REBOA

REBOA
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:复苏性血管内球囊阻断主动脉(REBOA)是一种有争议的出血控制干预措施,通常被吹捧为最终控制出血的桥梁。这篇综述总结了REBOA从成立到最新应用的演变,重点是临床结果。
    方法:这是基于对文献的选择性审查的叙述性审查。
    结果:REBOA仍然是创伤患者很少使用的干预措施。尽管据称导管技术有所改善,但随着时间的推移,并发症仍然保持一致。缺血再灌注损伤,终末器官功能障碍,肢体缺血,截肢都有报道。缺乏循证指南,和适当的适应症和这种干预的理想患者群体尚未确定。
    结论:尽管大肆宣传,所谓的技术进步,以及过去十年高质量研究的幻影,REBOA未能达到预期。寻求解决不受控制的NCTH的问题仍未解决。
    OBJECTIVE: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a controversial haemorrhage control intervention often touted as the bridge to definitive haemorrhage control. This review summarizes the evolution of REBOA from its inception to the latest applications with an emphasis on clinical outcomes.
    METHODS: This is a narrative review based on a selective review of the literature.
    RESULTS: REBOA remains a rarely utilized intervention in trauma patients. Complications have remained consistent over time despite purported improvements in catheter technology. Ischemia-reperfusion injuries, end-organ dysfunction, limb ischemia, and amputations have all been reported. Evidence-based guidelines are lacking, and appropriate indications and the ideal patient population for this intervention are yet to be defined.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite the hype, purported technological advancements, and the mirage of high-quality studies over the last decade, REBOA has failed to keep up to its expectations. The quest to find the solution for uncontrolled NCTH remains unsolved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:主动脉食管瘘(AEF)是上消化道出血的罕见原因。尽管诊断和治疗取得了进展,AEF患者的死亡率仍然很高,因为它的暴发性过程,即使有最大限度的重症监护。复苏性血管内球囊闭塞主动脉(REBOA)是一种控制危及生命的出血的复苏技术。它已成为危及生命的管理的重要方式,创伤或非创伤,动脉出血.然而,它在癌症引起的失血性休克中的应用鲜有报道。
    方法:一名51岁的有食道癌病史的女性患者因呕血到急诊科就诊。由于强烈怀疑出血性休克,因此进行了计算机断层扫描。诊断为食管癌导致的AEF,在使用REBOA控制出血的同时,进行了紧急胸主动脉腔内修复术。成功进行了阶段性选择性食管重建。
    结论:在出现疑似由AEF引起的失血性休克的患者中,止血至关重要。在这种情况下,及时实施REBOA已显示出希望和潜在的效力。
    BACKGROUND: Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare cause of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Despite diagnostic and therapeutic advances, the mortality rate in AEF patients remains high because of its fulminant course, even with maximal intensive care. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a resuscitation technique to control life-threatening bleeding. It has become an important modality in the management of life-threatening, traumatic or non-traumatic, arterial bleeding. However, it\'s use in hemorrhagic shock caused by cancer has rarely been reported.
    METHODS: A 51-year-old woman with a history of esophageal cancer presented to our emergency department with hematemesis. Computed tomography was performed because of a strong suspicion of hemorrhagic shock. With a diagnosis of AEF due to esophageal cancer, emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed while the bleeding was controlled using REBOA. Staged elective esophageal reconstruction was successfully performed.
