RCTs

RCT
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景/目的:对大血管闭塞(LVO)和Alberta卒中计划早期CT评分(ASPECTS)≥6的急性缺血性卒中患者推荐血管内治疗(EVT)。最近,关于LVO相关的大核心卒中患者EVT效应的随机对照试验(RCT)(ASPECTS0-5)。这里,我们提供了一项关于EVT对大核心卒中患者功能性神经状态影响的最新荟萃分析.方法:本研究遵循PRISMA指南。PubMed,EMBASE和CochraneCentral搜索比较EVT与大核LVO中风的最佳药物治疗(BMT)。主要结果是90天的功能独立性(改良的Rankin量表;mRS0-2)。次要结果为症状性颅内出血(sICH),良好的功能结局(mRS0-3)和出色的功能结局(mRS0-1)。EVTvs.通过随机效应荟萃分析比较BMT。使用I2和Q检验评估异质性,并根据RoB2工具报告偏倚风险。结果:纳入6个RCT(n=1656例)。所有研究都有中等偏倚风险,由于干预的性质,具有致盲偏见,潜在的分配偏差和不完整的结果报告。功能独立性在EVT与EVT中明显更频繁BMT组(OR=2.47,95%CI=1.52-4.03,p<0.001)。sICH率(OR=1.77,95%CI=1.01-3.11,p=0.04)和良好的功能结局(OR=2.20;95%CI=1.72-2.81,p<0.001)在EVT中更为频繁。BMT组,而mRS0-1的比率没有差异。结论:在大核心卒中和LVO患者中,与单独的BMT相比,EVT加BMT在3个月时的独立行走和良好的功能结局显着增加,尽管sICH略有增加。
    Background/Objectives: Endovascular treatment (EVT) is recommended for acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO) and an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) ≥ 6. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have recently become available on EVT effects in people with LVO-related large core stroke (ASPECTS 0-5). Here, we provide an updated meta-analysis of the EVT effect on functional neurological status in people with large-core stroke. Methods: The study followed the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central were searched for RCTs comparing EVT vs. best medical treatment (BMT) in large-core LVO stroke. The primary outcome was functional independence at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale; mRS 0-2). The secondary outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), good functional outcome (mRS 0-3) and excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1). EVT vs. BMT was compared through random effect meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 and Q test and risk of bias reported according to the RoB2 tool. Results: Six RCTs were included (n = 1656 patients). All studies had a moderate risk of bias, with blinding bias due to the nature of the intervention, potential allocation bias and incomplete outcome reporting. Functional independence was significantly more frequent in the EVT vs. BMT group (OR = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.52-4.03, p < 0.001). sICH rates (OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.01-3.11, p = 0.04) and good functional outcome (OR = 2.20; 95% CI = 1.72-2.81, p < 0.001) were more frequent in the EVT vs. BMT group, while the rates of mRS 0-1 did not differ. Conclusions: In patients with large-core stroke and LVO, EVT plus BMT as compared to BMT alone carries a significant increase in independent ambulation and good functional outcome at 3 months despite the marginal increase in sICH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)是全球慢性肝病的最常见原因。生活方式的改变是管理的主体,然而,大多数患者发现很难显著改变他们的生活方式。移动医疗是一种创新的医疗保健系统,在治疗哮喘等慢性疾病方面发挥着重要作用。癌症和心血管疾病。因此,我们进行了一项更新的meta分析,以评估移动健康干预(mHI)对NAFLD的疗效.
    方法:从论文开始到5月15日,对五个电子数据库进行了文献检索。2024.如果符合纳入标准,则纳入研究;随机对照试验仅对18年以上的NAFLD患者评估使用mHI和标准护理与标准护理相比。感兴趣的主要结果包括体重的变化,体重指数(BMI),从基线到干预后的肝脏标志物。使用Cochrane偏倚评估工具评估偏倚风险,同时使用审查经理的Mantel-Haenszel随机效应模型来汇总结果。
    结果:从7个RCT汇总结果,共621名参与者。体重显著下降(P<0.0001),与对照组相比,干预组从基线到随访的谷草转氨酶(AST)(P=0.002)和碱性转氨酶(ALT)(P=0.0009)。然而,BMI降低无显著性(P=0.64).
