Repeat FNA

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    FNA is a well-established method for the preoperative diagnosis of thyroid nodules, but limitations still reside among non-diagnostic and indeterminate samples. The objective of the present study was to assess the impact of repeat FNA in thyroid nodules primarily classified as non-diagnostic and indeterminate, with the evaluation of the diagnostic resolution rate after the reassessment of the nodule.
    We retrospectively collected all cases of thyroid FNA at our institution in the last 5 years that had one or more repeat aspirations of the same nodule, calculating the percentage of samples with change in the diagnostic category. Additional collected data included sex, age and interval between the repeat aspirations.
    One hundred and seventy-eight specimens from 167 patients (140 female, 27 male) with a median age of 56 years (range 11-90) were included in the study. Among the 86 cases primarily classified as non-diagnostic, 25 (29.1%) remained in the same category after the first reassessment and only 18 (20.9%) after the second repeat aspiration. Among the 40 indeterminate cases, only 10 (25%) retained their status after the second aspiration, with no change after the third assessment.
    Repeat aspiration of non-diagnostic and indeterminate thyroid nodules had a positive impact in both groups, with diagnostic resolution rates of 80% and 75%, respectively. The present study therefore endorses the use of such strategy for the initial follow-up of nodules with no definite diagnosis, especially in low-resource centres with limited access to modern molecular technologies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Management decisions are not straightforward when the Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (USFNA) demonstrates a Bethesda score of either category III or IV, and a diagnostic hemi-thyroidectomy or a repeat USFNA (r-USFNA) could be performed. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of r-USFNA in the management of indeterminate thyroid nodules by evaluating the likelihood of obtaining a definite diagnosis.
    METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all patients with thyroid nodules between 2011 and 2015 at the Jewish General Hospital (Montreal, Canada). Three hundred fifty-one patients who had undergone a surgical procedure (hemi or total thyroidectomy) and a diagnosis of B3 or B4 on the primary USFNA (p-USFNA) were included in the study. Ninety-six of the included patients also had a repeat USFNA prior to the surgery. Demographic data, type of procedure, and McGill Thyroid Nodule Score (MTNS) were obtained from the medical records. Malignancy rates were calculated based on the final surgical histopathology report.
    RESULTS: Upon r-USFNA, an average 76 % of patients did not change Bethesda categories, 7.4 % downgraded to a benign category. The results showed that, on an average 17.3 % of patients with p-USFNA of B3 and 20 % of patients with p-USFNA of B4, upgraded to a malignant or suspicious for malignancy category, thus changing the clinical management to total thyroidectomy. Our data demonstrates that r-USFNA facilitates choosing the correct surgery of total thyroidectomy in about 20 % of nodules that have upgraded from B3/B4 to a more definite malignant category.
    CONCLUSIONS: r-USFNA in patients with indeterminate diagnoses (B3 or B4) increases categorization into more definite categories. Approximately 20 % of patients are found to have malignant thyroid nodules and suspicious for malignancy thyroid nodules upon repeating the biopsy, hence a diagnostic hemi-thyroidectomy was avoided and a more definitive surgery could be performed. Furthermore, repeat USFNA results in a fewer number of hemi-thyroidectomy and completion thyroidectomy procedures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: In the case of a nondiagnostic thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy result, recent guidelines from the Bethesda system recommend repeat thyroid FNA after 3 months to prevent false-positive results. We aimed to examine our institutional data to determine whether the 3-month period affects the diagnostic yield of repeat biopsies.
    METHODS: A retrospective review of patient records over a 5-year period at our institution was performed. Patients who required repeat FNA due to nondiagnostic results were included. The time between the FNA biopsies, adequacy of the FNA specimens, as well as the surgical pathology diagnosis were analyzed.
    RESULTS: We identified 317 patients who required a repeat FNA. Of these, 96 (30.3%) patients had repeat FNAs less than 3 months after initial biopsy, while 221 (69.7%) patients had repeat FNAs in greater than 3 months. One hundred five patients were referred to our clinic with an initial nondiagnostic biopsy from an outside institution. Repeat FNA was nondiagnostic in 35 patients (11.04%) in the total study population. There was no difference in satisfactory diagnostic yield between repeat FNAs performed greater than 3 months (201 patients, 90.95%) or less than 3 months (81 patients, 84.38%) after the initial biopsy (P = .117). Of the 35 patients with repeat nondiagnostic biopsy, 17 patients underwent diagnostic lobectomy and 3 (17.6%) patients were found to have malignant disease.
    CONCLUSIONS: Early (<3 months) repeat FNA does not affect diagnostic yield of the subsequent sample. Patients with suspicious thyroid nodules could therefore receive a repeat FNA as soon as needed, rather than waiting 3 months. The shortened biopsy interval would alleviate stress on patients with benign nodules and expedite surgical intervention in patients with malignancy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号