Primary patency

初级通畅
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:有有限的证据支持最佳使用血管成形术来维持各种病变部位的血管通路,尽管它在促进肾脏替代治疗和动静脉瘘(AVF)的总体高失败率方面起着关键作用。这项研究旨在确定影响天然上肢血管通路AVF的血管成形术后的原发性和继发性通畅性的协变量。
    方法:这项回顾性研究包括所有在三级血管中心接受了4年以上的血管成形术的患者。记录基线特征,并分析了与原发性和继发性通畅率相关的因素。
    结果:共206例患者(88例男性,在研究期间,平均年龄为68(±14)岁的118名女性)进行了纤维成形术。糖尿病的患病率,缺血性心脏病和抗血小板使用率为33%,21%和70%,分别。在随访期间,每次入路的纤维成形术的中位数为2[1-3]。瘘被归类为放射性头颅(65),头臂(102)和腕臂移位(39)。复发性狭窄(RS)在60例患者中发现,这些患者在研究期间之前曾进行过支架成形术。146例患者有从头狭窄(DNS)。RS和DNS之间的狭窄位置显着不同(p=0.03),DNS主要是吻合,RS主要在中央和混合位置。与1岁以上的瘘管相比,年轻的瘘管更有可能发生吻合口狭窄(p=.001)。虽然没有观察到原发性通畅性(PP)的显着差异,继发性通畅性(SP)因狭窄位置而异:中部32[13-42]个月,瘘静脉20[12.5-35.5]个月,混合25[13.5-37.5]个月,吻合19[7-29.5]个月(p=.012)。
    结论:AVF狭窄部位与瘘的年龄和类型有关。年轻的瘘管经常由于吻合狭窄而失败,与其他站点的狭窄相比,二级通畅性较低。初步数据表明中央狭窄,主要发生在较老的瘘管中,与其他位置的狭窄相比,在纤维成形术后表现出更好的继发性通畅性。
    BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence supporting the optimal use of fistuloplasty to maintain vascular access at various lesion sites, despite its critical role in facilitating renal replacement therapy and the overall high failure rates of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs). This study aims to identify covariates affecting primary and secondary patency following fistuloplasty of native upper limb vascular access AVFs.
    METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent fistuloplasty at a tertiary vascular centre over 4 years. Baseline characteristics were recorded, and factors associated with primary and secondary patency rates were analysed.
    RESULTS: A total of 206 patients (88 male, 118 female) with a mean age of 68 (±14) years underwent fistuloplasty during the study period. The prevalence of diabetes, ischaemic heart disease and antiplatelet usage were 33%, 21% and 70%, respectively. The median number of fistuloplasties per access during the follow-up period was 2 [1-3]. Fistulas were classified as radiocephalic (65), brachiocephalic (102) and brachiobasilic transposition (39). Recurrent stenosis (RS) was identified in 60 patients who had previous fistuloplasty before the study period, while 146 patients had de novo stenoses (DNS). Stenosis location significantly differed between RS and DNS (p = .03), with DNS primarily being anastomotic and RS predominantly in central and mixed locations. Younger fistulas were more likely to have anastomotic stenoses compared to those older than 1 year (p = .001). While no significant differences in primary patency (PP) were observed, secondary patency (SP) varied by stenosis location: Central 32 [13-42] months, Fistula vein 20 [12.5-35.5] months, Mixed 25 [13.5-37.5] months and Anastomotic 19 [7-29.5] months (p = .012).