    CONCLUSIONS: Hemostasis is crucial in patients who present with suspected hemorrhagic shock attributable to AEF. The timely implementation of REBOA has shown promise and potential effectiveness in such cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    复苏性血管内球囊闭塞主动脉(REBOA)用于临时控制不可压缩的躯干出血(NCTH),作为最终手术治疗的桥梁。对射线照相进行安全球囊定位的依赖性是限制REBOA在民用和军用院前设置中的扩展使用的一个因素。我们旨在确定标准化的性别和基于年龄的可变距离导管插入长度,以在没有初始透视确认的情况下进行准确的REBOA放置。
    方法:回顾性分析来自荷兰非创伤人群代表性样本的对比增强CT扫描。测量从双侧股总动脉接入点(FAAP)到主动脉闭塞区中部和伴随边界的血管内距离。对于所有(组合)性别和基于年龄的亚组,计算了从FAAP到边界和中部III区的距离的平均值和95%置信区间。确定了这些组的最佳插入长度和潜在安全区域。Bootstrap分析与40毫米长的球囊引入模拟相结合,以确定一般人群的错误率和REBOA放置精度。
    结果:总计,纳入1354例非创伤患者(694名女性)。血管距离随着年龄的增长而增加,男性血管距离更长。右侧髂股轨迹长7毫米。最佳的I区导管插入长度为430mm。第III区导管最佳插入长度差异达30mm,范围在234和264毫米之间。在每个亚组的解剖距离和必要的引入深度之间观察到统计学上显着和潜在的临床相关差异。
    结论:这是第一项比较性别和年龄亚组之间主动脉形态和血管内距离的研究。由于III区长度一致,长度变异性和伸长率似乎主要起源于i股轨迹和II区。最佳的I区导管插入长度为430mm。最佳III区导管插入范围在234至264毫米之间。这些标准化的可变距离插入长度可以促进更安全的无透视检查REBOA,院前设置。
    UNASSIGNED: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is used to temporary control non-compressible truncal hemorrhage (NCTH) as bridge to definitive surgical treatment. The dependence on radiography for safe balloon positioning is one factor that limits the extended use of REBOA in civilian and military pre-hospital settings. We aimed to determine standardized sex and age-based variable-distance catheter insertion lengths for accurate REBOA placement without initial fluoroscopic confirmation.
    METHODS: Contrast enhanced CT-scans from a representative sample of a Dutch non-trauma population were retrospectively analyzed. Intravascular distances were measured from the bilateral common femoral artery access points (FAAP) to the middle of the aortic occlusion zones and accompanying boundaries. Means and 95% confidence intervals for the distances from the FAAPs to the boundaries and mid-zone III were calculated for all (combined) sex and age-based subgroups. Optimal insertion lengths and potentially safe regions were determined for these groups. Bootstrap analysis was performed in combination with a 40-mm long balloon introduction simulation to determine error-rates and REBOA placement accuracy for the general population.
    RESULTS: In total, 1354 non-trauma patients (694 females) were included. Vascular distances increased with age and were longer in males. The iliofemoral trajectory was 7 mm longer on the right side. The optimal zone I catheter insertion length would be 430 mm. Optimal zone III catheter insertion lengths showed up to 30 mm difference, ranging between 234 and 264 mm. Statistically significant and potentially clinically relevant differences were observed between the anatomical distances and necessary introduction depths for each subgroup.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to compare aortic morphology and intravascular distances between combined sex and age-based subgroups. As zone III length was consistent, length variability and elongation seem to mainly originate in the iliofemoral trajectory and zone II. The optimal zone I catheter insertion length would be 430 mm. Optimal zone III catheter insertion ranged between 234 and 264 mm. These standardized variable-distance insertion lengths could facilitate safer fluoroscopy-free REBOA in austere, pre-hospital settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在严重的不可压缩躯干创伤中使用复苏性血管内球囊闭塞主动脉(REBOA)进行临时出血控制仍存在争议,关于患者选择和结果的数据有限。这项研究旨在分析其在急诊科(ED)中使用的全国趋势。
    方法:对2017年至2022年的美国外科医生学会创伤质量改善计划(ACS-TQIP)进行了回顾性分析,专注于REBOA在ED中的放置。
    结果:分析包括3398个REBOA程序。大多数患者为男性(76%),中位年龄为40岁(27-58),损伤严重程度评分为20(20-41)。最常见的机制是碰撞(64%),骨盆创伤最常进行的紧急手术(14%)。一级创伤中心执行了82%的这些手术,年利用率一直很低(<200个设施)。安置后1小时的生存率为85%,按排放量大幅下降至42%。
    结论:REBOA的使用仍然有限但稳定,主要发生在1级创伤中心ED。虽然短期生存率是有利的,它们在放电时显著下降。
    BACKGROUND: Use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for temporary hemorrhage control in severe non-compressible torso trauma remains controversial, with limited data on patient selection and outcomes. This study aims to analyze the nationwide trends of its use in the emergency department (EDs).
