可可豆(n=870)中的沙门氏菌。在71中检测到(约8.2%)样品,除一个样品(4.1×104CFU/g)外,污染水平为0.3-46MPN/g。使用患病率和浓度数据作为输入,通过定量微生物风险评估(QMRA)方法计算了可可加工中的热处理对比利时随机巧克力消费者感染沙门氏菌病风险评估的影响.从生可可豆到可可液到假设的最终产品(70-90%黑巧克力片)的模块化过程风险模型,是为了了解生产过程中沙门氏菌浓度的变化。在豆子或笔尖蒸汽过程中进行不同的热处理,模拟了笔尖烘烤或液体灭菌(沙门氏菌减少0-6对数)。根据FAO/WHO沙门氏菌剂量反应模型和比利时的巧克力消费数据,估计了每次服务的沙门氏菌病风险和人口水平的每年病例。当沙门氏菌减少5对数时,估计每份平均风险为3.35×10-8(95%CI:3.27×10-10-1.59×10-7),估计每年的沙门氏菌病病例(1170万人口)为88例(95%CI:<1-418)。估计每份平均风险为3.35×10-9(95%CI:3.27×10-11-1.59×10-8),估计每年的沙门氏菌病病例为9例(95%CI:<1-42),减少6个对数。当前的QMRA模型仅考虑了可可工艺中单步热处理中沙门氏菌的减少。在其他工艺步骤(例如研磨)期间获得的失活可能发生,但未被考虑。由于目的是使用QMRA作为评估可可加工中对数减少的工具,不包括来自加工环境和成分的后污染.在可可工艺的单步热处理中,沙门氏菌最少减少5log,被认为是足够的。
    Salmonella in raw cocoa beans (n = 870) from main sourcing areas over nine months was analyzed. It was detected in 71 (ca. 8.2%) samples, with a contamination level of 0.3-46 MPN/g except for one sample (4.1 × 104 CFU/g). Using prevalence and concentration data as input, the impact of thermal treatment in cocoa processing on the risk estimate of acquiring salmonellosis by a random Belgian chocolate consumer was calculated by a quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) approach. A modular process risk model from raw cocoa beans to cocoa liquor up to a hypothetical final product (70-90% dark chocolate tablet) was set up to understand changes in Salmonella concentrations following the production process. Different thermal treatments during bean or nib steam, nib roasting, or liquor sterilization (achieving a 0-6 log reduction of Salmonella) were simulated. Based on the generic FAO/WHO Salmonella dose-response model and the chocolate consumption data in Belgium, salmonellosis risk per serving and cases per year at population level were estimated. When a 5 log reduction of Salmonella was achieved, the estimated mean risk per serving was 3.35 × 10-8 (95% CI: 3.27 × 10-10-1.59 × 10-7), and estimated salmonellosis cases per year (11.7 million population) was 88 (95% CI: <1-418). The estimated mean risk per serving was 3.35 × 10-9 (95% CI: 3.27 × 10-11-1.59 × 10-8), and the estimated salmonellosis cases per year was 9 (95% CI: <1-42), for a 6 log reduction. The current QMRA model solely considered Salmonella reduction in a single-step thermal treatment in the cocoa process. Inactivation obtained during other process steps (e.g. grinding) might occur but was not considered. As the purpose was to use QMRA as a tool to evaluate the log reduction in the cocoa processing, no postcontamination from the processing environment and ingredients was included. A minimum of 5 log reduction of Salmonella in the single-step thermal treatment of cocoa process was considered to be adequate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:目前对脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]和脂蛋白相关磷脂酶A2(Lp-PLA2)与卒中复发的联合相关性知之甚少。
    方法:在这项前瞻性多中心队列研究中,纳入了10,675例Lp(a)和Lp-PLA2的连续急性缺血性卒中(IS)和短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者。使用Cox比例风险模型和Kaplan-Meier曲线评估1年内卒中复发与Lp(a)和Lp-PLA2的相关性。通过乘法和加法量表评估Lp(a)和Lp-PLA2与中风复发之间的相互作用。
    结果:观察到Lp(a)和Lp-PLA2与卒中复发风险的显著联合关联。多变量cox回归分析显示Lp(a)升高(≥50mg/dL)和Lp-PLA2(≥175.1ng/ml)与卒中复发风险独立相关(调整后风险比:1.42;95%CI:1.15-1.76)。在Lp(a)和Lp-PLA2之间观察到显著的乘法[(exp(β3):1.63,95%CI:1.17-2.29,P=0.004]和加性相互作用(RERI:0.55,95%CI:0.20-0.90,P=0.002;AP:0.39,95CI,0.24-0.53)。
    结论:我们的结果表明Lp(a)和Lp-PLA2与IS/TIA患者卒中复发的风险有共同的关联。同时存在Lp(a)和Lp-PLA2升高的患者中风复发的风险更大。
    OBJECTIVE: Currently little is known about the joint association of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] and Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) with stroke recurrence.