    CONCLUSIONS: Stenosis location in AVFs is associated with the age and type of the fistula. Younger fistulas often fail due to anastomotic stenoses, which have lower secondary patency compared to stenoses at other sites. Preliminary data suggest that central stenoses, primarily occurring in older fistulas, exhibit better secondary patency following fistuloplasty than stenoses at other locations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较药物涂层球囊(DCB)与普通球囊血管成形术(PTA)后透析动静脉瘘(AVF)的主要通畅率和再狭窄率。
    方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了157例患者,这些患者在2012年1月至2022年期间接受了AVF血管成形术以治疗固有AVF狭窄。瘘管是头臂(75%),Brachobasillic(17%),和头颅(8%)。指标干预是DCB或经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA),随后进行随访。中心静脉狭窄患者,血栓性瘘,瘘管支架,排除索引程序后的AV移植物或手术干预。
    结果:28例患者使用DCB和129例患者使用PTA进行了动静脉瘘血管成形术。共有108例患者出现单一狭窄,42有2个狭窄,和7个有3个狭窄。这些狭窄的位置在静脉流出道(57%),吻合段(31%),和头弓(12%)。PTA再干预的中位时间为216天,而DCB为304天(p=0.079)。在6个月时,PTA和DCB分别为60.4%和75%(p=0.141)结论:尽管与PTA相比,DCB血管成形术治疗初治功能失调的AVF倾向于改善干预时间和6个月的原发性通畅。这一差异没有达到统计学意义.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the primary patency and restenosis rates in treatment naieve dialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) after drug-coated balloons (DCB) versus plain balloon angioplasty (PTA).
    METHODS: This retrospective study included 157 patients who underwent AVF angioplasty for treatment-native AVF stenosis between January 2012 to 2022. The fistulas were Brachiocephalic (75%), Brachiobasilic (17%), and radiocephalic (8%). The index intervention was with either DCB or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with subsequent follow up. Patients with central venous stenosis, thrombosed fistula, fistula stents, AV graft or surgical intervention after the index procedure were excluded.
    RESULTS: Arteriovenous fistula angioplasty was done in 28 patients using DCB and in 129 patients using PTA. A total of 108 patients presented with a single stenosis, 42 with 2 stenoses, and 7 with 3 stenoses. The location of these stenoses was in the venous outflow (57%), the juxta anastomotic segment (31%), and cephalic arch (12%). The median time to re-intervention for the PTA was 216 days compared to 304 days for the DCB (p=0.079). Primary patency at 6 months was 60.4% for PTA and 75% for DCB (p=0.141) CONCLUSION: Although DCB angioplasty of treatmentnaïve dysfunctional AVF tends to improve the time to intervention and 6-month primary patency compared to PTA, this difference did not reach statistical significance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:动静脉瘘(AVF)在儿科人群中用作血液透析(HD)的一线通道。这项调查的目的是描述AVF创建过程中的单中心经验,以及它在儿童中的通畅性。方法:这项单中心回顾性研究包括1993年至2023年之间创建的所有年龄≤18岁的AVF患者。收集的数据包括患者的人口统计学,血液透析史,术中数据,并需要重新干预,以确定这些变量对小学的影响,初级辅助,和二次通畅。结果:分析了57例患者的中位年龄为15岁(范围,7-18岁)。进行了54个前臂和4个上臂瘘。中位随访时间为6.9年(范围,0-23年)。主要失败率为10.5%。原发性通畅率为67.6%,53.6%,51.4%,1、3、5和10年后为38.1%;初级辅助通畅率为72.9%,62.8%,60.6%,和41.5%;继发性通畅率为87.3%,81.3%,76.8%,在研究人群中,1年、3年、5年和10年后为66.6%。结论:AVF显示出可接受的原发性失败率和良好的长期通畅性。在这种情况下,AVF是HD访问的合适选项,尤其是儿科患者。
    Background: Arterio-venous fistulas (AVF) are used as first-line access for hemodialysis (HD) in the pediatric population. The aim of this investigation was to describe a single-center experience in the creation of AVF, together with its patency in children. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included all patients aged ≤18 years with AVFs created between 1993 and 2023. The collected data included patients\' demographics, hemodialysis history, intraoperative data, and required reinterventions in order to determine the impact of these variables on primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency. Results: Fifty-seven patients were analyzed with a median age of 15 years (range, 7-18 years). Fifty-four forearm and four upper arm fistulas were performed. The median follow-up was 6.9 years (range, 0-23 years). The primary failure rate was 10.5%. The primary patency rate was 67.6%, 53.6%, 51.4%, and 38.1% after 1, 3, 5, and 10 years; primary-assisted patency was 72.9%, 62.8%, 60.6%, and 41.5%; and secondary patency was 87.3%, 81.3%, 76.8%, and 66.6% after 1, 3, 5, and 10 years in the studied population. Conclusions: AVFs showed an acceptable rate of primary failure and excellent long-term patency. In this context, AVFs are an appropriate option for HD access, especially in pediatric patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在本试验中,在日本患者中评估了TCD-17187药物涂层球囊(DCB)治疗股浅动脉(SFA)和近端动脉(PA)动脉粥样硬化病变的24个月安全性和有效性.
