Sclerosing lesions of the breast encompass a spectrum of benign and malignant entities and often pose a diagnostic challenge. Awareness of key morphologic features and pitfalls in the assessment of morphology and immunophenotype is essential to avoid over- or underdiagnosis and ensure optimal clinical management. This review summarizes nonneoplastic sclerosing lesions such as radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion, sclerosing adenosis, sclerosing intraductal papilloma, sclerosing variants of ductal adenoma and nipple adenoma, and fibroadenoma with extensive sclerosis, including their clinical presentation, characteristic morphology, differential diagnostic considerations, appropriate immunohistochemical work-up, when needed, and the clinical significance. In addition, atypical or neoplastic entities (such as atypical ductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, low-grade adenosquamous carcinoma, and fibromatosis-like metaplastic carcinoma) that can involve these sclerosing lesions are also briefly discussed.

OBJECTIVE: Radial sclerosing lesions (RSLs) are benign breast lesions composed of glandular and epithelial proliferations with stellate architecture and fibro-elastotic stroma, which can mimic invasive carcinoma on imaging. Surgical management following a core biopsy diagnosis of RSLs remains controversial.
RESULTS: We retrospectively identified core biopsies with RSLs without atypia who underwent subsequent surgical excision between 2015 and 2021. All core biopsy slides were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis. Imaging was reviewed to determine radiological-pathological concordance. An upgrade was defined as invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the excision. The final cohort consisted of 130 core biopsies from 124 women (median age = 52 years, range = 27-76). The imaging modality was mammogram in 52 (40%) cases, MRI in 52 (40%) and ultrasound in 26 (20%). One hundred and seven (82%) core biopsies were vacuum-assisted and 23 (18%) were ultrasound-guided without vacuum assistance. The median lesion size on imaging was 9 mm (range = 2-41). Overall, two (1%) cases were upgraded at excision, including one microinvasive lobular carcinoma and one 2 mm focus of invasive mammary carcinoma with associated DCIS. In both cases, the upgraded foci of carcinoma were not closely associated with the biopsy site and were considered incidental upgrades.
CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the body of literature supporting observation, rather than routine excision of radial sclerosing lesions without atypia.

Complex sclerosing lesion (CSL)/radial scar of breast is a benign entity that can pose a diagnostic challenge due to resemblance to breast carcinoma on imaging. Hamartoma are uncommon benign tumors, composed of disorganized mixture of glandular, fibrous, and adipose tissues, which can exhibit classical imaging characteristics. Here we describe a case of concomitant CSL and hamartoma in left beast, of which CSL presented as suspicious mass on imaging but was ultimately confirmed to be benign on histopathology with 4 years of documented stability.

