Psychiatrists

精神科医生
  • 文章类型: Published Erratum
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一段时间以来,科学家和心理健康专家对迷幻药的兴趣越来越大。鉴于专家介绍治疗方法并为患者提供建议,了解他们的观点很重要。因此,我们研究的目的是研究和比较精神病学家和心理学家对迷幻药的态度。我们对它们是如何形成的以及人格在这一过程中的作用感兴趣。我们包括218名受访者,其中92名是精神病学家,126名是心理学家。使用迷幻药问卷上的态度检查了对迷幻药的态度。我们使用五大清单来检查人格特质。关于迷幻药分量表的法律使用,研究表明,精神科医生对迷幻药有更多的消极态度(p=.033)。较高的开放性(β=0.184,p<.001)和较低的责任心(β=-0.144,p=.009)有助于对迷幻药的积极态度,以及以前使用迷幻药的终生经验(β=0.411,p<.001)和较年轻的年龄(β=-0.278,p<.001)。总之,我们可以说,心理健康专业人员是开放的,但也对迷幻药保持警惕。开放激励他们学习。出于这个原因,额外的教育可能会对精神科医生和心理学家的态度产生影响,并为他们实际使用迷幻药做好准备。
    For some time now, there has been an increased interest in psychedelics among scientists and mental health experts. Given that experts introduce therapy and advise patients, it is important to know their views. Therefore, the aim of our research was to examine and compare the attitudes of psychiatrists and psychologists toward psychedelics. We were interested in how they are formed and what is the role of personality in that process. We included 218 respondents, of which 92 were psychiatrists and 126 were psychologists. Attitudes toward psychedelics were examined using the Attitudes on Psychedelics Questionnaire. We used the Big Five Inventory to examine personality traits. On the Legal Use of Psychedelics subscale, it was shown that psychiatrists have more negative attitudes toward psychedelics (p = .033). Higher Openness (β = 0.184, p < .001) and lower Conscientiousness (β = -0.144, p = .009) contribute to positive attitudes toward psychedelics, as well as previous lifetime experience with psychedelics (β = 0.411, p < .001) and younger age (β = -0.278, p < .001). In conclusion, we can say that mental health professionals are open but also wary of psychedelics. Openness motivates them to learn. For this reason, additional education could have an impact on the attitudes of psychiatrists and psychologists and prepare them for the practical use of psychedelics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项调查评估了精神科居民/职业早期精神科医生对抗精神病药物治疗药物监测(TDM)效用的态度。
    先前制定的关于抗精神病药物治疗期间对TDM效用的态度的问卷在2022年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间由国家协调员按横截面分发。在线性回归分析中,使用TDM治疗除氯氮平以外的抗精神病药物的频率是主要结果,包括性,临床设置,案件量,以及探索性因素分析产生的因素。居民和早期职业精神病医生之间的比较,在门诊和门诊工作的受访者,以及低收入/中等收入和高收入国家。
    总之,1237名受访者完成了调查,37.9%从未使用过TDM抗精神病药。7个因素解释了41%的反应差异;其中6个因素与TDM使用频率相关(p<0.05)。因子负荷最高的项目包括TDM的临床益处(因子A和E:0.7),对患者对TDM的信念的负面期望(因素B:0.6-0.7),弱TDM科学证据(因子C:0.8),和TDM可用性(系数D:-0.8)。与高收入国家相比,来自低收入/中等收入国家的受访者不太可能/几乎总是使用TDM(9.4%与21.5%,p<0.001)。
    抗精神病药的TDM使用较差,并且与知识有限和可用性不足有关。
    UNASSIGNED: This survey assessed psychiatry residents\'/early-career psychiatrists\' attitudes towards the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antipsychotics.
    UNASSIGNED: A previously developed questionnaire on attitudes on TDM utility during antipsychotic treatment was cross-sectionally disseminated by national coordinators between 01/01/2022-31/12/2023. The frequency of using TDM for antipsychotics other than clozapine was the main outcome in a linear regression analysis, including sex, clinical setting, caseload, and factors generated by an exploratory factor analysis. Comparisons between residents and early-career psychiatrists, respondents working in in- and outpatient settings, and low-/middle- and high-income countries were performed.
