Radiography, Thoracic

射线照相术,胸膜
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在结核病(TB)中,胸部X线摄影(CXR)模式变化很大,模仿肺炎和许多其他疾病。本研讨旨在评价Google教导机的功效,基于深度神经网络的图像分类工具,开发预测CXR结核病概率的算法。训练数据集包括用于训练TB检测的348个TBCXR和3806个正常CXR。我们还收集了1150个异常CXR和627个正常CXR用于训练异常检测。对于外部验证,我们从医院收集了250个CXRs.我们还将算法的准确性与五位肺科医师和放射学报告进行了比较。在外部验证中,AI算法在验证数据集1和2中显示曲线下面积(AUC)为0.951和0.975.验证数据集2上的肺科医师的准确性显示0.936-0.995的AUC范围。当添加除TB以外的异常CXR时,人类读者(0.843-0.888)和AI算法(0.828)的AUC均降低。当人类读者与AI算法相结合时,AUC进一步增加至0.862-0.885。本研究中使用Google教学机开发的TBCXRAI算法是有效的,准确性接近经验丰富的临床医生,并可能有助于CXR检测结核病。
    In tuberculosis (TB), chest radiography (CXR) patterns are highly variable, mimicking pneumonia and many other diseases. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of Google teachable machine, a deep neural network-based image classification tool, to develop algorithm for predicting TB probability of CXRs. The training dataset included 348 TB CXRs and 3806 normal CXRs for training TB detection. We also collected 1150 abnormal CXRs and 627 normal CXRs for training abnormality detection. For external validation, we collected 250 CXRs from our hospital. We also compared the accuracy of the algorithm to five pulmonologists and radiological reports. In external validation, the AI algorithm showed areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.951 and 0.975 in validation dataset 1 and 2. The accuracy of the pulmonologists on validation dataset 2 showed AUC range of 0.936-0.995. When abnormal CXRs other than TB were added, AUC decreased in both human readers (0.843-0.888) and AI algorithm (0.828). When combine human readers with AI algorithm, the AUC further increased to 0.862-0.885. The TB CXR AI algorithm developed by using Google teachable machine in this study is effective, with the accuracy close to experienced clinical physicians, and may be helpful for detecting tuberculosis by CXR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    结核病负担较高的国家必须扭转COVID-19大流行的破坏性影响,以加快终结结核病的进程。越南的双X(2X)策略使用胸部X线摄影(CXR)和GeneXpert(Xpert)快速诊断测试来提高结核病的早期检测。家庭接触者和弱势群体(例如,60岁及以上的人,吸烟者,糖尿病患者,那些有酒精使用障碍的人,以及以前接受过结核病治疗的人)在社区活动中使用CXRs进行筛查,其次是Xpert对于那些有正面屏幕的人。在非结核病区的公共设施中,糖尿病患者,呼吸门诊病人,肺病住院患者,和其他弱势群体进行了2倍评估。在越南的COVID-19限制期间,2倍战略通过向乡镇卫生站下放权力,改善了获得结核病服务的机会,卫生系统的最低水平,并使用快速响应的移动应用程序实现自我筛选。对于所有2X模型,计算出使用CXR筛查(NNS)以诊断1名结核病患者所需的数量,并显示出自我筛查者中最高的产量(使用CXR的11NNS),社区(60NNS)和设施(19NNS)中弱势群体的高产量,以及社区运动中家庭接触者的中等高收益(154NNS)。CXR的计算机辅助诊断已纳入社区和设施实施,并改善了医生的CXR解释和Xpert转诊决策。结核病感染和结核病评估的整合提高了家庭接触者结核病预防治疗的资格。实施过程中的重大挑战。2X策略增加了Xpert的合理使用,采用全卫生系统的方法,在社区和设施中覆盖有和没有结核病症状的脆弱人群,以早期发现结核病。在COVID-19限制期间,该策略有效地适应了不同级别的卫生系统,并有助于越南大流行后结核病的恢复。
    Countries that are high burden for TB must reverse the COVID-19 pandemic\'s devastating effects to accelerate progress toward ending TB. Vietnam\'s Double X (2X) strategy uses chest radiography (CXR) and GeneXpert (Xpert) rapid diagnostic testing to improve early detection of TB disease. Household contacts and vulnerable populations (e.g., individuals aged 60 years and older, smokers, diabetics, those with alcohol use disorders, and those previously treated for TB) with and without TB symptoms were screened in community campaigns using CXRs, followed by Xpert for those with a positive screen. In public non-TB district facilities, diabetics, respiratory outpatients, inpatients with lung disease, and other vulnerable populations underwent 2X evaluation. During COVID-19 restrictions in Vietnam, the 2X strategy improved access to TB services by decentralization to commune health stations, the lowest level of the health system, and enabling self-screening using a quick response mobile