BACKGROUND: In recent years, intramedullary nails with medial support screws for proximal humeral fractures have become available. Although these devices have a potential risk of iatrogenic axillary nerve injury, no studies have investigated the anatomical relationship between the medial support screws in the modern intramedullary nail and the axillary nerve. This study aimed to clarify the anatomical relationship between the medial support screws in the intramedullary nail and the axillary nerve.
METHODS: In total, 29 cadaveric shoulders (mean age: 82.6 years old (range: 61-105); 15 males and 14 females) were included in this study. Shoulders within whole-body cadavers were used in all cases. A single proximal humeral nail with medial support screws (ARISTO Proximal Humeral Nail; MDM, Tokyo, Japan) was used. The distance of each medial support screw from the axillary nerve and its branches was measured.
RESULTS: In two (6.90%) of 29 shoulders, the axillary nerves came into contact with the medial support screws. In the remaining 27 of 29 shoulders (93.1%), the nerves were located proximal to the medial support screws.
CONCLUSIONS: Medial support screws in proximal humeral fracture nails had the potential to injure the axillary nerve and its branches.

Background: The morphology of proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) is complex, and the fixation and selection of implants need to be guided by the fracture type and classification, which requires an accurate understanding of the fracture line. This study had three purposes. 1) Define and analyze the fracture lines and morphological features of all types PHFs by three-dimensional (3D) mapping technology. 2) Determine the osteotomy position of the biomechanical model of the PHFs according to the fracture heat map. 3) Based on the analysis of the pathological morphology and distribution of a large number of consecutive cases of PHFs, propose a novel classification of PHFs. Methods: We retrospectively collected 220 cases of PHFs and generated a 3D fracture map and heat map based on computed tomography (CT) imaging. Through analysis of the fracture morphology of the 220 PHFs, a novel classification was proposed. The primary criterion for staging was the continuity between the humeral head and the greater tuberosity and lesser tuberosity, and the secondary criterion was the relationship between the humeral head segment and the humeral shaft. Results: The fracture line was primarily found around the metaphyseal zone of region of the surgical neck, with the most extensive distribution being below the larger tuberosity and on the posterior medial side of the epiphysis. We suggest that the osteotomy gap should be immediately (approximately 5-10 mm) below the lower edge of the articular surface. The most common type of fracture was type I3 (33 cases, 15.0%), followed by type IV3 fracture (23 cases, 10.4%), and type III2 fracture (22 cases, 10.0%). Interobserver and intraobserver reliability analysis for the fracture classification revealed a k value (95% confidence interval) of 0.639 (0.57-0.71) and 0.841, P < 0.01, respectively. Conclusion: In this study, the fracture line and morphological characteristics of PHFs were clarified in detail by 3D mapping technique. In addition, a new classification method was proposed by analysis of the morphological characteristics of 220 PHFs, A two-part fracture model for PHFs is also proposed.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to provide up-to-date evidence on the outcomes for hemiarthroplasties (HAs) that were performed using modern third-generation prostheses (post-2004) for isolated (excluding head-splits and fracture-dislocations) three-and four-part proximal humerus fractures (PHFs).
UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Medline, Embase and the Cochrane register were searched from January 1, 2012, to November 15, 2022, conforming to the PRISMA guidelines. The outcome measures were the complication rates, revision rates, surgery-related postoperative mortality, post-operative clinical outcome scores and radiological outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: 432 hemiarthroplasties in 432 patients were performed across the 11 eligible studies (two prospective and 9 retrospective). Three studies compared HA versus reverse shoulder replacement (RSR); one study compared HA with locking plate fixation (LPF) and RSR; one study compared HA with LPF. 61.1 % and 19.4 % of hemiarthroplasties were performed using cemented and uncemented techniques respectively, while cementing data was ill-defined in 19.4 % of shoulders. The results for the outcome measures have been derived directly from the included studies and no statistical pooling was performed, due to heterogeneity in the different study designs and outcomes. Descriptive data synthesis from the included studies showed that third generation HAs have higher overall postoperative complication rates, with similar revision and mortality rates when compared to RSR and LPF for three-and four-part PHFs. RSR and LPF showed better statistically significant improvements than HA for the Constant-Murley score, Quick DASH, forward flexion and abduction. Mixed results were observed for the DASH score, ASES score and internal rotation ROM between RSR/LPF versus HA.
