BACKGROUND: Despite increasing global attention to health literacy and adolescents\' digital health information seeking, no unidimensional instruments measuring digital health literacy (DHL) in adolescents have reportedly been validated using Rasch modeling. Moreover, the evidence of adolescents\' abilities to navigate the health system (NAV-HL) in light of their DHL proficiency is still scarce. Therefore, our study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of a DHL instrument (HLS19-DIGI scale) in order to investigate DHL in adolescents and young adults aged 16-25 and associations with abilities to navigate the health system.
METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional survey among 890 Norwegian adolescents was conducted during April-October 2020 using computer-assisted telephone interviewing. Rasch modeling, independent samples t-test, chi-square test, and binary regression models were used to analyze the data.
RESULTS: The HLS19-DIGI scale was sufficiently unidimensional, whereas no differential item functioning or disordered response categories were observed. However, relatively poor targeting was revealed indicating too many easy items for the target population. Yet, a high proportion (54%) of low DHL proficiency in adolescents was observed, as well as DHL was positively associated with the abilities to navigate the health system.
CONCLUSIONS: The HLS19-DIGI scale is considered a sufficiently unidimensional and valid instrument for measuring DHL in adolescents, which may be a useful tool for health authorities, public health workers, and health service providers. While DHL affects adolescents\' abilities to navigate the health system, future research should measure and examine their ability to utilize digital health services, separately.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a simple, practical methodology to equate or link equivalent domains of the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-item questionnaire (PROMIS-29) using the Rasch framework.
METHODS: In April 2016, the PROMIS-29 and SF-36 were completed by 1501 individuals selected to be representative of the French population. For each domain common to the two questionnaires, a Partial Credit Model was fitted to the items related to that dimension in the two questionnaires. These items were then calibrated on the same metric, which enabled the scores from one questionnaire to be associated with the scores from the other.
RESULTS: Six of the seven PROMIS-29 scales and five of the six SF-36 subscales (physical, pain, social, vitality, depression and anxiety domains) were equated or linked. Correspondence tables between scores, with a 95% confidence interval, were established for each domain. A freely available Stata macro program was developed to automatize the equating or linking process.
CONCLUSIONS: These results should facilitate comparisons across studies using the SF-36 and the PROMIS-29 in France. The equating or linking process developed is simple to implement and can be used in other countries and for other instruments.

Our purpose in this study was to provide additional psychometric evidence of the Quality of Life for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (QOLASD-C) scale. We used Rasch modeling to investigate the QOLASD-C functioning, the characteristics of the items comprising the scale, and the item functioning across subgroups of children with ASD based on gender and race/ethnicity. Results showed that QOLASD-C was unidimensional, met the local independence assumption, and measured quality of life (QOL). The items showed excellent fit to the model and good discriminating ability between low and high QOL. Most items showed a moderate difficulty level. No differential item functioning was observed based on children\'s gender and race/ethnicity. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

\"Access\" dimension of Food insecurity (FI) is directly measured by the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES). The current study assessed the appropriateness of the FIES for measuring FI in rural Bangladesh, followed by an assessment of FI prevalence and its correlates utilizing Bangladesh Integrated Household Survey (BIHS) data. The internal validity of the FIES and the prevalence of FI were investigated using the Rasch modeling approach. We utilized equating procedure to calibrate the study\'s result to the global FIES reference scale and determined FI prevalence rates that were comparable across countries. The external validity of the FIES was evaluated by examining its association with other FI measures using Spearman\'s rho correlation analysis. With an overall Rasch reliability of 0.84, the FIES met the Rasch model assumptions of conditional independence and equal discrimination, and as well as the fit statistics standards for all eight items. Infit statistics were within the allowed limit for all FIES items indicating good internal validity. However, we noted a high outfit (>2) for the \"unable to eat healthy and nutritious food\" item indicating the presence of some unusual response patterns. Our analysis found no significant (>0.4) correlation between FIES items. We also found a significant correlation between FIES and other FI proxies, e.g., the Household hunger scale (HHS), Food consumption score (FCS), and Household dietary diversity score (HDDS). Overall, the prevalence of moderate or severe FI was 18.92% in rural Bangladesh. Geographic areas, access to electricity, household ownership, access to sanitation, livestock ownership, family size, education level, and monthly per capita food expenditure significantly explained the variation in FI. Our analyses suggest that the FIES is internally and externally valid for FI measurement in rural Bangladesh. However, FIES questions may need to be reordered to more accurately evaluate lower levels of FI, and the item \"unable to eat healthy and nutritious food\" may need cognitive testing.

Children with cerebral palsy (CP) are faced with long-term dysfunction. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Children and Youth (ICF-CY) has been proposed but the complicated procedure limits the feasibility of clinical application and the exploration of health degrees. This study was aimed to establish a Mokken scale based on the ICF-CY for CP, and then to estimate psychometric properties through the derived Rasch model. 150 children with CP were assessed by the categories of \"b\" and \"d\" components in the core set. The binarized data was screened by the Mokken scale analysis and utilized for generating a reliable Rasch model. The validity of the final model was checked by the correlation between person ability, Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) and total scores. Using the Mokken scale to guide Rasch modeling, we can parameterize the properties of ICF-CY and realize the simple assessment of person abilities for children with CP.

