Problem-solving ability

解决问题的能力
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    领导越来越成为与第四次工业革命相关的高等教育形式的优先事项;然而,很少有研究在药学教育的背景下研究它。这项研究调查了沟通能力的水平,批判性思维倾向,解决问题的能力,和药学学生的领导,并确定了与领导力相关的因素。
    这项研究是使用全国性的横断面在线调查和自编问卷进行的。来自韩国全部35所药学院的三至六年级药学专业学生共416人,2019年9月1日至15日完成调查。数据采用描述性统计分析,t检验,皮尔森的相关性,和多元回归分析。我们通过探索性因子分析验证了结构的有效性。
    药学专业的学生表现出中等程度的沟通能力,批判性思维倾向,解决问题的能力,和领导力。沟通能力之间存在显著正相关(r=0.724,p<0.001),批判性思维倾向(r=0.615,p<0.001),解决问题的能力(r=0.599,p<0.001),和领导力。调整控制变量后,沟通能力(β=0.319,p<0.001)是领导能力的最显著预测因子(F=104.12,p<0.001,R2=0.756)。
    这项研究表明,学生的领导力受到他们有效沟通能力的影响,批判性思考,和解决问题。药学教育工作者应承认并实施创新的课程和评估方法,为药学学生的专业道路做好准备。
    UNASSIGNED: Leadership is increasingly becoming a priority in the forms of higher education associated with the Fourth Industrial Revolution; however, few studies have examined it in the context of pharmacy education. This study investigated the levels of communication competence, critical thinking disposition, problem-solving ability, and leadership of pharmacy students, and identified factors related to leadership.
    UNASSIGNED: This study was conducted using a nationwide cross-sectional online survey with a self-administered questionnaire. A total of 416 third-to-sixth-year pharmacy students from all 35 pharmacy schools in South Korea, completed the survey from September 1 to 15, 2019. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, Pearson\'s correlations, and multiple regression analysis. We verified construct validity by performing an exploratory factor analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: The pharmacy students revealed a moderate level of communication skills, critical thinking disposition, problem-solving ability, and leadership. Significant positive correlations were found among communication competence (r=0.724, p<0.001), critical thinking disposition (r=0.615, p<0.001), problem-solving ability (r=0.599, p<0.001), and leadership. After adjustment for control variables, communication competence (β=0.319, p<0.001) was found to be the most significant predictor of leadership (F=104.12, p<0.001, R2=0.756).
    UNASSIGNED: This study showed that the students\' leadership was influenced by their competence in communicating effectively, thinking critically, and solving problems. Pharmacy educators should acknowledge and implement innovative curriculum and assessment approaches in preparing pharmacy students for their professional paths.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:护理研究技能对于指导循证实践和加强医疗保健至关重要。然而,护理本科生经常遇到技能发展的挑战,因为课程限制优先考虑临床教育。弥合这一技能差距对于为学生做好循证实践和护理奖学金的准备至关重要。
    目的:本研究旨在探讨将行动学习纳入本科护理研究班对提高护士教育质量的影响。
    方法:采用混合方法方法,使用在线前和在线后调查进行定量分析,并使用反思期刊进行定性分析。
    方法:这项研究是在首尔的一所护理学院进行的,韩国。
    方法:对19名四年级护理专业学生的便利样本进行了研究。
    方法:实施了基于行动学习的护理研究课程十次,整合讲座和团队活动。关于沟通技巧的评估前和评估后数据,批判性思维倾向,并使用配对t检验分析问题解决能力。定性分析涉及个人和团队反思期刊的内容分析。
    结果:基于行动学习的护理研究课程的参与者在沟通技巧方面表现出了显着提高(t=3.46,p=0.002),批判性思维倾向(t=3.80,p=0.001),和解决问题的能力(t=1.82,p=0.043)。通过对反思性期刊的分析,开发了四个主要主题:有组织的团队项目,学习目标成就的动态,学习成果的扩展应用,以及更好的基于行动学习的课程的建议。
    结论:本研究强调行动学习是一种有效的教育方法,将理论和实践结合在护士教育中,帮助学生为将来担任护理专业人员的角色做准备。研究结果强调了行动学习在提高护理本科生的研究能力方面的有效性,并支持了持续发展此类教学方法的必要性。
    Research skills in nursing are crucial for guiding evidence-based practice and enhancing health care. However, undergraduate nursing students often encounter challenges in skill development because of curriculum constraints that prioritize clinical education. Bridging this skill gap is imperative for preparing students for evidence-based practice and nursing scholarship.
