Reasons to quit

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:青少年吸烟是一个严重的公共卫生问题,比任何其他烟草使用都更普遍。告知戒烟干预措施,我们探讨了青少年认为戒烟的原因以及帮助他们戒烟的策略。
    方法:半结构化访谈是对11名在过去90天内报告电子烟的青少年进行的便利样本,并从马萨诸塞州的一所高中招募。访谈被转录和双重编码。采用归纳主题分析,并编写了专题摘要。
    结果:青少年报告戒烟的原因包括成本,经历尼古丁戒断或过量摄入的“nic-sick”,对情绪的负面影响,浓度,或健康,并出现尼古丁依赖的症状。几乎所有人都试图多次退出。戒烟的障碍包括暴露于vaping,获取vape产品,压力,和“酷”的新产品或口味。退出策略包括避免别人vaping,寻求社会支持退出,解决同伴继续吸电子烟的压力,从同龄人那里学习成功的戒烟策略,并使用分散注意力的策略或替代vaping。
    结论:许多想戒烟的青少年,大多数人都尝试过多次。干预措施需要让青少年有不同的戒烟理由,障碍,并退出策略偏好。
    背景:本研究通过ClinicalTrials.gov注册。试验注册号为NCT05140915。试用注册日期为2021年11月18日。
    BACKGROUND: Youth vaping is a serious public health concern, being more prevalent than any other tobacco use. To inform cessation interventions, we explored what adolescents perceive as their reasons for quitting and strategies to help them quit.
    METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of 11 adolescents reporting vaping in the past 90 days and recruited from a high school in Massachusetts. Interviews were transcribed and dual-coded. Inductive thematic analysis was employed, and thematic summaries were prepared.
    RESULTS: Reasons adolescents reported for quitting included cost, experiencing \"nic-sick\" from nicotine withdrawal or excess intake, negative impacts on mood, concentration, or health, and experiencing symptoms of nicotine dependence. Nearly all tried to quit multiple times. Barriers to quitting included exposure to vaping, access to vape products, stress, and \"cool\" new products or flavors. Quit strategies included avoiding others vaping, seeking social support to quit, addressing peer pressure to continue vaping, learning successful quit strategies from peers, and using distraction strategies or alternatives to vaping.
    CONCLUSIONS: Many adolescents who vape want to quit, and most have tried multiple times. Interventions need to engage adolescents with varying reasons to quit, barriers, and quit strategy preferences.
    BACKGROUND: This study is registered through ClinicalTrials.gov. The trial registration number is NCT05140915. The trial registration date is 11/18/2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Preprint
    背景青少年吸烟是一种流行病,比任何其他烟草使用都更普遍。告知戒烟干预措施,我们探讨了青少年认为戒烟的原因以及帮助他们戒烟的策略。方法半结构化访谈是对11名在过去90天内报告电子烟的青少年进行的便利样本,并从马萨诸塞州的一所高中招募。采访被转录,和双重编码。采用归纳主题分析,并准备了主题摘要。结果青少年报告戒烟的原因包括:费用;因尼古丁戒断或过量摄入而经历“nic-sick”;对情绪的负面影响,浓度,或健康;并经历尼古丁依赖的症状。几乎所有人都试图多次退出。戒烟的障碍包括:接触vaping;获取vape产品;压力;和“酷”新产品或口味。戒烟策略包括:避免他人吸烟;寻求社会支持以戒烟;解决同伴继续吸电子烟的压力;从同伴那里学习成功的戒烟策略;并使用分散注意力的策略或替代vaping的方法。结论许多vape想要戒烟的青少年,大多数人已经尝试过多次。干预措施需要让青少年有不同的戒烟理由,障碍,并退出策略偏好。临床试验注册本研究通过ClinicalTrials.gov.注册。试验注册号为NCT05140915。试用注册日期为2021年11月18日。
    UNASSIGNED: Youth vaping is an epidemic, being more prevalent than any other tobacco use. To inform cessation interventions, we explored what adolescents perceive to be their reasons for quitting and strategies to help in their quit efforts.
    UNASSIGNED: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of 11 adolescents reporting vaping in the past 90 days and recruited from a high school in Massachusetts. Interviews were transcribed, and dual coded. Inductive thematic analysis was employed and thematic summaries were prepared.
    UNASSIGNED: Reasons adolescents reported for quitting included: cost; experiencing \"nic-sick\" from nicotine withdrawal or excess intake; negative impacts on mood, concentration, or health; and experiencing symptoms of nicotine dependence. Nearly all tried to quit multiple times. Barriers to quitting included: exposure to vaping; access to vape products; stress; and \"cool\" new products or flavors. Quit strategies included: avoiding others vaping; seeking social support to quit; addressing peer pressure to continue vaping; learning successful quit strategies from peers; and using distraction strategies or alternatives to vaping.
