Quad Shot

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究评估了在无法手术的头颈部癌症中使用为期4天的每日放疗三个疗程的姑息性放疗方案,强调口腔原发性癌症。
    方法:回顾性资料分析了116例患者,每日剂量为3.6-3.7Gy,在4天内分为4个部分,共3个疗程,每道菜后有两周的间隔,分析了生存结果。对口腔癌进行了亚组分析。
    结果:九十九(85%)完成了三个课程。总体主观反应率为77%。中位总生存期和无进展生存期分别为12个月(95%置信区间[CI]:8-20)和8个月(95%CI:6-10)。口腔癌的总体生存率更高。治疗耐受性良好,没有住院治疗或3-4级毒性。
    结论:改良的QUADSHOT方案适用于头颈癌的缓解。
    BACKGROUND: This study assessed a palliative radiotherapy regimen using daily radiation over 4 days for three courses in inoperable head and neck cancers, emphasizing oral primary cancers.
    METHODS: Retrospective data of 116 patients treated with a daily dose of 3.6-3.7 Gy in four fractions over 4 days to a total of three courses, with a 2-week gap after every course, were analyzed for survival outcomes. A subgroup analysis was done for oral cancer.
    RESULTS: Ninety-nine (85%) completed three courses. Overall subjective response rate was 77%. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 12 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8-20) and 8 months (95% CI: 6-10), with numerically higher overall survival in oral cancer. The treatment was well tolerated, with no on-treatment hospitalization or grade 3-4 toxicities.
    CONCLUSIONS: The modified QUAD SHOT regimen is practical for palliation in head and neck cancers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们的目的是评估肿瘤放射治疗组8502“QUAD射击”方案使用体积调节电弧疗法(VMAT)治疗无法治愈的头颈部癌症(HNC)的结果。
    方法:我们纳入了105例HNC患者的研究,接受至少一个QUAD注射方案周期。我们计划使用具有6MV光子的VMAT进行放射治疗。一个QUAD射击周期包括4个部分的14.8Gy,连续2天至少间隔6小时,每3-6周重复3个周期。
    结果:我们在11(10%)中完成了1、2和3个周期,17(16%),77名(73%)患者,分别。我们同时对13例(12%)患者进行了全身治疗。在92例(88%)患者中观察到肿瘤反应,在72例患者中的51例(71%)中观察到至少一种症状缓解。我们观察到98名(93%)患者的总体反应(肿瘤反应或症状缓解),所有完成3个周期的患者均实现了这一反应。中位总生存期(OS)为6.8个月。我们的多变量分析显示,非鳞状细胞癌(p<0.001),T类别为0-2(p=0.021),3个QUAD周期(p<0.001)是OS较好的独立预后因素。我们在2例(2%)患者中观察到3级毒性,而没有≥4级急性或≥3级晚期毒性。
    结论:使用VMAT的QUAD注射方案对无法治愈的HNC患者具有适当的缓解作用。为了获得更好的治疗结果,建议使用更高的QUAD射击周期数进行治疗。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 8502 \"QUAD shot\" regimen using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for incurable head and neck cancer (HNC).
    METHODS: We included 105 patients with HNC in the study, undergoing at least one QUAD shot regimen cycle. We planned the radiotherapy using VMAT with 6 MV photons. One QUAD shot cycle included 14.8 Gy in 4 fractions with at least 6-hour intervals over 2 consecutive days, repeated every 3-6 weeks up to 3 cycles.
    RESULTS: We completed 1, 2, and 3 cycles in 11 (10 %), 17 (16 %), and 77 (73 %) patients, respectively. We concurrently performed systemic therapy in 13 (12 %) patients. Tumor response was observed in 92 (88 %) patients and at least one symptom relief in 51 (71 %) of 72 patients. We observed an overall response (tumor response or symptom relief) in 98 (93 %) patients with all patients who completed 3 cycles achieving it. The median overall survival (OS) was 6.8 months. Our multivariate analysis revealed that non-squamous cell carcinoma (p < 0.001), T category of 0-2 (p = 0.021), and 3 QUAD shot cycles (p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of better OS. We observed Grade 3 toxicity in 2 (2 %) patients while no ≥ Grade 4 acute or ≥ Grade 3 late toxicity.
