背景:亲密伴侣和性暴力是美国大学校园中普遍存在的公共卫生问题。建议进行研究以创建和保持有效,相关,以及针对学生幸存者的可接受的预防计划和响应服务。
目的:加州大学(UC)SpeaksUp研究旨在研究3个UC校园中导致亲密伴侣和性暴力的因素,并利用研究结果制定和测试干预措施和政策,以预防暴力。促进健康,并为后续的大规模定量研究奠定基础。
方法:在加州大学洛杉矶分校进行了一项混合方法研究,加州大学圣地亚哥分校,加州大学圣巴巴拉分校。第一阶段(2017-2020年)涉及资源审核;学生对性同意的看法的文化共识建模;与学生进行深入访谈(IDI)和焦点小组讨论,以了解与经历有关的校园环境的看法以及预防和应对暴力;和IDI与教师,工作人员,和社区利益相关者调查影响学生生活和经历的机构和社区安排。第二阶段(2020年-正在进行)涉及IDI与学生幸存者一起评估校园和社区服务的使用和看法。定性内容分析用于生成出现的实质性代码和子主题,使用主题分析方法。
结果:在2019年1月,我们对本科生,研究生和专业学生进行了149次免费列表访谈和214次基于网络的调查,以进行文化共识建模。在2019年2月至2019年6月期间,共有179名IDI与86名(48%)本科生一起进行,21名(11.7%)研究生和专业学生,34名(19%)工作人员,27名(15.1%)教职员工,和11名(6.1%)社区利益相关者,与201名参与者进行了35次焦点小组讨论(27/35,77%与本科生,8/35,23%与研究生和专业学生)。自2020年9月以来,已进行了50%(15/30)的计划学生幸存者访谈。这部分数据收集因COVID-19大流行而中断。招聘正在进行中。
结论:数据分析和II期数据收集正在进行中。研究结果将用于制定和测试预防暴力的干预措施,促进健康和福祉,并确保幸存者服务与校园社区中所有个人的需求相关且可接受,包括那些通常被研究不足的人。这些发现还将用于准备严格的,UC全系统公共卫生预防研究。
未经批准:DERR1-10.2196/31189。
BACKGROUND: Intimate partner and sexual violence are pervasive public health issues on college and university campuses in the United States. Research is recommended for creating and maintaining effective, relevant, and acceptable prevention programs and response services for student survivors.
OBJECTIVE: The University of California (UC) Speaks Up study aims to examine factors contributing to intimate partner and sexual violence on 3 UC campuses and use the findings to develop and test interventions and policies to prevent violence, promote health, and lay the groundwork for subsequent large-scale quantitative research.
METHODS: A mixed methods study was conducted at UC Los Angeles, UC San Diego, and UC Santa Barbara. Phase I (2017-2020) involved a resource audit; cultural consensus modeling of students\' perceptions of sexual consent; in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions with students to understand perceptions of campus environment related to experiences as well as prevention of and responses to violence; and IDIs with faculty, staff, and community stakeholders to investigate institutional and community arrangements influencing students\' lives and experiences. Phase II (2020-ongoing) involves IDIs with student survivors to assess the use and perceptions of campus and community services. Qualitative content analysis is used to generate substantive codes and subthemes that emerge, using a thematic analysis approach.
RESULTS: In January 2019, we conducted 149 free-listing interviews and 214 web-based surveys with undergraduate and graduate and professional students for the cultural consensus modeling. Between February 2019 and June 2019, 179 IDIs were conducted with 86 (48%) undergraduate students, 21 (11.7%) graduate and professional students, 34 (19%) staff members, 27 (15.1%) faculty members, and 11 (6.1%) community stakeholders, and 35 focus group discussions (27/35, 77% with undergraduate students and 8/35, 23% with graduate and professional students) were conducted with 201 participants. Since September 2020, 50% (15/30) of the planned student survivor interviews have been conducted. This segment of data collection was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Recruitment is ongoing.
CONCLUSIONS: Data analysis and phase II data collection are ongoing. The findings will be used to develop and test interventions for preventing violence, promoting health and well-being, and ensuring that survivor services are relevant and acceptable to and meet the needs of all individuals in the campus community, including those who are typically understudied. The findings will also be used to prepare for rigorous, UC-system-wide public health prevention research.
UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/31189.