Prevention and management

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    外渗,静脉注射物质的意外泄漏,对癌症治疗提出了重大挑战,特别是在化疗和放疗期间。这篇全面的综述探讨了病理生理学,发病率,危险因素,临床表现,诊断,预防策略,管理方法,并发症,以及癌症患者外渗的长期影响。它还概述了未来的方向和研究机会,包括确定当前知识的差距,并提出进一步调查外渗预防和管理的领域。重点介绍了具有改善化疗和放疗中外渗预防和管理潜力的新兴技术和疗法。这些创新包括先进的静脉可视化技术,智能导管,靶向药物递送系统,新颖的局部治疗,和基于人工智能的图像分析。通过解决这些方面,这篇综述不仅为医疗保健专业人员提供了提高患者安全性和优化临床实践的见解,而且强调了正在进行的研究和创新在改善发生外渗事件的癌症患者预后方面的重要性.
    Extravasation, the unintended leakage of intravenously administered substances, poses significant challenges in cancer treatment, particularly during chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This comprehensive review explores the pathophysiology, incidence, risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnosis, prevention strategies, management approaches, complications, and long-term effects of extravasation in cancer patients. It also outlines future directions and research opportunities, including identifying gaps in the current knowledge and proposing areas for further investigation in extravasation prevention and management. Emerging technologies and therapies with the potential to improve extravasation prevention and management in both chemotherapy and radiotherapy are highlighted. Such innovations include advanced vein visualization technologies, smart catheters, targeted drug delivery systems, novel topical treatments, and artificial intelligence-based image analysis. By addressing these aspects, this review not only provides healthcare professionals with insights to enhance patient safety and optimize clinical practice but also underscores the importance of ongoing research and innovation in improving outcomes for cancer patients experiencing extravasation events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患者(及其亲戚/朋友)的侵略和暴力行为被广泛认为是一种严重的职业危害,医生特别容易在医院内目睹和经历此类事件。研究表明,这种侵略和暴力的负面后果不仅在个人层面上感受到,而且在团队和组织层面。了解如何预防和管理这种行为的医生在医院是紧迫的,没有充分的研究。虽然有许多潜在的有效干预措施,目前尚不清楚哪些对中国医院是有价值和可行的。因为患者的侵略和暴力在中国医院可能比其他国家更频繁地发生,这表明文化差异起到了一定作用,可能需要有针对性的干预措施.
    方法:我们进行了一项德尔菲研究,以就医院干预措施的重要性和可行性达成共识,以预防和管理患者(及其亲属/朋友)对中国医院医生的侵略和暴力行为。中国的17位专家应邀完成了三轮在线问卷调查。
    结果:经过三轮,就44项干预措施达成共识,其他五项干预措施被拒绝,在另外两个问题上没有达成共识。这些干预措施分为八类:环境设计,入口和入口,人员配备和工作实践,领导力与文化,培训和教育,支持,在事件操作期间/之后,医院政策。每个类别都被认为在预防和管理患者(及其亲戚/朋友)对中国医院医生的侵略和暴力方面很重要。这项研究还调查了建议干预措施的可行性,发现44项干预措施中有36项被认为不仅相关,而且在中国医院实施也是可行的。
    结论:本研究概述了可以在中国医院实施的干预措施,以预防和管理患者(及其亲属/朋友)的侵略和暴力行为。during,在暴力事件发生后。
    BACKGROUND: Aggression and violence by patient (and their relatives/friends) is widely acknowledged as a serious occupational hazard, with physicians being particularly susceptible to witnessing and experiencing such incidents within hospitals. Research has shown that the negative consequences of such aggression and violence are not only felt at the individual level, but also at the team and organizational levels. Understanding how to prevent and manage this behavior towards physicians in hospitals is urgent and not fully researched. While there are many potentially effective interventions, it is unclear which ones would be valuable and feasible for Chinese hospitals. Because patient aggression and violence may occur more frequently in Chinese hospitals than in other countries, this suggests that cultural differences play a role and that tailored interventions may be needed.
    METHODS: We conducted a Delphi study to reach a consensus on the importance and feasibility of hospital interventions to prevent and manage patient (and their relatives/friends) aggression and violence against physicians in Chinese hospitals. Seventeen experts in China were invited to complete online questionnaires over three rounds.