UNASSIGNED: Low to moderate quality evidence from this review showed that even third-generation HA prostheses provided worse overall outcomes than RSR and LPF for three-and four-part PHFs.

UNASSIGNED: The potential role of deltoid muscle density in the occurrence of proximal humeral fractures remains uncertain. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to examine the correlation between deltoid muscle density, as measured by CT attenuation value in Hounsfield units (HU), and the incidence of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. By investigating this association, we aim to shed light on the possible influence of deltoid muscle density on fracture risk in this specific population.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 68 patients with computed tomography (CT) images were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 34 patients presented with fractures following low-energy injuries, while the remaining 34 patients served as controls and underwent CT scans after low-energy injuries without any fractures. The muscle density of the deltoid muscles was assessed at the approximate tubercle of humerus. We compared these parameters between the two groups and conducted analyses considering factors such as age, sex, laterality, and deltoid muscle density of the shoulders.
UNASSIGNED: The demographic factors related to the shoulder did not exhibit any significant association with proximal humeral fracture. However, we observed a noteworthy difference in deltoid muscle density between patients with fractures (40.85 ± 1.35) and the control group (47.08 ± 1.61) (p = 0.0042), indicating a lower muscle density in the fracture group.
UNASSIGNED: Based on the findings of this study, we can conclude that there exists a negative correlation between deltoid muscle density and the incidence of proximal humeral fractures. These results suggest that lower deltoid muscle density may be associated with an increased risk of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly population under investigation.

UNASSIGNED: To assess fracture union rates using novel intramedullary plate technique. Post-operative humeral neck-shaft angles, patient range of motion and complication profile were secondary outcomes of interest.
UNASSIGNED: Single surgeon, retrospective case series of surgical technique at major trauma centre in Scotland. A 2.0mm mini-fragment plate was secured to the humeral head to act as an intramedullary strut during fixation in complex proximal humerus fractures. Fracture union and neck-shaft angle were assessed radiologically, whilst range of motion and complication profiles were assessed clinically.
UNASSIGNED: Twelve patients were followed up for an average of 10 months post-operatively. All achieved bony union with a mean neck-shaft angle of 128°. Mean range of motion values were 100° forward elevation, 83° abduction, 60° internal rotation and 37° external rotation. Four patients required further surgical intervention- two for hardware prominence, one for adhesive capsulitis and one for subsequent rotator cuff failure. There were no cases of avascular necrosis or infection.
UNASSIGNED: This novel technique addresses the established biomechanical propensity of proximal humerus fractures to fail in varus collapse and screw cut-out. This method provides an alternative to arthroplasty in the most severe proximal humerus fractures and is readily adopted via standard orthopaedic kit.

BACKGROUND: Most studies infer increasing incidence of proximal humeral fractures (PHF) from the 1950´s until the 1990´s. Recent time trends are less clear.
OBJECTIVE: Our primary objective was to identify time trends in the age- and sex-adjusted adult incidence of PHF in Malmö, Sweden, from year 1944 until 2020. Our secondary objectives were to describe the variation in incidence according to age, the monthly distribution, and to compare data from the two most recent decades with earlier.
METHODS: Malmö has one emergency hospital where acute fractures are treated. We identified PHF in adult patients (≥ 18 years) by reviewing relevant radiology examinations during 17 sample years from year 1944 to 2020. We used jointpoint analyses to estimate time trends.
RESULTS: We identified 3 031 PHF during the study period (3 231 161 person years), 73% were sustained by women with mean age of 69 years (mean age in men 59). Joinpoint analyses indicated an increase in the age- and sex-adjusted incidence of PHF from year 1944 (52 per 100 000 person years) until 1977 (120 per 100 000) and thereafter a decrease until 2020 (85 per 100 000). A seasonal variation with more fractures during winter months, was apparent in earlier but not recent decades.
CONCLUSIONS: The age- and sex-adjusted incidence of PHF increased in Malmö, Sweden, from the 1940´s until year 1977 and thereafter decreased until 2020. More fractures were seen during winter months in earlier but not recent decades.