    METHODS: In this prospective multicenter cohort study, 10,675 consecutive acute ischemic stroke (IS) and transient ischemic attack patients (TIA) with Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2 were enrolled. The association of stroke recurrence within 1 year with Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2 was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier curves. The interaction between Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2 with stroke recurrence was evaluated by multiplicative and additive scales.
    RESULTS: A significant joint association of Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2 with the risk of stroke recurrence was observed. Multivariate cox regression analysis demonstrated that the combination of elevated Lp(a) (≥ 50 mg/dL) and Lp-PLA2 (≥175.1 ng/ml) was independently associated with the risk of stroke recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.42; 95 % CI: 1.15-1.76). Both significant multiplicative [(exp(β3):1.63, 95 % CI: 1.17-2.29, P = 0.004] and additive interaction (RERI:0.55, 95 % CI: 0.20-0.90, P = 0.002; AP: 0.39, 95 %CI, 0.24-0.53) were observed between Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2 have a joint association with the risk of stroke recurrence in IS/TIA patients. Patients with concomitant presence of elevated Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2 have greater risk of stroke recurrence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    四联疗法对射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者有效,提供显著的临床益处,包括降低死亡率。临床医生现在正处于一个专注于如何在疾病轨迹的早期阶段启动和滴定象限治疗的时代,包括心力衰竭住院期间。然而,射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者仍面临死亡和心力衰竭住院的显著"残余风险".尽管四联疗法得到了有效的实施,高死亡率和再住院率在射血分数降低的心力衰竭中持续存在,许多患者由于低血压和肾功能不全等副作用而无法最大限度地治疗。在这种情况下,伊伐布雷定,Vericiguat,和omecamtivmecarbil除了四联疗法外,还可能具有辅助作用(请注意,omecamtivmecarbil目前尚未批准用于临床)。然而,伊伐布雷定和维利吉瓜的当代使用量在全球范围内相对较低,可能部分原因是对这些疗法的作用和成本的认识不足。这篇综述为临床医生提供了直接的指导,用于床边评估这些药物的潜在候选药物。四重疗法,有强有力的证据可以降低死亡率,应始终优先执行。作为二线疗法,对于尽管β受体阻滞剂的最大耐受剂量仍无法达到最佳心率控制(静息时≥70bpm)的患者,可以考虑伊伐布雷定。Vericiguat可以考虑用于高风险患者,尽管正在接受正交治疗,但最近经历了恶化的心力衰竭事件,但其N末端B型利钠肽前体水平不应超过8000pg/mL.在未来,omecamtivmecarbil可考虑用于严重心力衰竭(纽约心脏协会III至IV级,射血分数≤30%,和心力衰竭住院在6个月内),当目前的象限治疗是有限的,尽管这仍然是假设产生的,在批准之前需要进一步调查。
    Quadruple therapy is effective for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, providing significant clinical benefits, including reduced mortality. Clinicians are now in an era focused on how to initiate and titrate quadrable therapy in the early phase of the disease trajectory, including during heart failure hospitalization. However, patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction still face a significant \"residual risk\" of mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Despite the effective implementation of quadruple therapy, high mortality and rehospitalization rates persist in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and many patients cannot maximize therapy due to side effects such as hypotension and renal dysfunction. In this context, ivabradine, vericiguat, and omecamtiv mecarbil may have adjunct roles in addition to quadruple therapy (note that omecamtiv mecarbil is not currently approved for clinical use). However, the