application. The number needed to screen (NNS) with CXRs to diagnose 1 person with TB disease was calculated for all 2X models and showed the highest yield among self-screeners (11 NNS with CXR), high yield for vulnerable populations in communities (60 NNS) and facilities (19 NNS), and moderately high yield for household contacts in community campaigns (154 NNS). Computer-aided diagnosis for CXRs was incorporated into community and facility implementation and improved physicians\' CXR interpretations and Xpert referral decisions. Integration of TB infection and TB disease evaluation increased eligibility for TB preventive treatment among household contacts, a major challenge during implementation. The 2X strategy increased the rational use of Xpert, employing a health system-wide approach that reached vulnerable populations with and without TB symptoms in communities and facilities for early detection of TB disease. This strategy was effectively adapted to different levels of the health system during COVID-19 restrictions and contributed to post-pandemic TB recovery in Vietnam.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    深度学习(DL)算法的推广对于在临床实践中安全实施计算机辅助诊断系统至关重要。然而,广泛的泛化仍然是机器学习中的一个挑战。本研究旨在识别和研究可能影响DL网络内部验证和泛化的潜在因素,即图像来源的机构,X射线设备应用的图像处理,以及X射线设备的响应函数的类型。出于这些目的,预先训练的卷积神经网络(CNN)(VGG16)进行了三次训练,用于对COVID-19进行分类,并控制具有相同超参数的胸部X光片,但是使用三个不同的X射线设备制造商在两个机构中获取的数据的不同组合。关于内部验证,将来自外部机构的图像添加到训练集并没有改变算法的内部性能,然而,包含由不同制造商的设备获取的图像将性能降低了8%(p<0.05).相比之下,实现了具有相同类型响应函数的跨机构和X射线设备的推广。尽管如此,在具有不同类型响应函数的设备中未观察到推广.这个因素是我们研究中实现广泛概括的关键障碍,其次是设备的图像处理和机构间的差异,这两者都将泛化性能降低到18.9%(p<0.05),9.8%(p<0.05),分别。最后,利用CNN提取的特征进行聚类分析,揭示由预先训练的CNN提取的特征值对采集图像的X射线设备的实质依赖性。
    Generalization of deep learning (DL) algorithms is critical for the secure implementation of computer-aided diagnosis systems in clinical practice. However, broad generalization remains to be a challenge in machine learning. This research aims to identify and study potential factors that can affect the internal validation and generalization of DL networks, namely the institution where the images come from, the image processing applied by the X-ray device, and the type of response function of the X-ray device. For these purposes, a pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) (VGG16) was trained three times for classifying COVID-19 and control chest radiographs with the same hyperparameters, but using different combinations of data acquired in two institutions by three different X-ray device manufacturers. Regarding internal validation, the addition of images from an external institution to the training set did not modify the algorithm\'s internal performance, however, the inclusion of images acquired by a device from a different manufacturer decreased the performance up to 8% (p < 0.05). In contrast, generalization across institutions and X-ray devices with the same type of response function was achieved. Nonetheless, generalization was not observed across devices with different types of response function. This factor was the key impediment to achieving broad generalization in our research, followed by the device\'s image-processing and the inter-institutional differences, which both reduced generalization performance to 18.9% (p < 0.05), and 9.8% (p < 0.05), respectively. Finally, clustering analysis with features extracted by the CNN was performed, revealing a substantial dependence of feature values extracted by the pre-trained CNN on the X-ray device which acquired the images.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景由于骨质疏松症通常无症状表现,诊断骨质疏松症具有挑战性。