Research in the field of health promotion generates evidence-based knowledge and has the potential to increase the acceptance, impact and long-term effectiveness of interventions. Typically, a distinction is made between qualitative and quantitative approaches. Yet, with complex and multidimensional re-search questions in the field of health promotion a combination of the two approaches has proven useful. Using mixed-methods designs promises, among other things, to compensate for weaknesses of the individual methods, to improve the scope of the results, and to provide a comprehensive insight into the topic. In this systematic review of two German journals we examine the role of the mixed-methods approach in the field of health promotion and how it can be translated into specific research projects. The review\'s results show that mixed-methods designs are implemented in various contexts. In most studies, the quantitative research strand plays the central role. The use of the mixed-methods designs in health promotion can be further discussed, especially taking into account technical innovations in the field of data collection or with regard to the interpretative potential of qualitative research. The presentation of the review is based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) by the Equator Network.

Mixed methods studies (MMS) play an increasingly important role in the health sciences. Its potential lies in the acquisition of causal conditions and in the intersubjective understanding of diverse and new phenomena. The holistic and multi-perspective analysis strategy of MMS also allows a subject-oriented and an evidence-based approach to clinical practice. The article reviews the use of MMS in the health sciences on the basis of various reviews, and it highlights current methodological developments and research gaps.