Receptors, Urokinase Plasminogen Activator

受体,尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活剂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:脓毒症是一个全球性的健康挑战,需要先进的诊断和预后的方法,由于其发病率和死亡率升高。我们的研究旨在评估一组新的六种生物标志物结合严重程度评分在预测急诊科(ED)败血症患者28天死亡率中的价值。材料和方法:这个单中心,观察,前瞻性队列包括2020年11月至2022年12月纳入的67例连续脓毒性休克和脓毒症患者,根据结局分为存活组和非存活组。进行了以下评估:降钙素原(PCT),在髓样细胞-1(sTREM-1)上表达的可溶性触发受体,尿激酶纤溶酶原激活物受体(suPAR)的可溶形式,高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP),白细胞介素-6(IL-6),和天青素1(AZU1),除了临床评分,如快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA),全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS),序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA),急性生理学和慢性健康评估II(APACHEII),简化急性生理学评分II和III(SAPSII/III),国家预警评分(NEWS)急诊科脓毒症(MEDS)的死亡率,Charlson合并症指数(CCI),和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)。评估了每种生物标志物和临床评分及其组合预测28天死亡率的能力。结果:总死亡率为49.25%。机械通气与较高的死亡率相关。IL-6的水平在非存活组中显著更高,并且与其他生物标志物相比具有更高的AUC值。GCS,SOFA,APACHEII,和SAPSII/III显示出较好的预测能力。结合IL-6和suPAR,AZU1和临床评分SOFA,APACHEII,与单个生物标志物相比,SAPSII提高了预测准确性。结论:在我们的研究中,IL-6和SAPSII/III是ED中脓毒症患者28天死亡率的最准确预测因子。
    Background and Objectives: Sepsis represents a global health challenge and requires advanced diagnostic and prognostic approaches due to its elevated rate of morbidity and fatality. Our study aimed to assess the value of a novel set of six biomarkers combined with severity scores in predicting 28 day mortality among patients presenting with sepsis in the Emergency Department (ED). Materials and Methods: This single-center, observational, prospective cohort included sixty-seven consecutive patients with septic shock and sepsis enrolled from November 2020 to December 2022, categorized into survival and non-survival groups based on outcomes. The following were assessed: procalcitonin (PCT), soluble Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells-1 (sTREM-1), the soluble form of the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and azurocidin 1 (AZU1), alongside clinical scores such as the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and III (SAPS II/III), the National Early Warning Score (NEWS), Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS), the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). The ability of each biomarker and clinical score and their combinations to predict 28 day mortality were evaluated. Results: The overall mortality was 49.25%. Mechanical ventilation was associated with a higher mortality rate. The levels of IL-6 were significantly higher in the non-survival group and had higher AUC values compared to the other biomarkers. The GCS, SOFA, APACHEII, and SAPS II/III showed superior predictive ability. Combining IL-6 with suPAR, AZU1, and clinical scores SOFA, APACHE II, and SAPS II enhanced prediction accuracy compared with individual biomarkers. Conclusion: In our study, IL-6 and SAPS II/III were the most accurate predictors of 28 day mortality for sepsis patients in the ED.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:疑似肺炎的老年患者占住院人数的很大比例,这对医生来说是一个预后挑战。我们的研究旨在使用可溶性尿激酶纤溶酶原激活物受体(suPAR)结合临床资料评估肺炎患者的预后。
    方法:在一项前瞻性观察性研究中,包括164名>65岁(平均年龄84.2(+/-7.64)岁)因怀疑肺炎而住院的患者,对每位患者进行suPAR评估,预后评分(PSI,CURB65)和炎性生物标志物(C反应蛋白,降钙素原,白细胞)。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估suPAR对30天死亡率的预后价值。使用Youden指数确定具有相应灵敏度(SE)和特异性(SP)的最佳截止值。
    结果:SuPAR>5.1ng/mL可预测30天的死亡率,其敏感性为100%,特异性为40.4%。当至少两个参数高于或低于以下截止阈值时,以下参数的组合显示SP值为64.9%(95%CI,100-100)的SE为100%(95%CI,100-100):suPAR>9.8ng/mL,BMI<29.3kg/m2,PSI>106.5。
    结论:suPAR似乎是一种有希望的生物标志物,可以与PSI和BMI结合使用,以改善老年患者肺炎的预后。需要对更多人群进行前瞻性研究,以确认这种新方法是否可以改善患者的预后。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT02467192),2015年5月27日。
    老年患者肺炎的预后仍然具有挑战性,suPAR的剂量可以帮助临床医生确定老年患者肺炎的预后吗?应该改进个人或临床参数的使用,以更好地预测呼吸系统并发症和死亡率。将suPAR剂量与PSI和BMI一起添加可提供30天死亡率的最佳敏感性和特异性。
    OBJECTIVE: Elderly patients with suspected pneumonia represent a significant proportion of hospital admissions, which is a prognostic challenge for physicians. Our research aimed to assess the prognosis of patients with pneumonia using soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) combined with clinical data.