contemporary use of ivabradine and vericiguat is relatively low globally, likely due in part to the under-recognition of the role of these therapies as well as costs. This review offers clinicians a straightforward guide for bedside evaluation of potential candidates for these medications. Quadruple therapy, with strong evidence to reduce mortality, should always be prioritized for implementation. As second-line therapies, ivabradine could be considered for patients who cannot achieve optimal heart rate control (≥ 70 bpm at rest) despite maximally tolerated beta-blocker dosing. Vericiguat could be considered for high-risk patients who have recently experienced worsening heart failure events despite being on quadrable therapy, but they should not have N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels exceeding 8000 pg/mL. In the future, omecamtiv mecarbil may be considered for severe heart failure (New York Heart Association class III to IV, ejection fraction ≤ 30%, and heart failure hospitalization within 6 months) when current quadrable therapy is limited, although this is still hypothesis-generating and requires further investigation before its approval.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在SPARCL(通过积极降低胆固醇水平预防中风)试验中,在近期卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)且无已知冠状动脉疾病的患者中,将阿托伐他汀(80mg/d)与安慰剂进行比较.
    本研究旨在评估脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]对卒中/TIA幸存者随后的脑血管和心血管事件的影响。
    Lp(a)水平和载脂蛋白(a)[apo(a)]同工型大小通过液相色谱质谱法在基线时从2,814名SPARCL参与者(1,418名随机接受阿托伐他汀和1,396名安慰剂)收集的样本中进行测定。在每个治疗臂中,将最高四分位数(≥84.0nmol/L)的患者与Lp(a)浓度最低四分位数的患者进行比较.将apo(a)同工型大小最低四分位数(≤25.9KringleIV域)的患者与最高四分位数的患者进行比较。使用Cox比例回归模型计算多变量调整后的HR。
    Lp(a)浓度或apo(a)亚型大小与卒中复发风险之间没有显着关联,SPARCL的主要结果,随机分配给阿托伐他汀或安慰剂的患者的脑血管事件。相比之下,在随机接受阿托伐他汀治疗的患者中,Lp(a)浓度升高和apo(a)亚型短与冠状动脉事件风险增加呈正相关且独立相关(HR:1.607[95%CI:1.007-2.563]和HR:2.052[95%CI:1.303-3.232]).在随机接受安慰剂治疗的患者中没有发现这种关联(HR:1.025[95%CI:0.675-1.555]和HR:1.097[95%CI:0.735-1.637])。
    Lp(a)有助于他汀类药物治疗的卒中/TIA幸存者的残余冠状动脉疾病风险,为在该卒中人群中使用针对Lp(a)的疗法铺平了道路。(立普妥在预防中风中,对于以前有过中风的患者[SPARCL];NCT00147602)。
    UNASSIGNED: In the SPARCL (Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol levels) trial, atorvastatin (80 mg/d) was compared to placebo in patients with recent stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and no known coronary artery disease.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to assess the contribution of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] to subsequent cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events in stroke/TIA survivors.
    UNASSIGNED: Lp(a) levels and apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoform size were determined by liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry in samples collected at baseline from 2,814 SPARCL participants (1,418 randomized to atorvastatin and 1,396 to placebo). Within each treatment arm, patients in the highest quartile (≥84.0 nmol/L) were compared with those in the lowest quartiles of Lp(a) concentrations. Patients in the lowest quartile (≤25.9 Kringle IV domains) of apo(a) isoform sizes were compared with those in the highest quartiles. Multivariable-adjusted HRs were calculated using Cox proportional regression models.