    RESULTS: After three rounds, consensus was achieved concerning 44 interventions, five other interventions were rejected, and no consensus was reached on another two. These interventions were clustered into eight categories: environment design, access and entrance, staffing and working practices, leadership and culture, training and education, support, during/after-the-event actions, and hospital policy. Each category is considered important in preventing and managing patient (and their relatives/friends) aggression and violence towards physicians in Chinese hospitals. This study also investigated the feasibility of the suggested interventions and found that 36 of the 44 interventions were considered not only relevant, but also feasible for implementation in Chinese hospitals.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an overview of interventions that can be implemented in Chinese hospitals to prevent and manage patient (and their relatives/friends) aggression and violence before, during, and after a violent incident occurs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于与年龄相关的变化,老年人的压力伤害(PI)风险增加。传统上,医院和老年护理机构已经提供了PI知识和教育,然而,在理解如何与社区中的老年人及其护理人员分享预防和管理方面的PI知识方面仍然存在严重差距.我们旨在描述可用于社区居住的老年人及其照顾者的结构化和非结构化PI教育计划的性质和特征。随着应对审查的进行。我们搜索了五个数据库:CINAHL,Medline,Scopus,Cochrane图书馆和ProQuest从2009年到2023年8月。审查以Arksey和O\'Malley的六步框架为指导,并遵守PRISMA-ScR指南。它包括以英语发表的主要同行评审论文,侧重于社区环境中老年人和/或他们的照顾者的PI教育。数据提取被组织在一个表格中,以及作为叙述性总结呈现的发现。筛选了一百三十六篇论文,其中四篇被纳入审查。结果表明,在设计PI教育材料时,考虑了老年人及其护理人员的识字水平和认知状况。教育材料,如传单/小册子,使用了面对面的培训课程或两者的组合。然而,这些干预的持续时间各不相同,持续1-4周,而其他人则超过12个月。PI知识的一些改进,如如何对待PI,注意到饮食要求和流动性的重要性.然而,信息保留及其转化为有效的长期行为改变仍不清楚。总之,采用多方面的教育方法提高了PI知识翻译的有效性。持续教育,在与老年人和护理人员互动时,需要长期支持和加强PI,以确保长期管理和预防成功。当老年人和护理人员访问他们的全科医生诊所并获得其他医疗保健需求的支持服务时,关于PI的对话应该从初级保健水平开始。了解老年人和照顾者的识字水平,认知状态和文化背景可以帮助临床医生设计和提供适合目的的PI教育干预措施,在促进知识转移和行为改变方面具有相关性和有效性。护理人员是护理连续性中的重要管道。这些因素将导致更多的信息,合作和以人为本的PI管理和预防方法。
    Older adults are at increased risk of pressure injuries (PIs) due to age-related changes. Traditionally, PI knowledge and education have been delivered in hospitals and residential aged care facilities, however, there remains a critical gap in understanding how PI knowledge on prevention and management is shared with older adults and their carers living in the community. We aimed to describe the nature and characteristics of structured and unstructured PI education programs available to community-dwelling older adults and their carers. As coping review was undertaken. We searched five databases: CINAHL, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library and ProQuest from 2009 to August 2023. The review was guided by Arksey and O\'Malley\'s six-step framework and adhered to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. It included primary peer-reviewed papers published in English, which focus on PI education for older adults and/or their carers living in community settings. Data extraction was organised in a table, and findings presented as a narrative summary. One-hundred and thirty-six papers were screened and four included in the review. Results indicate that consideration was placed on literacy levels and cognitive status of older adults and their carers when designing PI education materials. Educational materials such as leaflets/brochures, in-person training sessions or a combination of both were used. However, duration of these interventions varied, lasting for 1-4 weeks while others were completed over 12 months. Some improvements in PI knowledge such as how to treat PI, dietary requirements and importance of mobility were noted. However, information retention and its translation into effective long-term behaviour change remained unclear. In conclusion, adopting a multifaceted educational approach increases the effectiveness of PI knowledge translation. Continuous education, support and reinforcement on PIs over time are necessary when interacting with older adults and caregivers to ensure long-term management and prevention success. Conversations on PIs should start at the primary care levels when older adults and carers are visiting their GP clinics and accessing support services for other healthcare needs. Understanding older adults\' and carers\' literacy levels, cognitive status and cultural background can assist clinicians in designing and delivering fit-for-purpose PI educational interventions that are accessible, relatable and effective in promoting knowledge transfer and behaviour change. Carers are vital conduits in the care continuum. These factors will lead to a more informed, collaborative and person-centred approaches to PI management and prevention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:虽然远程患者管理(RPM)有可能帮助实现初级保健中心血管危险因素的治疗目标,其有效性在不同患者亚组之间可能有所不同.面板管理,这涉及对特定患者风险群体的积极护理,可以提供一种有前途的方法来为这些群体定制RPM。本研究旨在(i)评估医疗保健专业人员和其他利益相关者对采用的看法,以及(ii)确定成功实施此类小组管理方法的障碍和促进者。
    方法:总共,在荷兰进行了19次半结构化访谈和两个焦点小组。三位作者审查了经过审核的成绩单。实施战略综合框架(CFIR)领域用于主题分析。
    结果:共有24名参与者(全科医生,护士,健康保险公司,项目经理,和IT顾问)参与。总的来说,各利益相关方认为初级保健RPM的小组管理方法很有价值.实施障碍包括对患者分层缺少必要风险因素的担忧,护士的额外临床和技术任务,和报销协议。促进者包括定制咨询频率和早期发现有风险的患者,负责监督项目程序并就评估实施指标达成协议的实施经理,大使的角色。
    结论:小组管理可以加强前瞻性护理,并准确确定哪些患者可以从RPM中获益最大,以减轻CVD风险。为了成功实施,我们建议就技术支持达成明确的协议,金融基础设施和衡量评估结果的标准。
    BACKGROUND: While remote patient management (RPM) has the potential to assist in achieving treatment targets for cardiovascular risk factors in primary care, its effectiveness may vary among different patient subgroups. Panel management, which involves proactive care for specific patient risk groups, could offer a promising approach to tailor RPM to these groups. This study aims to (i) assess the perception of healthcare professionals and other stakeholders regarding the adoption and (ii) identify the barriers and facilitators for successfully implementing such a panel management approach.