    METHODS: In a prospective observational study including 164 patients > 65 years (mean age 84.2 (+/-7.64) years) who were hospitalized for a suspicion of pneumonia, suPAR was assessed for each patient, as was the prognosis score (PSI, CURB65) and inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, white blood cells). The prognostic value of the suPAR for 30-day mortality was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. Optimal cut-offs with corresponding sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) were determined using the Youden index.
    RESULTS: A suPAR > 5.1 ng/mL was predictive of 30-day mortality with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 40.4%. A combination of the following parameters exhibited an SE of 100% (95% CI, 100-100) for an SP value of 64.9% (95% CI, 57.6-72.2) when at least two of them were above or below the following cut-off threshold values: suPAR > 9.8 ng/mL, BMI < 29.3 kg/m2 and PSI > 106.5.
    CONCLUSIONS: The suPAR seems to be a promising biomarker that can be combined with the PSI and BMI to improve the prognosis of pneumonia among elderly patients. Prospective studies with larger populations are needed to confirm whether this new approach can improve patient outcomes.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02467192), 27th may 2015.
    The prognosis of pneumonia in geriatric patients remain challenging, can the dosage of suPAR help clinicians determine the prognosis of pneumonia among geriatric patients? The use of individual or clinical parameters should be improved for a better prediction of respiratory complications and mortality. Adding suPAR dosage with PSI and BMI provides the best sensitivity and specificity for 30-day mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    可溶性尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体(suPAR)是全身性慢性炎症的标志。suPAR水平升高与不良临床结局相关,但一小部分suPAR低的患者也经历了较差的结局.因此,我们的目的是在一项基于注册登记的研究中,对到急诊科就诊的suPAR低(<3ng/mL)患者在出院后90天内死亡的特征进行分析.与存活的低suPAR患者(n=15122)相比,在90天内死亡的人(n=87)年龄更高(75.4岁),更高的药物使用率(7.0;71.3%的复方用药)和更多的参考区间以外的血液检查(5.0)(包括C反应蛋白,中性粒细胞和白蛋白),最常见的诊断是慢性肺病(27.6%),脑血管病(18.4%)和痴呆(11.5%)。suPAR低的患者比单纯suPAR所反映的病态更多。未来的研究必须确定在根据患者不良临床结局的风险对患者进行分层时,哪些因素对潜在算法贡献最大。这些数据表明包括药物数据可能是相关的。
    Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a marker of systemic chronic inflammation. Elevated suPAR levels are associated with adverse clinical outcomes, but a small subset of patients with low suPAR also experience poor outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to characterize patients presenting to the emergency department with low suPAR (<3 ng/mL) who died within 90 days after discharge in a registry-based study. Compared to patients with low suPAR who survived (n = 15 122), those who died within 90 days (n = 87) had higher age (75.4 years), higher medication use (7.0; 71.3% with polypharmacy) and more blood