    CONCLUSIONS: The QUAD shot regimen using VMAT exerts appropriate palliative effect in patients with incurable HNC. Treatment with higher QUAD shot cycle number would be recommended for better treatment outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:复发性和转移性头颈癌(HNC)患者的治疗选择有限。\'QuadShot\'(QS),大分割姑息性放疗方案,可以提供症状缓解和局部控制,并可能增强免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的作用。我们比较了QS±并发ICIs在HNC姑息治疗中的结果。
    方法:我们确定了从2017年至2022年接受≥三个周期QS的患者,并排除了未进行治疗后临床评估或影像学检查的患者。将单独接受QS的患者的结果与ICI同时接受QS治疗的患者进行比较。定义为在QS后4周内收到ICI。
    结果:包括70例患者,其中57%的人同时接受了ICI。年龄中位数为65.5岁(四分位数范围[IQR]:57.9-77.8),50%的患者之前接受过中位剂量为66Gy的放疗(IQR:60-70).中位随访时间为8.8个月。并发ICIs的局部控制率明显更高(12个月:85%vs.63%,p=0.038)。远程控制(12个月:56%vs.63%,p=0.629)和中位总生存期(9.0vs.10.0个月,p=0.850)两组之间相似。在多变量分析中,并发ICI是局部控制的重要预测因子(局部失败的HR:0.238;95%CI:0.073-0.778;p=0.018)。总的来说,23%的患者经历了3级毒性,这在两组之间是相似的。
    结论:与单独使用QS相比,QS与并发ICI的组合具有良好的耐受性,并显着改善了局部对照。9.4个月的中位OS与使用QS治疗的HNC患者的历史对照相比是有利的。对于不适合治愈性治疗的HNC患者,这种方法代表了一种有希望的治疗选择,值得前瞻性评估。
    OBJECTIVE: Patients with recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC) have limited treatment options. \'QuadShot\' (QS), a hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy regimen, can provide symptomatic relief and local control and may potentiate the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We compared outcomes of QS ± concurrent ICIs in the palliative treatment of HNC.
    METHODS: We identified patients who received ≥three cycles of QS from 2017 to 2022 and excluded patients without post-treatment clinical evaluation or imaging. Outcomes for patients who received QS alone were compared to those treated with ICI concurrent with QS, defined as receipt of ICI within 4 weeks of QS.
    RESULTS: Seventy patients were included, of whom 57% received concurrent ICI. Median age was 65.5 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 57.9-77.8), and 50% patients had received prior radiation to a median dose of 66 Gy (IQR: 60-70). Median follow-up was 8.8 months. Local control was significantly higher with concurrent ICIs (12-month: 85% vs. 63%, p = 0.038). Distant control (12-month: 56% vs. 63%, p = 0.629) and median overall survival (9.0 vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.850) were similar between the two groups. On multivariable analysis, concurrent ICI was a significant predictor of local control (HR for local failure: 0.238; 95% CI: 0.073-0.778; p = 0.018). Overall, 23% patients experienced grade 3 toxicities, which was similar between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: The combination of QS with concurrent ICIs was well tolerated and significantly improved local control compared to QS alone. The median OS of 9.4 months compares favorably to historical controls for patients with HNC treated with QS. This approach represents a promising treatment option for patients with HNC unsuited for curative-intent treatment and warrants prospective evaluation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    治疗皮肤癌的主要方法包括手术,尽管在患者自行拒绝治疗或不符合手术条件的情况下,根治性放疗(RT)可被视为替代选择。在此,我们根据在不符合手术资格的患者中使用大分割QUADSHOTRT来评估单机构材料。
    在2019年12月至2022年12月期间,9名局部晚期非黑色素瘤皮肤癌患者被取消手术资格,因此在Radom肿瘤学中心接受了治疗。波兰。患者接受肿瘤放射治疗组8502QUADSHOT方案(14.8Gy/4分,每天两次治疗,间隔6小时,连续2天)。使用体积调节电弧疗法(VMAT)每4周重复疗程3次。
    在9名患者中有4名(44.4%)观察到2级毒性,未观察到≥3级急性毒性.中位年龄为79.1(60-98)岁。照射面积如下:鼻皮(2),脸颊(2),眉毛与眼睑(1),前额(1),寺庙(1),胸骨(1),和肩胛骨(1)。表现状况如下:WHOII-5名患者(55.6%),世卫组织I-3名患者,WHOIII-一名患者。一名患者在2个地区接受了3个RT疗程,共6个疗程,6例患者接受了3个疗程的治疗,2例患者接受2个疗程。此外,截至2023年3月14日,4例患者死于非恶性原因.
