一部小说,引入了算法“命名网格”系统,以区分hypopyon和pseudohypyon,以对前房收集进行早期诊断和及时治疗,以涵盖所有沉积物特征。出于这个原因,在MEDLINE/PubMed中对“hypopyon”和“pseudohypyon”进行了文献综述,Scopus,和WebofScience从1966年到2023年5月15日。澄清了两个问题:1)当被要求评估具有前房沉降的眼睛以区分出前房和假房性时,眼科医生应遵循哪些策略,和2)在系统性疾病中,非眼科医生应迅速下令眼科咨询以区分假性缺氧症和缺氧症。检查了沉积物的病理学特征;巩膜显示(温暖/寒冷),位置(角膜/前房/囊/后部),可见性(宏观/微观/隐伏角度),方向(水平/垂直/倾斜),数字(单/双),形状(凸/三角形/金字塔形/环形/块状/反向),和颜色(白色/黄色/粉红色/棕色/黑色)。然后评估相关发现;急性/慢性,自发/激起,单边/双边,炎性/非炎性,化脓性(非无菌)/非化脓性(无菌),肉芽肿/非肉芽肿,经常性/非经常性,换档/非换档,和瞬态/持久性。降水的类型被命名(命名)并与潜在的病因(炎症,感染,治疗性的,化装舞会)。鉴于(伪)缺管症主要困扰年轻患者在他们最有生产力的年份,监督此类患者的临床医生应了解所有沉积物特征。眼科医生永远不应该要求非眼科医生对患有(伪)缺氧症的患者进行完整的测试,而是指出存在哪种类型的集合,它的特征是什么,以及最有可能被排除的诊断是什么。
A novel, algorithmic \"naming-meshing\" system was introduced for the distinction of hypopyon from
pseudohypopyon to make an early diagnosis and prompt treatment of anterior chamber collection standardized to encompass all sediment characteristics. For this reason, a literature review of \"hypopyon\" and \"
pseudohypopyon\" was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from 1966 to May 15, 2023. Two issues were clarified: 1) which strategies should the ophthalmologist follow when asked to evaluate an eye with anterior chamber sedimentation to distinguish hypopyon from
pseudohypopyon, and 2) in which systemic disorders should a non-ophthalmologist order a prompt ophthalmic consultation to distinguish
pseudohypopyon from hypopyon. Pathognomonic characteristics of the sediment were examined; scleral show (warm/cold), location (corneal/anterior chamber/capsular/posterior), visibility (macro/micro/occult-angle), orientation (horizontal/vertical/oblique), number (single/double), shape (convex/triangular/pyramidal/ring/lumpy/inverse), and color (white/yellow/pink/brown/black). Associated findings were then assessed; acute/chronic, spontaneous/provoked, unilateral/bilateral, inflammatory/non-inflammatory, suppurative (non-sterile)/non-suppurative (sterile), granulomatous/non-granulomatous, recurrent/non-recurrent, shifting/non-shifting, and transient/persistent. The type of precipitation was named (naming) and matched (meshing) to a potential list of etiologies (inflammatory, infective, therapeutic, masquerades). Given that (pseudo)hypopyon predominantly afflicts younger patients in their most productive years, clinicians supervising such patients should be aware of all sediment characteristics. The ophthalmologist should never ask non-ophthalmologists to run the full battery of tests in a patient with (pseudo)hypopyon, and rather indicate which type of collection is present, what its pathognomonic feature is, and what the most likely diagnoses to be excluded are.