Pudendal nerve entrapment

阴部神经卡压
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:阴部神经卡压(PNE)是一种未诊断的疾病,会影响骨盆功能谱,主要是疼痛,南特诊断标准概述。尽管有许多手术减压技术可用于其管理,在疗效和安全性方面缺乏共识.本研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估主要手术减压技术的疗效和并发症发生率。
    方法:在PubMed®中进行了全面的文献检索,Embase®,WebofScience®,和ClinicalTrails.gov®在2023年4月19日。初步筛选涉及标题和摘要评估,随后对摘要和全文文章进行检索和评估。包括评估阴部神经手术释放前后疼痛结果的研究。没有全文的研究,专注于诊断方法或仅与LUTS相关的结果,消化症状,或者性功能障碍,被排除在外。使用美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)研究质量评估工具进行偏倚风险评估。研究基于三种手术技术进行分类:会阴,跨臀肌,和腹腔镜经腹膜。采用随机效应荟萃分析和亚组分析。进行荟萃回归分析以研究协变量对观察结果的影响。
    结果:19项研究,包括810名患者,包括在内。所有技术的总显着疼痛缓解率估计为0.67(95%CI0.54至0.78),具有相当大的异质性(I2=80.4%)。亚组分析显示不同技术的成功率:腹腔镜(0.91,95%CI0.64至0.98),会阴(0.69,95%CI0.52至0.82),和跨臀肌(0.50,95%CI0.37至0.63)。腹腔镜技术的并发症发生率为16.0%。Meta回归显示患者年龄和中位随访时间显著影响预后。
    结论:虽然比较手术技术具有挑战性,这项荟萃分析突出了重要的结局差异.腹腔镜技术似乎最有希望改善疼痛。然而,该研究还强调需要进一步稳健,由于不同研究的显著异质性和偏见的高风险,需要长期研究。PROSPERO数据库:CRD42023496564。
    BACKGROUND: Pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE) is an underdiagnosed condition affecting a spectrum of pelvic functions, primarily pain, as outlined by Nantes diagnostic criteria. Although numerous surgical decompression techniques are available for its management, consensus on efficacy and safety is lacking. This study conducts a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and complication rates of the main surgical decompression techniques.
    METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed®, Embase®, Web of Science®, and ClinicalTrails.gov® on 19th of April 2023. Initial screening involved title and abstract evaluation, with subsequent retrieval and assessment of abstracts and full-text articles. Studies assessing pain outcomes before and after surgical release of the pudendal nerve were included. Studies without full-text, focusing on diagnostic methods or with outcomes relating solely to LUTS, digestive symptoms, or sexual dysfunction, were excluded. Risk of bias assessement was conducted using the National Institute of Health (NIH) Study Quality Assessment tool. Studies were categorized based on three surgical techniques: perineal, transgluteal, and laparoscopic transperitoneal. Random-effects meta-analysis with subgroup analysis were used. Meta-regression analyses were conducted to investigate the influence of covariates on the observed outcomes.
    RESULTS: Nineteen studies, comprising 810 patients, were included. The overall significant pain relief rate across all techniques was estimated at 0.67 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.78) with considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 80.4%). Subgroup analysis revealed success rate for different techniques: laparoscopic (0.91, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.98), perineal (0.69, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.82), and transgluteal (0.50, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.63). The laparoscopic technique exhibited a complication rate of 16.0%. Meta-regression indicated that patient age and median follow-up significantly influenced outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: While comparing surgical techniques is challenging, this meta-analysis highlights important outcome differences. The laparoscopic technique appears most promising for pain improvement. However, the study also emphasizes the need for further robust, long-term research due to significant heterogeneity across studies and prevelent risk of bias. PROSPERO database: CRD42023496564.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:阴部神经病是一种罕见的疾病,根据神经卡压的部位表现出多种症状。本研究旨在评估阴部神经松解术(PNN)在改善下尿路症状方面的疗效。肛门和/或尿失禁,和性功能障碍。
    方法:于2023年5月20日使用Scopus进行了系统的文献检索,PubMed,和Embase。仅包括英语和成人文件。会议摘要和临床前研究被排除。
    结果:21篇论文被接受,揭示了该领域的重大发现。该研究确定了阴部神经卡压(PNE)的四个主要部位,最普遍的位置可能在Alcock运河的水平。排泄症状通常表现在PNE患者中。PNN改善了尿急和排尿症状,尿失禁和肛门失禁,但在长期压迫的情况下效果较差。关于性功能,躯体传入途径的恢复导致神经溶解后早期勃起功能的改善。完全缓解女性持续性生殖器觉醒障碍,尽管双侧PNN是达到疗效所必需的。PNN与低度并发症有关。
    结论:PNN成为解决泌尿症状的可行选择,大便失禁,勃起功能障碍,和女性性唤起的患者患有PNE,术后发病率最低。
    OBJECTIVE: Pudendal neuropathy is an uncommon condition that exhibits several symptoms depending on the site of nerve entrapment. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of pudendal nerve neurolysis (PNN) in improving lower urinary tract symptoms, anal and/or urinary incontinence, and sexual dysfunctions.
    METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed on 20 May 2023 using Scopus, PubMed, and Embase. Only English and adult papers were included. Meeting abstracts and preclinical studies were excluded.
    RESULTS: Twenty-one papers were accepted, revealing significant findings in the field. The study identified four primary sites of pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE), with the most prevalent location likely being at the level of the Alcock canal. Voiding symptoms are commonly exhibited in patients with PNE. PNN improved both urgency and voiding symptoms, and urinary and anal incontinence but is less effective in cases of long-standing entrapment. Regarding sexual function, the recovery of the somatic afferent pathway results in an improvement in erectile function early after neurolysis. Complete relief of persistent genital arousal disorder occurs in women, although bilateral PNN is necessary to achieve the efficacy. PNN is associated with low-grade complications.
    CONCLUSIONS: PNN emerges as a viable option for addressing urinary symptoms, fecal incontinence, erectile dysfunction, and female sexual arousal in patients suffering from PNE with minimal postoperative morbidity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    骶结节韧带骨化在软组织中很少发生,在过去的几十年中,只有15例病例报告。我们报告了两例骶结节韧带双侧骨化的病例,并提供了有关该病理学的文献的简要综述。临床数据,射线照相结果,并获得了诊断和治疗细节。本研究通过回顾近30年的文献,总结该病的特点,探讨其发病机制。这种情况通常通过影像学检查或大体解剖学在老年男性中偶然证实,并且发病率低。其发病机制可能与应激集中有关,元素离子的过量摄入,损伤修复,和不当的操作技术。大多数患者可能不会表现出任何临床症状或体征,并且通常不需要医疗干预。可能并发阴部神经卡压综合征。手术切除的长期效果和最有效的治疗方法仍有待进一步研究。
    Ossification of the sacrotuberous ligament is a rare occurrence in soft tissue, with only 15 cases reported in the past few decades. We reported two cases of bilateral ossification in sacrotuberous ligaments and provided a concise review of the literature on this pathology. Clinical data, radiographic outcomes, and diagnostic and treatment details were obtained. This study aimed to summarize this disease\'s characteristics and investigate its pathogenesis through a review of literature from the last thirty years. This condition is often incidentally confirmed in elderly males via imagiological examination or gross anatomy and presents a low morbidity rate. Its pathogenesis may be related to stress concentration, excessive intake of element ions, injury repair, and improper operative technique. The majority of patients may not exhibit any clinical symptoms or signs and typically do not require medical interventions. It may be complicated with pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome. The long-term effects of surgical resection and the most effective treatment approach remain areas for further research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评价阴部神经卡压(PNE)患者阴部神经松解术(PNN)各种技术的有效性和安全性。5月20日进行了全面的文献检索,2023年,使用Scopus,PubMed,和Embase数据库。只接受涉及成年人的英语学习,而会议摘要和临床前研究被排除。共包括34篇论文。经会阴PNN成为一种有前途的技术,在减轻疼痛方面表现出巨大的潜力,恢复男性的勃起功能,并提高女性尿失禁的分辨率。此外,双侧方法在解决泌尿症状方面始终取得积极结果.经体技术似乎特别适用于后部PNE的病例,位于骶棘韧带和坐骨小孔之间。在随访期间观察到疼痛症状的进行性改善。微创PNN正在发展,可以沿着整个近端管道直到Alcock管减压,尽量减少合并症的风险。除了减少阴部神经痛,机器人辅助和腹腔镜方法确定了下尿路症状的减少和勃起功能的改善,尽管需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。PNN是治疗PNE的有效方法,发病率最低。因此,应根据PNE的部位定制PNN,以增强功能结局并改善患者的生活质量。