    结论:我们的荟萃分析报告,mHI在显著降低NAFLD患者体重和肝脏标志物方面发挥重要作用。考虑到这些因素的改善在疾病的管理中起着关键作用,mHI可能是为NAFLD患者提供更好结局的关键。
    BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Lifestyle modification is the mainstay of management, however, most patients find it difficult to significantly modify their lifestyle. Mobile health is an innovative healthcare system that has an established role in treating chronic diseases like asthma, cancer and cardiovascular disease. Hence, we conducted an updated meta analysis to evaluate the efficacy of mobile health intervention (mHI) for NAFLD.
    METHODS: Literature search of five electronic databases was performed from the inception of the paper till 15th May, 2024. Studies were included if they met the inclusion criteria; Randomized controlled trials evaluating use of mHI along with standard care in comparison to standard care only for patients with NAFLD over 18 years. Primary outcomes of interest included changes in weight, body mass index (BMI), and liver markers from baseline to post intervention. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane bias assessment tool while the Mantel-Haenszel Random-effects model on Review manager was used to pool outcomes.
    RESULTS: Outcomes were pooled from 7 RCTs comprising a total of 621 participants. There was a significant decrease in weight (P < 0.0001), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (P = 0.002) and alkaline aminotransferase (ALT) (P = 0.0009) from baseline to follow-up in the intervention group as compared to the control group. However, the reduction in BMI was found to be non-significant (P = 0.64).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our meta analysis reports that mHI plays an important role in significantly reducing weight and liver markers in patients with NAFLD. Considering that the improvement of these factors plays a key role in the management of the disease, mHI could be the key towards paving better outcomes for patients with NAFLD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    甘草(甘草属。)一直是中国和日本传统医学的基石。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估甘草制剂的疗效。单独或与其他草药结合使用,对原发性肝病患者肝功能酶的影响。我们系统地搜索了MEDLINE,Embase,Scopus,WebofScience,和Cochrane图书馆截至2024年4月。比较甘草效果的随机对照试验(RCT)。包括与安慰剂或标准护理对照相比的制剂.使用标准Cochrane方法提取数据并评估合格的研究。共15项RCT,涉及1367名参与者,包括在分析中。这些研究在地理位置上差异很大,持续时间,和甘草制剂使用。与对照组相比,甘草显著降低丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)15.63U/L(95%CI:-25.08,-6.18;p=0.001)和天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)7.37U/L(95%CI:-13.13,-1.61;p=0.01)。亚组分析显示,纯化的甘草酸化合物特别有效,显示更多的ALT和AST的减少没有显著的异质性。虽然甘草治疗并没有显著影响γ-谷氨酰转移酶和总胆红素(TBIL)的整体水平,特定的甘草草药制剂确实显示TBIL显着降低。甘草的安全性与已知的副作用一致,主要是轻度的,与其盐皮质激素作用有关。尽管存在异质性和潜在的语言偏见,研究结果表明,甘草可以增强肝功能。进一步的研究应规范甘草制剂,并探索其在多方面的草药配方中的作用,以更好地了解其保肝机制。
    Licorice (Glycyrrhiza spp.) has been a cornerstone of traditional Chinese and Japanese medicine. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of licorice formulations, alone or in combination with other herbs, on liver function enzymes in patients with primary liver disease. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to April 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of Glycyrrhiza spp. preparations versus placebo or standard of care controls were included. Standard Cochrane methods were used to extract data and appraise eligible studies. A total of 15 RCTs, involving 1367 participants, were included in the analysis. The studies varied widely in geographical location, duration, and licorice preparations used. Licorice significantly reduced alanine aminotransferase (ALT) by 15.63 U/L (95% CI: -25.08, -6.18; p = 0.001) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) by 7.37 U/L (95% CI: -13.13, -1.61; p = 0.01) compared to control groups. Subgroup analyses revealed that purified glycyrrhizic acid compounds were particularly effective, showing greater reductions in ALT and AST without significant heterogeneity. Although licorice treatment did not significantly impact gamma-glutamyl transferase and total bilirubin (TBIL) levels overall, specific licorice-herb preparations did show a notable reduction in TBIL. The safety profile of licorice was consistent with known side effects, predominantly mild and related to its mineralocorticoid effects. Despite heterogeneity and potential language bias, the findings suggest that licorice can enhance liver function. Further studies should standardize licorice preparations and explore its role in multifaceted herbal formulations to better understand its hepatoprotective mechanisms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    临床试验登记为研究参与者提供了各种好处,包括早期获得可能改变疾病状态轨迹的新疗法。