Soils in semiarid riparian ecosystems have large carbon (C) stocks that promote water and nutrient availability for productive plant communities consumed by grazing animals. Changes to riparian hydrologic conditions caused by channel incision result in different edaphic conditions and a greater abundance of upland plant species that may be associated with lower soil C stocks. Using riparian meadows alongside Maggie Creek in central Nevada, we show that 27 years of modified grazing practices can repair ecosystem processes and increase the C stocks. We compared C and nitrogen (N) stocks (of soils and plant biomass) on floodplains, terraces, and uplands of reaches where grazing was either modified or excluded to reaches where no changes to grazing practices were made. Grazing management allowed beaver to establish, improving hydrology and lengthening the growing season. These changes allowed C and N to accumulate on geomorphic surfaces that extended from the stream channel to the surrounding hillslopes. A stoichiometric relationship between C and N shows carbon sequestration can reduce nutrient runoff to nearby waterways and may depend on nitrogen availability. Gains in ecosystem carbon ranged from 93 to 452 g C m-2 y-1 and were dominated by increases in soil C. Gains in soil C occurred across the full depth range measured (0-45 cm) and were comparable to those found in restored wetlands and meadows located in more humid ecosystems. Carbon gains exhibited substantial variability caused by microtopography and plant community composition. While grazing exclusion resulted in the largest gains in ecosystem C, managed grazing that limited consumption of riparian plants increased ecosystem C relative to reaches where management wasn\'t changed. We demonstrate that managed grazing that maintains ecosystem process is compatible with projects aimed at increasing soil carbon in semiarid riparian rangelands.

Rivers and their floodplains have been severely degraded with increasing global activity and expenditure undertaken on restoration measures to address the degradation. Early restoration schemes focused on habitat creation with mixed ecological success. Part of the lack of ecological success can be attributed to the lack of effective monitoring. The current focus of river restoration practice is the restoration of physical processes and functioning of systems. The ecological assessment of restoration schemes may need to follow the same approach and consider whether schemes restore functional diversity in addition to taxonomic diversity. This paper examines whether two restoration schemes, on lowland UK rivers, restored macroinvertebrate taxonomic and functional (trait) diversity and relates the findings to the Bradshaw\'s model of ecological restoration. The study schemes are considered a success in terms of restoring physical processes, longitudinal connectivity and the resulting habitat composition. However, the rehabilitation of macroinvertebrate community structure and function was limited and inconsistent, varying over time, depending on the restoration measure applied and the taxonomic or functional index considered. Resampling of species pools at each site revealed a role for functional redundancy, meaning that increases in functional diversity are more difficult to achieve than outcomes based on taxonomic analyses. Our results highlight the usefulness of applying functional traits alongside taxonomic indices in evaluating river restoration projects.