    方法:这是一个前瞻性的,多中心,核心实验室裁决,单臂试验。从2019年到2020年,纳入了121例症状性外周动脉疾病患者。主要有效性结果指标是主要通畅性。安全性结果指标是主要不良事件(MAE)率。
    结果:年龄为74.5±7.3岁,糖尿病占67.5%。病变长度和参考血管直径(RVD)分别为106.0±52.6mm和5.2±0.8mm,分别。慢性完全闭塞(CTO)和双侧钙化率(外周动脉钙质评分系统(PACSS)3级和4级)分别为17.5%和50.8%,分别。经双工超声检查24个月原发性通畅率为71.3%,而无临床驱动的靶病变血运重建(CD-TLR)为87.0%。MAE率为13.2%,所有事件均为CD-TLR。在整个24个月中,没有发生与设备或手术相关的重大截肢死亡。多变量Cox比例风险回归分析显示,在以下特征中与原发性通畅性丧失相关的显著差异:再狭窄病变和RVD。
    结论:该试验证实了TCD-17187DCB治疗SFA和/或近端PA动脉粥样硬化病变长达24个月的安全性和有效性。
    方法:第3级,队列研究。
    背景:URL:https://center6。乌明。AC.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr。cgi?function=眉毛&action=眉毛&recptno=R000038612&type=summary&language=J:注册ID:UMIN000034122。注册日期:2018年9月13日。
    OBJECTIVE: In the present trial, the 24-month safety and effectiveness of the TCD-17187 drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and proximal popliteal artery (PA) were evaluated in Japanese patients.
    METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, core laboratory-adjudicated, single-arm trial. From 2019 to 2020, 121 patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease were enrolled. The primary effectiveness outcome measure was primary patency. The safety outcome measure was the major adverse event (MAE) rate.
    RESULTS: Age was 74.5 ± 7.3 years, and diabetes mellitus was present in 67.5%. Lesion length and reference vessel diameter (RVD) were 106.0 ± 52.6 mm and 5.2 ± 0.8 mm, respectively. Chronic total occlusion (CTO) and bilateral calcification rate (Grade 3 and 4 by peripheral arterial calcium scoring system (PACSS)) were 17.5% and 50.8%, respectively. The 24-month primary patency rate by duplex ultrasound was 71.3%, while freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) was 87.0%. The MAE rate was 13.2% and all events consisted of CD-TLR. There were no instances of device- or procedure-related deaths major amputations throughout the 24 months. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed significant differences associated with loss of primary patency in the following characteristics: CTO, restenotic lesion and RVD.
    CONCLUSIONS: This trial confirmed the safety and effectiveness of TCD-17187 DCB for atherosclerotic lesions of the SFA and/or proximal PA for up to 24 months.
    METHODS: Level 3, Cohort study.
