Background: The diet and physical activity of the world\'s population determine the increase in the number of bariatric surgeries. The most common types of bariatric surgery are laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and Roux-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Surgical interventions are carried out in patients with numerous comorbidities, among which the most common are cardiovascular diseases. The aim of the present study was to review the literature regarding the safety and results of surgical treatment in patients with cardiac revascularization prior to surgery. Methods: We performed an online search in Pubmed in September 2023 to identify articles that reported cardiac revascularization prior to bariatric surgery. The extracted information included details of the working method, number of patients, types of cardiovascular disease-heart failure (HF) and cardiac artery disease (CAD), types of revascularization-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or both CABG + PCI, demographic data (age, gender, race), clinical characteristics (body mass index-BMI, smoking status), comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, prior myocardial infarction), postoperative complications, and postoperative results. Results: A total of 171 records were identified by the initial search, and 165 papers were excluded after applying the exclusion criteria (types of cardiovascular disease, types of revascularization, and demographic data). We evaluated a group of 9479 patients of which 730 had HF, 2621 CAD, and 1426 underwent prior cardiac revascularization. The analysis of the demographic data showed an average age of 55.5 years and a fluctuation of the male gender between 39% and 71.1%, and the female gender between 28.9% and 61%. The main types of bariatric interventions were RYGB (3659 cases) and LSG (659 cases), to which adjustable gastric band (AGB) and bilio-pancreatic diversion-duodenal switch (BPD-DS) were added. Among the most postprocedural complications were ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (2 patients), gastro-intestinal bleeding (51 cases), pulmonary embolism (1 patient), arrhythmia (3 patients) and pacemaker insertion (1 patient). The recorded postoperative mortality rate was 0.42% (6 cases). Conclusions: Bariatric surgery remains safe in patients with cardiac revascularization. These finding need to be confirmed in more large-scale randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Clinical care pathways help guide and provide structure to clinicians and providers to improve healthcare delivery and quality. The Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Committee (QIPS) of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) has previously published care pathways for the performance of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and pre-operative care of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).
OBJECTIVE: This current RYGB care pathway was created to address intraoperative care, defined as care occurring on the day of surgery from the preoperative holding area, through the operating room, and into the postanesthesia care unit (PACU).
METHODS: PubMed queries were performed from January 2001 to December 2019 and reviewed according to Level of Evidence regarding specific key questions developed by the committee.
RESULTS: Evidence-based recommendations are made for care of patients undergoing RYGB including the pre-operative holding area, intra-operative management and performance of RYGB, and concurrent procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: This document may provide guidance based on recent evidence to bariatric surgeons and providers for the intra-operative care for minimally invasive RYGB.

OBJECTIVE: Mastering intracorporeal suturing is challenging in the evolution from conventional to laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Among various techniques competing for superiority in overcoming this hurdle, we focus on exploring the potential of barbed sutures through a meta-analysis that compares outcomes to those of conventional non-barbed sutures in bariatric surgery.
METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Scopus, and Embase to identify studies comparing barbed sutures with non-barbed sutures in bariatric surgeries, focusing on outcomes such as operative time, suturing time, postoperative complications, and hospital stay. The statistical analysis was carried out using RStudio version 4.3.2. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistics.
RESULTS: Incorporating data from 11 studies involving a total of 27,442 patients, including 3,516 in the barbed suture group across various bariatric surgeries, our analysis demonstrates a significant reduction in suturing time (mean difference -4.87; 95% CI -8.43 to -1.30; p < 0.01; I2 = 99%) associated with the use of barbed sutures. Specifically, in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, we observed a significant decrease in operative time (mean difference -12.11; 95% CI -19.27 to -4.95; p < 0.01; I2 = 93%). Subgroup analyses and leave-one-out analyses consistently supported these findings. Furthermore, we found that the mean body mass index did not significantly predict the mean difference in operative time outcome. No significant differences emerged in hospital stay or postoperative complications, including leak, bleeding, stenosis, and bowel obstruction (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings address barbed sutures as a potential alternative for laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing in bariatric surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Marginal ulceration (MU) following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is an established complication, with early MU (within 30-days of operation) being less understood compared to its late counterpart. This study aims to identify risk factors for early MU in patients undergoing primary RYGB.
METHODS: Utilizing data from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Project (MBSAQIP 2015-2021), 1,346,468 records were evaluated. After exclusions for revisions, conversions, pediatric cases, nonbinary gender, missing body mass index (BMI) data, and missing operative time; 291,625 cases of primary RYGB were included for full analysis and rare events modeling of early MU.