    To assess the effectiveness and safety of various techniques of pudendal nerve neurolysis (PNN) in patients with pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE). A comprehensive literature search was conducted on May 20th, 2023, using Scopus, PubMed, and Embase databases. Only studies in English involving adults were accepted, while meeting abstracts and preclinical studies were excluded. A total of 34 papers were included. Transperineal PNN emerged as a promising technique, demonstrating significant potential in alleviating pain, restoring erectile function in males, and improving the resolution of urinary stress incontinence in females. Furthermore, the bilateral approach consistently yielded positive outcomes in addressing urinary symptoms. The transgluteal technique appeared particularly suitable for cases of posterior PNE, situated between the sacrospinous ligament and the lesser sciatic foramen. A progressive amelioration of painful symptoms was observed during follow-up. Minimally invasive PNN is evolving and enables decompression along the entire proximal tract up to the Alcock canal, minimizing the risk of comorbidities. In addition to reducing pudendal neuralgia, robot-assisted and laparoscopic approaches determined a reduction in lower urinary tract symptoms and an improvement in erectile function, though further studies are required to corroborate these findings. PNN emerges as an effective treatment for PNE with minimal morbidity. Therefore, PNN should be tailored according to the site of PNE to enhance functional outcomes and improve patient quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:阴部神经痛是一种严重的,痛苦,神经病,涉及阴部神经的皮段(S2,S3,S4)。诊断是复杂的,通常需要很多年才能做出。使用电流的技术已被证明可以减轻疼痛并改善患有这种疾病的患者的生活质量。这篇综述的目的是分析现有文献中关于电流在阴部神经痛患者治疗中的作用。
    方法:在PubMed中进行了文献检索,Cinahl,Medline,科克伦图书馆,恩菲斯波,PEDro,Scopus和WebofScience数据库,使用搜索词“电刺激疗法”,“阴部神经痛”和“阴部神经卡压”。
    结果:最常见的重复干预是脉冲射频。使用的其他技术是经皮神经电刺激,脉冲电磁场治疗和神经调节。所有研究都显示疼痛有显著改善,镇痛摄入量,抑郁-焦虑或生活质量。
    结论:应用电流治疗阴部神经痛似乎是有效的。科学证据很少,方法质量差,它的使用是基于在其他慢性疼痛适应症中证明的疗效。
    OBJECTIVE: Pudendal neuralgia is a severely intense, painful, neuropathic condition, involving the dermatome of the pudendal nerve (S2, S3, S4). The diagnosis is complex and usually takes many years to be made. Techniques that use electrical current have been shown to decrease pain and improve quality of life in patients with this condition. The aim of this review was to analyze the existing literature on the effects of electrical current in the treatment of patients with pudendal neuralgia.
    METHODS: A literature search was carried out in PubMed, Cinahl, Medline, Cochrane Library, ENFISPO, PEDro, Scopus and Web of Science databases, using the search terms \"Electric Stimulation Therapy\", \"pudendal neuralgia\" and \"pudendal nerve entrapment\".
    RESULTS: The most frequently repeated intervention is pulsed radiofrequency. Other techniques used are transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy and neuromodulation. All studies show significant improvement in pain, analgesic intake, depression-anxiety or quality of life.