Evidence suggests that locally developed and/or adapted screening tools for mental ill-health can have higher validity than directly translated tools developed in other settings. We administered the locally developed Liberian Distress Screener (LDS) and the Liberian-adapted Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9L) to a random sample of 142 outpatients at a regional hospital in Maryland County, Liberia. In the LDS, seven items demonstrated poor model fit and were excluded, resulting in an 11-item screener (LDS-11). Exploratory factor analysis of the 11-item screener (LDS-11) showed a single latent variable construct with significant factor loadings. Cronbach\'s alpha revealed good internal consistency (α = 0.81). Rasch analyses showed that \"brain hot\" and \"heart fall down\" were the most difficult idioms of distress to endorse while \"things playing on the mind\" was the easiest. All LDS-11 elements were associated with elevated function impairment, with \"things playing on the mind,\" \"worry too much,\" \"head is hurting,\" and \"heart cut/beat fast\" achieving statistical significance. One item in the PHQ-9L demonstrated poor model fit and was excluded from psychometric analyses. The resultant eight-item PHQ demonstrated internal consistency (α = 0.76) and Rasch analysis revealed that \"moving/talking too slowly/fast\" was the most difficult item to endorse, while \"not happy when doing things\" was the easiest. Twelve items were significantly associated with functional impairment. Exploratory analyses reveal items that demonstrate ease and appropriateness of use for assessing mental distress in this population. Implementation research is needed to incorporate idioms of distress and screeners into Liberia\'s mental healthcare system.

Research and prevalence studies commonly use the nine-item Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI; Ferris and Wynne in The Canadian Problem Gambling Index, 2001) to measure problem gambling severity in older adults. However, the appropriateness of the PGSI for use with older adults must be evaluated to ensure accurate interpretation of scores. This study evaluated the PGSI with older adults that gamble using a Rasch model approach, which has not yet been examined in the literature. Data from the Quinte Longitudinal Study (Wiiliams et al. in The Quinte Longitudinal Study of Gambling and Problem Gambling 2006-2011, Bay of Quinte region, Ontario [Canada] (V28), 2014) were utilized, accessed through the Gambling Research Exchange of Ontario (GREO). Using WINSTEPS.V5, a Rasch rating scale model was applied to an older adult sample from Ontario, Canada (n = 571, Mage = 66, range = 60-80 +) to assess: (1) the dimensionality and fit between individual PGSI items and the underlying latent construct of problem gambling; (2) utility of items and response options; and (3) potential differential item functioning (DIF) between genders. Using a larger sample (N = 3206, Mage = 45, range = 18-80 +), DIF was examined across three age subgroups. Results supported unidimensionality of the PGSI and item polarity (rpm range = 0.42-0.85). Infit and outfit statistics showed mixed model misfit for three items. The use of three response options were deemed productive for measurement, but almost always was not frequently endorsed. Model-person separation (1.00) and reliability (0.50) were poor, and model-item separation (6.12) and reliability (0.97) were excellent. There was no significant DIF between older adults by gender. Three items showed significant DIF between older and younger adults. Possible modifications to improve the PGSI for use with older adults are discussed.

UNASSIGNED: This study aims to accomplish two tasks for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) application among persons with stroke: (1) to make an ICF tool for measuring personal abilities with simplified assessment operations; (2) to quantitatively evaluate ICF categories for being functioning rather than being disabled.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 130 inpatients with stroke via convenience sampling were evaluated by the extended comprehensive ICF core set for stroke, modified Rankin scale, and modified Barthel index (MBI). This study investigated the responses to 118 stroke-related ICF items (59 items in b and d domains individually) using Mokken scale analysis followed with Rasch modeling.
UNASSIGNED: A Mokken scale with 47 items was extracted from the binary data (1 as no-impairment or mild-impairment and 0 as moderate to complete impairment). A Rasch model with 45 items was derived from the Mokken scale. The conversion chart was available involving the original ordinal scores to Rasch-transformed scores from 0 to 100 (interval scale). Total scores exhibited a high correlation with the personal abilities estimated by the Rasch model. The personal ability also demonstrated a significantly strong correlation with the score of the MBI. Thus, the 45 ICF items were suggested to rate potential functional ability as a single measurement.
UNASSIGNED: Based on simple \"functioning or disabled\" judgment tasks, ICF assessment can be simplified to a questionnaire with answering \"yes-or-no\" questions for each category. Functioning level for each person and difficulty of being functioning for each category can be estimated by the Rasch model of this questionnaire.

The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) is the most cited instrument to measure dispositional mindfulness. However, some aspects of its validity are still under debate. We aimed to assess different sources of validity evidence (i.e., response processes, content, internal structure, reliability, and relations with external variables) of the MAAS scores in a sample of Spanish-speaking participants (N = 812) applying Rasch modeling. The items formed an essentially unidimensional structure, the item hierarchy was similar to that of previous comparable studies, the items were well targeted, and the ordering of persons along the construct was adequate. Moreover, measures were invariant across four age groups and three groups based on meditation practice, and correlated as expected with a variety of well-being variables. In sum, our findings supported the interpretation of MAAS scores as a measure of mindfulness in our sample of Spanish-speaking participants. Any other specific inference should be tested.

On 9 December2019, the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) released its final evidence report to establish the value of oral semaglutide (Novo Nordisk) for Type 2 diabetes (T2DM). A key element in this report was the development of a lifetime cost effectiveness microsimulation model based on a small sample of NHANES diabetes respondents. The model contrasted oral semaglutide added to current antihyperglycemic treatment for T2DM. The purpose of the model was to estimate outcomes that included life years (LYs) gained, an estimate of equal value life years gained (evLYGs), QALYs gained, clinical events, cost per major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) avoided and total costs for each intervention over a lifetime time horizon. Previous commentaries in INNOVATTIONS in Pharmacy have provided detailed critiques of the ICER modeling framework. While this model differs from previous ICER models, the result is still a framework that constructs a so-called evidence base that fails the demarcation test. It is best described as pseudoscience. The model creates, by assumption, an imaginary world. The claims made for oral semaglutide by ICER should not be taken seriously by health care decision makers. The purpose of this commentary is to point to the limitations of the model with particular reference to the utility metrics employed, the resulting claims for quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and consequent recommendations for price discounting and affordability.