RESULTS: The prevalence of early MU was .29% (n = 850). Higher rates of early MU were associated with BMI, race, history of diabetes mellitus (DM), prior thrombotic complications (deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE)), prior percutaneous cardiac intervention (PTC), immunosuppressive therapy, and anticoagulation status. Additionally, procedural aspects like the nonspecialization of the surgeon and longer operative times also correlated with higher early MU rates. Rare-events regression modeling noted significant associations of early MU with younger age, diabetes requiring insulin, history of PTC, DVT, immunosuppressive therapy, and anticoagulation status.
CONCLUSIONS: Early MU remains a relatively rare complication. The lower than previously reported occurrence suggests possible improvements in both patient preparation and surgical technique. The identification of relevant risk factors enables better perioperative and intraoperative management of patients at risk of developing early MU.

OBJECTIVE: With the escalating prevalence of obesity, healthcare providers are increasingly managing patients with a body mass index (BMI) exceeding 70. The aim of this study was to describe the perioperative experiences of this demographic group at two institutions.
METHODS: An analysis encompassing 84 patients presenting with BMI ≥ 70 kg/m2 from two institutions was conducted. Data included patient demographics, 30-day postoperative outcomes, and weight-loss at different intervals (30 days, 6 months, 1 year). Additionally, rates of emergency department (ED) utilization, readmission, and reoperation in the first postoperative year were examined.
RESULTS: Most patients were black (66.7%) and female (86.9%) with a mean age of 41.7 years. The majority underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG, 88.1%). Patients exhibited a marked decrease in BMI (7.84% at 30 days, 20.13% at 6 months, and 26.83% at 1 year). Average length of stay was comparable across procedure (F(3,80) = 0.016, p = .997). While 30-day complications were minimal (0.7%), 14.4% of patients experienced ED visits within 30 days, escalating to 19.6% by six months and 25% at 1 year. Readmission and reoperation rates at 1 year were 6.45% and 4.83%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: With global obesity rates rising, clinicians are being challenged to care for patients with BMI ≥ 70 kg/m2. Analysis of two institutions demonstrated low rates of 30-days complications but increased readmission rates and ED utilization in this patient population. Despite increased resource utilization, the study suggests that BMI ≥ 70 kg/m2 alone should not be a deterrent for surgery, emphasizing the need for nuanced care in this expanding demographic.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is standardized and safe. Nevertheless, complications such as anastomotic leakage (AL) or staple-line leakage (SLL) can occur. In upper GI or colorectal surgery, endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVT) offers a therapeutic alternative to revisional surgery. Data on EVT in patients with leakage after MBS remain scarce. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of EVT and its potential as endoscopic alternative to revisional surgery.
METHODS: All patients treated for AL or SLL with EVT after MBS between 01/2016 and 08/2023 at the Department for General Surgery, Medical University Vienna, were included in this retrospective, single-center study. Therapeutic value of EVT as management option for acute postoperative leakage after MBS in daily practice was evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed descriptively.
RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were treated with EVT within the observational period of 7 years. In 11 cases (52.4%), the index surgery was a primary bariatric intervention; in 10 cases (47.6%), a secondary surgery after initial MBS was performed. Favored approach was a combination of revisional surgery and EVT (n = 18; 85.7%), intermediate self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) in 16 (76.2%) cases. EVT was changed six times (0-33) every 3-4 days. Mean EVT time was 25.1 days (3-97). No severe associated complications were detected and EVT showed an efficacy of 95.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: This small case series supports the trend to establish EVT in daily clinical practice when revisional surgery after MBS is needed, thus preventing further reoperation and reducing associated morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) for insufficient weight loss/weight regain or metabolic relapse is increasing worldwide. There is currently no large multinational, prospective data on 30-day morbidity and mortality of RBS. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the 30-day morbidity and mortality of RBS at participating centres.
METHODS: An international steering group was formed to oversee the study. The steering group members invited bariatric surgeons worldwide to participate in this study. Ethical approval was obtained at the lead centre. Data were collected prospectively on all consecutive RBS patients operated between 15th May 2021 to 31st December 2021. Revisions for complications were excluded.
