Prescribing cascade

处方级联
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:处方级联可能导致不必要的药物使用,医疗费用,和病人的伤害。药剂师监督多个处方者的处方,并处于良好的位置来识别这种级联,让药剂师成为关键利益相关者来解决这些问题。
    目的:评估社区药师的认识,identification,以及处方级联的管理,并评估未来策略中可能针对的行为决定因素,以最大程度地减少不适当的处方级联。
    方法:使用理论域框架(TDF)进行了一项在线调查,并于2021年11月通过电子邮件发送给爱尔兰的所有注册社区药剂师(n=3775)。使用描述性和推断性统计分析定量数据。给出了自由文本部分,以捕获未解决已确定的处方级联的原因以及帮助处方级联识别和管理的建议;本文进行了内容分析。
    结果:在220名受访者中,51%的人在调查前知道“处方级联”这个词,而69%的人在实践中发现了潜在的不适当的处方级联。在调查前,超过三分之一的人对他们识别患者处方中潜在不适当的处方级联的能力略有信心(26.4%)或完全不自信(10%)。而55.2%的人担心患者正在接受他们尚未确定的处方级联。大多数受访者希望进一步的信息/培训,以帮助处方级联识别(88.3%)和管理(86.1%)。确定的四个主要的TDF域在以下两个方面都很常见:i)影响已确定的处方级联的非分辨率,以及ii)在帮助确定和管理处方级联的建议中:“环境背景和资源”,“社会/职业角色和身份”,\'社会影响\'和\'记忆,注意和决策过程。
    结论:显然需要提供额外的资源来帮助社区药剂师识别和管理处方级联。这些发现将支持理论知情行为改变策略的发展,以帮助最小化不适当的处方级联,并降低患者与药物相关伤害的风险。
    BACKGROUND: Prescribing cascades can lead to unnecessary medication use, healthcare costs, and patient harm. Pharmacists oversee prescriptions from multiple prescribers and are well positioned to identify such cascades, making pharmacists key stakeholders to address them.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate community pharmacists\' awareness, identification, and management of prescribing cascades and to assess behavioural determinants that may be targeted in future strategies to minimise inappropriate prescribing cascades.
    METHODS: An online survey was developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and emailed to all registered community pharmacists in Ireland (n = 3775) in November 2021. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Free-text sections were given to capture reasons for non-resolution of identified prescribing cascades and suggestions to aid prescribing cascade identification and management; this text underwent content analysis.
    RESULTS: Of the 220 respondents, 51% were aware of the term \'prescribing cascade\' before the survey, whilst 69% had identified a potentially inappropriate prescribing cascade in practice. Over one third were either slightly confident (26.4%) or not confident at all (10%) in their ability to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing cascades in patients\' prescriptions before the survey, whilst 55.2% were concerned that patients were receiving prescribing cascades they had not identified. Most respondents wanted further information/training to help prescribing cascade identification (88.3%) and management (86.1%). Four predominant TDF domains identified were common to both i) influencing non-resolution of identified prescribing cascades and ii) in the suggestions to help identify and manage prescribing cascades: \'Environmental Context and Resources\', \'Social/Professional Role and Identity\', \'Social Influences\' and \'Memory, Attention and Decision Processes\'.
    CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear need to provide additional resources to help community pharmacists identify and manage prescribing cascades. These findings will support the development of theory-informed behaviour change strategies to aid the minimisation of inappropriate prescribing cascades and decrease the risk of medication-related harm for patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    处方级联是一个重要的临床问题,但经常被忽视。我们探讨了与噻嗪类药物治疗相关的抗痛风药物处方级联反应在新暴露于药物治疗的痛风初治高血压成人中的发生率。这种以人口为基础的,回顾性队列研究使用台湾国家健康保险注册数据库.纳入2000年1月1日至2016年12月31日期间新分配一线抗高血压药物的未患痛风的高血压成年人。患者分为噻嗪组(n=4192)和非噻嗪组(n=81,083)。非噻嗪组包括接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的患者,血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂,钙通道阻滞剂,或β受体阻滞剂。该研究利用倾向评分匹配和多变量Cox回归模型来研究抗高血压治疗后的抗痛风药的处方级联。调整年龄等因素,性别,合并症,同时服用药物。在倾向得分匹配后,每组由4045名患者组成,噻嗪类药物组在治疗开始后的不同时间间隔内服用抗痛风药物的风险更高。具体来说,噻嗪组的校正风险比(aHRs)为2.23,2.07和2.41<30天,31-180天,>180天,分别,表明随着时间的推移存在持续和重大的风险。比较分析显示,噻嗪类利尿剂与其他抗高血压药物处方的风险更高。180天后尤其明显。各种人口统计学和合并症的亚组分析一致显示,噻嗪类群的风险增加。与服用其他一线抗高血压药物的人相比,新服用噻嗪类药物的未患痛风的成年人随后添加抗痛风药的风险更高。这些处方级联的意识和中断对于提高患者安全性至关重要。
    Prescribing cascade is a significant clinical problem but is often overlooked. We explore the incidence of the prescribing cascades of antigout medications related to thiazide treatment in gout-naïve hypertensive adults newly exposed to the pharmacological treatment. This population-based, retrospective cohort study used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Registry Database. Gout-naïve hypertensive adults who were newly dispensed first-line antihypertensive drugs between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2016, were enrolled. Patients were divided into the thiazide group (n = 4192) and the non-thiazide group (n = 81,083). The non-thiazide group included patients who received an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin II receptor blocker, calcium channel blocker, or beta-blocker. The study utilized propensity score matching and multivariable Cox regression models to investigate the prescribing cascade of antigout agents following antihypertensive treatment, adjusting for factors like age, sex, comorbidities, and concurrent medications. After propensity score matching, each group consisted of 4045 patients, with the thiazide group exhibiting a higher risk of being prescribed antigout medications across different time intervals post-treatment initiation. Specifically, adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for the thiazide group were 2.23, 2.07, and 2.41 for < 30 days, 31-180 days, and > 180 days, respectively, indicating a sustained and significant risk over time. Comparative analyses revealed thiazide diuretics were associated with a higher risk of antigout medication prescriptions compared to other antihypertensive classes, particularly evident after 180 days. Subgroup analyses across various demographics and comorbidities consistently showed an increased risk in the thiazide cohort. Gout-naïve hypertensive adults newly dispensed thiazide had a higher risk of subsequently adding antigout agents than those taking other first-line antihypertensive medications. The awareness and interruption of these prescribing cascades are critical to improving patient safety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:处方级联是多重用药的重要贡献者。关于哪些老年人经历处方级联的风险最高,人们知之甚少。我们探索了哪些老年退伍军人在加巴喷丁(包括加巴喷丁和普瑞巴林)-环利尿剂(LD)级联反应的风险最高,鉴于近年来加巴喷丁类药物处方的急剧增加。
    方法:使用退伍军人事务和医疗保险索赔数据(2010-2019年),我们进行了处方序列对称性分析(PSSA),以评估老年退伍军人(≥66岁)加巴喷丁开始注射环利尿剂前后的利尿剂.为了识别级联,我们计算了调整后的序列比(ASR),评估LD相对于gabapentinoid起始的时间性。探索高危人群,我们使用了多变量逻辑回归,并将处方顺序建模为二元因变量。我们计算了调整后的赔率比(aOR),测量因素与一个处方订单相对于另一个处方订单的关联程度。
    结果:在发起gabapentinoid的151,442名退伍军人中,1,981例患者在开始加巴喷丁类药物后6个月内开始LD,而1,599例患者在开始加巴喷丁类药物前6个月内开始LD.在gabapentinoid-LD组中,平均年龄是73岁,98%是男性,13%是黑人,5%是西班牙裔,80%是白人。各组患者在患者和健康利用因素之间相似(所有比较的标准化平均差<0.10)。ASR为1.23(95%CI:1.13,1.34),强烈暗示级联的存在。年龄≥85岁的人不太可能发生级联(与66-74岁相比;aOR0.74,95%CI:0.56-0.96),服用≥10种药物的患者更有可能发生级联反应(与0-4种药物相比;aOR为1.39,95%CI:1.07-1.82).
