OBJECTIVE: The RHCE gene plays an important role in the complex and polymorphic Rh blood group system. RHCE genotyping holds significant clinical and transfusion-related implications. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of RHC/c genotyping in the Chinese Han population.
METHODS: Blood samples were obtained from 653 Chinese Han blood donors. The serological RhD and RhCcEe types were determined using monoclonal antibodies. Subsequently, multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis was performed for RHC and RHc genotyping. Additionally, exon 2 of RHCE and exon 1 of RHD were sequenced.
RESULTS: The analysis in this study found 443 RhD-positive donors and 210 RhD-negative donors. Among the 653 total donors, discrepancies between the RHC genotyping results and the serological results were found in 37 individuals. Specifically, 6 false-positive RhC results in RhD-positive donors and 28 false-positive RhC results in RhD-negative donors were identified based on c.48C in RHCE exon 1. Additionally, 3 false-negative RhC results were observed in the RhD-positive donors due to a 109 bp insertion in RHCE intron 2. RHc typing demonstrated complete consistency between the real-time PCR and the serological results.
CONCLUSIONS: In the Chinese Han population, RHC genotyping was reliable when consistent results were achieved by both c.48C-based and 109 bp insertion-based genotyping. Moreover, RHc genotyping based on c.203A and c.307C polymorphic loci demonstrated dependable performance.

Patients who carry Rhesus (RH) blood group variants may develop Rh alloantibodies requiring matched red blood cell transfusions. Serologic reagents for Rh variants often fail to specifically identify variant Rh antigens and are in limited supply. Therefore, red blood cell genotyping assays are essential for managing transfusions in patients with clinically relevant Rh variants. Well-characterized DNA reference reagents are needed to ensure quality and accuracy of the molecular tests. Eight lyophilized DNA reference reagents, representing 21 polymorphisms in RHD and RHCE, were produced from an existing repository of immortalized B-lymphoblastoid cell lines at the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research/US Food and Drug Administration. The material was validated through an international collaborative study involving 17 laboratories that evaluated each DNA candidate using molecular assays to characterize RHD and RHCE alleles, including commercial platforms and laboratory-developed testing, such as Sanger sequencing, next-generation sequencing, and third-generation sequencing. The genotyping results showed 99.4% agreement with the expected results for the target RH polymorphisms and 87.9% for RH allele agreement. Most of the discordant RH alleles results were explained by a limited polymorphism coverage in some genotyping methods. Results of stability and accelerated degradation studies support the suitability of these reagents for use as reference standards. The collaborative study results demonstrate the qualification of these eight DNA reagents for use as reference standards for RH blood group genotyping assay development and analytical validation.

OBJECTIVE: The Rh blood group system is the most polymorphic human blood group system. Previous studies have investigated variants in the RHD and RHCE promoter. The relevance of these variants to the Chinese Han population is further clarified in this study.
METHODS: In total, 317 donors (223 Rh D-positive [D+], including 20 Del and 94 Rh D-negative [D-]) were randomly selected. The promoter regions and exon 1 of RHD and RHCE were amplified through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) whose products were directly sequenced using forward and reverse primers.
RESULTS: Expected PCR products of the RHD promoter and exon 1 were amplified in 223 D+ individuals, including 20 Del individuals, and were absent in 81 of 94 D- individuals. Expected PCR products of RHCE were observed in all donors. Two single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were observed in the RHD promoter region. Moreover, 11 SNVs were observed in the promoter and exon 1 of RHCE. rs4649082, rs2375313, rs2281179, rs2072933, rs2072932, rs2072931 and rs586178 with strong linkage disequilibria were significantly different between the D+ and D- groups. [A;C] was the most common haplotype in the RHD promoter (NC_000001.11:g.[-1033A>G;-831C>T]). [G;T;T;A;T;A;C;G;A;C;G] was the most predominant haplotype in both total and D- groups. In D+ individuals, [A;C;T;G;C;G;C;G;C;C;C] was the most frequent haplotype in the RHCE promoter (NC_000001.11:g.[-1080A>G;-958C>T;-390T>C;-378G>A;-369C>T;-296G>A;-144C>G;-132G>A;-122C>A;28C>T;48C>G]).
CONCLUSIONS: We speculate that the SNVs/haplotypes found in this article cannot significantly affect gene expression. The present study findings should help elucidate the molecular basis of the polymorphic expression of RHD and RHCE promoter regions.