    CONCLUSIONS: The application of electrical current seems to be effective in the management of pudendal neuralgia. The scientific evidence is scarce, of poor methodological quality, and its use is based on the efficacy demonstrated in other indications of chronic pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:阴部神经压迫(PNE)可以确定与神经支配区域相关症状相关的慢性盆腔疼痛。这项研究旨在介绍该技术并报告第一系列机器人辅助阴部神经释放(RPNR)的结果。
    方法:32例患者,我们招募了2016年1月至2021年7月期间在我们中心接受RPNR治疗的患者.脐内侧韧带鉴定后,该韧带与同侧髂外椎弓根之间的间隙被逐渐解剖以识别闭孔神经。该神经内侧的解剖可识别闭孔静脉和提肛器的弧腱,头颅插入坐骨脊柱。在脊柱水平的尾骨肌肉的冷切口之后,识别并切开骶棘韧带。阴部干(血管和神经)是可视化的,从坐骨脊柱中解脱出来,内侧转位。
    结果:症状持续时间的中位数为7(5,5-9)年。中位手术时间为74(65-83)分钟。中位住院时间为1(1-2)天。只有轻微的并发症。手术后3个月和6个月,已经遇到了统计学上显著的疼痛减轻。此外,皮尔逊相关系数报告疼痛持续时间与NPRS评分改善之间呈负相关,-0.81(p=0.01)。
    结论:RPNR是解决PNE引起的疼痛的安全有效方法。建议及时神经减压以提高疗效。
    Pudendal Nerve Entrapment (PNE) may determine chronic pelvic pain associated with symptoms related to its innervation area. This study aimed to present the technique and report the outcomes of the first series of robot-assisted pudendal nerve release (RPNR).
    32 patients, who were treated with RPNR in our centre between January 2016 and July 2021, were recruited. Following the medial umbilical ligament identification, the space between this ligament and the ipsilateral external iliac pedicle is progressively dissected to identify the obturator nerve. The dissection medial to this nerve identifies the obturator vein and the arcus tendinous of the levator ani, which is cranially inserted into the ischial spine. Following the cold incision of the coccygeous muscle at the level of the spine, the sacrospinous ligament is identified and incised. The pudendal trunk (vessels and nerve) is visualized, freed from the ischial spine and medially transposed.
    The Median duration of symptoms was 7 (5, 5-9) years. The median operative time was 74 (65-83) minutes. The median length of stay was 1 (1-2) days. There was only a minor complication. At 3 and 6 months after surgery, a statistically significant pain reduction has been encountered. Furthermore, the Pearson correlation coefficient reported a negative relationship between the duration of pain and the improvement in NPRS score, - 0.81 (p = 0.01).
    RPNR is a safe and effective approach for the pain resolution caused by PNE. Timely nerve decompression is suggested to enhance outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:阴部神经分布的顽固性疼痛患者可能受益于阴部神经调节;然而,有些人可能以前接受过阴部神经卡压手术(PNES),可能改变神经解剖结构和功能。
    目的:我们检查了PNES患者的阴部神经调节结果。
    方法:有PNES和四极病史的患者,对泌尿生殖器疼痛的阴部铅放置进行了综述。从现有的医疗记录中收集症状和结果。
    结果:将有阴部神经调节和先前PNES的患者与没有先前PNES且有阴部导线放置的患者进行比较。
    结果:评估了15例有1、2或3个PNES病史的患者(分别为13、1和1)。大多数(10;67%)是女性,双侧疼痛(9;60%),和5-26年的症状。在试验了线索之后,膀胱症状和疼痛在12人中有8人和14人中有9人得到改善,分别,80%(12/15)的患者接受了永久性发生器植入。当之前的PNES患者与之前没有PNES的患者(n=43)进行比较时,性别(67%vs77%女性;P=.50)和年龄(中位数63vs58岁;P=.80),是相似的;然而,BMI不同(平均24vs29;P=.008),发生器植入比例较低(12/15;80%vs42/43;98%;P=.049)。重要的是,两组间的中位导线植入时间(48分钟vs50分钟;P=.65)无差异.
    结论:阴部神经调节有可能为非常难以治疗的人群提供疼痛缓解;此外,以前的PNES手术似乎不会使引线放置明显更具挑战性.
    研究优势包括成为泌尿生殖器疼痛的三级转诊中心,并由一名外科医生以有计划的方式执行所有手术。局限性包括回顾性研究设计,小样本量和各种PN方法。
    结论:即使在之前的PNES之后,慢性阴部神经调节也是可行的选择。
    Patients with intractable pain in the pudendal nerve distribution may benefit from pudendal neuromodulation; however, some may have previously undergone pudendal nerve entrapment surgery (PNES), potentially altering nerve anatomy and function.
    We examined pudendal neuromodulation outcomes in patients with prior PNES.