    BACKGROUND: URL: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr.cgi?function=brows&action=brows&recptno=R000038612&type=summary&language=J:Registration ID: UMIN000034122. Registration Date: September 13, 2018.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在终末期肾病(ESRD)患者中,静脉瓣膜相关性狭窄(VVRS)是动静脉瘘失败的罕见类型。关于超声引导的经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)对VVRS的长期疗效的数据很少。
    选择2017年1月至2021年12月在重庆医科大学附属第一医院因VVRS行PTA的ESRD患者。将患者分为三个队列(队列t1,位于吻合口附近静脉3cm内的VVRS;队列t2,位于吻合口3cm外的VVRS;队列t3,多个狭窄)。通过Kaplan-Meier方法评估通畅率,并使用对数秩检验进行比较。进行单因素和多因素Cox分析以确定危险因素。
    共纳入292例患者,包括125(42.8%),111(38.0%),队列1、队列2和队列3中分别有56例(19.2%)患者。中位随访时间为34.8个月。6个月,1年,2年,3年原发性通畅率为86.0%,69.4%,47.5%,和35.3%,分别。二次通畅率为94.5%,89.4%,75.5%,和65.3%,分别。与队列t2和队列t3相比,Cohort1显示出相对更好的原发性通畅性。在三个队列中,二次通畅率具有可比性。透析持续时间和VVRS类型是与原发性通畅相关的潜在因素。
    这项研究显示,在ESRD患者中,经PTA治疗VVRS后,初级和次级通畅率可接受,尤其是对于那些位于吻合口附近静脉3cm内的VVRS。
    UNASSIGNED: Venous valve-related stenosis (VVRS) is an uncommon type of failure of arteriovenous fistula among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). There is a paucity of data on the long-term efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for VVRS.
    UNASSIGNED: ESRD patients who underwent PTA because of VVRS between January 2017 and December 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were enrolled. Patients were classified into three cohorts (cohort1, VVRS located within 3 cm of the vein adjacent to the anastomosis; cohort2, VVRS located over 3 cm away from the anastomosis; cohort3, multiple stenoses). The patency rates were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to identify the risk factors.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 292 patients were enrolled, including 125 (42.8%), 111 (38.0%), and 56 (19.2%) patients in cohort1, cohort2, and cohort3, respectively. The median follow-up was 34.8 months. The 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year primary patency rates were 86.0%, 69.4%, 47.5%, and 35.3%, respectively. The secondary patency rates were 94.5%, 89.4%, 75.5%, and 65.3%, respectively. Cohort1 showed a relatively better primary patency compared to cohort2 and cohort3. The secondary patency rates were comparable in the three cohorts. Duration of dialysis and VVRS type were potential factors associated with primary patency.
    UNASSIGNED: This study showed acceptable long-term primary and secondary patency rates after PTA for VVRS in ESRD patients, especially for those with VVRS located within 3 cm of the vein adjacent to the anastomosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估开窗式/分枝式主动脉腔内修复术(F/BEVAR)治疗复杂主动脉瘤的5年结局。
    方法:诊断为复杂主动脉瘤的患者,在单中心接受F/BEVAR的患者被纳入本研究并进行回顾性分析.根据动脉瘤程度划分队列,比较第1组(I-III型胸腹动脉瘤-TAAA),第2组(IV型TAAA),和第3组(近交系,pararenal,或胸膜旁主动脉瘤-JRAA,PRAA,PVAA)。主要终点是30天和5年生存率。次要终点是技术成功,脊髓缺血的发生,内脏动脉的原发性通畅,免于目标血管不稳定,和次要干预。
    结果:在2012年7月至2023年5月期间接受F/BEVAR的436例患者中,有131例表现为I-III型TAAA,具有IV型TAAA的69,和236与JRAA,PRAA,或PVAA。所有病例均根据医生赞助的IDE方案,使用特定于患者的公司制造或现成的设备进行治疗。第1组比第2组或第3组明显年轻(69.6±8.7vs72.4±7.1vs73.2±7.3,P<.001),女性比例更高(50.4%vs21.7%vs17.8%,P<.001)。在第1组患者中,主动脉夹层的既往病史明显更为常见(26%vs1.4%vs0.9%,P<.001),第1组的平均动脉瘤直径较大(64.5vs60.7vs63.2mm,P=.033)。两组的合并症相似,除了冠状动脉疾病(P<0.001)和烟草使用(P=0.003),在第1组中不那么普遍。三组的技术成功率相似(98.5%vs98.6%vs98.7%,P>.99)。30天死亡率为4.5%,1.4%,和0.4%,分别在第1、2和3组中,与第3组相比,第1组明显更高(P=0.01)。与第3组相比,第1组的脊髓缺血发生率明显更高(5.3vs4.3%vs.4%,P=.004)。与第1组相比,第3组的5年生存率明显更高(P=0.01)。与第1组相比,第3组的二级干预自由度明显更高(P=0.003)。在5年,在所检查的1652条靶血管中,各组间的靶血管不稳定情况或原发通畅情况无显著差异.
