BACKGROUND: Bipedicular/unipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty are common treatments for OVCF, and there are no studies to show which is more beneficial for AVCF. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of BPKP or UPKP in the treatment of AVCF.
METHODS: The clinical data of AVCF patients treated by PKP were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into two groups according to the surgical approach. General demographic data, perioperative complications, and general information related to surgery were recorded for both groups. The preoperative and postoperative vertebral height difference, vertebral local Cobb angle, lumbar pain VAS score and lumbar JOA score were counted for both groups. The above data were compared preoperatively, postoperatively and between the two groups.
RESULTS: 25 patients with AVCF were successfully included and all were followed up for at least 12 months, with no complications during the follow-up period. 10 patients in the BPKP group and 15 patients in the UPKP group, with no statistically significant differences in general information between the two groups. The VAS scores of patients in the BPKP group were lower than those in the UPKP group at 12 months after surgery, and the differences were statistically significant, and there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups at other follow-up time points. In the BPKP group, 80% of patients had symmetrical and more homogeneous bone cement dispersion. 50% of patients in the UPKP group had a lateral distribution of bone cement and uneven bone cement distribution, and the difference in bone cement distribution between the two groups was statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of AVCF, the clinical efficacy of both surgical approaches is basically the same. The distribution of cement is more symmetrical and uniformly diffused in the BPKP group, and the clinical efficacy VAS score is lower in the long-term follow-up. Bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty is recommended for the treatment of AVCF.
UNASSIGNED: XZXY-LJ-20161208-047.

OBJECTIVE: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective method for the treatment of liver tumors. Preoperative path planning, which plays a crucial role in RFA treatment, requires doctors to have significant experience and ability. Specifically, correct and highly active preoperative path planning should ensure the safety of the whole puncturing process, complete ablation of tumors and minimal damage to healthy tissues.
METHODS: In this paper, a high-security automatic multiple puncture path planning method for liver tumors is proposed, in which the optimization of the ablation number, puncture number, target positions and puncture point positions subject to comprehensive clinical constraints are studied. In particular, both the safety of the puncture path and the distribution of ablation ellipsoids are taken into consideration. The influence of each constraint on the safety of the whole puncturing process is discussed in detail. On this basis, the efficiency of the planning method is obviously improved by simplifying the computational data and optimized variables. In addition, the performance and adaptability of the proposed method to large and small tumors are compared and summarized.
RESULTS: The proposed method is evaluated on 10 liver tumors of various geometric characteristics from 7 cases. The test results show that the average path planning time and average ablation efficiency are 41.4 s and 60.19%, respectively. For tumors of different sizes, the planning results obtained from the proposed method have similar healthy tissue coverage. Through the clinical evaluation of doctors, the planning results meet the needs of RFA for liver tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method can provide reasonable puncture paths in RFA planning, which is beneficial to ensure the safety and efficiency of liver tumor ablation.