    UNASSIGNED: Altogether, 1,237 respondents completed the survey, with 37.9% having never used TDM for antipsychotics. Seven factors explained 41% of response variance; six of them were associated with frequency of TDM use (p < 0.05). Items with highest loadings for factors included clinical benefits of TDM (factors A and E: 0.7), negative expectations for beliefs of patients towards TDM (factor B: 0.6-0.7), weak TDM scientific evidence (factor C: 0.8), and TDM availability (factor D: -0.8). Respondents from low-/middle-income countries were less likely to frequently/almost always use TDM compared to high-income countries (9.4% vs. 21.5%, p < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: TDM use for antipsychotics was poor and associated with limited knowledge and insufficient availability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与灾难有关的精神疾病(DRPD)对精神卫生专业人员提出了重大挑战,然而,在研究生医学教育中,精神科医生在管理这些疾病方面的准备工作明显缺乏重视。
    这项研究利用问卷从精神科医生那里收集数据,专注于他们之前参与管理DRPD,感知能力,药物偏好,以及影响他们处理此类疾病经验的因素。分析包括变量的分布和排序,除了交叉分析之外,还检查了人口因素(年龄,性别,医院级别,多年的实践,董事会认证)和治疗经验,以及在DRPD管理中进行院内或院外动员的准备。
    一百零三名台湾精神科医生参与了这项研究,大多数报告参与管理DRPD(71.8%),特别是创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和抑郁症。抗抑郁药,特别是5-羟色胺选择性再摄取抑制剂,通常首选DRPD治疗,包括创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症。40岁以上,执业超过10年的精神科医生,并保持董事会认证状态,在医院外部或内部动员DRPD管理方面显示出更多的经验。
    研究结果表明,在研究生医学教育中,台湾精神病学家展示了丰富的经验,意愿,以及有效管理DRPD的能力。然而,有必要将灾难精神病学的全面培训纳入研究生精神病学教育计划,以进一步加强准备并优化管理这些挑战性条件的结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Disaster-related psychiatric disorders (DRPD) present a significant challenge to mental health professionals, yet there is a notable lack of emphasis on the preparedness of psychiatrists in managing these conditions within post-graduate medical education.
    UNASSIGNED: This study utilized a questionnaire to collect data from psychiatrists, focusing on their prior involvement in managing DRPD, perceived competence, medication preferences, and factors influencing their experiences in handling such disorders. Analysis included distribution and ranking of variables, alongside cross-analysis examining associations between demographic factors (age, gender, hospital levels, years of practice, board certification) and treatment experiences, as well as readiness for in-hospital or outside-hospital mobilization in DRPD management.
    UNASSIGNED: One hundred and three Taiwanese psychiatrists participated in the study, with the majority reporting involvement in managing DRPD (71.8%), particularly in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. Antidepressants, specifically serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors, were commonly preferred for DRPD treatment, including PTSD and depression. Psychiatrists aged over 40, with more than 10 years of practice, and hold the board-certified status, showed greater experiences for outside- or inside- the hospital mobilization in DRPD management.
    UNASSIGNED: Findings suggest that within post-graduate medical education, Taiwanese psychiatrists demonstrate significant experience, willingness, and capacity to effectively manage DRPD. However, there is a need to integrate comprehensive training on disaster psychiatry into post-graduate psychiatric education programs to further enhance preparedness and optimize outcomes in managing these challenging conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:苏格兰精神福利委员会发布了一份关于年轻人死亡的报告,为苏格兰儿童和青少年学院的皇家精神病学学院提供建议;探索在苏格兰年轻人中使用氯氮平是否存在障碍。
    方法:一项混合方法研究是通过对苏格兰儿童和青少年精神病学临床医生的横断面调查进行的,确定对使用氯氮平的态度以及对氯氮平治疗的感知障碍和促进因素。
    结果:结果表明,服务内部和服务之间可能缺乏明确定义的路径,以及缺乏对年轻人进行必要监测的资源开始服用氯氮平。多名受访者认为氯氮平入门技术不熟练,也没有接受过正式培训。改善氯氮平处方便利化的最常见主题是增加资源和培训。
    结论:包括精神福利委员会在内的国家决策者,NHS苏格兰教育,苏格兰NHS应考虑这些发现,以解决苏格兰18岁以下人群中潜在的氯氮平未充分利用的问题。应该对目前的服务提供进行审查,考虑是否可以更有效地实施我们研究强调的氯氮平处方的促进剂。这可能有助于减少已发现的障碍,并增加氯氮平处方给那些从中受益的人,可能改善患有难治性精神病的年轻人的预后。
    BACKGROUND: The Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland published a report into the death of a young person, with recommendations for the Royal College of Psychiatry in Scotland Child and Adolescent Faculty; to explore if there were barriers to the use of Clozapine in young people in Scotland.