    UNASSIGNED: There was no significant association between Lp(a) concentrations or apo(a) isoform sizes and the risk of recurrent stroke, the primary outcome of SPARCL, or cerebrovascular events in patients randomized to atorvastatin or placebo. In contrast, in patients randomized to atorvastatin, elevated Lp(a) concentrations and short apo(a) isoforms were positively and independently associated with an increased risk of coronary events (HR: 1.607 [95% CI: 1.007-2.563] and HR: 2.052 [95% CI: 1.303-3.232]). No such association was found in patients randomized to placebo (HR: 1.025 [95% CI: 0.675-1.555] and HR: 1.097 [95% CI: 0.735-1.637]).
    UNASSIGNED: Lp(a) contributes to the residual coronary artery disease risk of statin-treated stroke/TIA survivors, paving the way for use of therapies targeting Lp(a) in this population with stroke. (Lipitor In The Prevention Of Stroke, For Patients Who Have Had A Previous Stroke [SPARCL]; NCT00147602).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:纹身是澳大利亚主要的捐献者推迟的原因之一。直到2020年9月,所有捐赠类型的捐赠者在纹身后都被推迟了4个月。此时,我们的指导方针改变了,立即接受了用于进一步制造的血浆捐赠,只要纹身是在有执照或受监管的澳大利亚机构中管理的。我们研究了这种变化的影响。
    方法:确定在指南变更之前或之后2年内有纹身延期的捐赠者,并随访至2022年11月3日。在这两个时期之间,我们比较了血液传播病毒(BBV)的发病率,捐助者返回,以及推迟后重新获得的捐助者和捐款的数量。
    结果:在两个时期,纹身推迟后供体BBV感染的发生率均为零。超过丙肝病毒100万分之一的剩余风险,每年需要从纹身中感染190个捐赠者。变化后,捐赠者返回捐赠的速度明显更快(中位数为85天,而中位数为278天)。每10,000人年观察额外获得187次捐款,在纹身后0-4个月,全国总共增加了44,674次血浆捐赠。
    结论:允许在纹身后立即进行血浆捐赠可导致大量捐赠,而没有不良安全影响。Lifeblood随后将在澳大利亚许可/受监管的机构中的可输血成分捐赠的延期减少到7天。
    OBJECTIVE: Tattooing is one of the leading donor deferral reasons in Australia. Until September 2020, donors were deferred from all donation types for 4 months after a tattoo. At this time, our guideline changed such that donations of plasma for further manufacture were accepted immediately, provided the tattoo was administered in a licensed or regulated Australian establishment. We examined the effects of this change.
    METHODS: Donors with a tattoo deferral in the 2 years before or after the guideline change were identified and followed up until 3 November 2022. Between the two periods, we compared blood-borne virus (BBV) incidence, donor return, and the number of donors and donations regained after deferral.
    RESULTS: The incidence of BBV infection in donors after a tattoo deferral was zero in both periods. To exceed a residual risk of 1 in 1 million for hepatitis C virus, 190 donors would need to be infected yearly from a tattoo. Donors returned to donate significantly faster after the change (median return 85 days compared with 278 days). An extra 187 donations per 10,000 person-years of observation were gained, yielding a total of 44,674 additional plasma donations nationally 0-4 months after getting a tattoo.
    CONCLUSIONS: Allowing plasma donations immediately post-tattoo resulted in a substantial donation gain with no adverse safety effect. Lifeblood subsequently reduced the deferral for transfusible component donations to 7 days for tattoos in Australian licensed/regulated establishments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:早期强化低密度脂蛋白(LDL-C)治疗对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的二级预防具有重要意义。但进一步临床获益的治疗期仍未确定.这个单一中心,回顾性研究探讨了ACS后LDL-C轨迹及其与随后心血管事件(CVE)的关系.