    Patients with a history of PNES and quadripolar, tined pudendal lead placement for urogenital pain were reviewed. Symptoms and outcomes were collected from existing medical records.
    Patients with pudendal neuromodulation and prior PNES were compared to patients with no prior PNES who had pudendal lead placement.
    Fifteen patients with a history of 1, 2, or 3 prior PNES (n = 13, 1, and 1, respectively) were evaluated. Most (10; 67%) were female, with bilateral pain (9; 60%), and symptoms of 5-26 years. After trialing the lead, bladder symptoms and pain were improved in 8 of 12 and 9 of 14 patients, respectively, and 80% of patients (12/15) underwent permanent generator implantation. When prior PNES patients were compared to those with no prior PNES (n = 43), gender (67% vs 77% female; P = .50) and age (median 63 vs 58 years; P = .80), were similar; however, BMI differed (mean 24 vs 29; P = .008) and a lower proportion (12/15; 80% vs 42/43; 98%; P = .049) had generator implantation. Importantly, median lead implant time (48 vs 50 minutes; P = .65) did not differ between the 2 groups.
    Pudendal neuromodulation has the potential to provide pain relief for a very difficult-to-treat population; furthermore, it does not appear that prior PNES surgery made lead placement significantly more challenging.
    Study strengths include being a tertiary referral center for urogenital pain and having a single surgeon perform all procedures in a regimented way. Limitations include the retrospective study design, small sample size and various approaches to PN.
    Chronic pudendal neuromodulation can be a viable option even after prior PNES.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阴部神经分布的顽固性疼痛患者可能受益于阴部神经调节;然而,有些人可能以前接受过阴部神经卡压手术(PNES),可能改变神经解剖结构和功能。
    我们检查了既往PNES患者的阴部神经调节结果。
    有PNES和四极病史的患者,对泌尿生殖器疼痛的阴部铅放置进行了综述。从现有的医疗记录中收集症状和结果。
    将有阴部神经调节和先前PNES的患者与没有先前PNES且有阴部导线放置的患者进行比较。
    评估了15例既往有1、2或3个PNES病史的患者(分别为n=13、1和1)。大多数(10;67%)是女性,双侧疼痛(9;60%),和5-26年的症状。在试验了线索之后,膀胱症状和疼痛在12人中有8人和14人中有9人得到改善,分别,80%(12/15)的患者接受了永久性发生器植入。当之前的PNES患者与之前没有PNES的患者(n=43)进行比较时,性别(67%vs77%女性;P=.50)和年龄(中位数63vs58岁;P=.80),是相似的;然而,BMI不同(平均24vs29;P=.008),发生器植入比例较低(12/15;80%vs42/43;98%;P=.049)。重要的是,两组间的中位导线植入时间(48分钟vs50分钟;P=.65)无差异.
    阴部神经调节有可能为非常难以治疗的人群提供疼痛缓解;此外,以前的PNES手术似乎不会使引线放置明显更具挑战性.
    研究优势包括成为泌尿生殖器疼痛的三级转诊中心,并由一名外科医生以有计划的方式执行所有手术。局限性包括回顾性研究设计,小样本量和不同的PN方法结论:即使在以前的PNES后,慢性阴部神经调节也可以是一个可行的选择。KristenM.Meier,PatrickM.Vecellio,KimA.Killinger,JudithA.Boura,KennethM.Peters.阴部神经调节在阴部神经压迫手术后是可行和有效的。JSexMed2022;19:995-1001。
    Patients with intractable pain in the pudendal nerve distribution may benefit from pudendal neuromodulation; however, some may have previously undergone pudendal nerve entrapment surgery (PNES), potentially altering nerve anatomy and function.
    We examined pudendal neuromodulation outcomes in patients with prior PNES.
    Patients with a history of PNES and quadripolar, tined pudendal lead placement for urogenital pain were reviewed. Symptoms and outcomes were collected from existing medical records.
    Patients with pudendal neuromodulation and prior PNES were compared to patients with no prior PNES who had pudendal lead placement.