    结论:较大的动脉瘤范围与较低的5年生存率相关,30天死亡率更高,次要干预的发生率,脊髓缺血.在接受F/BEVAR治疗的复杂主动脉瘤患者中,所有组的次要干预措施的发生率使细致的随访至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 5-year outcomes of fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR) for the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms stratified by the aneurysm extent.
    METHODS: Patients with the diagnosis of complex aortic aneurysm, who underwent F/BEVAR at a single center were included in this study and retrospectively analyzed. The cohort was divided according to the aneurysm extent, comparing group 1 (types I-III thoracoabdominal aneurysms [TAAAs]), group 2 (type IV TAAAs), and group 3 (juxtarenal [JRAAs], pararenal [PRAAs], or paravisceral [PVAAs] aortic aneurysms). The primary endpoints were 30-day and 5-year survival. The secondary endpoints were technical success, occurrence of spinal cord ischemia, primary patency of the visceral arteries, freedom from target vessel instability, and secondary interventions.
    RESULTS: Of 436 patients who underwent F/BEVAR between July 2012 and May 2023, 131 presented with types I to III TAAAs, 69 with type IV TAAAs, and 236 with JRAAs, PRAAs, or PVAAs. All cases were treated under a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption protocol with a patient-specific company-manufactured or off-the-shelf device. Group 1 had significantly younger patients than group 2 or 3 respectively (69.6 ± 8.7 vs 72.4 ± 7.1 vs 73.2 ± 7.3 years; P < .001) and had a higher percentage of females (50.4% vs 21.7% vs 17.8%; P < .001). Prior history of aortic dissection was significantly more common among patients in group 1 (26% vs 1.4% vs 0.9%; P < .001), and mean aneurysm diameter was larger in group 1 (64.5 vs 60.7 vs 63.2 mm; P = .033). Comorbidities were similar between groups, except for coronary artery disease (P < .001) and tobacco use (P = .003), which were less prevalent in group 1. Technical success was similar in the three groups (98.5% vs 98.6% vs 98.7%; P > .99). The 30-day mortality was 4.5%, 1.4%, and 0.4%, in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and was significantly higher in group 1 when compared with group 3 (P = .01). The incidence of spinal cord ischemia was significantly higher in group 1 compared with group 3 (5.3% vs 4.3% vs 0.4%; P = .004). The 5-year survival was significantly higher in group 3 when compared with group 1 (P = .01). Freedom from secondary intervention was significantly higher in group 3 when compared with group 1 (P = .003). At 5 years, there was no significant difference in freedom from target vessel instability between groups or primary patency in the 1652 target vessels examined.
    CONCLUSIONS: Larger aneurysm extent was associated with lower 5-year survival, higher 30-day mortality, incidence of secondary interventions, and spinal cord ischemia. The prevalence of secondary interventions in all groups makes meticulous follow-up paramount in patients with complex aortic aneurysm treated with F/BEVAR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目前在全球范围内对主动脉(AI)闭塞性病变进行血管内治疗(EVT),但是对于复杂的AI病变,EVT存在挑战。VIABAHNVBX(W.L.Gore&Associates,弗拉格斯塔夫,AZ)是下一代球囊可扩张覆膜支架,设计用于复杂的AI病变。这项研究的目的是评估VIABAHNVBX对此类病变的中期结局。
    方法:回顾性分析了2018年至2020年在日本7个中心接受VIABAHNVBXEVT治疗AI病变的症状患者。主要终点是原发性通畅性和无靶病变血运重建(TLR)。
    结果:在71例患者中,共进行了95例使用VIABAHNVBX治疗AI闭塞性病变的EVT手术。患者的血脂异常(53%)和慢性肾脏病(61%)发生率较高,22%患有慢性威胁肢体缺血。TASCⅡ级为A级12例(17%),B在12(17%)中,C在10(14%),和D在37(52%)。31例患者(33%)出现治疗病变的严重钙化(360度)。中位手术时间为84(49-158)分钟,技术成功率100%。中位随访期为36(32-43)个月。VIABAHNVBX的3年主要和次要通畅率分别为91%和99%,从TLR的3年自由度为92%,3年的男性自由度为98%。没有四肢需要大截肢。病变严重程度(TASCⅡC或D)和严重钙化不影响TLR的原发通畅性或游离性。
    结论:无论病变严重程度和钙化情况如何,用VIABAHNVBX进行EVT治疗AI病变后的中期结局均可接受。这些结果表明,VIABAHNVBX可能适用于具有严重解剖复杂性和/或严重钙化的AI闭塞性病变。
    BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment (EVT) for aortoiliac (AI) occlusive lesions is now conducted worldwide, but there are challenges in EVT for complex AI lesions. The VIABAHN VBX (W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) is a next-generation balloon-expandable covered stent designed for use with complex AI lesions. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the medium-term outcomes of VIABAHN VBX for such lesions.