tests outside reference intervals (5.0) (including C-reactive protein, neutrophils and albumin), and the most common diagnoses were chronic pulmonary disease (27.6%), cerebrovascular disease (18.4%) and dementia (11.5%). Patients with low suPAR were more morbid than what was reflected by suPAR alone. Future studies must determine which factors that contribute the most to potential algorithms when stratifying patients based on their risk of adverse clinical outcomes. These data indicate that inclusion of medication data could be relevant.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)是一种炎症性疾病,影响全球10%以上的成年人。它分为Th1,Th2和Th17基因型以及嗜酸性和非嗜酸性类型。基于Th2的炎症和嗜酸性粒细胞性CRS(ECRS)与组织重塑和纤溶系统损害有关。
    阐明嗜酸性粒细胞在诱导CRS鼻息肉组织纤维蛋白沉积中的作用,并探索潜在的调节机制。
    我们使用基因表达Omnibus和下一代测序数据分析了与serpin家族和纤溶系统相关的基因的表达。差异表达基因(DEGs)分析用于比较对照和鼻息肉组织,其次是KEGG和基因本体论(GO)分析。我们测量了纤溶酶原激活物-1(PAI-1)的表达和相关性,组织纤溶酶原激活剂(t-PA),尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活剂(u-PA),和CRS组织中的尿激酶纤溶酶原激活物表面受体(u-PAR),并使用细胞因子阵列和共培养评估嗜酸性粒细胞对纤溶系统的影响。
    鼻息肉组织显示PAI-1,u-PA上调,和u-PAR表达和下调的t-PA表达。纤溶系统相关基因与Th2细胞因子呈正相关,除了T-PA。嗜酸性粒细胞衍生的几丁质酶-3样蛋白1(CHI3L1)增加了成纤维细胞和上皮细胞中PAI-1的表达并降低了t-PA的水平。CHI3L1的抑制抑制了这些改变。
    CHI3L1通过在鼻息肉形成过程中损害纤溶系统而有助于纤维蛋白沉积。调节CHI3L1的表达可能抑制ECRS中的纤维蛋白沉积和水肿,为这种情况提供了潜在的治疗方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammatory disease affecting more than 10% of the global adult population. It is classified into Th1, Th2, and Th17 endotypes and eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic types. Th2-based inflammation and eosinophilic CRS (ECRS) are associated with tissue remodeling and fibrinolytic system impairment.
    UNASSIGNED: To elucidate the role of eosinophils in inducing fibrin deposition in CRS nasal polyp tissues and explore potential regulatory mechanisms.
    UNASSIGNED: We analyzed the expression of genes related to the serpin family and fibrinolytic system using Gene Expression Omnibus and Next-generation sequencing data. Differentially expression genes (DEGs) analysis was used to compare control and nasal polyp tissues, followed by KEGG and Gene ontology (GO) analysis. We measured the expression and correlation of plasminogen activator-1 (PAI-1), tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), urokinase plasminogen activator (u-PA), and urokinase plasminogen activator surface receptor (u-PAR) in CRS tissues, and evaluated the effect of eosinophils on the fibrinolytic system using a cytokine array and co-culture.
    UNASSIGNED: Nasal polyp tissues showed upregulated PAI-1, u-PA, and u-PAR expression and downregulated t-PA expression. Fibrinolytic system-related genes positively correlated with Th2 cytokines, except for t-PA. Eosinophil-derived Chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1) increased PAI-1 expression and decreased t-PA levels in fibroblasts and epithelial cells. The inhibition of CHI3L1 suppresses these alterations.
