Phytobezoars is a rare disease and less common in Western countries. The stomach is the primary site for these formations, and endoscopic treatment involving fragmentation and extraction has traditionally been the most effective approach. However, medical treatments using enzymatic and chemical agents, such as cellulase and Coca-Cola, aimed at dissolving the bezoars, have also been utilized, showing varying degrees of resolution success. Notably, the oral dissolution treatment with Coca-Cola has emerged as a promising, simpler, and more cost-effective method. The study by Liu et al represents an important step in clinical research on this topic, despite some limitations that need addressing for a more comprehensive understanding of its findings. Key considerations for future research include sample size calculation, endoscopic procedure details, outpatient vs. inpatient treatment, and detailed cost calculations. The study\'s exclusions, such as patients with upper gastric surgery, phytobezoars older than 14 d, and cases of gastroparesis, limit its applicability to broader populations, especially in Western countries. Given the promising outcomes of the Coca-Cola treatment, it\'s advocated as a first-line therapy for phytobezoars. Nonetheless, further research is essential to overcome these limitations. However special situations such as perforation or small bowel obstruction will require surgical treatment.

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma includes surgery, radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy (TMZ/RT→TMZ). The proteasome has long been considered a promising therapeutic target because of its role as a central biological hub in tumor cells. Marizomib is a novel pan-proteasome inhibitor that crosses the blood brain barrier.
METHODS: EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8 was a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open label phase 3 superiority trial. Key eligibility criteria included newly diagnosed glioblastoma, age > 18 years and Karnofsky performance status > 70. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients receiving marizomib in addition to TMZ/RT→TMZ with patients receiving only standard treatment in the whole population, and in the subgroup of patients with MGMT promoter-unmethylated tumors.
RESULTS: The trial was opened at 82 institutions in Europe, Canada and the US. A total of 749 patients (99.9% of planned 750) were randomized. OS was not different between the standard and the marizomib arm (median 17 vs 16.5 months; HR=1.04; p=0.64). PFS was not statistically different either (median 6.0 vs. 6.3 months; HR=0.97; p=0.67). In patients with MGMT promoter-unmethylated tumors, OS was also not different between standard therapy and marizomib (median 14.5 vs 15.1 months, HR=1.13; p=0.27). More CTCAE grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in the marizomib arm than in the standard arm.
CONCLUSIONS: Adding marizomib to standard temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy resulted in more toxicity, but did not improve OS or PFS in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: This study was recruited to compare the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy (RT) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as postoperative adjuvant therapy after narrow-margin hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.
METHODS: This single-center prospective randomized study was conducted in the Cancer Hospital, Guang Xi Medical University, Nanning. A total of 72 patients who received treatment in this hospital between August 2017 and July 2019 were included and randomly allocated to TACE group (n = 48) and RT group (n = 24). Next, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates, recurrence patterns, financial burden, and safety were evaluated.
RESULTS: The difference between the RT and TACE groups was not significant in one-, three-, and five-year OS (87.5%, 79.0%, and 62.5% vs. 93.8%, 75.9%, and 63.4%, respectively, P = 0.071) and PFS rates (79.0%, 54.2%, and 22.6% vs. 75.0%, 47.9%, and 32.6%, respectively, P = 0.071). Compared to the TACE group, the RT group had significantly lower intrahepatic recurrence rate (20.8% vs. 52.1%, P = 0.011), higher extrahepatic recurrence rate (37.5% vs. 14.6%, P = 0.034), and no marginal and diffuse recurrences (0% vs. 16.7%, P < 0.05). The mean overall treatment cost was higher (¥62,550.59 ± 4397.27 vs. ¥40,732.56 ± 9210.54, P < 0.01), the hospital stay (15.1 ± 3.7 vs. 11.8 ± 4.1 days, P < 0.01) was longer, and the overall treatment stay (13.3 ± 5.3 vs. 41.29 ± 12.4 days, P < 0.01) was shorter in the TACE group than in the RT group. Besides, both groups did not exhibit significant differences in the frequency and severity of adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: Both adjuvant TACE and RT can better the OS and PFS of patients with HCC. However, RT has a significantly better performance than TACE in terms of improving intrahepatic recurrence rate, treatment cost and hospital stay.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of mirabegron and vibegron in female OAB patients.
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized crossover study of female patients with OAB. The patients were assigned to Group MV (mirabegron for 8 weeks, followed by vibegron for 8 weeks) or group VM (vibegron for 8 weeks, followed by mirabegron for 8 weeks). The primary endpoint was the change in OABSS from baseline, and the secondary endpoint was the change in FVC parameters. After completion of the study, each patient was asked which drug was preferable.