    METHODS: Symptomatic patients who underwent EVT with VIABAHN VBX for an AI lesion from 2018 to 2020 at 7 Japanese centers were reviewed retrospectively. The primary endpoints were primary patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR).
    RESULTS: A total of 95 EVT procedures with VIABAHN VBX for AI occlusive lesions were performed in 71 patients. The patients had high rates of dyslipidemia (53%) and chronic kidney disease (61%), and 22% had chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). The Transatlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC Ⅱ) class was A in 12 patients (17%), B in 12 (17%), C in 10 (14%), and D in 37 (52%). Severe calcification (360°) of the treated lesion was present in 31 patients (33%). The median procedure time was 84 (49-158) min, with a technical success rate of 100%. The median follow-up period was 36 (32-43) months. The 3-year primary and secondary patency of VIABAHN VBX were 91% and 99%, the 3-year freedom from TLR was 92%, and the 3-year freedom from major adverse limb event (MALE) was 98%. No limbs required major amputation. Lesion severity (TASC Ⅱ C or D) and severe calcification did not affect the primary patency or freedom from TLR.
    CONCLUSIONS: Medium-term outcomes after EVT with VIABAHN VBX for AI lesions were acceptable regardless of lesion severity and calcification. These results suggest that VIABAHN VBX may be suitable for AI occlusive lesions with severe anatomical complexity and/or severe calcification.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:主动脉分叉(CERAB)的覆盖血管内重建越来越多地用作主动脉-髂动脉闭塞性疾病(AIOD)患者的一线治疗。我们试图将接受CERAB的患者的预后与主动脉双口经桥(ABF)的金标准进行比较。
    方法:对2009-2021年接受ABF或CERAB的患者进行了血管质量调查。倾向评分是使用人口统计生成的,合并症,卢瑟福班,和紧迫性。两组使用5对1最近邻匹配进行匹配。我们的主要结果是1年估计的原发性通畅性,主要不良肢体事件(男性),无男性生存,无再干预生存,和无截肢生存。使用标准统计方法。
    结果:共发现3,944例ABF和281例CERAB。所有AIOD患者中,2009-2021年,CERAB的比例从0%上升至17.9%。与ABF相比,接受CERAB的患者年龄较大(64.7vs.60.2;p<.001),更常见于糖尿病(40.9%vs.24.1%;p<.001)和终末期肾病(1.1%vs.0.3%;P=0.03)。在匹配分析中(229CERABvs.929ABF),ABF患者无男性生存率提高(93.2%[±0.9%]vs.83.2%[±3%];p<.001)和较低的男性比率(5.2%[±0.9%]与14.1%[±3%];p<.001),具有可比的主要通畅率(98.3%[±0.3%]与96.6%[±1%];p=.6)和无截肢生存率(99.3%[±0.3%]vs.99.4%[±0.6%];p=.9)。CERAB组患者的无再干预生存率明显较低(62.5%±[6%]vs.92.9%±[0.9%];p<.001)。匹配分析还显示LOS较短(1与7天;p<.001),以及肺下部(1.2%与6.6%;p=0.01),肾(1.8%vs.10%;p<.001),和心脏(1.8%与12.8%;p<.001)CERAB患者并发症。
    结论:与ABF相比,CERAB的围手术期发病率较低,1年的原发性通畅率相似。然而,接受CERAB治疗的患者经历了更多的主要肢体不良事件和重新干预.尽管CERAB是AIOD患者的有效治疗方法,需要进一步的研究来确定CERAB与已确定的ABF耐久性相比的长期结局,并进一步确定CEARB在AIOD治疗中的作用.