这突出了为高危人群提供筛查的重要性。目的评估双能X线骨密度仪(DXA)筛查在使用胸片通过人工智能(AI)模型识别的高危骨质疏松症患者中的有效性。材料和方法这项在学术医学中心进行的随机对照试验包括年龄在2022年1月至12月期间接受胸部X线摄影而没有DXA检查史的40岁或以上的参与者。通过启用AI的胸部X光片确定的高风险参与者被随机分配到筛查组。在2023年1月至6月期间提供全额报销的DXA检查,或对照组,接受常规护理,定义为由医生或患者在没有AI干预的情况下主动进行DXA检查。逻辑回归用于检验主要结局的差异,新发骨质疏松症,在筛查组和对照组之间。结果在40658名参与者中,4912人(12.1%)被AI模型确定为高风险,2456人被分配到筛查组(平均年龄,71.8岁±11.5[SD];1909年女性)和2456人分配到对照组(平均年龄,72.1岁±11.8;1872年女性)。筛查组的2456名参与者中,共有315名(12.8%)接受了全额报销的DXA,315人中有237人(75.2%)被确定为新发骨质疏松症.在筛查组和对照组中通过常规护理纳入DXA结果后,筛查组的骨质疏松症检出率更高(2456人中的272例[11.1%]对2456人中的27例[1.1%];比值比[OR],与对照组相比,11.2[95%CI:7.5,16.7];P<.001)。与不符合DXA正式标准的筛查组参与者相比,骨质疏松症诊断的OR增加(OR,23.2[95%CI:10.2,53.1]与OR,8.0[95%CI:5.0,12.6];交互式P=0.03)。结论对具有AI功能的胸片确定的高危人群进行DXA筛查可以有效诊断更多的骨质疏松症患者。临床试验登记号.NCT05721157©RSNA,2024补充材料可用于本文。另见本期Smith和Rothenberg的社论。
    Background Diagnosing osteoporosis is challenging due to its often asymptomatic presentation, which highlights the importance of providing screening for high-risk populations. Purpose To evaluate the effectiveness of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) screening in high-risk patients with osteoporosis identified by an artificial intelligence (AI) model using chest radiographs. Materials and Methods This randomized controlled trial conducted at an academic medical center included participants 40 years of age or older who had undergone chest radiography between January and December 2022 without a history of DXA examination. High-risk participants identified with the AI-enabled chest radiographs were randomly allocated to either a screening group, which was offered fully reimbursed DXA examinations between January and June 2023, or a control group, which received usual care, defined as DXA examination by a physician or patient on their own initiative without AI intervention. A logistic regression was used to test the difference in the primary outcome, new-onset osteoporosis, between the screening and control groups. Results Of the 40 658 enrolled participants, 4912 (12.1%) were identified by the AI model as high risk, with 2456 assigned to the screening group (mean age, 71.8 years ± 11.5 [SD]; 1909 female) and 2456 assigned to the control group (mean age, 72.1 years ± 11.8; 1872 female). A total of 315 of 2456 (12.8%) participants in the screening group underwent fully reimbursed DXA, and 237 of 315 (75.2%) were identified with new-onset osteoporosis. After including DXA results by means of usual care in both screening and control groups, the screening group exhibited higher rates of osteoporosis detection (272 of 2456 [11.1%] vs 27 of 2456 [1.1%]; odds ratio [OR], 11.2 [95% CI: 7.5, 16.7]; P < .001) compared with the control group. The ORs of osteoporosis diagnosis were increased in screening group participants who did not meet formalized criteria for DXA compared with those who did (OR, 23.2 [95% CI: 10.2, 53.1] vs OR, 8.0 [95% CI: 5.0, 12.6]; interactive P = .03). Conclusion Providing DXA screening to a high-risk group identified with AI-enabled chest radiographs can effectively diagnose more patients with osteoporosis. Clinical trial registration no. NCT05721157 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Smith and Rothenberg in this issue.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在医学成像中,基于深度学习的语义分割算法与预处理技术的集成可以减少对人类注释的需求并推进疾病分类。在已建立的预处理技术中,对比度有限的自适应直方图均衡(CLAHE)已经证明了在各种模态中改进分割算法的功效。如X射线和CT。然而,考虑到数据集的异质性和不同解剖结构的各种对比,仍然需要改进的对比增强方法。
    方法:本研究提出了一种新的预处理技术,ps-KDE,研究其对深度学习算法在前后胸部X线片中分割主要器官的影响。Ps-KDE通过基于所有图像的归一化频率替换像素值来增强图像对比度。我们在U-Net架构上评估了我们的方法,并在ImageNet上预先训练了ResNet34骨干。训练五个独立的模型来分割心脏,左肺,右肺,左锁骨,和右锁骨.