试验赞助者受益于人口统计学上不同的试验参与者,使试验结果能够推广到更大比例的社区。尽管有这些和其他有据可查的好处,黑人和西班牙裔美国人以及女性的临床试验入学率仍然很低.与非西班牙裔白人美国人相比,特定疾病状态(如PAD)的患病率更高,黑人美国人的临床结果相对较差。外周动脉疾病(PAD)临床试验的招募过程可能是昂贵且具有挑战性的,并且通常以牺牲代表为代价。参与者的意愿和信任,订婚,社会经济地位在代表性不足的少数群体(URM)的代表性中起着至关重要的作用。尽管有相反的信念,诸如黑人和西班牙裔之类的URM团体与非西班牙裔白人一样愿意参加临床试验。然而,财政负担,文化障碍,健康素养和教育不足可能会阻碍URM获得临床试验和医疗服务。临床试验登记地点通常会带来交通障碍和挑战,对创建多样化的研究人群产生负面影响。试验人群中缺乏多样性可能源于利益相关者层面,由于错误的成本效益假设,学术读者的公司赞助商不认为临床试验的多样性是优先考虑的。资金来源也可能影响种族报告或给定试验的结果。基于行业的试验一直被批评为过度代表非西班牙裔白人人群,以最低的财政负担达到高完成率的愿望。有必要做出真正的努力,以确保少数群体在PAD临床试验中的代表,并朝着开发更持久和有效的PAD治疗方法的最终目标发展,以满足现实世界人群的需求。
    Clinical trial enrollment provides various benefits to study participants including early access to novel therapies that may potentially alter the trajectory of disease states. Trial sponsors benefit from enrolling demographically diverse trial participants enabling the trial outcomes to be generalizable to a larger proportion of the community at large. Despite these and other well-documented benefits, clinical trial enrollment for Black and Hispanic Americans as well as women continues to be low. Specific disease states such as peripheral artery disease (PAD) have a higher prevalence and clinical outcomes are relatively worse in Black Americans compared with non-Hispanic white Americans. The recruitment process for PAD clinical trials can be costly and challenging and usually comes at the expense of representation. Participant willingness and trust, engagement, and socioeconomic status play essential roles in the representation of under-represented minority (URM) groups. Despite the contrary belief, URM groups such as Blacks and Hispanics are just as willing to participate in a clinical trial as non-Hispanic Whites. However, financial burdens, cultural barriers, and inadequate health literacy and education may impede URMs\' access to clinical trials and medical care. Clinical trials\' enrollment sites often pose transportation barriers and challenges that negatively impact creating a diverse study population. Lack of diversity among a trial population can stem from the stakeholder level, where corporate sponsors of academic readers do not consider diversity in clinical trials a priority due to false cost-benefit assumptions. The funding source may also impact the racial reporting or the results of a given trial. Industry-based trials have always been criticized for over-representing non-Hispanic White populations, driven by the desire to reach high completion rates with minimum financial burdens. Real efforts are warranted to ensure adequate minorities\' representation in the PAD clinical trials and to the process toward the ultimate goal of developing more durable and effective PAD treatments that fit the needs of real-world populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究帕金森氏病PD中用于缓解Timedup和Go(TUG)的特定类型运动之间的剂量-反应关系。
    系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
    PubMed,Medline,Embase,PsycINFO,科克伦图书馆,和WebofScience从一开始一直搜索到2月5日,2024.
    使用具有MBNMA包的R软件进行数据分析。结果指标的影响大小表示为平均偏差(MD)和95%置信区间(95%CrI)。网络中的偏倚风险由两名审阅者使用ROB2独立评估。
    总共73项研究,涉及3,354名PD患者。本文讨论了在各种运动类型中改善PD患者TUG表现的剂量反应关系。值得注意的是,水产(AQE),混合运动(Mul_C),感觉运动(SE),和阻力训练(RT)证明有效剂量范围,AQE最佳为1500MET-min/周(MD:-8.359,95%CI:-1.398至-2.648),Mul_C在1000METs-min/周(MD:-4.551,95%CI:-8.083至-0.946),SE为1200MET-min/周(MD:-5.145,95%CI:-9.643至-0.472),RT为610METs-min/周(MD:-2.187,95%CI:-3.161至-1.278),分别。然而,没有发现有效的有氧运动剂量(AE),平衡步态训练(BGT),跳舞,和跑步机训练(TT)。身心锻炼(MBE)的有效范围为130至750METs-min/周,最佳剂量为750METs-min/周(MD:-2.822,95%CI:-4.604至-0.996)。根据等级制度,纳入研究的证据总体质量为中等水平.