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP) from 2017 to 2022 was performed, focusing on REBOA placements in EDs.
    RESULTS: The analysis included 3398 REBOA procedures. Majority patients were male (76 ​%) with a median age of 40 years (27-58) and injury severity score of 20 (20-41). The most common mechanism was collision (64 ​%), with emergency surgeries most frequently performed for pelvic trauma (14 ​%). Level 1 trauma centers performed 82 ​% of these procedures, with consistent low annual utilization (<200 facilities). Survival rates were 85 ​% at 1-h post-placement, decreasing significantly to 42 ​% by discharge.
    CONCLUSIONS: REBOA usage in remains limited but steady, primarily occurring at level 1 trauma center EDs. While short-term survival rates are favorable, they drop significantly by the time of discharge.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在世界各地出现在急诊科的危重病人的数量持续上升。事实上,急诊科危重患者的比例现在高于COVID-19大流行前的水平.[1]急诊医生(EP)通常是第一个评估和复苏危重病人的医生。鉴于重症监护病房(ICU)床位持续短缺,持续的人员短缺,和整体低效的医院吞吐量,EP的任务通常是为这些患者提供长期超过初始复苏阶段的重症监护。急诊重症患者的住院时间延长与ICU和住院时间增加有关,不良事件增加,ED员工倦怠,患者和家属满意度下降,and,最重要的是,死亡率增加。[2-5].因此,EP必须了解有关复苏和重症监护医学的最新文献,这样危重病人可以继续接受最好的治疗,最新的循证护理.这篇综述总结了2023年发表的与某些危重ED患者的复苏和管理有关的重要文章。本文包含的主题包括心脏骤停,心脏骤停后的护理,感染性休克,快速顺序插管,重症肺炎,输血,创伤,和关键程序。
    The number of critically ill patients that present to emergency departments across the world continues to rise. In fact, the proportion of critically ill patients in emergency departments is now higher than pre-COVID-19 pandemic levels. [1] The emergency physician (EP) is typically the first physician to evaluate and resuscitate the critically ill patient. Given the continued shortage of intensive care unit (ICU) beds, persistent staff shortages, and overall inefficient hospital throughput, EPs are often tasked with providing intensive care to these patients long beyond the initial resuscitation phase. Prolonged boarding of critically ill patients in the ED is associated with increased ICU and hospital length of stay, increased adverse events, ED staff burnout, decreased patient and family satisfaction, and, most importantly, increased mortality. [2-5]. As such, it is imperative for the EP to be knowledgeable about recent literature in resuscitation and critical care medicine, so that critically ill ED patients can continue to receive the best, most up-to-date evidence-based care. This review summarizes important articles published in 2023 that pertain to the resuscitation and management of select critically ill ED patients. Topics included in this article include cardiac arrest, post-cardiac arrest care, septic shock, rapid sequence intubation, severe pneumonia, transfusions, trauma, and critical procedures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:复苏血管内球囊阻断主动脉(REBOA)技术控制腹部,骨盆,交界处,主动脉内钳夹产后出血。在两级院前急救医疗系统中没有指导REBOA使用的协议或明确的适应症,在法国发现。我们进行了Delphi研究,以阐明在此类系统中应用REBOA的适应症和禁忌症。
    方法:我们与一组具有REBOA专业知识和临床经验的国际医生(血管内和创伤管理协会成员)进行了三轮Delphi研究。基于共识答案,在文献中现有数据的补充下,我们制定了在医疗化院前环境中使用REBOA的方案.
