背景:当股骨和/或膝下段闭塞的顺行再通失败时,逆行通道已成为既定的选择。为了评估股pop和the下闭塞的顺行和逆行联合再通的结果,我们对二次逆行再通尝试的患者进行了回顾性分析.
方法:主要终点是手术的成功(使用顺行/逆行技术成功阻断)。次要终点包括并发症发生率,原发性通畅和靶病变血运重建(TLR)率,截肢率,踝臂指数(ABI)的变化,卢瑟福-贝克尔班(RBC)。分析了手术失败和TLR的预测因子。
结果:我们包括888例患者:362例股pop骨(第1组),353膝下(第2组),173例进行多级(第3组)再通。危重肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)在第1、2和3组中占36%,62%,76%,分别。干预成功率为92.5%。93.8%,各自病例的90.8%(p=0.455)。总的围介入并发症发生率为7.2%。在6、12和24个月时,第一组的原发性通畅率最高(63.9%,45.8%,33.3%),其次是第3组(59.8%,46.1%,33.3%),和第2组(58.5%,43.1%,30.4%),p=0.537)。第1组24个月内反复发生TLR的风险为31.4%,第2组为39.1%,第3组为45.7%。24个月时,1、2、3组生存率为93.8%,79.4%和87.5%,分别。在24个月内,75例患者(8.4%)必须进行截肢。出院时以及6、12和24个月时ABI和RBC均有显着改善(p<0.001)。透析依赖性是前/逆行再通失败的预测因子(p=0.048)。病变长度(p=0.0043),透析(p=0.033)和再通水平(p=0.013)增加TLR的风险。
结论:使用组合的顺行/逆行通道,在许多情况下,可以实现闭塞的股pop和/或the下动脉的再通。由于在所有病灶定位中重复TLR的比率很高,先行和逆行再通的适应症可能仅限于CLTI患者.
BACKGROUND: When antegrade
recanalization of femoro- and/or infrapopliteal occlusions fails, retrograde access has become an established option. To evaluate the results of combined antegrade and retrograde
recanalization of femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal occlusions, patients undergoing secondary retrograde
recanalization attempts were analyzed retrospectively.
METHODS: Primary endpoint was the success of the procedure (successful occlusion crossing using the ante-/retrograde technique). Secondary endpoints include complication rate, primary patency and target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate, amputation rate, changes in ankle-brachial index (ABI), and Rutherford-Becker class (RBC). Predictors for procedure failure and TLR were analyzed.
RESULTS: We included 888 patients: 362 with femoropopliteal (group 1), 353 with infrapopliteal (group 2), and 173 with multi-level (group 3) recanalization. Critical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) was present in group 1, 2, and 3 in 36%, 62%, and 76%, respectively. The intervention was successful in 92.5%, 93.8%, 90.8% of respective cases (p=0.455). The overall peri-interventional complication rate was 7.2%. At 6, 12 and 24 months, primary patency was highest in group 1 (63.9%, 45.8%, 33.3%), followed by group 3 (59.8%, 46.1%, 33.3%), and group 2 (58.5%, 43.1%, 30.4%), p=0.537). The risk of undergoing repeated TLR within 24 months was 31.4% for group 1, 39.1% for group 2, and 45.7% for group 3. At 24 months, the survival rate in groups 1, 2, 3 was 93.8%, 79.4% and 87.5%, respectively. During 24 months, 75 patients (8.4%) had to undergo amputation. Significant improvements in both ABI and RBC were present at discharge as well as at 6, 12 and 24 months (p<0.001). Dialysis dependency was a predictor of unsuccessful ante/retrograde
recanalization (p=0.048). Lesion length (p=0.0043), dialysis (p=0.033) and
recanalization level (p=0.013) increase the risk of TLR.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a combined antegrade/retrograde access, recanalization of occluded femoropopliteal and/or infrapopliteal arteries can be achieved in a large number of cases. Due to the high rate of repeated TLR across all lesion localizations, the indication for ante- and retrograde recanalization may be limited to patients with CLTI.