    This study aimed to investigate the impact of incorporating action learning into undergraduate nursing research classes to improve the quality of nurse education.
    A mixed-methods approach was employed using pre- and post-online surveys for quantitative analysis and reflective journals for qualitative analysis.
    The study was conducted at a college of nursing in Seoul, South Korea.
    A convenience sample of 19 fourth-year nursing students participated in the study.
    Action learning-based nursing research classes were implemented over ten sessions, integrating lectures and team activities. Pre- and post-assessment data on communication skills, critical thinking tendencies, and problem-solving abilities were analyzed using paired t-tests. The qualitative analysis involved content analysis of individual and team reflective journals.
    Participants in action learning-based nursing research classes showed significant improvements in their communication skills (t = 3.46, p = 0.002), critical thinking tendencies (t = 3.80, p = 0.001), and problem-solving abilities (t = 1.82, p = 0.043). From the analysis of reflective journals four main themes were developed: organized team projects, dynamics of learning goal achievement, extended application of learning outcomes, and recommendations for better action learning-based classes.
    This study highlights action learning as an effective educational method that integrates theory and practice in nurse education, helping students prepare for their future roles as nursing professionals. The findings underscore the effectiveness of action learning in improving undergraduate nursing students\' research competency and support the need for continued development of such pedagogical approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项系统回顾和荟萃分析研究了循证实践(EBP)教育计划对本科护生的影响,专注于提高EBP能力,批判性思维,和解决问题的能力。
    方法:搜索,通过PubMed进行,科克伦图书馆,EMBASE,CINAHL,和截至2023年12月的WebofScience,包括以英语和韩语发表的研究,并遵守PRISMA指南。使用修订的ROBII进行随机试验,使用ROBINS-I进行非随机试验。对于荟萃分析,干预的效应大小计算为标准化平均差.
    结果:在我们的研究中,11项研究符合我们的纳入标准,其中8项研究纳入荟萃分析。EBP能力的影响大小,批判性思维,解决问题的能力分别为1.55、1.29和0.65。荟萃回归分析表明,量身定制的4-7周教育计划并进入4年级可显着提高EBP能力。
    结论:这些发现支持为学生积极开发可定制和应用的EBP教育,准备护理学生在毕业后在临床环境中有效实施EBP。尽管结果变量的影响大小显著,高度异质性提示需要进一步调查以验证护理专业学生的EBP教育结果.
    This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of evidence-based practice (EBP) education programs on undergraduate nursing students, focusing on enhancing EBP competency, critical thinking, and problem-solving ability.
    METHODS: The search, conducted through PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science up to December 2023, included studies published in English and Korean and adhered to PRISMA guidelines. Qualitative appraisal of the studies was conducted using the revised ROB II for randomized trials and the ROBINS-I for non-randomized trials. For the meta-analysis, the effect size of the intervention was calculated as a standardized mean difference.
    RESULTS: In our study, 11 studies met our inclusion criteria, and 8 studies of those were included in the meta-analysis. The effect sizes for EBP competency, critical thinking, and problem-solving ability were 1.55, 1.29, and 0.65, respectively. The meta-regression analysis indicated that tailored education programs of 4-7 weeks and being in the 4th grade significantly enhanced EBP competency.
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the development of a customizable and applied EBP education actively for students, preparing nursing students to effectively implement EBP in clinical settings after graduation. Despite the significant effect size of the outcome variables, the high heterogeneity suggests the need for further investigation to validate the EBP educational outcomes for nursing students.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    YumikawaD,佐藤M,KamedaN.Kaifuki康复病房住院患者赋权量表的开发:验证该量表的有效性和可靠性以及赋权量表与FIM之间的差异。JpnJComprRehabilSci2021;12:38-47。
    Kaifuki康复病房(KRW)为患者提供支持,以提高进行日常生活活动和获得自主性的能力。独立解决问题的能力,定义为赋权,对出院后的生活至关重要。本研究的目的是开发一种新的KRW赋权量表,并验证其有效性和可靠性。
    这种新的量表是通过从以前的开发赋权量表的工作中选择适合KRW的项目来创建的。对量表的有效性和可靠性进行评估,并将该量表与功能独立性测量(FIM)进行比较基于159个响应。
    尽管18个项目中有3个显示出反应偏差,量表的因素结构表现出中等有效性(RMSEA=0.083,子量表与总分的相关系数=0.61-0.83)。并发有效性和内部一致性总体良好,在组内相关系数中,总分的重测信度为0.93。FIM和新量表之间没有相关性。
    开发的授权量表具有一定的有效性和可靠性,并且可能提供与FIM不同的结果。
    Yumikawa D, Sato M, Kameda N. Development of an empowerment scale for inpatients in the Kaifukuki Rehabilitation Ward: validation of the validity and reliability of the scale and difference between the empowerment scale and the FIM. Jpn J Compr Rehabil Sci 2021; 12: 38-47.