Bevezetés: A proximalis humerustörések előfordulása gyakori, melyben további emelkedő tendencia várható. Az érintettek többsége az idősödő, ezáltal már gyakran gyengült csontszerkezettel rendelkező populációból kerül ki. Az elmozdult, többrészes töréssel rendelkező esetek adekvát kezelése gyakran kihívást jelent, különösen a már osteoporosis által is érintett felkarfej esetén. Műtéti ellátása során a leggyakrabban a szögstabil lemezrendszerekkel történő rögzítés használatos, a komplikációk azonban nem elhanyagolhatók, az elért funkcionális eredmények pedig gyakran szerények. Az intra-, illetve posztoperatív szövődmények csökkentésére, illetve a sérülés utáni funkció lehető legjobb helyreállítására az elmúlt időszakban fokozott figyelem fordult. Célkitűzés és módszerek: A valgizáló helyzetű szögstabil lemezelési módszert intézetünkben 2019 vége óta alkalmazzuk a már gyengült csontszerkezettel rendelkező multifragmentális felkarfejtörések rutinszerű kezelésében. Jelen vizsgálatunk során 46, 65 év feletti páciens (életkor 76,1 ± 7,9 év) 47 három-, illetve négyrész-törésének lemezelése mellett elért rövid távú funkcionális eredményeinket értékeltük retrospektív módon. Eredmények: Vizsgálatunk során az esetek 76%-ában tapasztaltunk jó, 120° feletti abductiós és flexiós értékeket. A Constant–Murley Score összesített eredménye 80,2 ± 12,5-nek mutatkozott. A 17,3 ± 9,4 hónapos utánkövetés során 23 esetben kitűnő, 14-nél jó, 7-nél kielégítő, míg 3-nál gyenge funkcionális eredményeket tapasztaltunk. A funkcionális eredmények szignifikáns kapcsolatot mutattak az életkorral (p = 0,009), illetve az alapbetegségekkel (p = 0,016), azonban a törés jellegétől, a BMI-től vagy a sérült oldaltól függetlennek mutatkoztak. Az összesített komplikációs rátát 6,4%-nak, a revíziós rátát 4,3%-nak találtuk. Neurológiai deficitet, pseudoarthrosist vagy avascularis felkarfejnecrosist nem észleltünk. Következtetés: Tapasztalataink szerint az általunk az időskori proximalis humerustörések esetén alkalmazott valgizáló helyzetű szögstabil lemezes osteosynthesis – az optimalizált fej-, illetve lemezhelyzet miatt – az esetek többségénél kiemelkedően jó funkcionális eredményeket biztosít, illetve jelentősen csökkenti a posztoperatív komplikációk előfordulását. A módszer kifejezetten jól alkalmazható elmozdult három-, vagy négyrész-törések esetén, gyengült, osteoporoticus csontszerkezet mellett is. Orv Hetil. 2024; 165(20): 775–784.

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has become an increasingly popular treatment strategy in the management of complex proximal humeral fractures (PHFs). However, no definitive consensus has been reached regarding the optimal surgical timing of RTSA following PHF, particularly considering nonoperative management is often a viable option. Therefore, the aim of this study was (1) to identify optimal timing intervals that maximize the likelihood of revision following RTSA and (2) to determine differences in revision etiologies using the identified timing intervals.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing PHF-indicated RTSA from 2010 to 2021 was conducted using a national administrative claims database. Stratum-specific likelihood ratio (SSLR) analysis was conducted to determine data-driven timing strata between PHF and RTSA that maximized the likelihood of revision surgery within 2 years of RTSA. To control for confounders, multivariable regression analysis was conducted to confirm the identified data-driven strata\'s association with 2-year revision rates as well as compare the likelihood of various indications for revision including mechanical loosening, dislocation, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), and periprosthetic fracture (PPF).
