Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation

射频导管消融
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:总体纵向应变(GLS)和心房电压是公认的持续性心房颤动(PeAF)消融术后心律较差的标志物。大多数研究工作都针对左心房(LA),相对较少的研究集中在右心房(RA)。这项研究的目的是研究双心房基质对射频导管消融(RFCA)后结果的影响。
    方法:所有患者在RFCA术前和术后阶段对LA和RA进行二维斑点追踪超声心动图(2D-STE)和高密度标测(HDM)。通过GLS评估心房底物,平均电压,和低电压区(LVZ)。
    结果:这项回顾性研究纳入了48例患者。随访385.98±161.78天,所有患者中有22.92%(11/48)的房颤复发,低应变组为63.64%。RFCA前左心房低电压区(LA-LVZ)分别为67.52±15.27%和54.21±20.07%,分别,复发组和非复发组。多因素回归分析显示术前LA-GLS(OR0.047,95CI0.002~0.941,p=0.046)是房颤复发的独立预测因子。术前阶段和术后阶段的双心房平均电压呈正相关(术前:r=0.563p<.001;术后:r=0.464p=.002)。在复发组中,除术前、术后各阶段隔膜外,RA的比例差异无统计学意义。
    结论:低LA-GLS和高LA-LVZ可能是PeAF患者RFCA复发的预测因子。术前、术后阶段双心房平均电压呈正相关。
    BACKGROUND: Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and atrial voltage are acknowledged markers for worse rhythm outcome after ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). The majority of research efforts have been directed towards the left atrium (LA), with relatively fewer studies focusing on the right atrium (RA). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the biatrial substrate on the outcome following radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA).
    METHODS: All patients underwent two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) and high-density mapping (HDM) on LA and RA in preoperative and postoperative stages of RFCA. Atrial substrate was assessed by GLS, average voltage, and low voltage zone (LVZ).
    RESULTS: This retrospective study enrolled 48 patients. With a follow-up of 385.98 ± 161.78 days, 22.92% (11/48) of all patients had AF recurrence and 63.64% in low strain group. Left atrial-low voltage zone (LA-LVZ) prior to RFCA was 67.52 ± 15.27% and 54.21 ± 20.07%, respectively, in the recurrence group and non-recurrence group. Multivariate regression analysis showed that preoperative LA-GLS (OR 0.047, 95%CI 0.002-0.941, p = .046) was independent predictors of AF recurrence. Biatrial average voltage in preoperative and postoperative stages were positively correlated (preoperative: r = 0.563 p < .001; postoperative: r = 0.464 p = .002). There was no significant difference in the proportion of RA in the recurrence group except the septum in preoperative and postoperative stages.
    CONCLUSIONS: Low LA-GLS and high LA-LVZ may be predictors of RFCA recurrence in PeAF patients. Biatrial average voltage were positively correlated in preoperative and postoperative stages.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管三尖瓣环峡部(CTI)的射频消融,负责维持房扑,是一个非常有效的程序,在此程序之后的扩展患者观察中,超过十分之一变得不成功。因此,这项研究旨在提供有关经胸超声心动图中CTI解剖的有用信息,这可以帮助更好地规划典型房扑患者的CTI射频消融。
    方法:在24个月的观察期结束时,对56例射频消融术后出现典型扑动的患者进行评估。胸骨后改良经胸超声心动图(mTTE)评估,我们确定了4个阻碍射频消融的主要解剖学障碍.这些障碍是三尖瓣环平面收缩期偏移,三尖瓣峡部长度,三尖瓣峡部形态,和突出的咽鼓管脊/咽鼓管瓣膜的存在。收集所有术中射频消融数据进行分析,并与解剖数据相关。
    结果:在24个月的观察期内,无房扑发生率为67.86%。峡部的平均长度为30.34±6.67mm。56例患者的峡部形态被归类为扁平(n=27;48.2%),凹(n=10;17.85%),和邮袋(n=19,33.9%)。在23例患者中观察到明显的咽鼓岭(41.1%)。mTTE评估中缺乏解剖学障碍导致100%疗效,而至少两个障碍物的存在显着增加了两个以上的消融失败的风险(OR12.31p=0.01)。一般来说,8毫米电极是最有效的非困难的CTI,而与3D系统一起使用的3.5mm电极对于复杂的CTI具有最高的性能。值得注意的是,衰老是导致长期结局恶化的唯一因素(OR1.07p=0.044).