    UNASSIGNED: The Kaifukuki Rehabilitation Ward (KRW) provides patients with support for improving the ability to perform activities of daily living and acquiring autonomy. The ability to solve problems independently, defined as empowerment, is crucial for life after hospital discharge. The purpose of this study was to develop a new empowerment scale for KRWs and verify its validity and reliability.
    UNASSIGNED: This new scale was created by selecting items suitable for KRWs from previous work on developing empowerment scales. The assessment of the validity and reliability of the scale and a comparison of this scale with the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) were performed based on 159 responses.
    UNASSIGNED: Although three of the 18 items showed response biases, the factor structure of the scale showed moderate validity (RMSEA = 0.083, correlation coefficient between subscale and total score = 0.61 - 0.83). The concurrent validity and internal consistency were generally good, and the test-retest reliability of the total score was 0.93 in the intraclass correlation coefficients. There was no correlation between the FIM and the new scale.
    UNASSIGNED: The developed empowerment scale has certain validity and reliability and may provide a different outcome than the FIM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:解决问题的能力已被确定为护理专业学生应发展的核心能力,它在职业发展中起着至关重要的作用。因此,在护理专业学生的背景下,有必要调查与问题解决能力相关的因素以及这些因素之间的路径关系。
    目的:本研究旨在确定影响解决问题能力的因素,并研究自我导向学习能力的路径关系,批判性思维能力,学习参与,和护理专业学生解决问题的能力。
    方法:横断面研究。
    方法:上海某高校护理系,中国。
    方法:本研究共纳入540名接受三年教育的护生。
    方法:使用结构化问卷收集数据,包括一般信息,学习参与,自主学习能力,批判性思维能力,护理专业学生解决问题的能力。皮尔森的相关性被用来探索学习参与度之间的关系,自主学习能力,批判性思维能力,和解决问题的能力。利用AMOS软件构建结构方程模型对路径关系进行分析。
    结果:我们的结果表明,学习投入,自主学习能力,批判性思维能力与解决问题能力呈正相关。此外,学习投入没有直接影响解决问题的能力,但它通过自我导向学习能力和批判性思维能力间接影响护生解决问题的能力。此外,自我导向学习(0.442)和批判性思维能力(0.581)对解决问题能力的总影响比学习投入(0.361)更显著。
    结论:为提高护生解决问题的能力,护理教育工作者应制定有针对性的策略来提高学习参与度,自主学习能力,和批判性思维能力。
    BACKGROUND: Problem-solving ability has been identified as a core competence that nursing students should develop, and it plays a vital role in career development. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate factors related to problem-solving ability and the path relationships among those factors in the context of nursing students.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify the factors that affect problem-solving ability, and to investigate path relationships of self-directed learning ability, critical thinking ability, learning engagement, and problem-solving ability among nursing students.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional study.
    METHODS: The Department of Nursing at a university located in Shanghai, China.
    METHODS: A total of 540 nursing students with a three-year education program were enrolled in the current study.
    METHODS: Data were collected by using a structured questionnaire, including general information, learning engagement, self-directed learning ability, critical thinking ability, and problem-solving ability of nursing students. Pearson\'s correlations were used to explore the relationships between learning engagement, self-directed learning ability, critical thinking ability, and problem-solving ability. The path relationships were analyzed by constructing a structural equation model using AMOS software.
    RESULTS: Our results showed that learning engagement, self-directed learning ability, and critical thinking ability were positively associated with problem-solving ability. Furthermore, learning engagement did not influence problem-solving ability directly, but it affected problem-solving ability indirectly via self-directed learning ability and critical thinking ability among nursing students. Additionally, the total effects of self-directed learning (0.442) and critical thinking ability (0.581) were more prominent than learning engagement (0.361) on problem-solving ability.