    UNASSIGNED: Many adolescents who vape want to quit and most have tried multiple times. Interventions need to engage adolescents with varying reasons to quit, barriers, and quit strategy preferences.
    UNASSIGNED: This study is registered through ClinicalTrials.gov. The trial registration number is NCT05140915. The trial registration date is 11/18/2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究调查了人们计划减少或停止烟草消费的原因及其与MPOWER评分的关系,适应社会人口统计学,文化,和经济因素。
    方法:使用的数据是EuromonitorInternational的消费者之声:2019-2020年尼古丁调查,世界银行的国家收入和世卫组织的MPOWER政策得分。分析样本包括21个中高收入国家的21913名合法吸烟年龄的成年人,他们使用尼古丁和烟草产品,并计划在未来12个月内减少或停止其消费。具有鲁棒误差方差的泊松回归模型,根据社会人口统计学和烟草使用协变量进行调整,根据连续的MPOWER评分,选择一定的原因来减少烟草消费,从而产生调整后的风险比(ARR)。
    结果:减少或停止烟草消费的主要原因是改善健康状况(85%),省钱(65%)来自家庭的压力(19%),并使用另一种物质(4%)。通过MPOWER评分观察到国家差异。在某些MPOWER得分与减少或停止烟草消费的原因之间发现了正相关:强制禁止烟草广告和使用另一种物质(ARR=1.28;95%CI:1.11-1.47);警告烟草的危险并节省金钱(ARR=1.25;95%CI:1.19-1.32);提供戒烟帮助并使用另一种物质(ARR=1.26;95%CI:1.08%,使用1.19-1.
    结论:MPOWER评分与报告的戒烟原因相关,包括改善健康,省钱,回应家庭压力或使用另一种物质。
    BACKGROUND: This study examined reasons why people planned to reduce or stop tobacco consumption and their relationship with MPOWER scores, adjusting for sociodemographic, cultural, and economic factors.
    METHODS: Data used were Euromonitor International\'s Voice of the Consumer: Nicotine Survey 2019-2020, World Bank\'s country income and WHO\'s MPOWER policy scores. Analytical sample included 21913 adults of legal smoking age in 21 middle- and high-income countries who used nicotine and tobacco products and planned to reduce or stop their consumption in the next 12 months. Poisson regression models with robust error variance, adjusted for sociodemographic and tobacco use covariables, generated adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) of selecting a certain reason to reduce tobacco consumption dependent on continuous MPOWER scores.
    RESULTS: Main reasons to reduce or stop tobacco consumption were improving health (85%), saving money (65%), pressure from family (19%), and using another substance instead (4%). Country variation was observed by MPOWER scores. Positive associations were found between some MPOWER scores and reasons to reduce or stop tobacco consumption: enforcing bans on tobacco advertising and using another substance (ARR=1.28; 95% CI: 1.11-1.47); warning about dangers of tobacco and saving money (ARR=1.25; 95% CI: 1.19-1.32); offering help to quit tobacco and using another substance (ARR=1.26; 95% CI: 1.10-1.45) or family pressure (ARR=1.11; 95% CI: 1.04-1.17); anti-tobacco campaigns and using another substance (ARR=1.15; 95% CI: 1.08-1.23); and raising taxes and saving money (ARR=1.11; 95% CI: 1.09-1.13).
    CONCLUSIONS: MPOWER scores are associated with reported reasons to quit tobacco including to improve health, save money, respond to family pressure or use another substance instead.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The aim of this study was to contribute to the understanding of why volunteers in a time bank known as \"NeighborhoodPension,\" which involves community-based care, are motivated to start, continue, and quit volunteering. The time bank started in 2013 and is the first time bank in Brussels, Belgium. A planned prospective longitudinal study involving qualitative focus group interviews was used to study a group of volunteers at four time points over 1 year. There were two main themes, the first of which pertains to older adults\' motives for volunteering with the time bank. These motives are largely attributable to the volunteer organization\'s contextual factors. The second theme focuses on reasons for quitting volunteering. Factors for retaining volunteers relate strongly to the purpose of the volunteer organization. Co-production (i.e., engaging the volunteers in the design of the project) and having an attention officer (i.e., a confidant who listens to the volunteers\' worries) are examples of retention strategies. Moreover, earning time credits did not appear to be a motive for continued volunteering. These theoretical perspectives could help to improve organizational support of volunteers and increase the participation of older citizens in community-based volunteering. The complexity associated with retaining volunteers stems from the fact that although initial motives for volunteering are generally clearly defined, other contextual factors (such as relationships with other volunteers and organizational structure) change the initial motives and can result in volunteer turnover.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号