OBJECTIVE: Computational biology analyses the theoretical tertiary structure of proteins and identifies the \'topological\' differences between RhD and RhCE. Our aim was to identify the theoretical structural differences between the four isoforms of RhCE and RhD using computational biological tools.
METHODS: Physicochemical profile was determined by hydrophobicity and electrostatic potential analysis. Secondary and tertiary structures were generated using computational biology tools. The structures were evaluated and validated using Ramachandran algorithm, which calculates the single score, p-value and root mean square deviation (RMSD). Structures were overlaid on local refinement of \'RhAG-RhCE-ANK\' (PBDID 7uzq) and RhAG to compare their spatial distribution within the membrane.
RESULTS: All proteins differed in surface area and electrostatic distance due to variations in hydrophobicity and electrostatic potential. The RMSD between RhD and RhCE was 0.46 ± 0.04 Å, and the comparison within RhCE was 0.57 ± 0.08 Å. The percentage of amino acids in the hydrophobic thickness was 50.24% for RhD while for RhCE it ranged between 73.08% and 76.68%. The RHAG hydrophobic thickness was 34.2 Å, and RhCE\'s hydrophobic thickness was 33.83 Å. We suggest that the C/c antigens differ exofacially at loops L1 and L2. For the E/e antigens, the difference lies in L6. By contrast, L4 is the same for all proteins except Rhce.
CONCLUSIONS: The physicochemical properties of Rh proteins made them different, although their genes are homologous. Using computational biology, we model structures with sufficient precision, similar to those obtained experimentally. An amino acid variation alters the folding of the tertiary structure and the interactions with other proteins, modifying the electrostatic environment, the spatial conformations and therefore the antigenic recognition.

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most important hemoglobinopathy worldwide. The treatment often requires phenotype-matched red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, but alloimmunization to non-ABO antigens may occur in a part of the SCD patients. The genotyping has been used for RBC antigen prediction, reducing the possibility of the alloimmunization.
OBJECTIVE: In this study we performed the genotyping for the Kell and RHCE blood groups in samples from 77 phenotyped Brazilian SCD patients, whose alloimmunization profiles were also assessed.
RESULTS: Discrepancies between genotyping and phenotyping for the RHCE and Kell blood groups systems were observed in 22.07% (17/77) of the SCD patients. We found C/c and E/e discrepancies in 11.68% and 9.09% of patients, respectively; one SCD patient (1.3%) presented a discrepancy in the Kell group. Two SCD patients with discrepancies between genotype and phenotype were alloimmunized. In total, twenty-eight patients (36.4%) developed alloantibodies, of which 55.17% were directed against antigens in the Rh system, 8.62% were directed against antigens in the Kell system and 36.20%, against other groups. Finally, the frequency of discrepancies is significantly higher in non-alloimmunized patients (30.61%), compared to alloimmunized patients (7.14%) (p = 0.0217).
CONCLUSIONS: In part, the alloimmunization of the SCD patients may have been triggered by these discrepancies, indicating that the integration of serological and molecular tests in the immunohematology routine could help to increase the transfusion safety. However, the higher number of alloimmunized patients without discrepancies showed that reasons other than the discrepancies appear to have influenced more strongly the alloimmunization in the SCD patients in this study.

Immunohematology laboratories are regularly facing transfusion issues due to serological weaknesses. Altered (partial) RH antigens account for most of them. In some situations, RHCE variant alleles are involved. Herein we present our three-step molecular exploration, with allele frequencies, that has efficiently untangled RH2 phenotype weaknesses and discrepancies in our 2017-2021 cohort. In the last 5 years, the PACA Corse EFS molecular platform received 265 samples from healthy blood donors or patients with C and C/e typing difficulties. The first-intention technique (DNA array and real time PCR for RHCE*CeRN research) detected RHCE variant alleles in 143 cases (54%). The RHCE alleles classically found in African populations were the most frequent, with RHCE*CeRN allele in 40 cases (15%) and (C)ces haplotype type 1 and 2 in 26 cases (10%). A \"CE\" effect haplotype was suspected in 56 cases, due to the uncommon DCE haplotype that may explain the low C expression. When there were no RHCE*Ce or RHCE*CE alleles, we then searched for RHD polymorphisms by DNA array. We detected the RHD*DAU5 and RHD*DIVa in 18 and 7 cases respectively, suggesting that C ambiguity is related to the presence of these alleles which has never been described with DAU5. If no variant RHCE and RHD alleles were detected, we finally sequenced the 10 exons of both RHCE and RHD genes according to the clinical context and found seven new RHCE alleles. Thus, this molecular strategy would improve the knowledge of RHCE variants\' expression and, thus, optimize the transfusion management.