    Fifteen patients with a history of 1, 2, or 3 prior PNES (n = 13, 1, and 1, respectively) were evaluated. Most (10; 67%) were female, with bilateral pain (9; 60%), and symptoms of 5-26 years. After trialing the lead, bladder symptoms and pain were improved in 8 of 12 and 9 of 14 patients, respectively, and 80% of patients (12/15) underwent permanent generator implantation. When prior PNES patients were compared to those with no prior PNES (n = 43), gender (67% vs 77% female; P = .50) and age (median 63 vs 58 years; P = .80), were similar; however, BMI differed (mean 24 vs 29; P = .008) and a lower proportion (12/15; 80% vs 42/43; 98%; P = .049) had generator implantation. Importantly, median lead implant time (48 vs 50 minutes; P = .65) did not differ between the 2 groups.
    Pudendal neuromodulation has the potential to provide pain relief for a very difficult-to-treat population; furthermore, it does not appear that prior PNES surgery made lead placement significantly more challenging.
    Study strengths include being a tertiary referral center for urogenital pain and having a single surgeon perform all procedures in a regimented way. Limitations include the retrospective study design, small sample size and various approaches to PN CONCLUSION: Chronic pudendal neuromodulation can be a viable option even after prior PNES. Kristen M. Meier, Patrick M. Vecellio, Kim A. Killinger, Judith A. Boura, Kenneth M. Peters. Pudendal Neuromodulation is Feasible and Effective After Pudendal Nerve Entrapment Surgery. J Sex Med 2022;19:995-1001.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    分析骶棘韧带(SSL)缝合术在骶棘韧带固定术(SSLF)后可疑阴部神经卡压的情况下,对减轻疼痛症状的疗效。
    回顾性队列研究。
    三级转诊中心,荷兰。
    21名女性因SSLF相关疼痛症状而移除SSLF缝线。
    临床记录审查。
    主要结果是SSL缝线移除后疼痛减轻。次要结果指标是缝线放置和缝线移除之间的时间间隔,完全去除缝线,盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的不良事件和复发。
    共有21名女性因严重和/或持续性疼痛而接受SSL缝合,临床检查证实:95%的女性(20/21)报告缝合后疼痛减轻,57%报告疼痛完全缓解。缝线放置和缝线移除之间的时间间隔的中位数为414天(范围8-1855天)。在86%的病例中可以完全去除缝线(18/21)。一名妇女失血过多(520毫升),没有输血。手术后6-8周,10%的女性(2/21)有新的症状性POP,≥2期,需要进行额外的POP手术。
    由经验丰富的临床医生执行时,SSL缝线移除是可行且有效的,发病率低。此外,短期内复发性POP的风险似乎较低.
    手术切除骶棘韧带缝线对于缓解疼痛是安全有效的,甚至远离初始位置。
    To analyse the efficacy of sacrospinous ligament (SSL) suture removal on the reduction of pain symptoms in the case of suspected pudendal nerve entrapment after sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF).
    Retrospective cohort study.
    Tertiary referral centre, the Netherlands.
    A cohort of 21 women having their SSLF sutures removed because of SSLF-related pain symptoms.
    Clinical record review.
    The primary outcome was reduction of pain after SSL suture removal. Secondary outcome measures were time interval between suture placement and suture removal, complete suture removal, adverse events and recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
    A total of 21 women underwent SSL suture removal for severe and/or persistent pain, which was confirmed on clinical examination: 95% of the women (20/21) reported pain reduction after suture removal, and 57% reported complete pain relief. The time interval between suture placement and suture removal was at a median of 414 days (range 8-1855 days). Sutures could be completely removed in 86% of cases (18/21). One woman had excessive blood loss (520 ml) without blood transfusion. At 6-8 weeks after surgery, 10% of the women (2/21) had renewed symptomatic POP, stage ≥ 2, for which additional POP surgery was indicated.
    When performed by an experienced clinician, SSL suture removal is feasible and efficacious, with low morbidity. In addition, the risk of recurrent POP in the short term appeared to be low.