    结果:使用ps-KDE训练来分割左肺的模型获得了0.780(SD=0.13)的Dice评分,而接受CLAHE训练的Dice得分为0.717(SD=0.19),p<0.01。ps-KDE似乎也更健壮,因为基于CLAHE的模型在左肺模型的选择测试图像中对右肺进行了错误分类。执行ps-KDE的算法可在https://github.com/wyc79/ps-KDE获得。
    结论:我们的结果表明,当分割某些肺区域时,ps-KDE比当前的预处理技术具有优势。这在随后的分析如疾病分类和风险分层中可能是有益的。
    BACKGROUND: In medical imaging, the integration of deep-learning-based semantic segmentation algorithms with preprocessing techniques can reduce the need for human annotation and advance disease classification. Among established preprocessing techniques, Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) has demonstrated efficacy in improving segmentation algorithms across various modalities, such as X-rays and CT. However, there remains a demand for improved contrast enhancement methods considering the heterogeneity of datasets and the various contrasts across different anatomic structures.
    METHODS: This study proposes a novel preprocessing technique, ps-KDE, to investigate its impact on deep learning algorithms to segment major organs in posterior-anterior chest X-rays. Ps-KDE augments image contrast by substituting pixel values based on their normalized frequency across all images. We evaluate our approach on a U-Net architecture with ResNet34 backbone pre-trained on ImageNet. Five separate models are trained to segment the heart, left lung, right lung, left clavicle, and right clavicle.
    RESULTS: The model trained to segment the left lung using ps-KDE achieved a Dice score of 0.780 (SD = 0.13), while that of trained on CLAHE achieved a Dice score of 0.717 (SD = 0.19), p<0.01. ps-KDE also appears to be more robust as CLAHE-based models misclassified right lungs in select test images for the left lung model. The algorithm for performing ps-KDE is available at https://github.com/wyc79/ps-KDE.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that ps-KDE offers advantages over current preprocessing techniques when segmenting certain lung regions. This could be beneficial in subsequent analyses such as disease classification and risk stratification.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Congress
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在使用基于人工智能(AI)的胸片(CXR)结果开发一种新的简单有效的预后模型来预测肺炎的结果。年龄>18岁的患者,包括2020年3月至2021年8月期间收治的肺炎治疗。我们开发了预后模型,除了传统的CURB-65(混乱,尿素,呼吸频率,血压,年龄≥65)和肺炎严重度指数(PSI)用于预测肺炎结局,定义为入院期间30天死亡率。共489名患者,包括310名和179名接受训练和测试的患者,包括在内。在训练集中,CXR的基于AI的巩固评分是预测结局的重要变量(风险比1.016,95%置信区间[CI]1.001-1.031).该模型结合了CURB-65,初始O2需求,插管,与其他模型相比,基于AI的巩固评分显示出明显较高的C指数0.692(95%CI0.628-0.757)。在测试集中,与常规CURB-65和PSI相比,该模型的C指数也显著较高,为0.726(95%CI0.644-0.809)(分别为p<0.001和0.017).因此,将基于AI的CXR结果与传统肺炎严重程度评分结合在一起的新预后模型可能是临床实践中预测肺炎结局的简单且有用的工具.