    本研究确定了能显著增强PD患者TUG表现的特定运动方式和剂量。AQE成为最有效的模式,最佳剂量为1,500METs-min/周。MBE在较低剂量下显示出显着的益处,迎合不同运动能力的患者。RT表现出微妙的“U形”剂量反应关系,建议最佳的范围平衡功效和过度训练的风险。这些发现倡导PD管理中量身定制的锻炼计划,强调个性化处方以最大化结果。系统审查注册:国际前瞻性系统审查注册(PROSPERO)(CRD42024506968)。
    UNASSIGNED: To examine the dose-response relationship between specific types of exercise for alleviating Timed up and Go (TUG) in Parkinson\'s disease PD.
    UNASSIGNED: Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception until February 5th, 2024.
    UNASSIGNED: Data analysis was conducted using R software with the MBNMA package. Effect sizes of outcome indicators were expressed as mean deviation (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CrI). The risk of bias in the network was evaluated independently by two reviewers using ROB2.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 73 studies involving 3,354 PD patients. The text discusses dose-response relationships in improving TUG performance among PD patients across various exercise types. Notably, Aquatic (AQE), Mix Exercise (Mul_C), Sensory Exercise (SE), and Resistance Training (RT) demonstrate effective dose ranges, with AQE optimal at 1500 METs-min/week (MD: -8.359, 95% CI: -1.398 to -2.648), Mul_C at 1000 METs-min/week (MD: -4.551, 95% CI: -8.083 to -0.946), SE at 1200 METs-min/week (MD: -5.145, 95% CI: -9.643 to -0.472), and RT at 610 METs-min/week (MD: -2.187, 95% CI: -3.161 to -1.278), respectively. However, no effective doses are found for Aerobic Exercise (AE), Balance Gait Training (BGT), Dance, and Treadmill Training (TT). Mind-body exercise (MBE) shows promise with an effective range of 130 to 750 METs-min/week and an optimal dose of 750 METs-min/week (MD: -2.822, 95% CI: -4.604 to -0.996). According to the GRADE system, the included studies\' overall quality of the evidence was identified moderate level.
    UNASSIGNED: This study identifies specific exercise modalities and dosages that significantly enhance TUG performance in PD patients. AQE emerges as the most effective modality, with an optimal dosage of 1,500 METs-min/week. MBE shows significant benefits at lower dosages, catering to patients with varying exercise capacities. RT exhibits a nuanced \"U-shaped\" dose-response relationship, suggesting an optimal range balancing efficacy and the risk of overtraining. These findings advocate for tailored exercise programs in PD management, emphasizing personalized prescriptions to maximize outcomes.Systematic Review Registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42024506968).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:格利福净被推荐为心力衰竭和/或心血管合并症患者的一线治疗,并被证明可以减少心房颤动(AF)的发生。然而,尚不清楚哪种格列净在降低房颤发生率方面产生更大的心脏保护作用。因此,我们的目的是比较与不同gliflozins相关的房颤复发数据.
    方法:对在线科学图书馆(从开始到2023年6月1日)进行了准确的搜索。59项研究被纳入荟萃分析,涉及108026例患者,其中60097人接受了gliflozins,47929人接受了安慰剂。
    结果:格利福净在总体人群中相对于标准护理治疗,房颤发生率有统计学意义的显著降低(相对风险[RR]:0.8880,95%CI:[0.8059;0.9784],p=.0164)和糖尿病和心肾疾病患者(RR:0.8352,95%CI:[0.7219;0.9663],p=.0155)。与安慰剂相比,达格列净显著降低了房颤发生率(0.7259[0.6337;0.8316],p<.0001)在总体人口中,糖尿病患者(RR:0.2482,95%CI:[0.0682;0.9033],p=.0345),与心肾疾病相关的糖尿病(RR:0.7192,95%CI:[0.5679;0.9110],p=.0063)和在亚分析中,包括随访≥1年的研究(RR:0.7792,95%CI:[0.6508;0.9330],p=.0066)。在不同的gliflozins之间,在AF保护方面没有发现显着差异。
    结论:在总体人群和糖尿病患者中,与安慰剂相比,使用达格列净可显著降低房颤风险。而使用其他gliflozins并不能显著减少房颤的发生。
    BACKGROUND: Gliflozins are recommended as first-line treatment in patients with heart failure and/or cardiovascular comorbidities and are demonstrated to reduce atrial fibrillation (AF) occurrence. However, it is not well known which gliflozin yields the larger cardioprotection in terms of AF occurrence reduction. Hence, we aimed to compare data regarding AF recurrence associated with different gliflozins.