    UNASSIGNED: CHI3L1 contributes to fibrin deposition by impairing the fibrinolytic system during nasal polyp formation. The regulation of CHI3L1 expression may inhibit fibrin deposition and edema in ECRS, presenting a potential treatment for this condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:急性胰腺炎(AP)是一种常见的紧急情况,发病率高,死亡率,和社会经济影响。可溶性尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体(suPAR)是AP预后的潜在生物标志物。本研究系统地回顾了suPAR在评估AP严重程度中的预后作用的文献。器官衰竭,死亡率,和其他病理标记。
    方法:对截至2023年3月19日的5个数据库进行了全面搜索,选择研究suPAR与AP结局关系的队列研究。结果变量包括AP严重程度,器官衰竭,死亡率,住院时间,和suPAR与其他炎症标志物的关联。我们的论文已在Prospero上注册(ID:CRD42023410628)。
    结果:纳入了9项前瞻性观察性研究,共1033例AP患者。8项研究中有7项发现suPAR在重症急性胰腺炎中显著升高(P<0.05)。四项研究表明suPAR有效预测器官衰竭风险,4项研究得出suPAR可显著预测死亡率(P<0.05)。审查没有高风险研究,提高信誉。
    结论:suPAR是AP的有价值的预后指标,显著预测严重程度,器官衰竭,住院时间,和死亡率。需要进一步的大规模研究来探索suPAR在与AP病程相关的其他临床结局中的作用。将其确立为AP预后的支柱。
    BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common emergency condition with high morbidity, mortality, and socio-economic impact. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a potential biomarker for AP prognosis. This study systematically reviews the literature on suPAR\'s prognostic roles in assessing AP severity, organ failure, mortality, and other pathological markers.
    METHODS: A comprehensive search of 5 databases up to March 19, 2023, was conducted, selecting cohort studies that examined suPAR\'s relationship with AP outcomes. Outcome variables included AP severity, organ failure, mortality, hospital stay length, and suPAR\'s association with other inflammatory markers. Our paper has been registered on Prospero (ID: CRD42023410628).
    RESULTS: Nine prospective observational studies with 1033 AP patients were included. Seven of eight studies found suPAR significantly elevated in severe acute pancreatitis (P < .05). Four studies showed suPAR effectively predicted organ failure risk, and 4 studies concluded suPAR significantly predicted mortality (P < .05). The review had no high-risk studies, enhancing credibility.
    CONCLUSIONS: suPAR is a valuable prognostic marker in AP, significantly predicting severity, organ failure, hospital stay length, and mortality. Further large-scale studies are needed to explore suPAR\'s role in other clinical outcomes related to AP disease course, to establish it as a mainstay of AP prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)阴性宫颈癌患者的预后明显差于HPV阳性宫颈癌患者。了解这种机制对于预防疾病发展至关重要。在本研究中,构建GV367‑蜗牛家族转录抑制因子2(SNAI2)慢病毒载体,并将其转导到C‑33A细胞中。随后,使用细胞计数试剂盒(CCK)-8方法检测肿瘤细胞的增殖。流式细胞术用于分析肿瘤细胞的细胞周期进程。使用氧化酶测定法检测肿瘤细胞的葡萄糖消耗,并使用β-半乳糖苷酶染色检测肿瘤细胞的衰老。使用逆转录定量PCR和蛋白质印迹法检测p38和ERK1/2的基因表达和活性,分别。成功建立了C‑33A‑SNAI2细胞系。与HeLa和C‑33A‑Wild细胞相比,C‑33A‑SNAI2组G0/G1期细胞的增殖和百分比降低,通过CCK‑8检测(100±0与239.1±58.3vs.39.7±20.1,P<0.01)和流式细胞术(34.0±7.1%vs.46.2±10.6%vs.61.3±5.3%,P<0.05)。与HeLa集团相比,C‑33A‑Wild和C‑33A‑SNAI2组的葡萄糖消耗显著降低(P<0.01)。β-半乳糖苷酶染色结果显示,与C-33A-Wild组相比,C-33A-SNAI2组的β-半乳糖苷酶阳性细胞比例明显降低(P<0.01)。SNAI2的上调增强了p21表达的增加,与C-33A-Wild细胞相比,C-33A细胞中CDK1,尿激酶纤溶酶原激活物受体(u-PAR)和细胞周期蛋白D1的表达降低(P<0.05)。此外,与C‑33A‑Wild和HeLa组相比,C‑33A‑SNAI2组的p38、ERK1/2活性和磷酸化(p)‑ERK1/2/p‑p38比值降低(P<0.05)。总之,SNAI2增强HPV阴性宫颈癌C‑33A细胞休眠,以G0/G1阻滞为特征,通过u‑PAR表达式的下调,和体外p‑ERK1/2和p‑p38MAPK信号通路的活性降低。癌症复发和转移是大多数癌症相关死亡的原因。鉴于SNAI2是增强HPV阴性宫颈癌细胞休眠所必需的,调节这一过程可能促使宫颈肿瘤细胞进入持续休眠状态,这可能是一种潜在的肿瘤治疗方法。