    The surgical removal of sacrospinous ligament sutures is safe and efficacious for pain relief, even remote from initial placement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:一些文章报道了使用经会阴[1]的Alcock管综合征(ACS)的手术治疗,跨臀肌[2],或传统的腹腔镜方法[3,4]。2015年,Rey和Oderda[5]报道了第一个机器人神经松解术,提供机器人辅助手术的优势:放大和三维视觉和更高的运动精度。然而,根据我们的知识,没有关于在妇科领域使用机器人平台治疗ACS的报道.因此,该视频的目的是描述机器人探索骨盆中的躯体神经以及ACS的骶棘韧带横切(神经减压)的解剖学和技术亮点。
    方法:用叙述的视频片段逐步演示该技术。
    方法:某城市综合医院。一名没有手术史的48岁女性在坐着时因剧烈疼痛而转诊,盆腔循环性疼痛,臀肌和会阴疼痛,所有这些都对药物治疗有抵抗力。她的疼痛蔓延到大腿后部。来我们医院之前,几年前,她拜访了一名整形外科医生,并被诊断出患有坐骨神经痛。磁共振成像显示子宫腺肌病既没有深子宫内膜异位症也没有血管压迫。在神经骨盆评估的基础上,由于骶棘韧带压迫了大腿的阴部神经和后皮神经,该患者被怀疑患有ACS。
    方法:本手术参照腹腔镜神经导航技术[6],按以下9个步骤进行:第1步,沿髂外动脉打开腹膜;第2步,髂外动脉暴露;第3步,腰骶间隙发育;第4步,腰骶干的鉴定;第5步,臀上神经的鉴定;第6步,骶神经的鉴定;第9步手术顺利完成,无任何并发症,术后过程顺利。我们认为ACS与子宫内膜异位症之间没有关系。患者报告说,她的疼痛在术后1个月和3个月逐渐减轻,最终在6个月时神经痛完全缓解。神经骨盆评估仍每6个月进行一次。
    结论:机器人辅助切断骶棘韧带是可行的,选择ACS患者的安全技术。在过早将患者标记为难以治疗之前,应进行盆腔神经探查以进一步诊断和治疗[7]。
    OBJECTIVE: Some articles have reported the surgical management of Alcock canal syndrome (ACS) using the transperineal [1], transgluteal [2], or conventional laparoscopic approach [3,4]. In 2015, Rey and Oderda [5] reported the first robotic neurolysis of the pudendum, providing the advantages of robot-assisted surgery: magnified and 3-dimensional vision and greater precision of movements. However, to our knowledge, there have been no reports on the use of a robotic platform for the treatment of ACS in the field of gynecology. Therefore, the objective of this video is to describe the anatomic and technical highlights of robotic exploration of the somatic nerves in the pelvis and transection of the sacrospinous ligament (nerve decompression) for ACS.
    METHODS: Stepwise demonstration of the technique with narrated video footage.
    METHODS: An urban general hospital. A 48-year-old woman who had no previous surgical history was referred for severe pain when sitting, cyclic pelvic pain, and gluteal and perineal pain, all of which were resistant to medication therapy. Her pain radiated to the posterior aspect of the thigh. Before coming to our hospital, she visited an orthopedic surgeon a few years earlier and was diagnosed with sciatic neuralgia. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed adenomyosis with neither deep endometriosis nor vascular entrapment. On the basis of neuropelveologic evaluation, the patient was suspected to be suffering from ACS owing to compression of the pudendal nerve and the posterior cutaneous nerve of the thigh by the sacrospinous ligament.
    METHODS: The procedure was performed using the following 9 steps while referencing the laparoscopic neuronavigation technique [6]: step 1, opening the peritoneum along the external iliac artery; step 2, exposure of the external iliac artery; step 3, development of the lumbosacral space; step 4, identification of the lumbosacral trunk; step 5, identification of the superior gluteal nerve; step 6, identification of the sciatic nerve; step 7, identification of the inferior gluteal nerve; step 8, identification of the pudendal nerve; and step 9, transection of the sacrospinous ligament. The surgery was completed successfully without any complications, and the postoperative course was uneventful. We considered that there was no relationship between the ACS and endometriosis. The patient reported that her pain decreased gradually at postoperative month 1 and month 3, and finally the neuralgia was completely resolved at month 6. Neuropelveologic evaluation still continues every 6 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted transection of the sacrospinous ligament is a feasible, safe technique for selected patients with ACS. Exploration of the pelvic nerves should be performed for further diagnosis and therapy before prematurely labeling the patient as refractory to the treatment [7].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号