    CONCLUSIONS: To improve the problem-solving ability of nursing students, nursing educators should develop targeted strategies to enhance learning engagement, self-directed learning ability, and critical thinking ability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    工业革命4.0的现象目前强调快速的技术进步。需要在技术开发方面进行创新,以更有效地包装当前的学习过程,其中之一是学习媒体的发展,这是学习过程的重要组成部分,当然是针对有意义的学习,鼓励学生发展21世纪的技能作为教育领域的紧迫性。本研究旨在1)基于细胞呼吸材料的案例方法,开发具有清晰故事情节的交互式学习媒体。2)查看学生对交互式学习媒体的反应,根据细胞呼吸材料的案例方法来表达故事情节,以训练学生解决问题的能力。这项研究是一项研究与开发(R&D)。本研究中的开发模型使用了分析,设计,发展,实施,和评估(ADDIE)模型,这项研究一直进行到开发阶段。本研究使用的工具是一份开放式问卷,材料方面验证表,媒体方面验证表和教学方面验证表。所使用的分析技术是描述性定性分析技术和定量分析,通过找到从验证者的评估中获得的平均得分并查看标准。这项研究的结果获得了非常有效的交互式学习媒体,在非常有效的类别中,获得了3.9分的材料专家验证者,3.69非常有效类别的媒体专家验证者,有效类别中3.47的教学专家验证者。可以得出结论,基于案例方法开发的清晰故事情节交互式学习媒体可以提高学生的解决问题的能力。
    The phenomenon of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 currently emphasizes rapid technological advances. There is a need for innovation in technology development to package the current learning process more effectively, one of which is the development of learning media which is an important part of the learning process and is certainly directed at meaningful learning that encourages students to develop 21st Century skills as an urgency in the field of education. This study aims to 1) Develop interactive learning media with an articulate storyline based on a case method on cellular respiration material. 2) Look at students\' responses to the interactive learning media articulate storyline based on the case method on cellular respiration material in training students\' problem-solving skills. This research is a Research and Development (R & D). The development model in this study uses the Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation (ADDIE) model, this research was carried out until the Development stage. The instruments used in this study were an open questionnaire sheet, material aspect validation sheet, media aspect validation sheet and pedagogic aspect validation sheet. The analytical technique used is descriptive qualitative analysis technique and quantitative analysis by finding the average score obtained from the validator\'s assessment and looking at the criteria. The results of this study obtained a very valid interactive learning media with a score of 3.9 material expert validators in the very valid category, 3.69 media expert validators in the very valid category, pedagogical expert validators of 3.47 in the valid category. It can be concluded that the articulate storyline interactive learning media based on the case method developed can improve students\' problem-solving abilities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    生理学实验课程对提高医学生的科学能力具有重要作用。本研究涉及生理学实验室课程中基于问题的自行设计实验的教学改革。研究对象分为两组,即,2019年入学的学生被分配到传统课程对照组(n=146),2021年入学的学生被分配到改良课程测试组(n=128).要求测试组的学生根据每个实验主题的问题进行自行设计的实验,除了完成指定的实验项目。在课程结束时,比较两组学生学习成绩的差异。结果表明,与对照组相比,实验组学生完成指定实验项目的时间较少(P<0.05)。实验组学生在指定实验的操作考核中获得了较好的成绩(P<0.05),纪律竞赛的优胜者人数大幅增加,科研项目的参与者,在试验组中观察到学术出版物。测试组的大多数学生都认为自行设计的实验促进了他们的科学思维,帮助他们更好地理解理论知识,提高了他们的动手操作和团队合作能力。我们的研究表明,我们的教学改革促进了学生的自主学习和解决问题的能力,激发了他们对科学研究的热情,有利于创新型医学人才的培养。
    A physiology laboratory course plays an important role in improving the scientific abilities of medical students. This study involved a teaching reform based on problem-based self-designed experiments in a physiology laboratory course. The study subjects were divided into two groups, i.e., students enrolled in 2019 were assigned to the traditional course control group (n = 146) and students enrolled in 2021 were assigned to the improved course test group (n = 128). Students in the test group were required to conduct self-designed experiments based on the questions for each experimental theme, in addition to completing the specified experimental items. At the end of the course, the differences in academic achievements between the two groups were compared. The results showed that compared to the control group, the students in the test group spent less time finishing the specified experimental items (P < 0.05). More students in the test group obtained good results in the operation assessment for the specified experiments (P < 0.05), and a significant increase in the number of winners in discipline-wise competitions, participants in scientific research projects, and academic publications was observed in the test group. Most of the students in the test group agreed that the self-designed experiment promoted their scientific thinking, helped them better understand theoretical knowledge, and improved their hands-on operation and team cooperation abilities. Our research showed that our teaching reform promoted students\' self-directed learning and problem-solving abilities, stimulated their enthusiasm for scientific research, and was conducive to the cultivation of innovative medical talents.