    The prognosis of patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)‑negative cervical cancer is significantly worse than that of patients with HPV‑positive cervical cancer. Understanding the mechanisms of this is crucial for preventing disease evolution. In the present study, the GV367‑snail family transcriptional repressor 2 (SNAI2) lentiviral vector was constructed and transduced into C‑33A cells. Subsequently, the proliferation of tumor cells was detected using the Cell Counting Kit (CCK)‑8 method. Flow cytometry was used to analyze the cell cycle progression of tumor cells. The glucose consumption of tumor cells was detected using an oxidase assay, and the senescence of tumor cells was detected using beta‑galactosidase staining. The gene expression and the activity of p38 and ERK1/2 were detected using reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR and western blotting, respectively. The C‑33A‑SNAI2 cell line was successfully established. Compared with HeLa and C‑33A‑Wild cells, the proliferation and percentage of G0/G1‑phase cells in the C‑33A‑SNAI2 group were decreased, as detected by the CCK‑8 assay (100±0 vs. 239.1±58.3 vs. 39.7±20.1, P<0.01) and flow cytometry (34.0±7.1% vs. 46.2±10.6% vs. 61.3±5.3%, P<0.05). Compared with the HeLa group, the glucose consumption of the C‑33A‑Wild and C‑33A‑SNAI2 groups was significantly decreased (P<0.01). The results of beta‑galactosidase staining showed that the proportion of beta‑galactosidase‑positive cells in the C‑33A‑SNAI2 group was significantly decreased compared with the C‑33A‑Wild group (P<0.01). Upregulation of SNAI2 enhanced the increase in p21 expression, and the decrease in CDK1, urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (u‑PAR) and cyclin D1 expression in C‑33A cells compared with C‑33A‑Wild cells (P<0.05). In addition, the activities of p38, ERK1/2 and the phosphorylated (p)‑ERK1/2/p‑p38 ratio were decreased in the C‑33A‑SNAI2 group compared with the C‑33A‑Wild and HeLa groups (P<0.05). In conclusion, SNAI2 enhanced HPV‑negative cervical cancer C‑33A cell dormancy, which was characterized by G0/G1 arrest, by the downregulation of u‑PAR expression, and a decrease in the activity of the p‑ERK1/2 and p‑p38MAPK signaling pathways in vitro. Cancer recurrence and metastases are responsible for most cancer‑related deaths. Given that SNAI2 is required for enhancing HPV‑negative cervical cancer cell dormancy, regulating this process may promote cervical tumor cells to enter a continuous dormant state, which could be a potential approach for tumor therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肺动脉高压(PAH)最终导致右心室衰竭和过早死亡。具有预后效用的循环生物标志物的鉴定被认为是优先事项。由于慢性炎症被认为是关键的致病因素,我们试图鉴定炎症相关循环蛋白,这些蛋白为PAH患者的长期生存增加了目前的危险分层模型的价值.