    结论:术前使用mTTE评估有助于预测三尖瓣峡部射频消融的难度,从而允许使用最精确的射频消融电极更好地规划射频消融策略。
    BACKGROUND: Although radiofrequency ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI), responsible for sustaining atrial flutter, is a highly effective procedure, in extended patients\' observations following this procedure, more than every tenth becomes unsuccessful. Therefore, this study aimed to provide helpful information about the anatomy of the CTI in transthoracic echocardiography, which can aid in better planning of the CTI radiofrequency ablation in patients with typical atrial flutter.
    METHODS: 56 patients with typical atrial flutter after radiofrequency ablation were evaluated at the end of the 24-month observation period. With substernal modified transthoracic echocardiographic (mTTE) evaluation, we identified four main anatomical obstacles impeding radiofrequency ablation. These obstacles were tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, cavotricuspid isthmus length, cavotricuspid isthmus morphology, and the presence of a prominent Eustachian ridge/Eustachian valve. All intraprocedural radiofrequency ablation data were collected for analysis and correlated with anatomical data.
    RESULTS: In the 24-month observation period, freedom from atrial flutter was 67.86%. The mean length of the isthmus was 30.34 ± 6.67 mm. The isthmus morphology in 56 patients was categorized as flat (n = 27; 48.2%), concave (n = 10; 17.85%), and pouch (n = 19, 33.9%). A prominent Eustachian ridge was observed in 23 patients (41.1%). Lack of anatomical obstacles in mTTE evaluation resulted in 100% efficacy, while the presence of at least two obstacles significantly increased the risk of unsuccessful ablation with more than two (OR 12.31 p = 0.01). Generally, 8 mm electrodes were the most effective for non-difficult CTI, while 3.5 mm electrodes used with a 3D system had highest performance for complex CTI. Notably, aging was the only factor that worsened the long-term outcome (OR 1.07 p = 0.044).
    CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative usage of mTTE evaluation helps predict difficulty in cavotricuspid isthmus radiofrequency ablation, thus allowing better planning of the radiofrequency ablation strategy using the most accurate radiofrequency ablation electrode.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:射频导管消融(RFA)靶向左心耳峡部(LAA峡部)和二尖瓣峡部治疗心房颤动。然而,在消融术期间,峡部左旋支动脉(LCxA)和心大静脉(GCV)的接近会带来致命风险.
    方法:本研究调查了LCxA和GCV在LAA和二尖瓣峡部三条直线上的关系,用15个人类尸体的心脏.血管和心内膜之间的距离,心肌,测量血管周围脂肪厚度。
    结果:结果表明,LCxA大部分始终位于下心房段,而GCV位于下/上心房段,主要在左心耳中部观察到病程变化。在80%的标本中,LCxA与LAA地峡的下边界相距3-5毫米,在LAA地峡内2-3毫米的深度,其中1毫米由心肌组成,其余为脂肪,这可能不能提供足够的保护,由于脂肪液化与热应用的可能性。在两个峡部中,所有病例的有效心肌厚度始终为1mm。LCxA在LAA峡部的第二和第三部分(“小心段”)为2毫米。左下肺静脉开口的LCxA距离为5至12毫米,在16%的病例中,偶尔会危险地接近<1毫米。
    结论:这项研究首次在印度人群中测量了LAA和二尖瓣峡部的LCxA和GCV。协助外科医生进行RFA规划。
    BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) targets the left atrial appendage isthmus (LAA isthmus) and mitral isthmus for treatment of atrial fibrillation. However, proximity of left circumflex artery (LCxA) and great cardiac vein (GCV) in the isthmuses poses fatal risks during ablation.