RESULTS: A total of 83 patients were enrolled (40 and 43 in groups MV and VM, respectively). At 8th and 16th week, 33 and 29 in Group MV and 34 and 27 in Group VM continued to receive the treatment. The change in PVR was not significantly different between treatment with mirabegron and vibegron. The changes in OABSS, nighttime frequency, mean, and maximum voided volume were similar between mirabegron and vibegron. The mean change in the daytime frequency was greater in the vibegron than in the mirabegron. Of the 56 patients, 15 (27%) and 30 (53%) preferred mirabegron and vibegron, respectively. The remaining 11 patients (20%) showed no preference. The change in the urgency incontinence score during vibegron was better in patients who preferred vibegron to mirabegron.
CONCLUSIONS: The efficacies of mirabegron and vibegron in female patients was similar. The patients\' preference for vibegron could depend on the efficacy of vibegron for urgency incontinence.

UNASSIGNED: Social media (SoMe) are emerging as important tools for research dissemination. Twitter/X promotion has been shown to increase citation rates in well-established journals. We aimed to test the effect of a SoMe promotion strategy on the Mendeley reader counts, the Altmetric Attention Score and the number of citations in an upcoming open-access journal.
UNASSIGNED: The #TweetTheJournal study is a randomized, controlled study. Articles published in seven subsequent issues of the International Journal of Cardiology Heart & Vasculature (April 2021-April 2022) were randomized to a Twitter/X promotion arm (articles were posted four times) and to a control arm (without active posting). Articles with accompanied editorials were excluded. Primary endpoint of the study was Mendeley reader count, secondary endpoints were Altmetric Attention Score and number of citations. Follow-up was one year.
UNASSIGNED: SoMe promotion of articles showed no statistically significant difference in Mendeley reader counts or number of citations at one year follow up. SoMe promotion resulted in a statistically significant higher Altmetric Attention Score in the intervention compared to the control group (RR 1.604, 95 % CI 1.024-2.511, p = 0.039). In the overall group, Altmetric Attention Score showed a correlation with Mendeley reader counts (Spearman\'s ρ = 0.202, p = 0.010) and Mendeley reader counts correlated significantly with number of citations (Spearman\'s ρ = 0.372, p < 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: A dedicated SoMe promotion strategy did not result in statistically significant differences in early impact indicators as the Mendeley reader count in a upcoming journal, but increased the Altmetric Attention Score.

UNASSIGNED: Medical management of adenomyosis is an emerging perspective in modern gynecology. Though levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and dienogest (DNG) effectively relieve symptoms in adenomyosis, neither has been approved for the same indication. Our study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of these progestins in treating adenomyosis.
UNASSIGNED: To study the efficacy and safety of LNG-IUS versus DNG in patients with symptomatic adenomyosis.
UNASSIGNED: Open-labeled, parallel, single-centered, randomized clinical trial.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with adenomyosis-associated pain with or without abnormal uterine bleeding were randomly allocated to either LNG-IUS group or DNG group. The primary outcome was a reduction in painful symptoms after 12 weeks of treatment measured by visual analog scale (VAS) score. Changes in menstrual blood loss (MBL), improvement in quality of life (QoL), and adverse drug reactions were also analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: The VAS score significantly decreased from baseline in both groups. The baseline and post-treatment VAS scores in the LNG-IUS group were 6.41 ± 1.07 and 3.41 ± 1.04 (p = <0.001) and in the DNG group, were 6.41 ± 0.95 and 3.12 ± 1.40 (p = <0.001), respectively. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the LNG-IUS group experienced lighter MBL as compared to the DNG group [27/30 (90%) in the LNG-IUS group versus 17/22 (77.2%) in the DNG group (p = 0.006)]. Both the groups had improvement in QOL scores calculated by the World Heath Organisation QOL scale (WHOQOL BREF) questionnaire; however, it was more pronounced in the DNG group [(28.76 ± 30.47 in the LNG-IUS group versus 48.26 ± 44.91 in the DNG group (p = 0.04)]. Both the agents were safe as there were no reported major adverse drug reactions.
UNASSIGNED: DNG can be an effective and safe alternative to LNG-IUS for the medical management of adenomyosis.
UNASSIGNED: The trial was prospectively registered at the clinical trial registry - India (CTRI) vide CTRI number CTRI/2020/05/025186.