RESULTS: A total of 65 global centres submitted data on 750 patients. Sleeve gastrectomy (n = 369, 49.2 %) was the most common primary surgery for which revision was performed. Revisional procedures performed included Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in 41.1 % (n = 308) patients, One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) in 19.3 % (n = 145), Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) in 16.7 % (n = 125) and other procedures in 22.9 % (n = 172) patients. Indications for revision included weight regain in 615(81.8 %) patients, inadequate weight loss in 127(16.9 %), inadequate diabetes control in 47(6.3 %) and diabetes relapse in 27(3.6 %). 30-day complications were seen in 80(10.7 %) patients. Forty-nine (6.5 %) complications were Clavien Dindo grade 3 or higher. Two patients (0.3 %) died within 30 days of RBS.
CONCLUSIONS: RBS for insufficient weight loss/weight regain or metabolic relapse is associated with 10.7 % morbidity and 0.3 % mortality. Sleeve gastrectomy is the most common primary procedure to undergo revisional bariatric surgery, while Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the most commonly performed revision.

<br><b>Introduction:</b> Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a leading bariatric surgery globally. One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), a modification of RYGB, ranks as the third most common bariatric procedure in Poland. While clinical trials show that OAGB outcomes are comparable to those of RYGB regarding weight loss, remission of comorbidities, and hormonal impact, there is limited data on long-term outcomes and complications.</br><br><b>Aim:</b> The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of revisional surgeries conducted after OAGB <i>versus</i> RYGB.</br> <br><b>Material and methods:</b> This retrospective study analyzed patients undergoing revisional bariatric surgeries from January 2010 to January 2020 across 12 Polish centers. The inclusion criteria were an age of at least 18 years and prior OAGB or RYGB surgery. Those with incomplete primary surgery data and follow-up post-revision were excluded. Data were collected regarding parameters for anthropometrics, comorbidities, and perioperative details. The patients were categorized based on their initial surgery: OAGB or RYGB. The primary endpoints were the reasons for and types of revisional surgery and weight changes; the secondary endpoints were postoperative complications and length of hospital stay (LOS).</br> <br><b>Results:</b> In total, 27 patients participated, with a mean age of 38.18 7 years. Differences between the OAGB (13 patients) and RYGB (14 patients) groups included median initial body weight (100 kg <i>vs.</i> 126 kg, p<0.016), number of postoperative complications (9 <i>vs.</i> 3, p = 0.021), and median LOS (3 <i>vs.</i> 4.5 days, p = 0.03). GERD was the primary reason for OAGB revisions (69.2%), whereas insufficient weight loss led to the most RYGB revisions (42.9%).</br><br><b>Conclusions:</b> The RYGB patients commonly needed revisions due to weight issues, whereas reoperations in the OAGB patients were conducted due to postoperative complications. The postoperative complications and LOS were similar between the groups.</br> <br><b>The importance of research for the development of the field:</b> The results may influence clinical surgeons\' choice of surgical technique.</br>.

Transcatheter arterial radioembolization (TARE) is a common locoregional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. It is associated with peptic ulcer disease in up to 5% of patients. A 70-year-old man with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and liver cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with TARE 6 months earlier was evaluated for continued melena and was found to have an ulcer in the excluded stomach. This was successfully treated with liquid proton pump inhibitor through gastrostomy tube to the excluded stomach. This represents a unique case of successful management of TARE-induced peptic ulcer disease in the excluded stomach of a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patient.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a treatment for severe obesity. However, many patients have insufficient total weight loss (TWL) after RYGB. Although multiple factors have been involved, their influence is incompletely known. The aim of this exploratory study was to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of the use of machine learning (ML) techniques to estimate the success in weight loss after RYGP, based on clinical, anthropometric and biochemical data, in order to identify morbidly obese patients with poor weight responses. We retrospectively analyzed 118 patients, who underwent RYGB at the Hospital Clínico Universitario of Valencia (Spain) between 2013 and 2017. We applied a ML approach using local linear embedding (LLE) as a tool for the evaluation and classification of the main parameters in conjunction with evolutionary algorithms for the optimization and adjustment of the parameter model. The variables associated with one-year postoperative %TWL were obstructive sleep apnea, osteoarthritis, insulin treatment, preoperative weight, insulin resistance index, apolipoprotein A, uric acid, complement component 3, and vitamin B12. The model correctly classified 71.4% of subjects with TWL < 30% although 36.4% with TWL ≥ 30% were incorrectly classified as \"unsuccessful procedures\". The ML-model processed moderate discriminatory precision in the validation set. Thus, in severe obesity, ML-models can be useful to assist in the selection of patients before bariatric surgery.