    METHODS: In total, nineteen semi-structured interviews and two focus groups were conducted in the Netherlands. Three authors reviewed the audited transcripts. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Strategies (CFIR) domains were used for the thematic analysis.
    RESULTS: A total of 24 participants (GPs, nurses, health insurers, project managers, and IT consultants) participated. Overall, a panel management approach to RPM in primary care was considered valuable by various stakeholders. Implementation barriers encompassed concerns about missing necessary risk factors for patient stratification, additional clinical and technical tasks for nurses, and reimbursement agreements. Facilitators included tailoring consultation frequency and early detection of at-risk patients, an implementation manager accountable for supervising project procedures and establishing agreements on assessing implementation metrics, and ambassador roles.
    CONCLUSIONS: Panel management could enhance proactive care and accurately identify which patients could benefit most from RPM to mitigate CVD risk. For successful implementation, we recommend having clear agreements on technical support, financial infrastructure and the criteria for measuring evaluation outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:先天性心脏病(CHDs)的诊断和治疗的进展导致CHD患者的生存率提高。现在,多达90%的轻度CHD和40%的复杂CHD患者年龄达到60岁。先前的研究表明动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)和相关危险因素的风险升高,发病率,和成人先天性心脏病(ACHD)的死亡率。然而,直到最近,ACHD人群获得性心血管疾病(CVDs)的预防和管理还没有全面的指南.病例介绍:一名55岁的男性患有艾森曼格综合征和合并症(动脉高血压,心力衰竭,血脂异常,高尿酸血症,和肺栓塞(PE)病史)伴有进行性呼吸困难。心电图(ECG)显示右心室(RV)肥大和超负荷的迹象,而超声心动图显示RV功能降低,RV过载,和严重的肺动脉高压(PH)体征,保留左心室(LV)功能。排除了新的体育节目后,诊断为急性冠脉综合征(ACS),并在入院后24-48小时内进行经皮干预。结论:该病例强调了提高冠心病肺动脉高压患者对获得性心脏病认识的重要性。
    Background: Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of congenital heart diseases (CHDs) have resulted in improved survival rates for CHD patients. Up to 90% of individuals with mild CHD and 40% with complex CHD now reach the age of 60. Previous studies have indicated an elevated risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and associated risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). However, there were no comprehensive guidelines for the prevention and management of acquired cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in ACHD populations until recently. Case presentation: A 55-year-old man with Eisenmenger syndrome and comorbidities (arterial hypertension, heart failure, dyslipidemia, hyperuricemia, and a history of pulmonary embolism (PE)) presented with progressive breathlessness. The electrocardiogram (ECG) revealed signs of right ventricle (RV) hypertrophy and overload, while echocardiography showed reduced RV function, RV overload, and severe pulmonary hypertension (PH) signs, and preserved left ventricle (LV) function. After ruling out a new PE episode, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was diagnosed, and percutaneous intervention was performed within 24-48 h of admission. Conclusions: This case highlights the importance of increased awareness of acquired heart diseases in patients with pulmonary hypertension due to CHD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    高血压是世界范围内普遍存在的慢性疾病,可影响患者的生活质量。口服降压药被广泛用于控制高血压,主要通过调节肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统。然而,有限的疗效和低依从性代表了重大障碍,主要来自剂量,持续时间,和药物类型限制。此外,长期使用抗高血压药物可能导致依赖性和不良反应,在达到目标血压水平方面没有任何实质性改善。因此,研究集中在使用运动疗法治疗高血压。太极,一项广泛实践的中国健康运动,已经演变成一种运动疗法,可能有助于减轻与高血压相关的风险。因此,本文旨在概述太极拳在预防和管理高血压中的作用。
    Hypertension is a prevalent chronic condition worldwide that can impact patients\' quality of life. Oral antihypertensive drugs are widely used to manage high blood pressure, primarily by regulating the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Nevertheless, limited efficacy and low compliance represent significant obstacles, arising primarily from dose, duration, and medication type restrictions. Furthermore, the prolonged use of antihypertensive medication may result in dependence and adverse effects, without any substantial improvement in achieving targeted blood pressure leves. As a result, research has focused on using exercise therapy to treat hypertension. Tai Chi, a widely-practiced Chinese health exercise, has evolved into a form of exercise therapy that might help alleviate the risk associated with hypertension. Therefore, this article aims to outline the role of Tai Chi in preventing and managing hypertension.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Published Erratum
    [这更正了文章DOI:10.3389/fhar.2023.1239395。].