Comparison of effectiveness and safety of Mirena (LNG-IUS) with dienogest for treatment of adenomyosis Adenomyosis is a condition affecting women, typically aged 40–50, but its incidence is rising in younger women, impacting fertility. It causes painful symptoms like dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, and heavy menstrual bleeding. Managing symptoms is crucial, and medical approaches include levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and dienogest (DNG). LNG-IUS is reversible contraception, approved for eight years, effectively treating symptoms. DNG, a newer progestin, is effective for endometriosis, but evidence for adenomyosis is limited. This single-center, open-label randomized clinical trial compared LNG-IUS and DNG in treating adenomyosis. Women over 20 with pelvic pain were diagnosed using ultrasound and met specific criteria. After informed consent, participants were assigned randomly to LNG-IUS or DNG groups. Treatment outcomes, including pelvic pain, quality of life (QoL), and adverse effects, were assessed over 12 weeks. Out of 84 assessed, 74 women were recruited, with 34 in each group analyzed. After 12 weeks, both groups showed significantly reduced pelvic pain (VAS scores), but no significant difference was found between the groups. LNG-IUS resulted in a significantly greater reduction in heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), whereas DNG showed better improvement in overall QOL. Adverse effects were similar in both groups, with hot flushes reported in the DNG group. This study is one of the few comparing LNG-IUS and DNG for adenomyosis, finding both effective for symptom relief. Although LNG-IUS was superior in reducing HMB, DNG showed better overall improvement in QoL. Safety profiles were similar. Previous studies support the efficacy of DNG in reducing adenomyosis symptoms. To conclude, both LNG-IUS and DNG effectively alleviate adenomyosis symptoms, with LNG-IUS superior in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding and DNG showing better overall improvement in QOL. DNG is a viable and effective alternative to LNG-IUS.

BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been ongoing for over 3 years, during which numerous clinical and experimental studies have been conducted. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the survival probability and complications of COVID-19 patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).
METHODS: We searched the databases by using Population-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome-Study Design (PICOS). We conducted a search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases to retrieve studies published until December 10, 2022. A random-effects meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, and assessed the studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score. The results were presented as pooled morbidity with 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: The study was conducted on 19 studies that enrolled a total of 1494 patients, and the results showed a pooled survival probability of 66.0%. The pooled morbidity for intracranial hemorrhage was 8.7%, intracranial thrombosis 7.0%, pneumothorax 9.0%, pulmonary embolism 11.0%, pulmonary hemorrhage 9.0%, heart failure 14.0%, liver failure 13.0%, renal injury 44.0%, gastrointestinal hemorrhage 6.0%, gastrointestinal ischemia 6.0% and venous thrombosis 31.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies focused on the survival probability and complications of COVID-19 patients undergoing ECMO, which are significant in evaluating the use of ECMO in COVID-19 patients and provide a basis for further research.
BACKGROUND: Our study was registered on PROSPERO with registration number CRD42022382555.

OBJECTIVE: Only one phase III prospective randomized study, published in 2006, has assessed the performance of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) for glioblastoma resection. The aim of the RESECT study was to compare the onco-functional results associated with 5-ALA fluorescence and with white-light conventional microsurgery in patients with glioblastoma managed according to the current standards of care.
METHODS: This was a phase III prospective randomized single-blinded study, involving 21 French neurosurgical centers, comparing 5-ALA FGS with white-light conventional microsurgery in patients with glioblastoma managed according to the current standards of care, including neuronavigation use and postoperative radiochemotherapy. Randomization was performed in a 1:1 ratio stratified by institution. 5-ALA (20 mg/kg) or placebo (ascorbic acid) was administered orally 3-5 hours before the incision. The primary endpoint was the rate of gross-total resection (GTR) blindly assessed by an independent committee. Patients without a confirmed pathological diagnosis of glioblastoma or with unavailable postoperative MRI studies were excluded from the per-protocol analysis.
RESULTS: Between March 2013 and August 2016, a total of 171 patients were assigned to the 5-ALA fluorescence group (n = 88) or to the placebo group (n = 83). Twenty-four cases were excluded because the WHO histological criteria of grade 4 glioma were not met. The proportion of GTR was significantly higher in the 5-ALA fluorescence group (53/67, 79.1%) than in the placebo group (33/69, 47.8%; p = 0.0002). After adjustment for age, preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale score, and tumor location, GTR was still associated with 5-ALA fluorescence (OR 4.13 [95% CI 1.94-8.79]). The mean 7-day postoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale score (≥ 80% in 49/71, 69.0% [5-ALA group]; 50/71, 70.4% [placebo group], p = 0.86) and the proportion of patients with a worsened neurological status 3 months postoperatively (9/68, 13.2% [5-ALA group]; 9/70, 12.9% [placebo group], p = 0.95) were similar between groups. Adverse events related to 5-ALA intake were rare and consisted of photosensitization in 4/87 (4.6%) patients and hepatic cytolysis in 1/87 (1.1%) patients. The 6-month PFS (70.2% [95% CI 57.7%-79.6%] and 68.4% [95% CI 55.7%-78.1%]; p = 0.39) and 24-month OS (30.1% [95% CI 18.9%-42.0%] and 37.7% [95% CI 25.8%-49.5%]; p = 0.89) did not significantly differ. In multivariate analysis, GTR was an independent predictor of PFS (hazard ratio 0.56 [95% CI 0.36-0.86], p = 0.008) and OS (hazard ratio 0.65 [95% CI 0.42-1.01], p = 0.05). The use of 5-ALA FGS generates a significant extra cost of 2732.36€ (95% CI 1658.40€-3794.11€).