    This study aimed to develop a new simple and effective prognostic model using artificial intelligence (AI)-based chest radiograph (CXR) results to predict the outcomes of pneumonia. Patients aged > 18 years, admitted the treatment of pneumonia between March 2020 and August 2021 were included. We developed prognostic models, including an AI-based consolidation score in addition to the conventional CURB-65 (confusion, urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and age ≥ 65) and pneumonia severity index (PSI) for predicting pneumonia outcomes, defined as 30-day mortality during admission. A total of 489 patients, including 310 and 179 patients in training and test sets, were included. In the training set, the AI-based consolidation score on CXR was a significant variable for predicting the outcome (hazard ratio 1.016, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.001-1.031). The model that combined CURB-65, initial O2 requirement, intubation, and the AI-based consolidation score showed a significantly high C-index of 0.692 (95% CI 0.628-0.757) compared to other models. In the test set, this model also demonstrated a significantly high C-index of 0.726 (95% CI 0.644-0.809) compared to the conventional CURB-65 and PSI (p < 0.001 and 0.017, respectively). Therefore, a new prognostic model incorporating AI-based CXR results along with traditional pneumonia severity score could be a simple and useful tool for predicting pneumonia outcomes in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尘肺的诊断是复杂和主观的,导致读数不可避免的可变性。对于没有经验的医生来说尤其如此。为了提高准确性,计算机辅助诊断系统用于更有效的尘肺诊断。三种模型(Resnet50,Resnet101和DenseNet)用于基于1250个胸部X射线图像的尘肺分类。三位经验丰富且高素质的医生阅读收集的数字射线照相图像,并以双盲方式将其从0类分类到III类。同意的3位医生的结果被认为是相对的黄金标准。随后,使用3个模型来训练和测试这些图像,并使用多类分类度量来评估它们的性能。我们使用kappa值和准确性来评估最佳模型与临床分型的一致性和可靠性。结果表明,ResNet101是3种卷积神经网络中的最优模型。ResNet101的AUC分别为1.0、0.9、0.89和0.94,用于检测尘肺类别0、I、II,III,分别。微观平均和宏观平均AUC值分别为0.93和0.94。ResNet101四重分类的准确度和Kappa值分别为0.72和0.7111,二分分类的准确度和Kappa值分别为0.98和0.955,分别,与诊所的相对标准分类相比。这项研究开发了一种基于深度学习的模型,用于使用胸部X光片对尘肺病进行筛查和分期。ResNet101模型在对尘肺进行分类方面比放射科医师表现相对更好。二分法分类表现突出,从而表明深度学习技术在尘肺筛查中的可行性。
    The diagnosis of pneumoconiosis is complex and subjective, leading to inevitable variability in readings. This is especially true for inexperienced doctors. To improve accuracy, a computer-assisted diagnosis system is used for more effective pneumoconiosis diagnoses. Three models (Resnet50, Resnet101, and DenseNet) were used for pneumoconiosis classification based on 1250 chest X-ray images. Three experienced and highly qualified physicians read the collected digital radiography images and classified them from category 0 to category III in a double-blinded manner. The results of the 3 physicians in agreement were considered the relative gold standards. Subsequently, 3 models were used to train and test these images and their performance was evaluated using multi-class classification metrics. We used kappa values and accuracy to evaluate the consistency and reliability of the optimal model with clinical typing. The results showed that ResNet101 was the optimal model among the 3 convolutional neural networks. The AUC of ResNet101 was 1.0, 0.9, 0.89, and 0.94 for detecting pneumoconiosis categories 0, I, II, and III, respectively. The micro-average and macro-average mean AUC values were 0.93 and 0.94, respectively. The accuracy and Kappa values of ResNet101 were 0.72 and 0.7111 for quadruple classification and 0.98 and 0.955 for dichotomous classification, respectively, compared with the relative standard classification of the clinic. This study develops a deep learning based model for screening and staging of pneumoconiosis is using chest radiographs. The ResNet101 model performed relatively better in classifying pneumoconiosis than radiologists. The dichotomous classification displayed outstanding performance, thereby indicating the feasibility of deep learning techniques in pneumoconiosis screening.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号