背景:早期开始产前护理已被广泛接受,以改善母亲及其婴儿的妊娠健康结局。确定患者经历的各种进入护理的障碍,可以告知和改善医疗保健提供,反过来,提高患者接受必要护理的能力。
目的:本研究采用了一种混合方法方法来建立方法和程序,以确定在医学上脆弱的患者人群中早期进入产前护理的障碍,以及未来质量改进计划的领域。
方法:对在布鲁克林一家联邦合格的大型健康中心妊娠头三个月后开始产前护理的产科患者进行了初步图表审查,NY,以确定患者指定的延误原因。结合参数和非参数分析对这些数据进行了主题分析,以表征感兴趣的人群,并确定延迟进入的主要决定因素。
结果:感兴趣人群中患者的年龄(n=169)为双峰,范围为15-43年,平均28年。进入产前护理的平均胎龄为19周。图表评论显示,最近有8%的人从纽约或美国以外的地方搬到了布鲁克林。9%的人在怀孕的头三个月内很难安排初次产前检查。少女怀孕占7%。注意到提供者对文档的挑战(21%)。确定的最常见的主题(n=155)是患者正在过渡(21%),意外怀孕(17%),以及与护理挂钩的问题(15%),包括没有显示或病人取消。产前护理迟到的患者与同龄人也有很大不同,因为他们更有可能说西班牙语,要年轻,并且在怀孕确认和进入护理之间经历相对较长的延迟。此外,延迟进入治疗的最大决定因素是患者年龄.
结论:我们的研究为其他类似诊所提供了一个过程,以识别有延迟进入产前护理风险的患者,并强调了进入的常见障碍。未来的举措包括引入智能数据元素,以记录延迟的原因,并在没有预约或取消患者后使用社区卫生工作者进行专门的外展。
BACKGROUND: Early initiation of prenatal care is widely accepted to improve the health outcomes of pregnancy for both mothers and their infants. Identification of the various barriers to entry into care that patients experience may inform and improve health care provision and, in turn, improve the patient\'s ability to receive necessary care.
OBJECTIVE: This study implements a mixed-methods approach to establish methods and procedures for identifying barriers to early entry to prenatal care in a medically-vulnerable patient population and areas for future quality improvement initiatives.
METHODS: An initial chart review was conducted on obstetrics patients that initiated prenatal care after their first trimester at a large federally qualified health center in Brooklyn, NY, to determine patient-specified reasons for delay. A thematic analysis of these data was implemented in combination with both parametric and non-parametric analyses to characterize the population of interest, and to identify the primary determinants of delayed entry.
RESULTS: The age of patients in the population of interest (n = 169) was bimodal, with a range of 15 - 43 years and a mean of 28 years. The mean gestational age of entry into prenatal care was 19 weeks. The chart review revealed that 8% recently moved to Brooklyn from outside of NYC or the USA. Nine percent had difficulty scheduling an initial prenatal visit within their first trimester. Teenage pregnancy accounted for 7%. Provider challenges with documentation (21%) were noted. The most common themes identified (n = 155) were the patient being in transition (21%), the pregnancy being unplanned (17%), and issues with linkage to care (15%), including no shows or patient cancellations. Patients who were late to prenatal care also differed from their peers dramatically, as they were more likely to be Spanish-speaking, to be young, and to experience a relatively long delay between pregnancy confirmation and entry into care. Moreover, the greatest determinant of delayed entry into care was patient age.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a process for other like clinics to identify patients who are at risk for delayed entry to prenatal care and highlight common barriers to entry. Future initiatives include the introduction of a smart data element to document reasons for delay and use of community health workers for dedicated outreach after no show appointments or patient cancellations.