    结论:在老年人中,那些年轻且服用许多药物的人可能患gabapentinoid-LD级联的风险更高,导致多重用药和潜在的药物相关危害恶化。我们没有确定这种级联的强预测因子,这表明,处方级联预防工作应该是广泛的,而不是集中在特定的亚组。
    BACKGROUND: Prescribing cascades are important contributors to polypharmacy. Little is known about which older adults are at highest risk of experiencing prescribing cascades. We explored which older veterans are at highest risk of the gabapentinoid (including gabapentin and pregabalin)-loop diuretic (LD) cascade, given the dramatic increase in gabapentinoid prescribing in recent years.
    METHODS: Using Veterans Affairs and Medicare claims data (2010-2019), we performed a prescription sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA) to assess loop diuretic initiation before and after gabapentinoid initiation among older veterans (≥66 years). To identify the cascade, we calculated the adjusted sequence ratio (aSR), which assesses the temporality of LD relative to gabapentinoid initiation. To explore high-risk groups, we used multivariable logistic regression with prescribing order modeled as a binary dependent variable. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aORs), measuring the extent to which factors are associated with one prescribing order versus another.
    RESULTS: Of 151,442 veterans who initiated a gabapentinoid, there were 1,981 patients who initiated a LD within 6 months after initiating a gabapentinoid compared to 1,599 patients who initiated a LD within 6 months before initiating a gabapentinoid. In the gabapentinoid-LD group, the mean age was 73 years, 98% were male, 13% were Black, 5% were Hispanic, and 80% were White. Patients in each group were similar across patient and health utilization factors (standardized mean difference <0.10 for all comparisons). The aSR was 1.23 (95% CI: 1.13, 1.34), strongly suggesting the cascade\'s presence. People age ≥85 years were less likely to have the cascade (compared to 66-74 years; aOR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56-0.96), and people taking ≥10 medications were more likely to have the cascade (compared to 0-4 drugs; aOR 1.39, 95% CI: 1.07-1.82).
    CONCLUSIONS: Among older adults, those who are younger and taking many medications may be at higher risk of the gabapentinoid-LD cascade, contributing to worsening polypharmacy and potential drug-related harms. We did not identify strong predictors of this cascade, suggesting that prescribing cascade prevention efforts should be widespread rather than focused on specific subgroups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    处方级联发生在患者被处方药物治疗之前处方药物的药物不良反应时。处方序列对称性分析(PSSA)可用于评估处方或配药数据库中两种药物之间的关联,从而评估处方级联的潜在发生。在这篇文章中,提出了进行PSSA以评估处方级联的分步指南。我们描述了药物数据收集和设置相关参数的时间段的注意事项,包括冲洗窗,曝光窗口,持续暴露间隔和停电期。举两个例子,我们说明了这些参数的变化对所观察到的关联强度的影响.鉴于所看到的影响,我们建议研究人员在研究PSSA处方级联时,清楚地指定和解释所有有关药物包括和时间窗口设置的考虑因素,并进行亚组和敏感性分析。
    Prescribing cascades occur when patients are prescribed medication to treat the adverse drug reaction of previously prescribed medication. Prescription sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA) can be used to assess the association between two medications in prescription or dispensing databases and thus the potential occurrence of prescribing cascades. In this article, a step-by-step guide is presented for conducting PSSA to assess prescribing cascades. We describe considerations for medication data collection and setting time periods for relevant parameters, including washout window, exposure window, continued exposure interval and blackout period. With two examples, we illustrate the impact of changes in these parameters on the strengths of associations observed. Given the impact seen, we recommend that researchers clearly specify and explain all considerations regarding medication included and time windows set when studying prescribing cascades with PSSA, and conduct subgroup and sensitivity analyses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:老年综合征(GS)涉及多种危险因素。虽然药物治疗通常有助于GS,日本老年人的具体病因尚不清楚.在这项研究中,我们研究了符合晚期老年健康保险资格的老年门诊患者中可能的处方级联率,并阐明了GS和GS之间与药物相关的差异(GSAM)趋势.