    METHODS: A mixed-methods study was performed using a cross-sectional survey of clinicians working in child and adolescent psychiatry across Scotland, to determine attitudes towards clozapine use and the perceived barriers and facilitators to clozapine treatment.
    RESULTS: Results suggest that there may be a lack of clearly defined pathways within and between services, as well as a lack of resources provided for the necessary monitoring of a young person started on clozapine. Multiple respondents felt unskilled in clozapine initiation and had not accessed formal training. The most frequently mentioned themes for improving facilitation of clozapine prescription were that of increased resources and training.
    CONCLUSIONS: National policymakers including the Mental Welfare Commission, NHS Education for Scotland, and NHS Scotland should consider these findings to address the potential underutilisation of clozapine for people aged under 18 in services across Scotland. A review of current service provision should take place, with consideration of whether the facilitators to clozapine prescription which our study has highlighted could be implemented more effectively. This may help reduce identified barriers and increase clozapine prescription to those who would benefit from it, potentially improving outcomes for young people with treatment-resistant psychosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:临床助理是健康专业干部,可用于南非的心理健康任务共享,但这取决于培训。这项研究的目的是确定潜在的课程内容,培训网站,和本科生和潜在研究生临床助理心理健康培训的教学模式,并确定他们应该根据这些课程执行的任务。
    方法:我们利用Delphi方法与由精神科医生和家庭医生组成的小组就项目达成共识。Delphi调查的第一轮问卷是根据文献综述和整个研究早期阶段的结果制定的。调查以电子方式进行,分为三轮。在第一轮和第二轮之后,我们构建了一份更新的问卷,省略了达成共识的项目。问卷主要由九分量表组成,基于70%的参与者的评分为1,2,3或7,8,9。
    结果:第一轮有26名参与者,在后面的几轮中这一数字下降到23名。在本科(96.2%)和研究生水平(100%)的社区卫生中心(CHC)对心理健康诊所的培训附件达成了强烈共识。就本科六类疾病和研究生九类疾病管理培训的重要性达成共识。在本科生和研究生阶段,将患者作为一种教学方式达到了100%的共识。PHC诊所,CHC和地区医院达成共识,作为临床助理提供心理健康服务的适当设置。此外,GP实践和二级医院与接受研究生培训的人达成了共识。在列出的21项任务中,有10项可以根据本科培训执行,而在21项任务中,有20项可以根据心理健康研究生资格执行。
    结论:Delphi小组的建议为加强临床员工的心理健康课程提供了明确的路线图,使他们能够利用精神卫生服务提供。未来的临床助理研究生心理健康资格将允许扩大任务共享。
    BACKGROUND: Clinical associates are a health professional cadre that could be utilised in mental health task sharing in South Africa but this is training dependent. The objectives of the study were to identify the potential curricula content, training sites, and teaching modalities for undergraduate and potential postgraduate clinical associate mental health training and to identify the tasks that they should perform based on these curricula.
    METHODS: We utilised the Delphi method to reach consensus on items with the panel comprising psychiatrists and family physicians. The first round questionnaire of the Delphi survey was developed based on a literature review and the results from earlier phases of the overall study. The survey was administered electronically and consisted of three rounds. Following both the first and second rounds, an updated questionnaire was constructed omitting the items on which consensus was reached. The questionnaire consisted primarily of nine-point scales with consensus based on 70% of participants rating 1,2,3 or 7,8,9.