    结果:在PAH患者(n=60)和血液动力学正常的对照组(n=28)中,使用邻近延伸测定技术测量了384种炎症蛋白的血浆水平。其中,与对照组相比,PAH患者的血浆中有51种分析物明显过表达。进行Cox比例风险分析和C统计以评估差异表达蛋白的预后价值和增量预后价值。一组6种蛋白质(CRIM1[富含半胱氨酸的跨膜骨形态发生蛋白调节剂1],HGF[肝细胞生长因子],FSTL3[卵泡抑素样3],PLAUR[纤溶酶原激活剂,尿激酶受体],CLSTN2[calsyntenin2],在根据2015年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲呼吸学会指南进行调整后,SPON1[spondin1])与PAH诊断时的死亡/肺移植独立相关,REVEAL(评估早期和长期PAH疾病管理的注册表)2.0风险评分,和完善的4层风险评估。CRIM1,PLAUR,FSTL3和SPON1在预测模型之上显示出递增的预后价值。通过蛋白质印迹测定,在PAH患者和动物模型(注射野百合碱和接受肺动脉绑扎的大鼠)的右心室中,FSTL3和SPON1显着上调。
    结论:除了揭示可能参与PAH心肺重塑的新参与者,我们的筛查确定了有希望的循环生物标志物,以改善PAH的风险预测,这应该得到外部确认。
    BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) ultimately leads to right ventricular failure and premature death. The identification of circulating biomarkers with prognostic utility is considered a priority. As chronic inflammation is recognized as key pathogenic driver, we sought to identify inflammation-related circulating proteins that add incremental value to current risk stratification models for long-term survival in patients with PAH.
    RESULTS: Plasma levels of 384 inflammatory proteins were measured with the proximity extension assay technology in patients with PAH (n=60) and controls with normal hemodynamics (n=28). Among these, 51 analytes were significantly overexpressed in the plasma of patients with PAH compared with controls. Cox proportional hazard analyses and C-statistics were performed to assess the prognostic value and the incremental prognostic value of differentially expressed proteins. A panel of 6 proteins (CRIM1 [cysteine rich transmembrane bone morphogenetic protein regulator 1], HGF [hepatocyte growth factor], FSTL3 [follistatin-like 3], PLAUR [plasminogen activator, urokinase receptor], CLSTN2 [calsyntenin 2], SPON1 [spondin 1]) were independently associated with death/lung transplantation at the time of PAH diagnosis after adjustment for the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines, the REVEAL (Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management) 2.0 risk scores, and the refined 4-strata risk assessment. CRIM1, PLAUR, FSTL3, and SPON1 showed incremental prognostic value on top of the predictive models. As determined by Western blot, FSTL3 and SPON1 were significantly upregulated in the right ventricle of patients with PAH and animal models (monocrotaline-injected and pulmonary artery banding-subjected rats).
    CONCLUSIONS: In addition to revealing new actors likely involved in cardiopulmonary remodeling in PAH, our screening identified promising circulating biomarkers to improve risk prediction in PAH, which should be externally confirmed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:有一些证据表明炎症与精神障碍的发病机制有关。可溶性尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体(suPAR)是慢性炎症的生物标志物,与更广泛使用的生物标志物相比,它提供了更稳定的全身性炎症指标。这篇综述旨在综合研究,测量患有精神疾病的个体的suPAR浓度,以确定与健康参与者相比,这些浓度是否发生了变化。
    方法:从开始到2023年10月,对五个相关数据库进行了全面的文献检索(PubMed,WebofScience,Embase,Scopus,APAPsychInfo)。进行随机效应荟萃分析以比较患有任何精神疾病的个体相对于对照的血液suPAR水平(即血浆或血清)的标准化平均差异。对精神分裂症或其他精神病和抑郁症患者的suPAR水平进行了单独的荟萃分析。使用纽卡斯尔渥太华量表评估偏倚风险。事后敏感性分析包括排除偏倚高风险研究,以及分别测量血清或血浆中suPAR浓度的研究分析。
    结果:文献检索确定了149条记录。筛选了10项全文研究的资格,并纳入了9项研究进行审查。初步分析显示,与对照组相比,患有任何精神疾病的个体之间的suPAR水平没有显着差异(k=7,SMD=0.42,95%CI[-0.20,1.04])。然而,与对照组相比,抑郁症患者的suPAR水平升高(k=3,SMD=0.61,95%CI[0.34,0.87]).同样,二级分析显示,当排除偏倚高风险研究时,没有证据表明患有任何精神疾病的个体的suPAR水平存在显着差异(k=6,SMD=0.54,95%CI[-0.14,1.22]),但发现精神分裂症或其他精神病患者的suPAR浓度升高(k=3,SMD=0.98,95%CI[0.39,1.58]).此外,分析血浆suPAR浓度的研究发现,相对于对照组,患有任何精神疾病的个体的血浆suPAR水平升高(k=5,SMD=0.84,95%CI[0.38,1.29]),而测量任何精神疾病患者血清suPAR水平的研究均未发现差异(k=2,SMD=-0.61,95%CI[-1.27,0.04]).对于等离子体,精神分裂症或其他精神病患者的suPAR浓度也升高(k=3,SMD=0.98,95%CI[0.39,1.58]).