    BACKGROUND: Covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB) is increasingly used as a first line-treatment in patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). We sought to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent CERAB compared with the gold standard of aortobifemoral bypass (ABF).
    METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried for patients who underwent ABF or CERAB from 2009 to 2021. Propensity scores were generated using demographics, comorbidities, Rutherford class, and urgency. The two groups were matched using 5-to-1 nearest-neighbor match. Our primary outcomes were 1-year estimates of primary patency, major adverse limb events (MALEs), MALE-free survival, reintervention-free survival, and amputation-free survival. Standard statistical methods were used.
    RESULTS: A total of 3944 ABF and 281 CERAB cases were identified. Of all patients with AIOD, the proportion of CERAB increased from 0% to 17.9% between 2009 and 2021. Compared with ABF, patients who underwent CERAB were more likely to be older (64.7 vs 60.2; P < .001) and more often had diabetes (40.9% vs 24.1%; P < .001) and end-stage renal disease (1.1% vs 0.3%; P = .03). In the matched analysis (229 CERAB vs 929 ABF), ABF patients had improved MALE-free survival (93.2% [±0.9%] vs 83.2% [±3%]; P < .001) and lower rates of MALE (5.2% [±0.9%] vs 14.1% [±3%]; P < .001), with comparable primary patency rates (98.3% [±0.3%] vs 96.6% [±1%]; P = .6) and amputation-free survival (99.3% [±0.3%] vs 99.4% [±0.6%]; P = .9). Patients in the CERAB group had significantly lower reintervention-free survival (62.5% [±6%] vs 92.9% [±0.9%]; P < .001). Matched analysis also revealed shorter length of stay (1 vs 7 days; P < .001), as well as lower pulmonary (1.2% vs 6.6%; P = .01), renal (1.8% vs 10%; P < .001), and cardiac (1.8% vs 12.8%; P < .001) complications among CERAB patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: CERAB had lower perioperative morbidity compared with ABF with a similar primary patency 1-year estimates. However, patients who underwent CERAB experienced more major adverse limb events and reinterventions. Although CERAB is an effective treatment for patients with AIOD, further studies are needed to determine the long-term outcomes of CERAB compared with the established durability of ABF and further define the role of CEARB in the treatment of AIOD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:进行了系统评价(SRs)和最新的荟萃分析,以评估药物涂层球囊(DCBs)与经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)治疗动静脉瘘(AVF)狭窄的临床疗效和安全性。
    方法:检索文献以检索比较DCB和PTA对AVF的SRs。进行了SRs的叙述性回顾和汇总分析。
    结果:包括11个SR。与PTA相比,DCB在6个月和12个月时表现出良好的结果,7个SRs通畅性改善,3个SRs有良好结局趋势,无统计学意义。在三个SR中报告了TLR;两个综述报告DCB组的发病率明显低于PTA组,而一篇综述报告12个月时无显著差异.四项报告全因死亡率的研究显示两种治疗方法之间没有显着差异。在更新的荟萃分析中,包括23项研究,DCB在6个月和12个月时表现出改善的原发性通畅性(RR,1.27;95%置信区间[CI],1.07-1.50和RR,1.36;95%CI,分别为1.19-1.55),并与6个月和12个月时TLR的较低发生率相关(RR,0.54;95%CI,0.41-0.73和RR,0.78;95%CI,分别为0.62-0.99)。两组24个月的死亡率无差异。
    结论:对SRs和荟萃分析更新的综述显示,DCB优于PTA在原发性通畅性和TLR方面治疗AVF具有一致的益处。与PTA相比,DCB不会增加死亡风险。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) compared with those of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenosis via a review of systematic reviews (SRs) and an update of the current meta-analysis.