    RESULTS: There were 26 participants in the first round with this number falling to 23 in later rounds. There was strong consensus on a training attachment to a mental health clinic at a community health centre (CHC) at undergraduate (96.2%) and postgraduate level (100%). Consensus was reached on the importance of training on the management of six categories of disorders at the undergraduate level and nine categories of disorders at the postgraduate level. Clerking patients as a teaching modality reached 100% consensus at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels. PHC clinics, CHCs and district hospitals reached consensus as appropriate settings for clinical associates to provide mental health services. In addition, GP practices and secondary hospitals reached consensus for those with postgraduate training. Consensus was reached on ten of the 21 listed tasks that could be performed based on undergraduate training and 20 of the 21 tasks based on a postgraduate qualification in mental health.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi panel\'s recommendations provide a clear roadmap for enhancing mental health curricula for clinical associates, enabling their utilisation in mental health service provision. A future postgraduate mental health qualification for clinical associates would allow for expanded task sharing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:远程医疗已成为全球医疗保健发展的基本支柱。在突尼斯,卫生系统的挑战,被COVID-19大流行放大,强调了采取创新解决方案的紧迫性。在这方面,总统法令的公布第318/2022号公报于4月8日发表在《突尼斯共和国官方公报》上,代表了远程医疗监管的重大进展。
    目的:评估突尼斯精神科医生和儿童精神科医生关于远程医疗的知识,其法律框架,以及他们对这种新医疗实践的看法。
    方法:在总统令发布8个月后进行了描述性横断面研究。该调查是通过GoogleForms上的电子问卷在线进行的。
    结果:本次调查共纳入68名参与者。专业年数的中位数为5±7年。在参与者中,82%从事精神病学工作,18%从事儿童精神病学工作。实践部门在69%的案件中是公共的,在31%的案件中是私人的。他们中的大多数(62%)不知道不同的远程医疗行为,57%的医生不知道总统令的存在。大多数医生(84%)对采用心灵感应表示赞成,不分性别(p=0.69),专业地位(p=0.512),专业(p=1),多年的经验(p=0.83),和实践部门(p=1)。
    结论:尽管有关远程医疗的知识水平较低,该研究强调了参与者对将心灵感应纳入临床实践的兴趣。
    BACKGROUND: Telemedicine has become a fundamental pillar of the evolution of healthcare worldwide. In Tunisia, the challenges of the health system, amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic, have highlighted the urgency to adopt innovative solutions. In this regard, the publication of Presidential Decree No. 318/2022 on April 8 in the Official Journal of the Tunisian Republic represents a significant advance in the regulation of telemedicine.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the knowledge of Tunisian psychiatrists and child psychiatrists regarding telemedicine, its legal framework, and their perceptions of this new medical practice.
    METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted 8 months after the issuance of the presidential decree. The survey was conducted online through an electronic questionnaire on Google Forms.
    RESULTS: A total of 68 participants were included in this survey. The median number of professional years was 5±7 years. Among the participants, 82% worked in psychiatry and 18% worked in child psychiatry. The sector of practice was public in 69% and private in 31% of cases. Most of them (62%) did not know about the different telemedicine acts, and 57% of doctors were unaware of the existence of the presidential decree. The majority of doctors (84%) expressed a favorable opinion regarding the adoption of telepsychiatry, regardless of sex (p=0.69), professional status (p=0.512), specialty (p=1), years of experience (p=0.83), and practice sector (p=1).
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite a low level of knowledge regarding telemedicine, the study highlights the interest of the participants in integrating telepsychiatry into their clinical practices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:在越来越多的国家中,作为在线记录访问的一部分,患者可以访问其临床记录(“开放笔记”)。特别是在心理健康领域,开放笔记仍然存在争议,一些临床医生认为开放笔记是通过增加患者参与来改善治疗结果的工具,而其他人则担心患者可能会经历心理困扰和污名化,特别是在阅读临床医生的笔记时。需要更多的研究来优化收益并减轻风险。
    方法:使用定性研究设计,我们对在德国执业的精神科医生进行了半结构化访谈,探讨他们认为需要具备哪些条件,以确保在精神病学实践中成功实施公开笔记,以及预期的工作量和治疗结果的后续变化。采用专题分析法对数据进行分析。
    结果:我们采访了18名精神科医生;受访者认为,在实施公开笔记之前,需要做好四个关键条件,包括仔细考虑(1)诊断和症状严重程度,(2)有更多的时间来撰写临床笔记并与患者讨论,(3)可用资源和系统兼容性,(4)法律和数据保护方面。由于引入了公开笔记,受访者预期文档会发生变化,处理过程,和医生互动。虽然预计公开笔记会提高透明度和信任度,参与者预期会产生非预期的负面后果,包括由于与获取相关的误解和冲突而导致治疗关系恶化的风险.
    结论:在德国执业的精神科医生尚未将公开笔记作为医疗保健数据基础设施的一部分。受访者支持公开笔记,但有一些保留。他们发现开放笔记通常是有益的,但预期效果会根据患者特征而有所不同。管理访问的明确准则,时间限制,可用性,隐私至关重要。公开笔记被认为增加了透明度和患者的参与,但也被认为引起了污名化和冲突的问题。
    OBJECTIVE: In a growing list of countries, patients are granted access to their clinical notes (\"open notes\") as part of their online record access. Especially in the field of mental health, open notes remain controversial with some clinicians perceiving open notes as a tool for improving therapeutic outcomes by increasing patient involvement, while others fear that patients might experience psychological distress and perceived stigmatization, particularly when reading clinicians\' notes. More research is needed to optimize the benefits and mitigate the risks.