    结论:当考虑仅测量血清或仅测量血浆suPAR的研究时,在精神疾病组之间观察到suPAR水平没有显着差异,尽管在中度至重度抑郁症患者中检测到suPAR水平显著升高。然而,与对照组相比,患有任何精神疾病的患者的血浆suPAR水平显着升高,而血清样本没有发现差异。精神分裂症或其他精神病性障碍也有类似的发现。血浆发现表明,慢性炎症失调可能导致精神分裂症和抑郁症的病理。需要进一步的纵向研究来充分阐明该标记物在这些疾病的精神病理学中的作用。
    BACKGROUND: There is some evidence of an association between inflammation in the pathogenesis of mental disorders. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a biomarker of chronic inflammation, which provides a more stable index of systemic inflammation than more widely used biomarkers. This review aims to synthesise studies that measured suPAR concentrations in individuals with a psychiatric disorder, to determine if these concentrations are altered in comparison to healthy participants.
    METHODS: Comprehensive literature searches from inception to October 2023 were conducted of five relevant databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, APA PsychInfo). Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to compare the standardised mean difference of blood suPAR levels (i.e. plasma or serum) for individuals with any psychiatric disorder relative to controls. Separate meta-analyses of suPAR levels were conducted for individuals with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder and depressive disorder. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Post-hoc sensitivity analyses included excluding studies at high risk of bias, and analyses of studies that measured suPAR concentrations either in serum or in plasma separately.
    RESULTS: The literature search identified 149 records. Ten full-text studies were screened for eligibility and 9 studies were included for review. Primary analyses revealed no significant difference in suPAR levels between individuals with any psychiatric disorder compared to controls (k = 7, SMD = 0.42, 95 % CI [-0.20, 1.04]). However, those with depressive disorder had elevated suPAR levels relative to controls (k = 3, SMD = 0.61, 95 % CI [0.34, 0.87]). Similarly, secondary analyses showed no evidence of a significant difference in suPAR levels in individuals with any psychiatric disorder when studies at high risk of bias were excluded (k = 6, SMD = 0.54, 95 % CI [-0.14, 1.22]), but elevated suPAR concentrations for those with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder were found (k = 3, SMD = 0.98, 95 % CI [0.39, 1.58]). Furthermore, studies that analysed plasma suPAR concentrations found elevated plasma suPAR levels in individuals with any psychiatric disorder relative to controls (k = 5, SMD = 0.84, 95 % CI [0.38, 1.29]), while studies measuring serum suPAR levels in any psychiatric disorder did not find a difference (k = 2, SMD = -0.61, 95 % CI [-1.27, 0.04]). For plasma, elevated suPAR concentrations were also identified for those with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder (k = 3, SMD = 0.98, 95 % CI [0.39, 1.58]).