    METHODS: Literature was searched to retrieve SRs comparing DCBs and PTA for AVFs. A narrative review of SRs and pooled analysis were performed.
    RESULTS: Eleven SRs were included. DCBs demonstrated favorable outcomes at 6 and 12 months compared with PTA, with improved patency in 7 SRs and a trend toward favorable outcomes without statistical significance in 3 SRs. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was reported in 3 SRs; 2 reviews reported a significantly lower incidence in the DCB group than in the PTA group, whereas 1 review reported no significant differences at 12 months. Four studies reporting all-cause mortality revealed no significant difference between the 2 treatments. In the updated meta-analysis including 23 studies, DCBs demonstrated improved primary patency at 6 months (risk ratio [RR], 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07-1.50) and 12 months (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.19-1.55) and were associated with a lower incidence of TLR at 6 months (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41-0.73) and 12 months (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.99). There was no difference in mortality between the 2 groups for 24 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: A review of SRs and meta-analysis update revealed the consistent benefits of DCBs over PTA in treating AVFs in terms of primary patency and TLR. Compared with PTA, DCBs do not increase mortality risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在探讨经皮腔内血管成形术(介入后原发通畅)后动静脉瘘狭窄的超声特征及其与原发通畅的关系,并将该分类与病变位置进行比较。对2020年7月至2021年12月接受超声引导下经皮腔内血管成形术治疗动静脉内瘘狭窄的血液透析患者进行回顾性评估。病变(不包括流入动脉)根据超声特征分为五组,分析影响动静脉内瘘介入后原发通畅的临床特点及危险因素。在185名患者中,100(54.05%),36(19.46%),22(11.89%),11(5.95%),16人(8.65%)被归类为内膜显性,非内膜显性,瓣膜阻塞,血管钙化,和混合团体,分别。透析时间和动静脉内瘘使用时间在血管钙化组最高,分别为86个月(四分位距:49-140)和77个月(四分位距:49-110),分别。糖尿病在内膜显性组中最常见(42.0%)。在Kaplan-Meier和单变量Cox分析中,III型病变位置(静脉汇合部位狭窄)与介入术后原发性通畅率较低相关.在多变量Cox分析中,经皮腔内血管成形术次数(经皮腔内血管成形术治疗动静脉瘘狭窄功能障碍的患者次数),血管钙化,病变部位的钙化需要经皮腔内血管成形术,和血清甲状旁腺激素水平是干预后原发性通畅的独立危险因素。超声特征显示动静脉瘘钙化不利于动静脉瘘介入后原发通畅。
    This study aimed to investigate ultrasound features of arteriovenous fistula stenosis and their relationship with primary patency after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (post-intervention primary patency) and compare this classification with that using lesion location. Hemodialysis patients who underwent ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for arteriovenous fistula stenosis from July 2020 to December 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Lesions (excluding inflow arteries) were categorized into five groups based on ultrasound features, and the clinical characteristics and risk factors affecting the post-intervention primary patency of the arteriovenous fistula were analyzed. Among 185 patients, 100 (54.05%), 36 (19.46%), 22 (11.89%), 11 (5.95%), and 16 (8.65%) were classified into the intima-dominant, non-intima-dominant, valve obstruction, vascular calcification, and mixed groups, respectively. The dialysis duration and arteriovenous fistula use time were the highest in the vascular calcification group at 86 (interquartile range: 49-140) and 77 (interquartile range: 49-110) months, respectively. Diabetes mellitus was most common in the intima-dominant group (42.0%). In Kaplan-Meier and univariate Cox analysis, type III lesion location (stenosis in the venous confluence site) was associated with the lower post-intervention primary patency. In the multivariate Cox analysis, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty times (the number of times patients were treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for arteriovenous fistula stenosis dysfunction), vascular calcification, calcification at the lesion site requiring percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, and serum parathyroid hormone levels were independent risk factors for post-intervention primary patency. Ultrasound features showed that calcification of the arteriovenous fistula was detrimental to the post-intervention primary patency of arteriovenous fistula.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号