    METHODS: Using a qualitative research design, we conducted semi-structured interviews with psychiatrists practicing in Germany, to explore what conditions they believe need to be in place to ensure successful implementation of open notes in psychiatric practice as well as expected subsequent changes to their workload and treatment outcomes. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
    RESULTS: We interviewed 18 psychiatrists; interviewees believed four key conditions needed to be in place prior to implementation of open notes including careful consideration of (1) diagnoses and symptom severity, (2) the availability of additional time for writing clinical notes and discussing them with patients, (3) available resources and system compatibility, and (4) legal and data protection aspects. As a result of introducing open notes, interviewees expected changes in documentation, treatment processes, and doctor-physician interaction. While open notes were expected to improve transparency and trust, participants anticipated negative unintended consequences including the risk of deteriorating therapeutic relationships due to note access-related misunderstandings and conflicts.
    CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatrists practiced in Germany where open notes have not yet been established as part of the healthcare data infrastructure. Interviewees were supportive of open notes but had some reservations. They found open notes to be generally beneficial but anticipated effects to vary depending on patient characteristics. Clear guidelines for managing access, time constraints, usability, and privacy are crucial. Open notes were perceived to increase transparency and patient involvement but were also believed to raise issues of stigmatization and conflicts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前没有足够的证据证明使用特定的药物治疗人格障碍(PD)。研究文献缺乏对临床医生对PD药物治疗经验的系统探索。定性研究的目的是研究精神科医生如何对PD患者的药物治疗做出决定。访谈采用归纳主题分析法进行分析。结果表明,模棱两可的指南具有精神科医生经常依靠自己的经验的效果,或者他们的同事。作为决定药物治疗的依据,还确定了人际成分。当前研究中的一些精神科医生认为,药物可能是与患者建立联盟的一部分,药物是将患者与诊所联系起来的一种方式。我们的研究结果表明,在实践中如何实施临床指南很重要。
    There is currently insufficient evidence for the use of a specific pharmacological treatment for personality disorders (PD). The research literature lacks a systematic exploration of clinicians\' experiences of pharmacological treatment of PD. The aim of the qualitative study was to examine how psychiatrists make decisions about pharmacological treatment for patients with PD. The interviews were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. The results showed that ambiguous guidelines had the effect that the psychiatrists often relied on their own experience, or that of their colleagues. As a basis for decisions concerning drug treatment, an interpersonal component was also identified. Some of the psychiatrists in the current study argued that medications may be part of the alliance-building with the patient and that medications were a way of tying the patient to the clinic. Our findings show that it is important to work on how the clinical guidelines should be implemented in practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    了解心理健康从业者如何看待迷幻辅助心理治疗(PAP)的最新发现非常重要,因为这种治疗有可能被纳入临床实践。我们研究的目的是探索不参与迷幻药研究且位于欧洲地区的精神科医生如何看待迷幻药和PAP。
    我们对来自8个欧洲国家的12名精神病学专家和精神病学学员进行了在线半结构化访谈。使用由码本主题分析提供信息的一般归纳方法分析数据。
    根据访谈,我们制定了四个主要主题和14个子主题,包括(1)迷幻药持有潜力,(2)迷幻药是危险的,(3)迷幻药的未来是不确定的,和(4)精神病学是矛盾的迷幻药。
    我们的受访者-精神科医生承认PAP的潜力,但仍然保持谨慎,尚未认为其证据基础足够强大。在医学和精神病学培训中缺乏对迷幻药的教育,应加以改进,以促进心理健康专家参与PAP的决策。
    UNASSIGNED: It is important to understand how mental health practitioners view recent findings on psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy (PAP) as there is potential this treatment may be incorporated into clinical practice. The aim of our study was to explore how psychiatrists who are not involved in psychedelic research and who are located in the European region perceive psychedelics and PAP.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted online semi-structured interviews with 12 psychiatry specialists and psychiatry trainees from 8 European countries. Data were analyzed using a general inductive approach informed by codebook thematic analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Based on the interviews, we developed four main themes and 14 sub-themes, including (1) Psychedelics hold potential, (2) Psychedelics are dangerous, (3) Future of psychedelics is uncertain, and (4) Psychiatry is ambivalent toward psychedelics.
    UNASSIGNED: Our respondents-psychiatrists acknowledged the potential of PAP but remained cautious and did not yet perceive its evidence base as robust enough. Education on psychedelics is lacking in medical and psychiatric training and should be improved to facilitate the involvement of mental health experts in decision-making on PAP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号