CONCLUSIONS: The authors found that 5-ALA FGS is an easy-to-use, cost-effective, and minimally time-consuming technique that safely optimizes the extent of resection in patients harboring glioblastoma amenable to a large resection.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possible acute toxicities and pathological changes associated with intravenous, intraperitoneal, or intratumoral injection of natural killer (NK) cells in mice subcutaneously bearing human pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PaC).
METHODS: 100 NPG tumor-bearing mice (50/sex) were engrafted subcutaneously with human PaC BXPC-3 cells 9 days before administration. They were randomly divided into 10 groups with 5 males and 5 females in each group. Mice in Group 1 were given sodium chloride intravenously as vehicle control, and mice in Groups 2-4 human peripheral blood-derived NK cells intravenously at doses of 2 × 107, 1 × 108, and 5 × 108 cells/kg, respectively; mice in Groups 5-7 were injected with NK cells intraperitoneally at doses of 2 × 107, 1 × 108, and 5 × 108 cells/kg, respectively, and mice in Groups 8-10 with NK cells intratumorally at doses of 4 × 103, 2 × 104, and 1 × 105 cells/mm3, respectively. Each group was given a single dose; the mice were observed clinically, and body weight, food intake, blood biochemistry, and tumor volume were measured. On Day 15, the mice were euthanized for gross anatomy and histopathology.
RESULTS: On planned euthanasia, in Groups 2-4 no gross or microscopic pathological changes related to cells injection were found; in Groups 5-7 mice of both sexes showed a decrease in extramedullary hematopoiesis of spleen, and at the dose of 5 × 108 cells/kg, mice of both sexes showed an increase in the composition of spleen white pulp cells. In Groups 8-10, mice of both sexes at doses of 4 × 103 and 1 × 105 cells/mm3 and female mice at the dose of 2 × 104 cells/mm3 showed a decrease in extramedullary hematopoiesis of spleen, and female mice at a dose of 4 × 103 cells/mm3 and mice of both sexes at doses of ≥ 2 × 104 cells/mm3 showed an increase in the composition of spleen white pulp cells; perivascular/peribronchiolar inflammatory cell infiltration in lung and bronchus was observed in mice of both sexes at doses of ≥ 2 × 104 cells/mm3, and inflammatory cell infiltration in liver was observed in mice of both sexes at a dose of 1 × 105 cells/mm3. No other abnormal changes with toxicological significance in clinical observation, body weight, food intake, or blood biochemistry were observed in each group.
CONCLUSIONS: In our study intravenous injection appears the safest way to give NK cells to human PaC-bearing mice. Using intraperitoneal or intratumoral administration, spleen, liver, and lung were the most often affected organs, albeit with mostly mild pathological changes.

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is an extremely contagious illness caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus and has been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). There are currently no particular treatments, however, nebulized heparin has been offered as a viable therapy. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy of nebulized heparin in COVID-19 patients with respiratory symptoms.
UNASSIGNED: Relevant studies were identified through a systematic search of the PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science, and Scopus databases. The search terms included \"nebulized heparin,\" \"COVID-19,\" and \"SARS-CoV-2.\" Studies that evaluated the use of nebulized heparin in COVID-19 patients with respiratory symptoms were included. The rest of the studies along with those that were not published in English were excluded. The systematic review was registered under PROSPERO-CRD42023413927.
UNASSIGNED: Five studies have been included in this systematic review. Case reports, case series, observational studies, and randomized controlled trial (RCT) comprised the studies. The patient sample sizes ranged from 2 to 98. The studies assessed the efficacy of nebulized heparin in COVID-19 patients with variable disease severity. The evaluated outcomes included mortality, hospital stay duration, oxygen requirements, and laboratory parameters.
UNASSIGNED: Based on the clinical studies included in this systematic review, nebulized heparin may be useful in the management of COVID-19. Oxygen saturation was greater, inflammatory indicators were lower, and hospital stays were shorter in these patients. However, the studies had limitations, including inconsistent sample sizes, varying dosages of nebulized heparin, and no control groups. Nebulized heparin in patients with COVID-19 needs to be studied further to determine its safety and effectiveness.
UNASSIGNED: Gupta B, Ahluwalia P, Gupta N, Gupta A. Role of Nebulized Heparin in Clinical Outcome of COVID-19 Patients with Respiratory Symptoms: A Systematic Review. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(8):572-579.