    METHODS: This study investigated relationships of LCxA and GCV across three lines in the LAA and mitral isthmus, using 15 human cadaveric hearts. Distances between the vessels and the endocardium, myocardium, and perivascular fat thickness were measured.
    RESULTS: The results showed that LCxA was mostly consistently located in lower atrial segments and GCV was in lower/upper atrial segments, with change of course mainly observed in the middle of the LAA. The LCxA was found as close as 3-5 mm from the lower border of the LAA isthmus in 80% of specimens, at a depth of 2-3 mm within the LAA isthmus, where 1 mm consisted of myocardium and the remainder was fat, which may not provide adequate protection due to the possibility of liquefaction of fat with heat application. The effective myocardial thickness was consistently 1 mm across all cases in both isthmuses. LCxA was 2 mm in second and third sections of LAA isthmus (\"careful segment\"). LCxA distances from left inferior pulmonary vein opening was 5 to 12 mm, occasionally dangerously close as <1 mm in 16% of cases.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study measured LCxA and GCV in the LAA and mitral isthmus across three lines for the first time in the Indian population, aiding surgeons in RFA planning.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心房颤动是最常见的快速性心律失常,导管消融是房颤的有效治疗方法。然而,过程中可能会出现疼痛和紧张。此外,对于在这些手术中使用哪种镇痛剂和镇静剂最好,仍未达成共识。因此,我们进行了一项网络荟萃分析,以评估用于心房颤动导管消融术的镇痛药和镇静剂的疗效和安全性.
    我们搜索了PubMed,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,EMBASE,中国国家知识基础设施,和百度文库文档下载网站,用于随机对照试验从开始到2023年2月26日。仅包括在镇痛药或镇静剂之间进行比较并涉及接受射频导管消融的房颤患者的研究。疗效终点为房颤射频导管消融期间Ramsay镇静评分和视觉模拟量表评分。安全性终点是呼吸抑制的发生率,低血压,恶心,和呕吐。进行了成对比较和频率方法分析。结果报告为比值比(OR),平均差(MD),和相应的95%置信区间(CI)。我们根据Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册评估了研究的风险偏倚。
    在最初检索到的709篇文章中,14项研究,共有1156名参与者,包括在内。就功效而言,在房颤射频消融术期间接受右美托咪定的患者的Ramsay镇静评分高于接受咪达唑仑加芬太尼的患者,或其衍生物(MD-0.88,95%CI[-0.04至-0.72])。与吗啡相比,地佐辛(MD1.88,95%CI[1.16至2.60]),氢吗啡酮(MD4.07,95%CI[3.56至4.58]),布托啡诺(MD3.18,95%CI[2.38至3.96]),芬太尼或其衍生物(MD1.57,95%CI[1.25to1.89])具有较好的镇痛效果。在安全方面,与右美托咪定加芬太尼或其衍生物相比,丙泊酚(OR16.46;95%CI[1.54,175.95])和咪达唑仑加芬太尼或其衍生物(OR7.02;95%CI[1.33,36.99])显著增加了呼吸抑制的发生率。与单独使用芬太尼相比,右美托咪定加芬太尼或其衍生物可降低恶心和呕吐的发生率(OR4.74;95%CI[1.01,22.22])。丙泊酚的恶心和呕吐发生率低于氢吗啡酮(OR0.01;95%CI[0.00~0.59])和芬太尼或其衍生物(OR0.01;95%CI[0.00~0.51])。任何两种策略之间的低血压发生率均无统计学差异。
    氢吗啡酮和布托啡诺的镇痛效果优于芬太尼或其衍生物。右美托咪定有较好的镇静效果。在安全方面,右美托咪定,羟吗啡酮,和布托啡诺优越。有必要探索在心房颤动(AF)射频消融术中同时考虑有效性和安全性的方案。
    这项研究在PROSPERO注册,编号:CRD42023403661。
    UNASSIGNED: Atrial fibrillation is the most common tachyarrhythmia, while catheter ablation is an effective therapy for atrial fibrillation. However, pain and nervousness may occur during the procedure. Moreover, a consensus has still not been reached on which is the best kind of analgesic and sedative to use in these procedures. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of analgesics and sedatives used in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Baidu Wenku document download website for randomized controlled trials from their inception to February 26, 2023. Only studies that made comparisons among analgesics or sedatives and involved patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation were included. The efficacy endpoints were Ramsay sedation scores and visual analog scale scores during the radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. The safety endpoints were the incidence of respiratory depression, hypotension, nausea, and vomiting. Pairwise comparisons and frequency method analyses were conducted. Results were reported as odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the risk bias of the studies in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