    CONCLUSIONS: When studies measuring either only serum or only plasma suPAR were considered, no significant difference in suPAR levels were observed between psychiatric disorder groups, although significantly elevated suPAR levels were detected in those with moderate to severe depressive disorder. However, plasma suPAR levels were significantly elevated in those with any psychiatric disorder relative to controls, while no difference in serum samples was found. A similar finding was reported for schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder. The plasma findings suggest that chronic inflammatory dysregulation may contribute to the pathology of schizophrenia and depressive disorder. Future longitudinal studies are required to fully elucidate the role of this marker in the psychopathology of these disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    荧光分子成像在图像引导手术中起着至关重要的作用。在这种情况下,尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体(uPAR)是一种有趣的生物标志物,由于其在肿瘤细胞和肿瘤微环境中的表达升高,因此能够检测和描绘各种肿瘤类型。在这项研究中,抗uPAR纳米抗体(Nbs)通过用人和鼠uPAR蛋白免疫美洲驼产生。使用放射性标记的变体进行广泛的体外表征和体内测试以评估它们的药代动力学并选择前导化合物。随后,选定的NBS被转化为荧光剂,在各种皮下和原位肿瘤模型中评估了它们在荧光引导手术中的应用。该研究产生了一组高亲和力抗uPARNbs,在体外和体内显示跨多种类型的癌细胞的特异性结合。在所有评估的uPAR表达肿瘤模型中,在静脉注射后1小时,铅荧光标记的化合物表现出高肿瘤摄取和高对比度。优于非靶向对照Nb。此外,在原位人类神经胶质瘤模型中证明了快速准确的肿瘤定位和划界。利用这些NBS可以潜在地提高手术肿瘤切除的精度,因此,提高临床生存率。
    Fluorescence molecular imaging plays a vital role in image-guided surgery. In this context, the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is an interesting biomarker enabling the detection and delineation of various tumor types due to its elevated expression on both tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment. In this study, anti-uPAR Nanobodies (Nbs) are generated through llama immunization with human and murine uPAR protein. Extensive in vitro characterization and in vivo testing with radiolabeled variants are conducted to assess their pharmacokinetics and select lead compounds. Subsequently, the selected Nbs are converted into fluorescent agents, and their application for fluorescence-guided surgery is evaluated in various subcutaneous and orthotopic tumor models. The study yields a panel of high-affinity anti-uPAR Nbs, showing specific binding across multiple types of cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Lead fluorescently-labeled compounds exhibit high tumor uptake with high contrast at 1 h after intravenous injection across all assessed uPAR-expressing tumor models, outperforming a non-targeting control Nb. Additionally, rapid and accurate tumor localization and demarcation are demonstrated in an orthotopic human glioma model. Utilizing these Nbs can potentially enhance the precision of surgical tumor resection and, consequently, improve survival rates in the clinic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    可溶性尿激酶纤溶酶原激活物受体(suPAR),尿激酶纤溶酶原激活剂受体的可溶性对应物,在不同层次的循环中发现。suPAR及其母体分子,细胞表面uPAR,表现出相似的结构和细胞外功能作用,促进纤维蛋白溶解,细胞粘附,和移民。研究已经评估了suPAR在心血管疾病(CVD)中的相关性。据推测,suPAR可以作为CVD进展过程中炎症激活和负担的指标。SuPAR升高独立预测急性冠脉综合征预后较差,在心力衰竭中,以及冠状动脉疾病和动脉粥样硬化。为了指导转化为临床应用,suPAR已在许多CVD设置中进行评估,以改善独立的风险歧视或与已确定的传统风险因素相关联.虽然suPAR在其他疾病如肾脏疾病和癌症中的参与已经被探索,只有新出现的证据表明suPAR机制参与心血管疾病。在这次审查中,我们提供了suPAR及其作为CVD生物标志物的潜在作用的背景。
    Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), the soluble counterpart of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, is found in the circulation at various levels. suPAR and its parent molecule, cell surface uPAR, exhibit similar structure and extracellular functional roles facilitating fibrinolysis, cellular adhesion, and migration. Studies have assessed the correlation between suPAR in cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is postulated that suPAR may serve as an indicator of inflammatory activation and burden during CVD progression. Increased suPAR independently predicts poorer outcomes in acute coronary syndromes, in heart failure, as well as in coronary artery disease and atherosclerosis. To guide translation into clinical utization, suPAR has been assessed in numerous CVD settings for improved risk discrimination independently or in association with established traditional risk factors. Whilst the involvement of suPAR has been explored in other diseases such as kidney diseases and cancer, there is only emerging evidence of suPAR\'s mechanistic involvement in cardiovascular disease. In this review, we provide a background into suPAR and its potential role as a biomarker in CVD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号