    结果:我们确定了10个文献中没有回答的问题,并将其提交给21位专家。经过三轮,就这10个问题达成共识。最重要的是\"在你看来,在出血性病人身上,血管充盈良好,其血流动力学在3mg/h的去甲肾上腺素下仍不稳定,我们是否应该膨胀REBOA以防止患者死亡并让他们活着进入手术室?您是否同意最大遮挡持续时间约为30分钟,
    结论:我们提出了在医疗化院前环境中使用REBOA的方案。该协议澄清了失血性休克,尽管去甲肾上腺素(也称为去甲肾上腺素)的剂量为0.6µg/kg/min,对于没有REBOA的患者来说,被认为太严重了,无法将其运送到创伤中心。此外,它阐明了区域1REBOA应充气最多30分钟,并采用部分遮挡策略,如果可能的话。在建立院前REBOA和大型随机研究后,应根据反馈更新该方案。
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在英国,院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者中只有不到十分之一的人能够出院。对于院前团队,尽管有高级生命支持(ALS),但仍在难治性OHCA中的患者改善预后;增加自发循环恢复可能性的新策略,同时保持脑循环,应该调查。复苏的血管内球囊闭塞主动脉(REBOA)已被证明可以改善心肺复苏期间的冠状动脉和脑灌注。早期,院前开始使用REBOA可能会改善对标准ALS无反应的患者的结局.然而,有重要的临床,技术,以及在OHCA中快速提供院前REBOA的后勤挑战;在英国城乡环境中提供这种干预的可行性尚未评估。
    院外心脏骤停(ERICA-ARREST)主动脉的紧急复苏腔内球囊闭塞是一项前瞻性研究,单臂,介入可行性研究。该试验将招募20名非创伤性OHCA成年患者。主要目的是评估在英国院前环境中尽管有标准ALS但仍留在OHCA的患者中进行I区(腹腔上)主动脉闭塞的可行性。试验的次要目标是描述对主动脉闭塞的血流动力学和生理反应;报告关键时间间隔;并记录在此情况下进行REBOA时的不良事件。
    使用压缩的地理,和有针对性的调度,除了完善的股动脉接入计划,ERICA-ARREST研究将评估在英国城乡混合的OHCA中部署REBOA的可行性。试用登记。ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT06071910),注册日期2023年10月10日,https://classic。clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06071910.
    UNASSIGNED: Fewer than one in ten out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients survive to hospital discharge in the UK. For prehospital teams to improve outcomes in patients who remain in refractory OHCA despite advanced life support (ALS); novel strategies that increase the likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation, whilst preserving cerebral circulation, should be investigated. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) has been shown to improve coronary and cerebral perfusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Early, prehospital initiation of REBOA may improve outcomes in patients who do not respond to standard ALS. However, there are significant clinical, technical, and logistical challenges with rapidly delivering prehospital REBOA in OHCA; and the feasibility of delivering this intervention in the UK urban-rural setting has not been evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: The Emergency Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (ERICA-ARREST) study is a prospective, single-arm, interventional feasibility study. The trial will enrol 20 adult patients with non-traumatic OHCA. The primary objective is to assess the feasibility of performing Zone I (supra-coeliac) aortic occlusion in patients who remain in OHCA despite standard ALS in the UK prehospital setting. The trial\'s secondary objectives are to describe the hemodynamic and physiological responses to aortic occlusion; to report key time intervals; and to document adverse events when performing REBOA in this context.
    UNASSIGNED: Using compressed geography, and targeted dispatch, alongside a well-established femoral arterial access programme, the ERICA-ARREST study will assess the feasibility of deploying REBOA in OHCA in a mixed UK urban and rural setting.Trial registration.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06071910), registration date October 10, 2023, https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06071910.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究的目的是评估在严重骨盆骨折伴失血性休克中接受主动脉内球囊复苏术(REBOA)的患者的死亡率。
    方法:访问了2017-2019日历年的美国外科医生创伤质量改善计划(ACS-TQIP)数据库。该研究包括所有年龄在15岁及以上的严重骨盆骨折患者,定义为缩写损伤量表(AIS)评分≥3分,且收缩压最低(SBP)<90mmHg的损伤。患有严重脑损伤的患者被排除在研究之外。倾向评分匹配用于比较接受REBOA的患者与未接受REBOA的患者具有相似特征。
    结果:在3,186名符合研究条件的患者中,35例(1.1%)患者因持续失血性休克伴严重骨盆骨折而接受REBOA治疗。倾向匹配产生了35对患者。配对分析显示,接受REBOA的组和未接受REBOA的组之间在患者人口统计学方面没有显着差异,损伤严重程度,骨盆骨折的严重程度,初始评估和开腹手术时的最低血压。在住院总死亡率方面,REBOA与无REBOA组之间没有显着差异(34.3%与28.6,P=0.789)。
    结论:我们的研究未发现接受REBOA治疗严重骨盆骨折相关失血性休克患者与未接受REBOA治疗的相似队列患者相比有任何死亡率优势。需要更大样本量的前瞻性研究来验证我们的结果。
    证据级别IV.
    BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the mortality of patients who received Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of The Aorta (REBOA) in severe pelvic fracture with hemorrhagic shock.
    METHODS: The American College of Surgeon Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP) database for the calendar years 2017-2019 was accessed for the study. The study included all patients aged 15 years and older who sustained severe pelvic fractures, defined as an injury with an abbreviated injury scale (AIS) score of ≥ 3, and who presented with the lowest systolic blood pressure (SBP) of < 90 mmHg. Patients with severe brain injury were excluded from the study. Propensity score matching was used to compare the patients who received REBOA with similar characteristics to patients who did not receive REBOA.
    RESULTS: Out of 3,186 patients who qualified for the study, 35(1.1%) patients received REBOA for an ongoing hemorrhagic shock with severe pelvic fracture. The propensity matching created 35 pairs of patients. The pair-matched analysis showed no significant differences between the group who received REBOA and the group that did not receive REBOA regarding patients\' demography, injury severity, severity of pelvic fractures, lowest blood pressure at initial assessment and laparotomies. There was no significant difference found between REBOA versus no REBOA group in overall in-hospital mortality (34.3% vs. 28.6, P = 0.789).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study did not identify any mortality advantage in patients who received REBOA in hemorrhagic shock associated with severe pelvic fracture compared to a similar cohort of patients who did not receive REBOA. A larger sample size prospective study is needed to validate our results.
    UNASSIGNED: Level of Evidence IV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    出血是创伤患者死亡的主要原因之一。用于控制出血的辅助技术包括使用主动脉交叉钳夹,骨盆粘合剂的应用,快速扩张的止血海绵,和腹膜外填塞。此外,复苏腔内球囊闭塞主动脉(REBOA)可以为大量内出血患者提供挽救生命的近端控制。这项研究涉及一名接受1区REBOA治疗的自发性肝总动脉破裂引起的IV级出血性休克患者。在明确的选择性栓塞之前,在外科重症监护病房(SICU)的床边进行了REBOA。一名健康的28岁男性在高速机动车碰撞后遭受了4级肝裂伤和胰头横切,并伴有十二指肠损伤。抵达后,患者需要进行损伤控制剖腹手术并多次再次手术以治疗腹内损伤。到医院第11天,明显的内脏粘连导致腹部冻结。住院第20天,患者出现大量呕血,便血,还有IV级失血性休克.血管手术被要求在SICU的床边进行REBOA。患者在插入12Fr鞘的同时接受了大量输血方案,并在1区对主动脉闭塞球囊进行了充气,从而在血管造影套件中实现了血流动力学稳定,以进行运输和明确的管理。该病例报道了REBOA的新用途,在SICU的床边,用于处理腹部冻结患者的大量胃肠道出血。在这种情况下,REBOA使我们能够在血管造影套件中进行明确控制之前实现暂时的血液动力学稳定性。在SICU的床边使用REBOA可以防止某些失血和死亡。
    Hemorrhage is among the leading causes of death for trauma patients. Adjunct techniques used to control bleeding include use of aortic cross clamping, application of a pelvic binder, rapidly expanding hemostatic sponges, and extra-peritoneal packing. Additionally, Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) can provide life-saving proximal control for patients with massive internal hemorrhage. This study concerns a patient treated with Zone 1 REBOA for class IV hemorrhagic shock from a spontaneous common hepatic artery rupture. REBOA was performed at bedside in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) prior to definitive selective embolization. A healthy 28-year-old male suffered a grade 4 liver laceration and pancreatic head transection with associated duodenal injury after a high-speed motor vehicle collision. On arrival, the patient required a damage control laparotomy with multiple reoperations for management of his intra-abdominal injuries. By hospital day 11, significant visceral adhesions resulted in a frozen abdomen. On hospital day 20, the