    UNASSIGNED: Out of the 709 articles initially retrieved, 14 studies, with a total of 1156 participants, were included. In terms of efficacy, patients receiving dexmedetomidine during radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation had higher Ramsay sedation scores than those receiving midazolam plus fentanyl, or its derivatives (MD -0.88, 95% CI [-0.04 to -0.72]). Compared with morphine, dezocine (MD 1.88, 95% CI [1.16 to 2.60]), hydromorphone (MD 4.07, 95% CI [3.56 to 4.58]), butorphanol (MD 3.18, 95% CI [2.38 to 3.96]), and fentanyl or its derivatives (MD 1.57, 95% CI [1.25 to 1.89]) had a better analgesic effect. In terms of safety, propofol (OR 16.46; 95% CI [1.54 to 175.95]) and midazolam plus fentanyl or its derivatives (OR 7.02; 95% CI [1.33 to 36.99]) significantly increased the incidence of respiratory depression compared with dexmedetomidine plus fentanyl or its derivatives. Dexmedetomidine plus fentanyl or its derivatives reduced the incidence of nausea and vomiting compared with fentanyl alone (OR 4.74; 95% CI [1.01 to 22.22]). Propofol was associated with a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting than hydromorphone (OR 0.01; 95% CI [0.00 to 0.59]) and fentanyl or its derivatives (OR 0.01; 95% CI [0.00 to 0.51]). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of hypotension between any two strategies.
    UNASSIGNED: Hydromorphone and butorphanol had better analgesic effects than fentanyl or its derivates. Dexmedetomidine had better sedative effects. In terms of safety, dexmedetomidine, oxymorphone, and butorphanol were superior. It is necessary to explore the regimen that can consider both the effectiveness and safety during radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF).
    UNASSIGNED: This study was registered with PROSPERO, number: CRD42023403661.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心房颤动(AF)患者在射频导管消融术(RFCA)和深度镇静期间呼吸异常会影响手术的成功。然而,RFCA深度镇静期间的呼吸模式尚不清楚.本研究旨在探讨房颤患者RFCA期间呼吸异常及其与睡眠呼吸暂停的关系。
    我们纳入了房颤患者,这些患者在夜间和深度镇静的RFCA期间使用便携式测谎仪进行心肺监测。根据给予的镇静药物对患者进行划分。
    我们纳入了40例房颤患者。一项夜间睡眠研究显示,27名患者患有睡眠呼吸暂停;其中,9显示出中心优势。在RFCA深度镇静期间,15例患者出现呼吸异常,14例患者表现出阻塞性优势。Further,17和23例患者单独使用丙泊酚和右美托咪定加丙泊酚,分别。夜间呼吸事件指数(REI)无显著组间差异(7.9vs.9.3,p=0.744)。然而,与接受右美托咪定加丙泊酚的组相比,在RFCA期间,丙泊酚单药组的REI较高(5.4vs.2.6,p=0.048),更频繁地使用气道(47%vs.13%,p=0.030),和较高剂量的丙泊酚(3.9mg/h/kgvs.1.2mg/h/kg,p<0.001)。多变量分析表明,在RFCA期间,只有异丙酚的量与REI相关(p=0.007)。
    我们的研究结果表明,深度镇静的RFCA期间的呼吸事件主要是阻塞性的。丙泊酚应与右美托咪定一起使用,而不是单独使用,以减少丙泊酚的量并避免呼吸不稳定。
    UNASSIGNED: Abnormal respiration during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) with deep sedation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) can affect the procedure\'s success. However, the respiratory pattern during RFCA with deep sedation remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate abnormal respiration during RFCA and its relationship with sleep apnea in patients with AF.