BACKGROUND: Several centers have selected Black donors to prevent Rh alloimmunization of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). As the Brazilian population is considered very admixed and race definition by self-declaration is questionable, this study aimed to compare RHCE diversity among patients with SCD and selected groups of Brazilian blood donors to define which group of donors would be the adequate red cell supply for patients with SCD.
METHODS: We compared RHCE allele frequencies between patients with SCD and four groups of Brazilian blood donors: self-declared Black donors (SDB), donors with predominant African genetic markers (AAM), donors with weak D expression (WDD), and random donors (RDs). Variant RHCE alleles were identified using molecular protocols.
RESULTS: Among patients with SCD, 47% had at least one variant RHCE, in SDB and WDD this frequency was higher, 53% and 58.6%, respectively. In AAM and in RD the frequencies were 32% and 27.6%, respectively. In patients with SCD and SDB, the most common alleles were RHCE*ce.01, RHCE*ceVS.01, and RHCE*ceVS.02. WDD had a high frequency of RHCE*ceAR and highest frequency of variant RHCE in both alleles, followed by patients with SCD and SDB.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that even in an admixed population the selection of SDB donors is the best choice of matching for transfusion support in patients with SCD. For specific RHCE alleles, selection of donors with weak D expression could be a good option.

BACKGROUND: D antigen is one among the most immunogenic antigens and is the most common cause of Haemolytic Disease of Fetus and Newborn (HDFN). The D-phenotype is a rare Rh variant in which none of the RhCE antigens are expressed on the red cell surface. Individuals having D-phenotype are capable of producing a rare alloantibody named as anti-Rh17(Hr° ) in response to pregnancy or transfusion and has the potential to react with C/c and E/e antigens causing severe haemolytic transfusion reaction (HTR) and haemolytic disease of fetus and newborn (HDFN).
METHODS: We have encountered a case of severe HDFN with an accidental discovery of D- phenotype of the mother with anti-Rh-17 antibodies. D- phenotype has been confirmed with molecular typing along with genotyping of all family members.
CONCLUSIONS: Rare phenotypes like D- individuals especially if allo-immunised are of great concern at times of transfusion requirements. Hence, proper identification of these individuals are important to contribute them to the rare donor pool and to adopt adequate patient blood management strategies.

The molecular pathology of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) is determined by different RHD, RHCE, and KEL genotypes and by blood group incompatibility between the mother and fetus that is caused by erythrocyte antigen presence/absence on the cell surface. In the Czech Republic, clinically significant antierythrocyte alloantibodies include anti-D, anti-K, anti C/c, and anti-E. Deletion of the RHD gene and then three single nucleotide polymorphisms in the RHCE and KEL genes (rs676785, rs609320, and rs8176058) are the most common. The aim of this study is to develop effective and precise monitoring of fetal genotypes from maternal plasma of these polymorphisms using droplet digital (dd)PCR. Fifty-three plasma DNA samples (from 10 to 18 weeks of gestation) were analyzed (10 RHD, 33 RHCE, and 10 KEL). The ddPCR methodology was validated on the basis of the already elaborated and established method of minisequencing and real-time PCR and with newborn phenotype confirmation. The results of ddPCR were in 100% agreement with minisequencing and real-time PCR and also with newborn phenotype. ddPCR can fully replace the reliable but more time-consuming method of minisequencing and real-time PCR RHD examination. Accurate and rapid noninvasive fetal genotyping minimizes the possibility of HDFN developing.

The genetic diversity of the RHCE gene locus has been explored in diverse populations of different racial backgrounds. Data referring to the diversity of RHCE encoding weakened expression of C, c, E, and e in multiethnic populations is still incomplete.
Samples from Brazilian blood donors presenting reduced expression of C, c, E, or e on gel method were selected for the study. All exons and flanking introns of RHCE were genotyped though direct Sanger sequencing for the included donors.
Sixty-six donors were included: 23 with weak C, 22 with weak c, 6 with weak E, 14 with weak e, and 1 with weak c and E. Among the samples with weak C, the following altered RH*C were encountered: RHCE*CeMA (n = 3), RHCE*Ce941C (n = 1), and RHCE*CeVA (n = 1). RHD*D-CE(4-7)-D was detected in six cases, RHCE*CE was presumably present in five cases, and seven cases were unexplained. Two altered alleles underlay the weak c phenotype: RHCE*ceJAL (n = 20) and RHCE*ce340T (n = 2), and two altered RHCE justified weak e: RHCE*ceMO (n = 6) and RHCE*ceJAL (n = 8). Three variant RHCE were associated with weak E: RHCE*cEJU (n = 4), RHCE*cE382C (n = 1), and RHCE*cEIV (n = 1). The RHCE*cE905A justified one case of weak c and E.
We describe the distribution of RHCE variants found in association with weak expression of C, c, E, and e in blood donors of multiethnic origin, which differs in comparison to that previously reported for people of African or Caucasian descent.