Homologous recombination (HR) is essential for the maintenance of genome stability. During HR, Replication Protein A (RPA) rapidly coats the 3\'-tailed single-strand DNA (ssDNA) generated by end resection. Then, the ssDNA-bound RPA must be timely replaced by Rad51 recombinase to form Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments that drive homology search and HR repair. How cells regulate Rad51 assembly dynamics and coordinate RPA and Rad51 actions to ensure proper HR remains poorly understood. Here, we identified that Rtt105, a Ty1 transposon regulator, acts to stimulate Rad51 assembly and orchestrate RPA and Rad51 actions during HR. We found that Rtt105 interacts with Rad51 in vitro and in vivo and restrains the adenosine 5\' triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis activity of Rad51. We showed that Rtt105 directly stimulates dynamic Rad51-ssDNA assembly, strand exchange, and D-loop formation in vitro. Notably, we found that Rtt105 physically regulates the binding of Rad51 and RPA to ssDNA via different motifs and that both regulations are necessary and epistatic in promoting Rad51 nucleation, strand exchange, and HR repair. Consequently, disrupting either of the interactions impaired HR and conferred DNA damage sensitivity, underscoring the importance of Rtt105 in orchestrating the actions of Rad51 and RPA. Our work reveals additional layers of mechanisms regulating Rad51 filament dynamics and the coordination of HR.

Despite the potential of small molecules and recombinant proteins to enhance the efficiency of homology-directed repair (HDR), single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) donors, as currently designed and chemically modified, remain suboptimal for precise gene editing. Here, we screen the biased ssDNA binding sequences of DNA repair-related proteins and engineer RAD51-preferred sequences into HDR-boosting modules for ssDNA donors. Donors with these modules exhibit an augmented affinity for RAD51, thereby enhancing HDR efficiency across various genomic loci and cell types when cooperated with Cas9, nCas9, and Cas12a. By combining with an inhibitor of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or the HDRobust strategy, these modular ssDNA donors achieve up to 90.03% (median 74.81%) HDR efficiency. The HDR-boosting modules targeting an endogenous protein enable a chemical modification-free strategy to improve the efficacy of ssDNA donors for precise gene editing.

Although previous studies have reported that pre-mRNA splicing factors (SFs) are involved in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) via homologous recombination (HR), their exact role in promoting HR remains poorly understood. Here, we showed that SART1, an SF upregulated in several types of cancer, promotes DSB end resection, an essential first step of HR. The resection-promoting function of SART1 requires phosphorylation at threonine 430 and 695 by ATM/ATR. SART1 is recruited to DSB sites in a manner dependent on transcription and its RS domain. SART1 is epistatic with BRCA1, a major HR factor, in the promotion of resection, especially transcription-associated resection in the G2 phase. SART1 and BRCA1 accumulate at DSB sites in an interdependent manner, and epistatically counteract the resection blockade posed by 53BP1 and RIF1. Furthermore, chromosome analysis demonstrated that SART1 and BRCA1 epistatically suppressed genomic alterations caused by DSB misrepair in the G2 phase. Collectively, these results indicate that SART1 and BRCA1 cooperatively facilitate resection of DSBs arising in transcriptionally active genomic regions in the G2 phase, thereby promoting faithful repair by HR, and suppressing genome instability.

Homologous recombination (HR) is a high-fidelity DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway. Both familial and somatic loss of function mutation(s) in various HR genes predispose to a variety of cancer types, underscoring the importance of error-free repair of DSBs in human physiology. While environmental sources of DSBs have been known, more recent studies have begun to uncover the role of endogenous base damage in leading to these breaks. Base damage repair intermediates often consist of single-strand breaks, which if left unrepaired, can lead to DSBs as the replication fork encounters these lesions. This review summarizes various sources of endogenous base damage and how these lesions are repaired. We highlight how conversion of base repair intermediates, particularly those with 5\'or 3\' blocked ends, to DSBs can be a predominant source of genomic instability in HR-deficient cancers. We also discuss how endogenous base damage and ensuing DSBs can be exploited to enhance the efficacy of Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), that are widely used in the clinics for the regimen of HR-deficient cancers.