    UNASSIGNED: We included patients with AF who underwent RFCA with cardiorespiratory monitoring using a portable polygraph both at night and during RFCA with deep sedation. The patients were divided based on the administered sedative medicines.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 40 patients with AF. An overnight sleep study revealed that 27 patients had sleep apnea; among them, 9 showed central predominance. During RFCA with deep sedation, 15 patients showed an abnormal respiratory pattern, with 14 patients showing obstructive predominance. Further, 17 and 23 patients were administered with propofol alone and dexmedetomidine plus propofol, respectively. There was no significant between-group difference in the respiratory event index (REI) at night (7.9 vs. 9.3, p = 0.744). However, compared with the group that received dexmedetomidine plus propofol, the propofol-alone group showed a higher REI during RFCA (5.4 vs. 2.6, p = 0.048), more frequent use of the airway (47% vs. 13%, p = 0.030), and a higher dose of administered propofol (3.9 mg/h/kg vs. 1.2 mg/h/kg, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that only the propofol amount was associated with REI during RFCA (p = 0.007).
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings demonstrated that respiratory events during RFCA with deep sedation were mainly obstructive. Propofol should be administered with dexmedetomidine rather than alone to reduce the propofol amount and avoid respiratory instability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:射频导管消融(RFCA)是一种非常成功的干预措施。通过比较有和没有冷却的RFCA后前列腺实质和横纹肌组织的病变变化,可以评估形状规律性之间的相关性,area,和热损伤的周长,并预测病变的几何形状变化。材料和方法:对13只非纯种犬进行了两次标准的前列腺和横纹肌RFCA手术:不冷却和用0.1%NaCl溶液冷却。切片机切割的2-3μm组织样品切片用苏木精和曙红染色并进一步检查。商公式用于评估消融部位损伤区的几何形状。结果:RFCA后横纹肌组织的损伤程度与前列腺实质组织相当。回归分析表明,所有实验组的面积和周长之间都有很强的正相关关系。在有和没有冷却的实质组织的实验组中,损伤区面积或周长的增加对应于商值的增加。在冷却的横纹肌组中观察到类似的趋势。然而,在没有冷却的横纹肌群中,病变面积或周长的增加降低了商值。标准化回归系数表明,在冷却的横纹肌中,破坏区的形状更多是由面积决定的,而不是由周长决定的。然而,在实质组织中,周边对损伤区形状的影响比该区域更大。结论:损伤面积和周长对横纹肌和实质组织中损伤区几何形状的整体形状规律性具有预测能力。采用这种方法来实现对肿瘤根除的需要与对健康组织的消融诱导的并发症的最小化之间的平衡。
    Background and Objectives: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is a highly successful intervention. By comparing the lesion changes in prostate parenchymal and striated muscle tissues after RFCA with and without cooling, it was possible to assess the correlation between the shape regularity, area, and perimeter of the thermal lesion, and to predict the geometric shape changes of the lesions. Materials and Methods: A standard prostate and striated muscle RFCA procedure was performed on 13 non-purebred dogs in two sessions: no cooling and cooling with 0.1% NaCl solution. Microtome-cut 2-3 µm sections of tissue samples were stained with haematoxylin and eosin and further examined. The quotient formula was employed to evaluate the geometric shape of the damage zones at the ablation site. Results: The extent of injury following RFCA in striated muscle tissue was comparable to that in prostate parenchymal tissue. Regression analysis indicated a strong and positive relationship between area and perimeter in all experimental groups. In the experimental groups of parenchymal tissues with and without cooling, an increase in the area or perimeter of the damage zone