    METHODS: An accurate search of online scientific libraries (from inception to June 1, 2023) was performed. Fifty-nine studies were included in the meta-analysis involving 108 026 patients, of whom 60 097 received gliflozins and 47 929 received placebo.
    RESULTS: Gliflozins provided a statistically significant reduction of AF occurrence relative to standard of care therapy in the overall population (relative risks [RR]: 0.8880, 95% CI: [0.8059; 0.9784], p = .0164) and in patients with diabetes and cardiorenal diseases (RR: 0.8352, 95% CI: [0.7219; 0.9663], p = .0155). Dapagliflozin significantly decreased AF occurrence as compared to placebo (0.7259 [0.6337; 0.8316], p < .0001) in the overall population, in patients with diabetes (RR: 0.2482, 95% CI: [0.0682; 0.9033], p = .0345), with diabetes associated with cardiorenal diseases (RR: 0.7192, 95% CI: [0.5679; 0.9110], p = .0063) and in the subanalysis including studies with follow-up ≥1 year (RR: 0.7792, 95% CI: [0.6508; 0.9330], p = .0066). No significant differences in terms of AF protection were found among different gliflozins.
    CONCLUSIONS: Dapagliflozin use was associated with significant reduction in AF risk as compared to placebo in overall population and patients with diabetes, whereas the use of other gliflozins did not significantly reduce AF occurrence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:社区药剂师的作用已经超越了药品的分配。本范围审查的目的是描述在社区药房环境中扩大药剂师实践范围的干预措施,并评估其有效性。
    方法:我们进行了范围审查,以确定随机对照试验(RCT),2013年至2024年在全球出版,重点介绍了旨在扩大社区药剂师执业范围的干预措施。审查是根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的范围审查方法进行的。为了实现本次范围审查的目的,纳入的RCT被映射到受澳大利亚制药协会制定的2023年专业实践标准影响的主题:药物管理,协作护理和药物依从性。
    结果:12项研究证明了扩大社区药剂师执业范围的潜力。两项RCT均未导致干预效果。一项RCT(在意大利进行)导致了社区药剂师执业范围的实际变化,哮喘控制患者的比例有统计学上的显着改善。
    结论:总的来说,这项范围审查综合了同行评审的RCT研究的结果,这些研究表明,扩大社区药剂师的执业范围可能会改善患者的预后,减轻医疗系统的负担,和更高的生产力。
    BACKGROUND: The role of community pharmacists has evolved beyond the dispensing of medicines. The aim of this scoping review was to describe the interventions that expand the pharmacist\'s scope of practice within a community pharmacy setting and assess their effectiveness.
    METHODS: We performed a scoping review to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs), published worldwide from 2013 to 2024, which focused on interventions designed to expand pharmacists\' scope of practice in the community. The review was undertaken in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. To address the aim of this scoping review, the included RCTs were mapped to themes influenced by the Professional Practice Standards 2023 as developed by the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia: medication management, collaborative care and medication adherence.
    RESULTS: Twelve studies demonstrated the potential to expand community pharmacists\' scope of practice. Two RCTs resulted in no effect of the intervention. One RCT (conducted in Italy) led to an actual change to community pharmacists\' scope of practice, with a statistically significant improvement in the proportion of patients with controlled asthma.