    使用VMATRT的QUADSHOT时间表可能是一种有效的姑息治疗方法,具有良好的反应率,这对局部晚期非黑色素瘤皮肤癌患者的生活质量有积极影响。
    UNASSIGNED: The primary approach for managing skin cancer involves surgery, although radical radiotherapy (RT) may be considered as an alternative option in cases where patients decline the treatment themselves or are not eligible for surgical intervention. Herein we assess single-institution material in terms of the use of hypofractionated QUAD SHOT RT in patients disqualified from surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: Between December 2019 and December 2022, nine patients with locally advanced non-melanoma skin cancer were disqualified from surgery and as a result were treated at the Radom Oncology Centre, Poland. Patients were treated with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 8502 QUAD SHOT regimen (14.8 Gy/4 fractions, twice-daily treatment with a 6 h interval, on 2 consecutive days). Courses were repeated every 4 weeks 3 times using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).
    UNASSIGNED: Grade 2 toxicities were observed in 4 of 9 (44.4%) patients, no grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity was observed. The median age was 79.1 (60-98) years. Irradiated areas were as follows: nose skin (2), cheek (2), eyebrow with eyelid (1), forehead (1), temple (1), sternum (1), and scapula (1). Performance status was as follows: WHO II - 5 patients (55.6%), WHO I - 3 patients, WHO III - one patient. One patient underwent 3 RT courses in 2 areas for a total of 6 treatment courses, 6 patients received 3 courses of treatment, and 2 patients received 2 courses. Additionally, as of 14 March 2023, four patients died of non-malignant causes.
    UNASSIGNED: QUAD SHOT schedule with VMAT RT may be an effective palliative treatment method with a good response rate, which positively affects patients\' quality of life in locally advanced non-melanoma skin cancer patients disqualified from surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一名54岁的男子被诊断出患有降结肠癌并在肝脏中转移,主动脉旁淋巴结,还有阴茎,在结肠造口术后引入了化疗。患者在诊断时仅报告轻度阴茎疼痛;然而,疼痛逐渐恶化,干扰了他的日常生活。阿片类药物不能提供足够的镇痛,患者出现排尿困难和阴茎异常勃起。通过膀胱造口术,使用QUADShot方案(14Gy分4次,每天两次,每4周重复2天)对阴茎转移进行姑息性放疗,以缓解疼痛和缩小肿瘤。辐射迅速改善了阴茎症状,能够减少阿片类药物和去除膀胱造口术。病人一直没有疼痛,能够自己排尿,直到他去世。转移性阴茎肿瘤很少见,尤其是那些来源于结肠癌的.阴茎转移主要发生在癌症晚期,可能损害患者的生活质量。在这种情况下,姑息性放疗,尤其是使用QUADShot方案,在治疗时间短的情况下是有用的,持久的症状控制,副作用很小,保持生活质量。
    A 54-year-old man was diagnosed with descending colon cancer with metastases in the liver, para-aortic lymph nodes, and penis, and chemotherapy was introduced after construction of a colostomy. The patient reported only mild penile pain at the time of diagnosis; however, the pain gradually worsened and interfered with his daily life. Opioids did not provide sufficient analgesia, and the patient developed dysuria and priapism. Through construction of a cystostomy, palliative radiotherapy with QUAD Shot regimen (14 Gy in 4 fractions twice-daily on 2 days repeated every 4 weeks) to the penile metastasis was started for pain relief and tumor shrinkage. The radiation rapidly