RESULTS: In total, 11,707 patients undergoing TSA following PHF were included in this study. SSLR analysis identified 2 timing categories: 0-6 weeks and 7-52 weeks from the time of PHF to TSA surgery. Relative to the 0-6-week cohort, the 7-52-week cohort was more likely to undergo revision surgery within 2 years (OR 1.93, P < .001). Moreover, the 7-52-week cohort had significantly higher odds of revision indicated for dislocation (OR 2.24, P < .001), mechanical loosening (OR 1.71, P < .001), PJI (OR 1.74, P < .001), and PPF (OR 1.96, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Using SSLR, we were successful in identifying 2 data-driven timing strata between PHF and RTSA that maximized the likelihood of 2-year revision surgery. As it can be difficult to determine whether RTSA or nonoperative management is initially more appropriate, considering the results of this study, an early trial of 4-6 weeks of nonoperative management may be appropriate without altering the risks associated with RTSA.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes following proximal humeral fracture (PHF) may be impacted by a range of clinical, fracture and premorbid factors. The aim of this study was to examine factors impacting hospital admission; length of stay (LOS) and new discharge destination for patients presenting to hospital with PHF.
METHODS: Retrospective audit conducted at a tertiary health service. Data was collected from adult patients presenting to hospital with a PHF over a 54-month period. Fractures that were pathological or sustained during admission were excluded. Univariable and multivariable logistic and negative binomial regression were used to explore factors associated with hospital admission, LOS and new discharge destination.
RESULTS: Data were analyzed from 701 participants (age 70 years (IQR 60, 81); 72.8% female); 276 (39.4%) participants required a hospital admission. New discharge destination was required for 109 (15.5%) participants, of whom 49 (45%) changed from home alone to home with family/friend(s). Greater comorbidities, as indicated by the Charlson Comorbidity Index score, were associated with hospital admission, longer LOS and new discharge destination. Premorbid living situations of home with family/friend(s) or from an external care facility were associated with a decreased likelihood of hospital admission, shorter LOS and reduced risk of a new discharge destination. Surgical treatment was associated with shorter LOS. Older age and dementia diagnosis were associated with a new discharge destination.
CONCLUSIONS: Many factors potentially impact on the likelihood or risk of hospitalization, LOS and new discharge destination post PHF. Patients with greater comorbidities are more likely to have negative outcomes, while patients who had premorbid living situations of home with family/friend(s) or from an external care facility are more likely to have positive outcomes. Early identification of factors that may impact patient outcomes may assist timely decision making in hospital settings. Further research should focus on developing tools to predict hospital outcomes in the PHF population.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared to nonoperative treatment for patients presenting with complex proximal fractures have been rarely explored. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the functional results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty with those of nonsurgical treatment in patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures.
METHODS: A multicentric prospective randomized control trial of patients older than 70 years who sustained an acute proximal humeral fracture (3 or 4 parts), with less than 3 weeks of evolution, and had no previous condition or surgery on the affected shoulder was conducted. Patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group (implantation of a reverse shoulder arthroplasty and tuberosities reattachment) or the control group (nonoperative treatment). Functional outcome was assessed using the Constant-Murley score (CMS) at the 1-year follow-up. Complications and reinterventions were considered secondary outcomes. The power of the study relied on the inclusion of 81 patients to recognize a statistically significant difference of 10 points between CMS scores in the groups. Analysis was performed based on the intention to treat principle.
RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were randomized to surgical treatment or nonoperative treatment, while 66 patients completed the 1-year follow-up evaluation. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age (76.1 yo vs. 77.43 yo, P = .43), sex (81.08% women in the surgical group vs. 84.09% in the nonoperative group, P = .72), or type of fracture according to Neer\'s classification system (P = .06). At the 1-year follow-up, the group assigned to undergo the intervention had better functional outcomes than the nonoperative treatment group (mean CMS; 61.24, SD: 13.33 vs. mean CMS: 52.44, SD: 16.22, P: .02), with a mean difference of 8.84 points, 95% CI (1.57, 16.11). Two patients in the intervention group (6.5%) suffered major complications (periprosthetic joint infection and axillary nerve palsy). No major complications were observed in the nonoperative group. One patient in the intervention group underwent secondary surgery for a periprosthetic joint infection.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with reverse shoulder arthroplasty provides superior functional outcomes compared with conservative treatment for patients presenting with an acute proximal humeral fracture. The difference in CMS is close to the clinically significant thresholds, and some harms are associated with the operative treatment.