corresponded to an increase in the quotient value. A similar tendency was observed in the striated muscle group with cooling. However, in the striated muscle group without cooling, an increase in lesion area or perimeter lowered the quotient value. Standardised regression coefficients demonstrated that in the striated muscle with cooling, the damage zone shape was more determined by area than perimeter. However, in the parenchymal tissue, the perimeter had a more substantial impact on the damage zone shape than the area. Conclusions: The damage area and perimeter have predictive power on the overall shape regularity of damage zone geometry in both striated muscles and parenchymal tissue. This approach is employed to achieve a balance between the need for tumour eradication and the minimisation of ablation-induced complications to healthy tissue.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:高频低潮气量(HFLTV)通气可提高阵发性心房颤动(PAF)射频导管消融(RFCA)的疗效和效率。这些益处是否可以外推到持续性AF(PeAF)的RFCA尚不确定。
    目的:评估PEAF患者在RFCA期间是否使用HFLTV通气,与标准通气(SV)相比,与改善的手术和临床结果相关。
    方法:在本前瞻性多中心注册(REAL-AF)中,纳入了使用HFLTV通气或SV对PeAF进行PVIPWI的患者。主要疗效结果是在12个月时无所有房性心律失常。次要结果包括手术和长期临床结果,和并发症。
    结果:共纳入210例患者(HFLTV=95vs.SV=115)在分析中。组间基线特征无差异。手术时间(80[63-103.5]vs.110[85-141],p<0.001),总射频时间(18.73[13.93-26.53]vs.26.15[20.30-35.25],p<0.001),和PVRF时间(11.35[8.78-16.69]vs.18[13.74-24.14],与SV相比,使用HFLTV通气时p<0.001)明显更短。与SV相比,HFLTV通气的全房性心律失常的发生率明显更高(82.1%vs.68.7%;HR0.41,95%CI[0.21-0.82],p=0.012),表明全房性心律失常复发的相对风险降低了43%,绝对风险降低了13.4%.两组之间的长期手术相关并发症没有差异(p=0.270)。
    结论:在接受PVI+PWIPEAF的RFCA患者中,与SV相比,在12个月的随访中,使用HFLTV通气与全房心律失常的发生率更高,手术时间和射频时间明显更短,同时报告相似的安全性。
    BACKGROUND: High-frequency-low-tidal-volume (HFLTV) ventilation increases the efficacy and efficiency of radiofrequency catheter-ablation (RFCA) of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Whether those benefits can be extrapolated to RFCA of persistent AF (PeAF) is undetermined.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether using HFLTV ventilation during RFCA in patients with PeAF, is associated with improved procedural and clinical outcomes when compared to standard ventilation (SV).
    METHODS: In this prospective-multicenter registry (REAL-AF) patients who underwent PVI+PWI for PeAF using either HFLTV-ventilation or SV were included. The primary efficacy outcome was freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included procedural and long-term clinical outcomes, and complications.
    RESULTS: A total of 210 patients were included (HFLTV=95 vs. SV=115) in the analysis. There was no difference in baseline characteristics between groups. Procedural time (80 [63-103.5] vs.110 [85-141], p<0.001), total RF time (18.73 [13.93-26.53] vs. 26.15 [20.30-35.25], p<0.001), and PV RF time (11.35 [8.78-16.69] vs. 18 [13.74-24.14], p<0.001) were significantly shorter using HFLTV ventilation when compared with SV. Freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias was significantly higher with HFLTV ventilation when compared with SV (82.1% vs. 68.7%; HR 0.41, 95% CI [0.21-0.82], p=0.012), indicating a 43% relative risk reduction and a 13.4% absolute risk reduction in all-atrial arrhythmias recurrence. There was no difference in long-term procedural-related complications between the groups (p=0.270).