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study involved a teaching reform based on problem-based self-designed experiments in a physiology laboratory course. Students in the test group were required to conduct self-designed experiments based on questions for each experimental theme, in addition to completing the specified experimental items. The results showed that the teaching reform promoted the students\' self-directed learning and problem-solving ability, stimulated their enthusiasm for scientific research, and was conducive to cultivating innovative medical talents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在探讨有和没有自杀意念的初中一年级青少年心理弹性和解决问题能力之间的差异。重点研究这些因素与自杀意念的关系。
    方法:将99名青少年(10至14岁)分为自杀意念(SI,n=49)和非自杀意念(NSI,n=50)按自杀自评观念量表(SIOSS)分组。采用心理弹性量表(PRS)和河内塔任务(TOH)评估心理弹性和解决问题的能力,分别。
    结果:SI组在PRS上的得分明显低于NSI组(p<0.001),而在TOH上的表现则比NSI组差,错误数指数(p<0.001),任务完成时间指数(p<0.05)。在这项研究的所有参与者中,PRS与SIOSS呈显著负相关(r=-0.413,p<0.01)。PRS的子维度包括情绪控制,家庭支持,人际援助与SIOSS总分呈显著负相关(r=-0.361,-0.360,-0.382;p<0.01)。
    结论:本研究分析了有和没有自杀意念的青少年在心理弹性和解决问题能力方面的特点和差异。数据表明,患有SI的青少年可能在心理弹性和解决问题的能力方面存在缺陷,这可能是自杀干预的潜在目标。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore differences between psychological resilience and problem-solving ability in grade one junior middle school adolescents with and without suicidal ideation, focusing on the relationship between these factors and suicidal ideation.
    METHODS: Ninety-nine adolescents (aged 10 to 14) were divided into Suicidal Ideation (SI, n = 49) and Non-Suicidal Ideation (NSI, n = 50) grouped by the Self-rating Idea of Suicide Scale (SIOSS). The Psychological Resilience Scale (PRS) and Tower of Hanoi task (TOH) were applied to assess psychological resilience and problem-solving ability, respectively.
    RESULTS: The SI group scored significantly lower than the NSI group on PRS (p < 0.001) and performed more poorly on TOH than the NSI group, with more mistakes in the number of errors index (p < 0.001) and requiring a longer time in the task completion time index (p < 0.05). Among all the participants in this study, a significant negative correlation was observed between PRS and SIOSS (r = - 0.413, p < 0.01). The sub-dimensions of PRS including emotional control, family support, and interpersonal assistance were significantly negatively correlated with the SIOSS total score (r = - 0.361, - 0.360, - 0.382; p < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study profiled the characteristics and differences in psychological resilience and problem-solving ability between adolescents with and without suicidal ideation. The data suggested adolescents with SI might have deficits in psychological resilience and problem-solving ability, which may serve as potential targets for suicide intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:雇主期望之间的差距,理论和实践是护理教育中最突出、最普遍的问题。新的研究生护士似乎具备学术能力,但在进入临床环境时无法将他们的知识融入实践。雇主表示,批判性思维能力有限是新毕业护士中的常见问题。
    目的:研究以团队为基础的学习(TBL)在培养护生解决问题能力和批判性思维能力方面的功效,并确定TBL在护理教育中使用的策略和障碍。
    方法:实验和准实验研究的系统评价(SR)。
    方法:2022年4月19日,对四个电子数据库进行了全面的数据库搜索:学术搜索总理,CINAHL完成,ERIC,Medline/PubMed。根据本SR的纳入和排除标准,选择了1990年代至2022年的合格研究。
    方法:本SR采用了PRISMA2020指南。使用JBI关键评估清单来评估所选研究的质量。四名审稿人参与了审查过程,以确保研究的严谨性和可信度。
    结果:所审查的六项研究包括一项随机对照试验,一项交叉研究,和四项准实验研究。两项研究评估了TBL在发展批判性思维能力方面的有效性,并表明TBL的支持具有统计学上的显着差异。五项研究评估了TBL在增强解决问题能力方面的有效性。五项研究中的三项在TBL组中表现出了优势。确定了TBL在护理教育中使用的教学策略和障碍。
    结论:TBL可能被认为是一种潜在的以主动学习者为中心的方法,可以在护理教育中发展关键和解决问题的技能。需要进一步的研究来确定实施TBL的最佳持续时间,以培养护生的批判性思维能力和解决问题的能力。
    BACKGROUND: The gaps between employers\' expectations, theory and practice are the most prominent and universal issues in nursing education. New graduate nurses seem to be academically equipped but cannot integrate their knowledge into practice as they enter the clinical settings. Employers expressed limited critical thinking skills are a common problem among new graduate nurses.