patient developed massive hematemesis, hematochezia, and class IV hemorrhagic shock. Vascular surgery was called to bedside in the SICU to perform REBOA. The patient received massive transfusion protocol while a 12 Fr sheath was inserted, and an aortic occlusion balloon was inflated in Zone 1 allowing for hemodynamic stabilization for transport and definitive management in the angiography suite. This case reports a novel use of REBOA, at bedside in the SICU, for the management of a massive gastrointestinal bleed in a patient with frozen abdomen. In this case, REBOA allowed us to achieve temporary hemodynamic stability prior to definitive control in the angiography suite. Bedside use of REBOA in the SICU prevented certain exsanguination and death.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在血管狭窄的血流动力学不稳定患者中获得经皮血管通路可能具有挑战性。在此过程中培训战斗医务人员对于在院前环境中管理流体和血液制品以及引入血管内出血控制工具是必要的。回声涂层针可以在侵入性手术中提供更好的超声可见性,从而降低并发症。主要目的是评估微教程序的有效性,以获得超声引导的股动脉通道,以供超声经验不足的战斗医务人员使用。次要目的是评估创新的回声涂层针在超声引导的血管通路中的附加价值。
    战斗医务人员参加了四步微格教学计划。该计划包括一个理论和一步一步的实践部分与三个不同的模型,包括活的和死的组织和REBOA访问任务培训师。在最后的测试中,所有参与者都必须在具有回声涂层和常规针头的加压死后人体样本模型上获得股动脉通路.对自我感知和观察到的表现以及手术时间进行评分。
    所有9名参与者在3分钟内在两个模型中成功地进行了血管可视化并获得了血管通路,并且在第二次尝试加压死后人体标本模型时明显更快。没有经验的超声人员的评分比较和可用性偏好显示,回声涂层针的优势存在显着差异。
    显微教学可能是训练战斗医务人员获得超声引导下经皮股动脉通路的有效方法。在针上使用回声涂层可能是有价值的辅助手段,并在获得血管通路方面提供优势。未来的研究应集中在对严峻情况的真实模拟上,并进一步评估在这些院前环境中使用回声涂层器械进行血管通路。
    UNASSIGNED: Obtaining percutaneous vascular access in hemodynamically unstable patients with constricted vessels can be challenging. Training combat medics in this procedure is necessary for administration of fluid and blood products and introducing endovascular bleeding control tools in pre-hospital settings. Echogenic coated needles might provide better ultrasound visibility in invasive procedures and hereby lower complications. The primary aim was to evaluate the efficacy of a microteaching program for obtaining ultrasound-guided femoral artery access for ultrasound inexperienced combat medics. The secondary aim was to assess the additional value of innovative echogenic coated needles in ultrasound-guided vascular access.
    UNASSIGNED: Combat medics participated in a four-step microteaching program. The program consisted of a theoretical and step-by-step practical part with three different models including live and dead tissue & a REBOA Access Task Trainer. During the final test, all participants had to obtain femoral artery access on a pressurized post-mortem human specimen model with both echogenic coated and conventional needles. Self-perceived and observed performance as well as procedure times were scored.
    UNASSIGNED: All nine participants succeeded in blood vessel visualization and obtaining vascular access in the two models within 3 minutes and were significantly faster during the second attempt on the pressurized post-mortem human specimen model. Scoring comparison and usability preference by ultrasound inexperienced personnel showed a significant difference in favor of the echogenic coated needles.
    UNASSIGNED: Microteaching may be an effective approach to train combat medics in obtaining ultrasound-guided percutaneous femoral artery access. The use of echogenic coatings on needles could be a valuable adjunct and provide advantage in obtaining vascular access. Future research should focus on realistic simulation of austere situations and further evaluation of the use of echogenic coated instruments for vascular access in these pre-hospital settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号