Double-stranded break (DSB) repair of eukaryotic DNA is mainly accomplished by nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination (HR). Providing exogenous templates during HR repair can result in the editing of target genes, which is the central mechanism of the well-established clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) gene editing system. Currently, exogenous templates are mainly DNA molecules, which can provoke a cellular immune response within the cell. In order to verify the feasibility of RNA molecules as repair templates for HR in mammalian cell genome editing, we fused RNA template molecules to the 3\'-end of single guide RNA (sgRNA), so that the sgRNA and the homologous template RNA form a single RNA molecule. The results show this construct can be used as a repair template to achieve target gene editing in mammalian cells. In addition, the factors influencing HR mediated by RNA template molecules were investigated, and it was found that increasing the length of homologous arms and inducing an R-loop near the DSBcan effectively promote HR repair. Furthermore, intracellular homologous chromosomes may compete with exogenous RNA templates. The findings in this article provide a reference for the utilization of RNA template molecules to mediate target gene editing in eukaryotic cells, as well as a basis for the study of the mechanism by which RNA molecules mediate the repair of DSBs.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the mutation spectrum of homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes and its association with tumor immune infiltration and prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). TNBC patients (434 patients from Ruijin cohort) were evaluated with targeted next-generating sequencing for mutations in HRR genes. The frequencies of mutations were compared with public reference cohorts (320 TNBC patients from METABRIC, 105 from TCGA, and 225 from MSKCC 2018). Associations between mutation status and tumor immune infiltration and prognosis were analyzed. HRR genes mutations were seen in 21.89% patients, with BRCA1/2 mutations significantly enriched in tumors with breast/ovarian cancer family history (P = 0.025) and high Ki-67 levels (P = 0.018). HRR genes mutations were not related with recurrence-free survival (RFS) (adjusted P = 0.070) and overall survival (OS) (adjusted P = 0.318) for TNBC patients, regardless of carboplatin treatment (P > 0.05). Moreover, tumor immune infiltration and PD-L1 expression was positively associated with HRR or BRCA1/2 mutation (all P < 0.001). Patients with both HRR mutation and high CD8+ T cell counts had the best RFS and OS, whereas patients with no HRR mutation and low CD8+ T cell counts had the worst outcomes (RFS P < 0.001, OS P = 0.019). High frequency of HRR gene mutations was found in early TNBC, with no prognostic significance. Immune infiltration and PD-L1 expression was positively associated with HRR mutation, and both HRR mutation and high CD8+ T cell infiltration levels were associated with superior disease outcome.

Accurate detection of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in cancer patients is paramount in clinical applications, as HRD confers sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. With the advances in genome sequencing technology, mutational profiling on a genome-wide scale has become readily accessible, and our knowledge of the genomic consequences of HRD has been greatly expanded and refined. Here, we review the recent advances in HRD detection methods. We examine the copy number and structural alterations that often accompany the genome instability that results from HRD, describe the advantages of mutational signature-based methods that do not rely on specific gene mutations, and review some of the existing algorithms used for HRD detection. We also discuss the choice of sequencing platforms (panel, exome, or whole-genome) and catalog the HRD detection assays used in key PARP inhibitor trials.

While that ROS causes DNA damage is well documented, there has been limited investigation into whether DNA damages and their repair processes can conversely induce oxidative stress. By generating a site-specific DNA double strand break (DSB) via I-SceI endonuclease expression in S. cerevisiae without damaging other cellular components, this study demonstrated that DNA repair does trigger oxidative stress. Deleting genes participating in the initiation of the resection step of homologous recombination (HR), like the MRX complex, resulted in stimulation of ROS. In contrast, deleting genes acting downstream of HR resection suppressed ROS levels. Additionally, blocking non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) also suppressed ROS. Further analysis identified Rad53 as a key player that relays DNA damage signals to alter redox metabolism in an HR-specific manner. These results suggest both HR and NHEJ can drive metabolism changes and oxidative stress, with NHEJ playing a more prominent role in ROS stimulation. Further analysis revealed a correlation between DSB-induced ROS increase and enhanced activity of NADPH oxidase Yno1 and various antioxidant enzymes. Deleting the antioxidant gene SOD1 induced synthetic lethality in HR-deficient mutants like mre11Δ and rad51Δ upon DSB induction. These findings uncover a significant interplay between DNA repair mechanisms and cellular metabolism, providing insights into understanding the side effects of genotoxic therapies and potentially aiding development of more effective cancer treatment strategies.

The best predictive marker for the expected efficacy of PARP inhibitor therapy is mutations in BRCA1/2 or other homologous recombination repair genes. These tests are part of routine molecular pathology diagnostics. Among 281 patients with prostate adenocarcinoma, somatic pathogenic mutations in one of these genes were identified in 21.4% of patients. In 28.5% of the patients, the test was unsuccessful; the main limitation of successful testing was the age of the paraffin blocks and low DNA concentration. In the case of BRCA1/2 testing, the success rate was significantly reduced for samples older than 5 years, while in tests involving a broader set of homologous recombination repair genes, the success rate was significantly reduced for samples older than 2 years. Therefore, it is very important to test high-risk prostate cancers at the time of primary diagnosis, and probably also liquid biopsy testing of circulating tumor DNA will play an important role in safe diagnosis in the near future.

DNA repair is directly performed by hundreds of core factors and indirectly regulated by thousands of others. We massively expanded a CRISPR inhibition and Cas9-editing screening system to discover factors indirectly modulating homology-directed repair (HDR) in the context of ∼18,000 individual gene knockdowns. We focused on CCAR1, a poorly understood gene that we found the depletion of reduced both HDR and interstrand crosslink repair, phenocopying the loss of the Fanconi anemia pathway. CCAR1 loss abrogated FANCA protein without substantial reduction in the level of its mRNA or that of other FA genes. We instead found that CCAR1 prevents inclusion of a poison exon in FANCA. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that the CCAR1 splicing modulatory activity is not limited to FANCA, and it instead regulates widespread changes in alternative splicing that would damage coding sequences in mouse and human cells. CCAR1 therefore has an unanticipated function as a splicing fidelity factor.