BACKGROUND. Radial scars are more commonly identified on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) than on digital mammography (DM). Nonetheless, universal guidelines for radial scar management in the current era of DBT are lacking. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the upstaging rates of screening DBT-detected radial scars with and without atypia and to identify features related to upstaging risk. METHODS. This retrospective study included patients who underwent core needle biopsy (CNB) showing a radial scar after screening DBT and DM from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020. Patients without surgical excision or at least 2 years of imaging follow-up after CNB were excluded. Rates of upstaging to breast cancer (ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS] or invasive disease) were compared between radial scars with and without atypia at CNB. Associations of upstaging with patient, imaging, and pathologic variables were explored using standard statistical tests. RESULTS. Of 165 women with 171 radial scars, the final study sample included 153 women (mean age, 56 years; range, 33-83 years) with 159 radial scars that underwent surgical excision (80.5%, 128/159) or at least 2 years of imaging follow-up (19.5%, 31/159). Seven radial scars were upstaged to DCIS and one to invasive disease. Therefore, the up-staging rate of radial scars to cancer was 5.0% (8/159). The upstaging rate of radial scars without atypia at CNB was 1.6% (2/129) and that of radial scars with atypia was 20.0% (6/30) (p < .001). On multivariable analysis, features associated with higher upstaging risk included a prior breast cancer diagnosis (62.5% vs 4.8%; p = .01) and the presence of atypia at CNB (75.0% vs 15.9%; p = .02). The upstaging rate according to mammographic finding type was 7.1% (1/14) for asymmetries, 12.5% (2/16) for masses, 5.3% (5/95) for architectural distortion, and 0.0% (0/34) for calcifications. CONCLUSION. Screening-detected radial scars without atypia at CNB have a low upstaging rate to breast cancer of 1.6%. CLINICAL IMPACT. Imaging surveillance rather than surgery is a reasonable approach for radial scars without atypia, particularly for those presenting as calcifications.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: To determine the best management option (surgical excision versus imaging surveillance) following the diagnosis of pure radial scars (RSs) and RSs with associated additional high-risk lesions (HRLs) encountered on percutaneous core-needle breast biopsy.
METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective review of the breast imaging reporting system database was performed to identify all cases of pure RS alone or RS plus an additional HRL (papilloma, atypia, lobular neoplasia) diagnosed on core-needle biopsy, from 2007 to 2016, at four breast centers in our institution. Cases with associated malignancy, discordant radiologic-pathologic results, or those lost to follow-up were excluded. The remaining cases were evaluated to determine results of either subsequent surgical excision or long-term follow-up imaging (minimum of two years). Additional data recorded included clinical presentation, breast density, personal and family history of breast cancer, lesion imaging characteristics, and biopsy method.
RESULTS: The study cohort included 111 patients with 111 lesions: 56.8% (63/111) with RS alone (pure) and 43.2% (48/111) with RS plus additional HRL(s). Out of the 63 radiologic-pathologic concordant pure RSs, there were no upgrades to malignancy in 51 subsequent surgical excisions or 12 long-term surveillance cases (0/63, 0%). Out of the 48 RSs plus additional HRL(s), there were 2 upgrades to malignancy (2/48, 4.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: Cases of radiologic-pathologic concordant pure RS diagnosed at core-needle biopsy do not require surgical excision. On the other hand, surgical excision should be considered for RS plus additional HRLs diagnosed at core-needle biopsy.

Benign breast disease (BBD) is a heterogenous group of lesions often classified as nonproliferative or proliferative, with the latter group further categorized based on the presence of atypia. Although nonproliferative lesions are more common, the risk of breast cancer is elevated in women with proliferative lesions. Historically, the majority of proliferative lesions were excised due to concern for future and/or concomitant breast cancer at the site of the index lesion. However, contemporary data suggest that the risk of cancer associated with various proliferative lesions may be lower than previously thought, and management of BBD has become more nuanced. In this review, we will focus on recent updates in the management of a select group of benign and high-risk lesions.

BACKGROUND. Biopsy site markers (BSMs) placed during image-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) are typically targeted for surgical excision, along with the breast imaging abnormality. Retained BSMs raise concern of incomplete resection of the breast abnormality. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to assess the frequency of residual malignancy in patients with retained BSMs identified on the initial mammography performed after breast lesion surgical excision. METHODS. This retrospective study included 30 patients (median age, 59 years) who underwent surgical resection between August 2015 and April 2022 of a borderline, high-risk, or malignant breast lesion after CNB and technically adequate preoperative image-guided localization, in whom the initial postoperative mammography report described a retained nonmigrated BSM. EMR data were extracted. The index pathology from CNB and initial surgical resection was classified as malignant or nonmalignant. The presence of residual malignancy after initial surgical resection required pathologic confirmation from subsequent tissue sampling; the absence of residual malignancy required 2 years of benign imaging follow-up. RESULTS. Thirteen specimen radiographs were interpreted intraoperatively by a surgeon with later radiologist interpretation, and 17 underwent real-time radiologist interpretation. Eighteen patients had malignant index pathology from the initially resected lesion. The frequency of residual malignancy on subsequent follow-up after initial surgical resection was higher in patients with malignant than nonmalignant index pathology (39% [7/18] vs 0% [0/12], respectively; p = .02). Among patients with malignant index pathology, the frequency of residual malignancy was higher in those without, than with, malignancy in the initial surgical specimen (80% [4/5] vs 23% [3/13]; p = .047). Also in these patients, the frequency of a positive interpretation of the initial postoperative mammography (BI-RADS category 4 or 6) was not significantly different between those with and without residual malignancy (57% [4/7] vs 55% [6/11]; p > .99). CONCLUSION. Patients with retained BSMs associated with malignant index lesions are at substantial risk of having residual malignancy. Initial postoperative mammography is not sufficient for excluding residual malignancy. CLINICAL IMPACT. Retained BSMs associated with index malignancy should be considered suspicious for residual malignancy. In this scenario, timely additional tissue sampling targeting the retained BSM is warranted, given the greater-than-2% chance of malignancy. Active surveillance is a reasonable management strategy in patients with retained BSMs from nonmalignant index lesions.