    CONCLUSIONS: On the whole, this scoping review synthesised the findings of peer-reviewed RCT studies that revealed expanding community pharmacists\' scope of practice may result in improved patient outcomes, a reduced burden for the healthcare system, and greater productivity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是量化和比较体内不同关节内皮质类固醇(CS)作用对骨关节炎(OA)治疗的临床相关性。
    搜索是在PubMed上进行的,科克伦,和2023年10月的WebofScience。使用PRISMA指南。纳入标准:动物或人类随机对照试验(RCTs),英语语言,没有时间限制,比较不同关节腔内CS治疗OA的疗效。使用CochraneRoB2和人类随机对照试验的GRADE指南评估文章质量,和SYRCLE的动物随机对照试验工具。
    选择了18个随机对照试验(16个人类和2个动物研究),包括1577名患者(1837个关节)和31只动物(51个关节)。使用的CS是曲安奈德(14项人类和2项动物研究),甲基强的松龙(7人和1动物研究),倍他米松(3项人体研究)和地塞米松(1项人体研究)。所有研究都针对膝关节OA,除了三项人类和一项动物研究。对甲基强的松龙和曲安西龙在膝关节OA患者中的比较进行了荟萃分析,分析了极短(≤2周)的VAS疼痛,短(>2和≤4周),中期(>4和≤8周),长(>8和≤12周),并且非常长期(>12和≤24周)。与甲基强的松龙相比,曲安奈德在很短的时间内显示出更好的注射后价值(p=0.028)。在任何随访中均未观察到VAS改善方面的差异。
    现有的临床前和临床文献对不同CS的比较提供了有限的证据,阻碍了在OA关节关节内注射的分子和剂量方面确定最佳CS方法的可能性。
    一级
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the clinical relevance of the different intra-articular corticosteroids (CS) effects in vivo for osteoarthritis (OA) treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: The search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science in October 2023. The PRISMA guidelines were used. Inclusion criteria: animal or human randomized controlled trials (RCTs), English language and no time limitation, on the comparison of different intra-articular CS for OA treatment. The articles\' quality was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 and GRADE guidelines for human RCTs, and SYRCLE\'s tool for animal RCTs.
    UNASSIGNED: Eighteen RCTs were selected (16 human and 2 animal studies), including 1577 patients (1837 joints) and 31 animals (51 joints). The CS used were triamcinolone (14 human and 2 animal studies), methylprednisolone (7 human and 1 animal study), betamethasone (3 human studies) and dexamethasone (1 human study). All studies addressed knee OA except for three human and one animal study. A meta-analysis was performed on the comparison of methylprednisolone and triamcinolone in humans with knee OA analysing VAS pain at very short- (≤2 weeks), short- (>2 and ≤4 weeks), mid- (>4 and ≤8 weeks), long- (>8 and ≤ 12 weeks), and very long-term (>12 and ≤24 weeks). Triamcinolone showed better post-injection values compared to methylprednisolone at very short-term (p = 0.028). No difference in terms of VAS improvement was observed at any follow-up.
    UNASSIGNED: The available preclinical and clinical literature provides limited evidence on the comparison of different CS, hindering the possibility of determining the best CS approach in terms of molecule and dose for the intra-articular injection of OA joints.
    UNASSIGNED: Level I.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于缺乏能够改善或消除非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)的适当治疗方法,许多研究人员已经开始关注基于传统医学的天然产物,这些天然产物可用于成功治疗NAFLD。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估七种天然产物(姜黄素,水飞蓟素,白藜芦醇,朝鲜蓟叶提取物,小檗碱,儿茶素,和柚皮素)对NAFLD患者。为此,PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,和WebofScience,仅搜索随机对照试验(RCTs)。通过Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具对选定的研究进行方法学质量评估,并使用数据分析软件对数据进行相应的分析。收集了从最早的可用日期到2022年9月的RCT。该过程导致37个RCT,包括2509个患者的总样本量。网络荟萃分析的结果表明,朝鲜蓟叶提取物在降低天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)水平方面具有相对优势(SUCRA:99.1%),丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)水平(SUCRA:88.2%)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平(SUCRA:88.9%)。柚皮素在降低甘油三酯(TG)水平方面具有优势(SUCRA:97.3%),总胆固醇(TC)水平(SUCRA:73.9%),改善高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)水平(SUCRA:74.9%)。与安慰剂相比,高密度儿茶素显着降低了体重指数(BMI)水平(SUCRA:98.5%)。该网络的排名图表明,朝鲜蓟叶提取物和柚皮素在促进患者康复方面比其他天然产品表现更好。因此,我们认为朝鲜蓟叶提取物和柚皮素可能对NAFLD发挥更好的治疗作用。这项研究可能有助于指导临床医生并导致进一步的详细研究。