    方法:在831例ACS患者中,我们评估了ACS后前2个月的LDL-C降低作为早期干预指标,并以70mg/dl作为未来6个月的阈值(AOC-70)作为持续强度指数,评估了LDL-C曲线上的面积.对患者进行CVE随访的中位数为3.0(1.1-5.2)年,定义为心血管死亡的复合物,非致死性心肌梗死,需要血运重建的心绞痛,脑梗塞,和冠状动脉搭桥术.
    结果:LDL-C从基线下降到ACS后2个月(107±38mg/dl至78±25mg/dl,p<0.001)通过高强度他汀类药物处方(91.8%),而在2个月时LDL-C<70mg/dl的发生率仅保持40.2%,此后无明显变化。在后续期间,200例患者发生CVE。前2个月的LDL-C降低和后6个月的AOC-70均与随后的CVE风险相关(HR[风险比][95%置信区间]:1.48[1.16-1.89]和1.22[1.05-1.44])。此外,早期干预后持续强化LDL-C降低治疗可进一步降低CVE风险.
    结论:本研究观察到,在ACS后的前两个月内实现早期和密集的LDL-C降低并在接下来的六个月内保持其抑制了随后的CVE风险,表明早期的重要性,密集,和持续的LDL-C降低治疗在ACS二级预防中的应用。
    OBJECTIVE: Early and intensive low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C)-lowering therapy plays important roles in secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but the treatment period for further clinical benefit remains undefined. This single-center, retrospective study explored LDL-C trajectory after ACS and its associations with subsequent cardiovascular events (CVE).
    METHODS: In 831 patients with ACS, we evaluated LDL-C reduction during the first 2 months post-ACS as an index of early intervention and the area over the curve for LDL-C using 70 mg/dl as the threshold in the next 6 months (AOC-70) as a persistent intensity index. Patients were followed for a median of 3.0 (1.1-5.2) years for CVE, defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, angina pectoris requiring revascularization, cerebral infarction, and coronary bypass grafting.
    RESULTS: LDL-C decreased from baseline to 2 months post-ACS (107±38 mg/dl to 78±25 mg/dl, p<0.001) through high-intensity statin prescription (91.8%), while achieving rates of LDL-C <70 mg/dl at 2 months remained only 40.2% with no significant changes thereafter. During the follow-up period, CVE occurred in 200 patients. LDL-C reduction during the first 2 months and AOC-70 in the next 6 months were both associated with subsequent CVE risk (sub-HR [hazard ratio] [95% confidence interval]: 1.48 [1.16-1.89] and 1.22 [1.05-1.44]). Furthermore, early intervention followed by persistently intensive LDL-C-lowering therapy resulted in further CVE risk reduction.