improved the penile symptoms, enabling opioid reduction and cystostomy removal. The patient remained pain-free and able to urinate on his own until his death. Metastatic penile tumors are rare, especially those derived from colon cancer. Penile metastases occur mainly in the late stages of cancer and may impair the patient\'s quality of life. In such cases, palliative radiotherapy, especially with QUAD Shot regimen, is useful with short treatment time, durable symptom control, and little adverse effect, maintaining quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    QUADSHOT是一种超小分割放射治疗(RT)技术,可在2天内提供14.0-14.8Gy。虽然这种技术已经获得了一些地位作为一种有效的姑息性治疗不可手术的头颈癌(HNC),它在其他情况下的应用没有得到太多考虑。在这里,我们报告了一例62岁女性患者,她接受了低分化腮腺癌的术前QUADSHOT治疗.在这种情况下,经过两个疗程的QUADSHOT加上pembrolizumab的标准化疗方案,病人无法手术,庞大的肿瘤急剧缩小并可手术。最棒的是,虽然取得了足够的治疗效果,患者的时间投入和体力消耗是有限的。在此期间的RT在4天内仅由8个级分组成。根据以前的报道,四射的反应率足够高,严重不良事件的发生率相当低。此病例提出了一个问题,即是否可以将QUADSHOT照射的适应症扩大为HNC外科医生进行的术前干预措施之一,以实现转换手术。
    QUAD SHOT is an ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) technique that prescribes 14.0-14.8 Gy over 2 days. Although this technique has already gained some status as an effective palliative treatment for inoperable head and neck cancer (HNC), its application in other situations has not been given much consideration. Herein, we report a case of a 62-year-old woman who received preoperative QUAD SHOT therapy for poorly differentiated parotid carcinoma. In this case, after two courses of QUAD SHOT plus a standard chemotherapy regimen with pembrolizumab, the patient\'s inoperable, bulky tumor shrank dramatically and became operable. Best of all, while adequate therapeutic effects were achieved, the patient\'s time commitment and physical exertion were limited. RT during this period consisted of only eight fractions over 4 days. According to previous reports, the response rate for QUAD SHOT is sufficiently high, and the rate of serious adverse events is quite low. This case asks the question of whether the indications for QUAD SHOT irradiation can be expanded as one of the preoperative interventions undertaken by HNC surgeons to achieve conversion surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:口腔癌的治疗主要是手术,经常使用辅助疗法。然而,患者经常出现局部晚期疾病和降期将使手术更可行。我们在头颈部癌症的确定性手术之前评估了大分割放射治疗(QUADShot),目标是降级。
    方法:18例原发性头颈部恶性肿瘤患者,主要是局部晚期口腔癌,2016年6月至2021年7月接受了QUADShot放射治疗。在两天内,外部束放射治疗分四个部分到达原发性病变,两部分/天,间隔至少6小时,总剂量范围为1400cGy至1500cGy。12名患者进行了明确的手术。
    结果:在接受手术的12例患者中,其中1人对放射治疗有完全缓解,手术时没有出现病理性疾病.四名患者有部分反应,定义为最终病理的降级。五名患者没有反应,两个人患有进行性疾病,定义为最终病理分期。QuadShot后,有7例患者的影像学原发性肿瘤收缩≥0.5cm。QuadShot耐受性良好,没有报告的不良反应。
    结论:临床分期和病理分期之间的差异是常见和预期的。然而,40%的患者在四射后经历了降级。因此,新辅助放射治疗对于在等待手术时延缓肿瘤生长可能是可行的,或降低分期,从而为局部晚期头颈癌提供技术上更可行且病态更低的手术。
    OBJECTIVE: The mainstay of oral cavity cancer treatment is surgery, often with adjuvant therapies. However, patients often present with locally advanced disease and downstaging would render surgery more feasible. We evaluated hypofractionated radiation therapy (QUAD Shot) prior to definitive surgery for head and neck cancers, with a goal of downstaging.