    [This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1239395.].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对乙酰氨基酚(APAP)过量是药物性肝损伤和急性肝衰竭的重要原因。诊断,筛选,和APAP诱导的肝损伤(AILI)的管理是具有挑战性的,因为涉及复杂的机制。从目前对AILI机制的研究出发,这篇综述集中在诊断领域的新发现,筛选,和AILI的管理。它强调了当前需要解决的问题。本文旨在总结近期的研究进展,并对未来的研究提出建议。
    Acetaminophen (APAP) overdose is a significant cause of drug-induced liver injury and acute liver failure. The diagnosis, screening, and management of APAP-induced liver injury (AILI) is challenging because of the complex mechanisms involved. Starting from the current studies on the mechanisms of AILI, this review focuses on novel findings in the field of diagnosis, screening, and management of AILI. It highlights the current issues that need to be addressed. This review is supposed to summarize the recent research progress and make recommendations for future research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:研究不当行为,即制造,伪造,抄袭与个人有关,机构,国家,和全球因素。研究人员对预防和管理研究不当行为的薄弱或不存在的机构指南的看法可以鼓励这些做法。非洲很少有国家对研究不端行为有明确的指导。在肯尼亚,没有记录防止或管理学术和研究机构中研究不端行为的能力。这项研究的目的是探索肯尼亚研究监管机构对预防或管理研究不当行为的发生和机构能力的看法。
    方法:对27名研究监管机构(伦理委员会主席和秘书,学术和研究机构的研究主管,和国家监管机构)。在其他问题中,参与者被问到:(1)您认为研究不端行为有多普遍?(2)您的机构是否有能力防止研究不端行为?(3)您的机构是否有能力管理研究不端行为?他们的回答被录音,转录,并使用NVivo软件进行编码。演绎编码涵盖了预定义的主题,包括对发生的感知,预防检测,调查,和研究不端行为的管理。结果以说明性报价呈现。
    结果:受访者认为研究不端行为在编写论文报告的学生中非常普遍。他们的答复表明,在机构和国家两级没有预防或管理研究不当行为的专门能力。没有关于研究不端行为的具体国家准则。在机构层面,提到的唯一能力/努力是为了减少,检测,管理学生抄袭。没有直接提到教师研究人员管理捏造和伪造或不当行为的能力。我们建议制定涵盖不当行为的肯尼亚行为守则或研究诚信准则。
    BACKGROUND: Research misconduct i.e. fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism is associated with individual, institutional, national, and global factors. Researchers\' perceptions of weak or non-existent institutional guidelines on the prevention and management of research misconduct can encourage these practices. Few countries in Africa have clear guidance on research misconduct. In Kenya, the capacity to prevent or manage research misconduct in academic and research institutions has not been documented. The objective of this study was to explore the perceptions of Kenyan research regulators on the occurrence of and institutional capacity to prevent or manage research misconduct.
    METHODS: Interviews with open-ended questions were conducted with 27 research regulators (chairs and secretaries of ethics committees, research directors of academic and research institutions, and national regulatory bodies). Among other questions, participants were asked: (1) How common is research misconduct in your view? (2) Does your institution have the capacity to prevent research misconduct? (3) Does your institution have the capacity to manage research misconduct? Their responses were audiotaped, transcribed, and coded using NVivo software. Deductive coding covered predefined themes including perceptions on occurrence, prevention detection, investigation, and management of research misconduct. Results are presented with illustrative quotes.
    RESULTS: Respondents perceived research misconduct to be very common among students developing thesis reports. Their responses suggested there was no dedicated capacity to prevent or manage research misconduct at the institutional and national levels. There were no specific national guidelines on research misconduct. At the institutional level, the only capacity/efforts mentioned were directed at reducing, detecting, and managing student plagiarism. There was no direct mention of the capacity to manage fabrication and falsification or misconduct by faculty researchers. We recommend the development of Kenya code of conduct or research integrity guidelines that would cover misconduct.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号