    Due to a scarcity of appropriate therapeutic approaches capable of ameliorating or eliminating non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), many researchers have come to focus on natural products based on traditional medicine that can be utilized to successfully treat NAFLD. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects exerted by seven natural products (curcumin, silymarin, resveratrol, artichoke leaf extract, berberine, catechins, and naringenin) on patients with NAFLD. For this purpose, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exclusively. The selected studies were evaluated for methodological quality via the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool, and data analysis software was used to analyze the data accordingly. The RCTs from the earliest available date until September 2022 were collected. This process resulted in 37 RCTs with a total sample size of 2509 patients being included. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that artichoke leaf extract confers a relative advantage in reducing the aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels (SUCRA: 99.1%), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (SUCRA: 88.2%) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (SUCRA: 88.9%). Naringenin conferred an advantage in reducing triglyceride (TG) levels (SUCRA: 97.3%), total cholesterol (TC) levels (SUCRA: 73.9%), and improving high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels (SUCRA: 74.9%). High-density catechins significantly reduced body mass index (BMI) levels (SUCRA: 98.5%) compared with the placebo. The Ranking Plot of the Network indicated that artichoke leaf extract and naringenin performed better than the other natural products in facilitating patient recovery. Therefore, we propose that artichoke leaf extract and naringenin may exert a better therapeutic effect on NAFLD. This study may help guide clinicians and lead to further detailed studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究老年痴呆症和痴呆症患者的总体和某些类型的运动与认知功能之间的剂量-反应关系。
    方法:基于系统和贝叶斯模型的网络元分析。
    方法:在我们的研究中,我们分析了来自随机对照试验的数据,这些试验调查了不同锻炼对老年AD患者认知结局的影响.我们搜索了科学网,PubMed,Cochrane中央控制试验登记册,和Embase至2023年11月。使用Cochrane偏差风险工具(Rob2)进行质量评估,使用带有MBNMA软件包的R软件进行数据分析,我们测定了标准均数差异(SMD)和95%置信区间(95%CrI)来评估运动对AD患者认知功能的影响.
    结果:对2,242名AD患者进行的27项研究显示,AD患者的运动与认知改善之间存在非线性关系。我们在高达1000METs-min/周的有效运动剂量下观察到显着的认知增强(SMD:0.535,SD:0.269,95%CrI:0.023至1.092)。发现最佳剂量为650MET-min/周(SMD:0.691,SD:0.169,95%CrI:0.373至1.039),AE(有氧运动)特别有效。对于AE,最佳认知增强剂量为660METs-min/周(SMD:0.909,SD:0.219,95%CrI:0.495~1.362).
    结论:阿尔茨海默病运动与认知改善之间的非线性剂量反应关系,确定的最佳AE剂量为660METs-min/周,用于增强AD的认知功能。
    OBJECTIVE: Research the dose-response relationship between overall and certain types of exercise and cognitive function in older adults with Alzheimer\'s disease and dementia.
    METHODS: Systemic and Bayesian Model-Based Network Meta-Analysis.
    METHODS: In our study, we analyzed data from randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of different exercises on cognitive outcomes in older adults with AD. We searched the Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase up to November 2023. Using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (Rob2) for quality assessment and R software with the MBNMA package for data analysis, we determined standard mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CrI) to evaluate exercise\'s impact on cognitive function in AD.
    RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies with 2,242 AD patients revealed a nonlinear relationship between exercise and cognitive improvement in AD patients. We observed significant cognitive enhancements at an effective exercise dose of up to 1000 METs-min/week (SMDs: 0.535, SD: 0.269, 95% CrI: 0.023 to 1.092). The optimal dose was found to be 650 METs-min/week (SMDs: 0.691, SD: 0.169, 95% CrI: 0.373 to 1.039), with AE (Aerobic exercise) being particularly effective. For AE, the optimal cognitive enhancement dose was determined to be 660 METs-min/week (SMDs: 0.909, SD: 0.219, 95% CrI: 0.495 to 1.362).
    CONCLUSIONS: Nonlinear dose-response relationship between exercise and cognitive improvement in Alzheimer\'s disease, with the optimal AE dose identified at 660 METs-min/week for enhancing cognitive function in AD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号