The heterogeneous group of B3 lesions in the breast harbors lesions with different malignant potential and progression risk. As several studies about B3 lesions have been published since the last Consensus in 2018, the 3rd International Consensus Conference discussed the six most relevant B3 lesions (atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), flat epithelial atypia (FEA), classical lobular neoplasia (LN), radial scar (RS), papillary lesions (PL) without atypia, and phyllodes tumors (PT)) and made recommendations for diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Following a presentation of current data of each B3 lesion, the international and interdisciplinary panel of 33 specialists and key opinion leaders voted on the recommendations for further management after core-needle biopsy (CNB) and vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB). In case of B3 lesion diagnosis on CNB, OE was recommended in ADH and PT, whereas in the other B3 lesions, vacuum-assisted excision was considered an equivalent alternative to OE. In ADH, most panelists (76%) recommended an open excision (OE) after diagnosis on VAB, whereas observation after a complete VAB-removal on imaging was accepted by 34%. In LN, the majority of the panel (90%) preferred observation following complete VAB-removal. Results were similar in RS (82%), PL (100%), and FEA (100%). In benign PT, a slim majority (55%) also recommended an observation after a complete VAB-removal. VAB with subsequent active surveillance can replace an open surgical intervention for most B3 lesions (RS, FEA, PL, PT, and LN). Compared to previous recommendations, there is an increasing trend to a de-escalating strategy in classical LN. Due to the higher risk of upgrade into malignancy, OE remains the preferred approach after the diagnosis of ADH.

UNASSIGNED: A radial scar (RS) is a benign breast lesion (BBL) that has an obscure etiology. RS is easily confused with breast carcinoma and therefore correct identification radiologically and pathologically is important. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of atypical lesions by evaluating RS detected with BBL and to investigate whether atypia and RS are related to their characteristics.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 1.370 patients with a diagnosis of BBL postoperatively in a single department were analyzed retrospectively. Forty-six confirmed RS/complex sclerosing lesion (CSL) cases were selected. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients and the relationship between RS and other BBL were evaluated. In addition, the relationship between RS/CSL and the presence of atypia was interpreted.
UNASSIGNED: The mean age was 45.17±8.72 years. Spiculated lesion (34.8%) on mammography and microcalcification (37%) on histopathological examination were the most common features. The most common BBL accompanying RS/CSL was adenosis. Atypical epithelial hyperplasia (AEH) was presented in 15 (32.6%) of those diagnosed with RS. Although all patients were benign, the frequency of AEH accompanying RS was found to be significantly higher. The mean size of RS was 10.8±8.4 mm (2-30 mm). The size of RS/CSL was not significantly associated with atypia.
UNASSIGNED: RS/CSLs usually present as suspicious lesions that must be distinguished radiologically from malignancy. However RS, which can be present with malign breast lesions, can be also seen with all BBL. Therefore, core biopsy and/or excisional biopsy continue to be important for definitive histopathological diagnosis.