    METHODS: Eighteen patients with primary head and neck malignancy, predominantly locally advanced oral cavity cancers, received QUAD Shot radiation therapy from June 2016 to July 2021. External beam radiation therapy was delivered to the primary lesion in four fractions over two days, two fractions/day at least six hours apart with total dose ranging from 1400 cGy to 1500 cGy. Twelve patients proceeded to definitive surgery.
    RESULTS: Of the twelve patients receiving surgery, one had complete response to radiation therapy with no pathological disease seen at surgery. Four patients had a partial response, defined as downstaging on final pathology. Five patients showed no response, and two had progressive disease defined as upstaging on final pathology. Seven patients had radiographic primary tumor shrinkage ≥ 0.5 cm following Quad Shot. The Quad Shot was tolerated well with no reported adverse effects.
    CONCLUSIONS: Discrepancies between clinical- and pathological-staging are common and expected. However, ∼40 % of our patients experienced downstaging following QUAD Shot. Thus, neoadjuvant radiation therapy may be viable for temporizing tumor growth while awaiting surgery, or for downstaging and thus facilitating more technically feasible and less morbid surgery for locally advanced head and neck cancers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:回顾放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)8502“QUADshot”方案使用体积调节电弧放射治疗(VMAT)治疗无法治愈的头颈部癌症(HNC)的单一机构经验。
    方法:对34例连续HNC患者进行至少1个周期的RTOG8502方案治疗。治疗计划包括使用具有由线性加速器产生的6个MV光子的VMAT。每天递送两个3.7Gy的分数,间隔至少6小时,连续2天,总计14.8Gy超过4个分数。这每3-4周重复一次,共三个周期。未同时进行全身治疗。
    结果:完成的周期数为6(18%)患者中的1,2/5(15%),和3/23(68%)。29例(85%)患者获得肿瘤反应,26例患者中有20例(77%)症状缓解。32(94%)患者获得了总体反应(肿瘤反应或症状缓解)。所有接受2个或更多个治疗周期的患者均获得总体响应。中位总生存期(OS)为5.7个月。多因素分析显示,完成所有三个治疗周期与更好的OS显著相关(P=0.002)。在四名(12%)患者中观察到2级毒性,但未观察到急性≥3级或晚期毒性。
    结论:使用VMAT的RTOG8502“QUADshot”方案对无法治愈的HNC有效,毒性大大降低。建议使用多周期治疗以获得更好的治疗反应和/或存活。
    BACKGROUND: To review a single institutional experience of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 8502 \"QUAD shot\" regimen using volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) for incurable head and neck cancer (HNC).
    METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients with HNC were treated with at least one cycle of the RTOG 8502 regimen. Treatment plans included the use of VMAT with 6 MV photons generated by a linear accelerator. Two daily fractions of 3.7 Gy were delivered with an interval of at least 6 h for 2 consecutive days, totaling 14.8 Gy over 4 fractions. This was repeated every 3-4 weeks for a total of three cycles. No concurrent systemic therapy was performed.
    RESULTS: The number of completed cycles was 1 in 6 (18%) patients, 2 in 5 (15%), and 3 in 23 (68%). Tumor response was achieved in 29 (85%) patients and symptom relief in 20 (77%) of 26 patients. Overall response (tumor response or symptom relief) was achieved in 32 (94%) patients. All patients who received 2 or more treatment cycles achieved overall response. Median overall survival (OS) was 5.7 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that completion of all three treatment cycles was significantly associated with better OS (P = 0.002). Grade 2 toxicity was observed in four (12%) patients, but no acute Grade ≥ 3 or late toxicity was observed.
    CONCLUSIONS: The RTOG 8502 \"QUAD shot\" regimen using VMAT is effective for incurable HNC with highly reduced toxicity. Treatment with multiple cycles is recommended for better treatment response and/or survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号