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of team-based learning (TBL) in developing problem-solving ability and critical thinking skills among nursing students and to identify the strategies used and obstacles to TBL in nursing education.
    METHODS: Systematic review (SR) of experimental and quasi-experimental studies.
    METHODS: A thorough database search was done on 19 April 2022 with four electronic databases: Academic Search Premier, CINAHL Complete, ERIC, Medline/PubMed. Eligible studies from the 1990s to 2022 were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this SR.
    METHODS: The PRISMA 2020 guideline was applied in this SR. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklists were used to evaluate the quality of the selected studies. Four reviewers participated in the review process to ensure rigour and credibility of the study.
    RESULTS: The six studies reviewed included one randomised control trial, one crossover study, and four quasi-experimental studies. Two studies assessed the effectiveness of TBL in developing critical thinking skills and had shown in favour of TBL with statistically significant differences. Five studies evaluated the effectiveness of TBL in enhancing problem-solving ability. Three of five studies showed favour in TBL groups. The teaching strategies and obstacles in TBL use in nursing education were identified.
    CONCLUSIONS: TBL may be considered a potential active-learner-centred approach to develop critical and problem-solving skills in nursing education. Further research is needed to identify the optimal duration of implementing TBL to develop nursing students\' critical thinking skills and problem-solving abilities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:同理心,情绪智力(EI)和解决问题的能力是影响临床实践中有效沟通的三个重要特征。先前的研究尚未充分探索这三种能力之间的具体关系及其在护理专业学生中的性别差异。
    目的:我们试图调查情绪智力的现状,同理心,以及护理专业学生解决问题的能力,并确定性别差异是否会影响这三个特征,以及如何利用性别差异对护士进行同理心教育。
    方法:我们进行了横断面调查。
    方法:湖南两所三级甲等医院993名护生,中国参与了这项研究。
    方法:使用临床护士共情量表(ENCS)收集数据,临床初级护士情绪智力量表(EIS)和社会问题解决量表(SPSI)。数据采用独立样本t检验分析,皮尔逊相关与分层多元线性回归
    结果:男、女护生的ENCS和SPSI成绩无显著差异,男护生EIS评分较低(P<0.05)。发现ENCS之间存在显着关联,女护理专业学生在大多数维度上的EIS和SPSI,但是在男性中,ENCS和EIS总分之间没有显着关联。通过分层多元回归分析,我们发现问题解决能力是影响男女护生共情变化的最重要因素。
    结论:性别差异不仅反映在情绪智力水平上,也反映在情绪智力之间的关系上。同理心,和解决问题的能力。护理教育者应该意识到性别差异如何影响这三个特征;这对于基于学生能力的教学尤为重要。
    BACKGROUND: Empathy, emotional intelligence (EI) and problem-solving ability are three important characteristics that influence effective communication in clinical practice. Previous studies have not adequately explored the specific relationships between these three abilities and their gender differences among nursing students.
    OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the current state of emotional intelligence, empathy, and problem-solving ability in nursing students and to identify whether gender differences affect these three characteristics and how gender differences can be used to educate nurses on empathy.
    METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey.
    METHODS: A total of 993 nursing students from two grade A tertiary hospitals in Hunan, China participated in this study.
    METHODS: Data were collected using the Empathy of Clinical Nurse Scale (ENCS), Emotional Intelligence Scale of Clinical Junior Nurses (EIS) and Social Problem-Solving Inventory (SPSI). Data were analyzed using an independent samples t-test, Pearson correlation and hierarchical multiple linear regression.
    RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the ENCS and SPSI scores between male and female nursing students, but male nursing students had lower EIS scores (P < 0.05). A significant association was found between ENCS, EIS and SPSI on most dimensions among female nursing students, but no significant association was found between ENCS and EIS for total scores among males. We found that problem-solving ability was the most important factor affecting the variation in empathy for both male and female nursing students through hierarchical multiple regression analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Gender differences are reflected not only in the level of emotional intelligence but also in the relationships between emotional intelligence, empathy, and problem-solving ability. Nursing educators should be aware of how gender differences can affect these three traits; this is particularly important for teaching based on students\' aptitudes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号