    CONCLUSIONS: The present study observed that achieving early and intensive LDL-C reduction within the first two months after ACS and maintaining it for the next six months suppressed subsequent CVE risk, suggesting the importance of early, intensive, and persistent LDL-C-lowering therapy in the secondary prevention of ACS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者进行充分医疗管理后的剩余风险评估仍然具有挑战性。需要评估高敏C反应蛋白(hsCRP)和残余胆固醇(RC)在评估这些患者的残余炎症风险(RIR)和残余胆固醇风险(RCR)水平以进行风险分层中的有用性。
    方法:在2016年3月至2019年3月期间接受他汀类药物治疗的ACS患者接受了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。根据住院期间的hsCRP和RC水平对纳入的患者进行分层。主要结果是12个月时的缺血事件,定义为心脏死亡的复合物,心肌梗塞,或中风。次要结局包括12个月的全因死亡和心脏死亡。
    结果:在5778名患者中,hsCRP浓度中位数为2.60mg/L,RC浓度中位数为24.98mg/dL.RIR与缺血事件显着相关(最高hsCRP与最低hsCRP三元,调整后的风险比[AHR]:1.52,95%置信区间[CI]:1.01-2.30,P=0.046),心源性死亡(aHR:1.77,95%CI:1.02-3.07,P=0.0418)和全因死亡(aHR:2.00,95%CI:1.24-3.24,P=0.0048)。RCR也与这些结果显着相关,RC最高三分位数的相应值为1.81(1.21-2.73,P=0.0043),2.76(1.57-4.86,P=0.0004),和1.72(1.09-2.73,P=0.0208),分别。缺血性事件的风险(aHR:2.80,95%CI:1.75-4.49,P<0.0001),心源性死亡(AHR:4.10,95%CI:2.18-7.70,P<0.0001),RIR和RCR患者(hsCRP和RC最高)的全因死亡(aHR:3.00,95%CI,1.73-5.19,P<0.0001)明显高于RIR和RCR患者(hsCRP和RC最低)。值得注意的是,RIR和RCR与缺血事件风险增加相关,尤其是在低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)得到充分控制(LDL-C<70mg/dl)的患者中(P-interaction=0.04).此外,除了这些患者的GRACE评分外,RIR和RCR还提供了更准确的风险评估[缺血事件的曲线下面积(AUC):0.64vs.0.66,P=0.003]。
    结论:在接受现代他汀类药物治疗并接受PCI的ACS患者中,残余炎症和胆固醇的风险很高,由hsCRP和RC评估,与缺血事件风险增加密切相关,心脏死亡,和全因死亡。
    BACKGROUND: Residual risk assessment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients after sufficient medical management remains challenging. The usefulness of measuring high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and remnant cholesterol (RC) in assessing the level of residual inflammation risk (RIR) and residual cholesterol risk (RCR) for risk stratification in these patients needs to be evaluated.
    METHODS: Patients admitted for ACS on statin treatment who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between March 2016 and March 2019 were enrolled in the analysis. The included patients were stratified based on the levels of hsCRP and RC during hospitalization. The primary outcome was ischemic events at 12 months, defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The secondary outcomes included 12-month all-cause death and cardiac death.
    RESULTS: Among the 5778 patients, the median hsCRP concentration was 2.60 mg/L and the median RC concentration was 24.98 mg/dL. The RIR was significantly associated with ischemic events (highest hsCRP tertile vs. lowest hsCRP tertile, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-2.30, P = 0.046), cardiac death (aHR: 1.77, 95% CI:1.02-3.07, P = 0.0418) and all-cause death (aHR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.24-3.24, P = 0.0048). The RCR was also significantly associated with these outcomes, with corresponding values for the highest tertile of RC were 1.81 (1.21-2.73, P = 0.0043), 2.76 (1.57-4.86, P = 0.0004), and 1.72 (1.09-2.73, P = 0.0208), respectively. The risks of ischemic events (aHR: 2.80, 95% CI: 1.75-4.49, P < 0.0001), cardiac death (aHR: 4.10, 95% CI: 2.18-7.70, P < 0.0001), and all-cause death (aHR: 3.00, 95% CI, 1.73-5.19, P < 0.0001) were significantly greater in patients with both RIR and RCR (highest hsCRP and RC tertile) than in patients with neither RIR nor RCR (lowest hsCRP and RC tertile). Notably, the RIR and RCR was associated with an increased risk of ischemic events especially in patients with adequate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control (LDL-C < 70 mg/dl) (Pinteraction=0.04). Furthermore, the RIR and RCR provide more accurate evaluations of risk in addition to the GRACE score in these patients [areas under the curve (AUC) for ischemic events: 0.64 vs. 0.66, P = 0.003].
    CONCLUSIONS: Among ACS patients receiving contemporary statin treatment who underwent PCI, high risks of both residual inflammation and cholesterol, as assessed by hsCRP and RC, were strongly associated with increased risks of ischemic events, cardiac death, and all-cause death.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号