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing RFCA with PVI+PWI for PeAF, the use of HFLTV ventilation was associated with a higher freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias at 12-month follow-up with significantly shorter procedural and RF times compared to SV, while reporting a similar safety profile.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    接受射频导管消融(RFCA)的房颤(AF)患者需要服用抗心律失常药物以防止早期复发。这些患者的临床结果可能受到不同的抗心律失常方案的影响。
    确定与早期复发相关的危险因素,并比较不同抗心律失常方案在射频导管消融术(RFCA)后3个月的老年房颤患者中的临床结果。
    一项回顾性观察性研究包括420例RFCA后房颤的老年患者。在最初的术后访视期间收集基线数据,并在3个月的随访期内仔细监测临床结果。进行了Logistic回归和Cox比例风险回归分析,以研究各种抗心律失常方案与临床结局之间的关系。
    多因素logistic回归分析显示,年龄(p=0.001),左心房直径(p<0.001),左心室直径(p=0.015),反应性充血指数(RHI)(p<0.001),抗心律失常药物(p<0.001)和hs-cTnI(p=0.017)是早期复发的独立危险因素。此外,在COX生存回归分析模型中,胺碘酮组早期复发生存率高于普罗帕酮组(HR2.30,95CI1.17-4.53,p=0.016)和索他洛尔组(HR3.60,95CI2.17-5.95,p<0.001).与胺碘酮组相比,决奈达隆组(p=0.046)和普罗帕酮组(p=0.021)肝功能异常的发生率较低.缓慢性心律失常的发生率(p=0.003),索他洛尔组的QT间期延长(p=0.035)和房室传导阻滞(p=0.021)高于胺碘酮组。
    RHI是老年房颤患者RFCA术后早期复发的独立危险因素。与胺碘酮相比,普罗帕酮和索他洛尔的早期复发风险升高.尽管胺碘酮和决奈达隆在早期复发方面没有显着差异,决奈达隆因其药物不良反应发生率低于胺碘酮而成为首选药物.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who undergo radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) necessitate the administration of antiarrhythmic drugs to prevent early recurrence. The clinical outcomes among these patients may be influenced by varying antiarrhythmic regimens.
    UNASSIGNED: To identify the risk factors associated with early recurrence and compare the clinical outcomes among different antiarrhythmic regimens in elderly patients with AF following radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) during a 3-month period.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective observational study encompassed 420 elderly patients with AF following RFCA. Baseline data were collected during the initial postoperative visit and clinical outcomes were carefully monitored over a 3-month follow-up period. Logistic regression and Cox-proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to investigate the relationship between various antiarrhythmic regimens and the clinical outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age (p = 0.001), left atrial diameter (p < 0.001), left ventricular diameter (p = 0.015), reactive hyperemia index (RHI) (p < 0.001), antiarrhythmic drug (p < 0.001) and hs-cTnI (p = 0.017) were independent risk factors of early recurrence. Furthermore, in cox survival regression analysis model, survival rate of early recurrence in the amiodarone group was higher than in the propafenone group (HR 2.30, 95%CI 1.17-4.53, p = 0.016) and in the sotalol group (HR 3.60, 95%CI 2.17-5.95, p < 0.001). Compared to the amiodarone group, the incidence of liver dysfunction was lower in the dronedarone group (p = 0.046) and the propafenone group (p = 0.021). The incidence of bradyarrhythmia (p = 0.003), QT interval prolongation (p = 0.035) and atrioventricular transmission block (p = 0.021) were higher in the sotalol group than in the amiodarone group.
    UNASSIGNED: RHI was identified as an independent risk factor for early recurrence among elderly AF patients after RFCA. Compared to amiodarone, propafenone and sotalol exhibited an elevated risk of early recurrence. Although there was no significant difference in early recurrence between amiodarone and dronedarone, dronedarone emerged as the preferred option due to its lower frequency of adverse drug reactions than amiodarone.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号