    方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了2018年10月至2019年3月日本医疗保险索赔数据中的患者;住院患者被排除在外。在GS:GS(不使用引起GS的药物)和可能的GSAM(p-GSAM;使用引起GS的药物)的参与者中确定了两组。使用Excel的贝尔曲线分析收集的数据,P<0.05,有统计学意义。
    结果:总计,纳入137781名门诊患者。在32259名没有使用引起GS的药物的门诊患者中,7342分为GS组。在使用引起GS的药物的105522名门诊患者中,8347被分类为具有p-GSAM。p-GSAM组的平均处方数明显高于GS组(P<0.01)。此外,所有GS症状均表现出显著差异,p-GSAM组比GS组的食欲下降最普遍(P<0.01)。p-GSAM组8347名门诊患者中有2826名(33.9%)怀疑可能的处方级联。
    结论:服用引起GS的药物的患者食欲受损可能导致处方级联反应。需要进一步的研究来防止这种处方级联。GeriatrGerontolInt2023;••:••-•。
    OBJECTIVE: Multiple risk factors are involved in geriatric syndrome (GS) occurring in older adults. Although drug therapy often contributes to GS, the specific causes among older adults in Japan remain unclear. In this study, we examined the possible prescribing cascade rate among older outpatients eligible for Late-stage Elderly Health Insurance and elucidated the differences between GS and GS associated with medication (GSAM) trends.
    METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled patients from health insurance claims data in Japan between October 2018 and March 2019; hospitalized patients were excluded. Two groups were identified among the participants with GS: GS (no use of GS-causing medications) and possible-GSAM (p-GSAM; use of GS-causing medications). The collected data were analyzed using the Bell Curve for Excel, and statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
    RESULTS: In total, 137 781 outpatients were enrolled. Of the 32 259 outpatients who did not use GS-causing medications, 7342 were classified into the GS group. Among 105 522 outpatients who used GS-causing medications, 8347 were classified as having p-GSAM. The mean number of prescriptions was significantly higher in the p-GSAM group than in the GS group (P < 0.01). Furthermore, all GS symptoms showed significant differences, with impaired appetite being the most prevalent in the p-GSAM group than in the GS group (P < 0.01). A possible prescribing cascade was suspected in 2826 (33.9%) of 8347 outpatients in the p-GSAM group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Impaired appetite in patients taking GS-causing medications might lead to prescribing cascades. Further studies are needed to prevent such prescribing cascades. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 61-67.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:当药物不良事件被误解为新的医疗条件和第二,潜在不必要的药物,是用来治疗不良事件的处方。处方级联的人口水平后果仍然未知。
    方法:这项基于人群的队列研究使用了安大略省的链接卫生管理数据库,加拿大。这项研究包括居住在社区的成年人,66岁或以上患有高血压,并且在上一年没有心力衰竭(HF)或利尿剂使用史,新配发钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)。随后在事件CCB分配后90天内分配利尿剂的个体被归类为处方级联组。与那些没有分配利尿剂的人相比,归类为非处方级联组。那些有和没有处方级联的人在倾向得分和性别上一对一匹配。主要结果是严重不良事件(SAE),这是90天随访期内急诊室就诊和住院的综合结果.我们使用Andersen-Gill复发事件回归模型,以95%置信区间(CI)估算SAE的风险比(HR)。
    结果:在39,347名患有高血压且无HF病史的老年人中,新分配了CCB,1881(4.8%)在CCB开始后90天内分配了新的利尿剂。与非处方级联组相比,处方级联组的SAE发生率较高(HR:1.21,95%CI:1.02-1.43).
    结论:CCB-利尿剂处方级联与SAE的发生率增加有关,暗示除了开第二种药物治疗之外的伤害。我们的研究提高了对CCB-利尿剂处方级联在人群水平的下游影响的认识,并为识别这种处方级联的临床医生提供了一个机会,以审查他们的患者药物,以确定他们是否可以优化。
    Prescribing cascades occur when a drug adverse event is misinterpreted as a new medical condition and a second, potentially unnecessary drug, is prescribed to treat the adverse event. The population-level consequences of prescribing cascades remain unknown.
    This population-based cohort study used linked health administrative databases in Ontario, Canada. The study included community-dwelling adults, 66 years of age or older with hypertension and no history of heart failure (HF) or diuretic use in the prior year, newly dispensed a calcium channel blocker (CCB). Individuals subsequently dispensed a diuretic within 90 days of incident CCB dispensing were classified as the prescribing cascade group, and compared to those not dispensed a diuretic, classified as the non-prescribing cascade group. Those with and without a prescribing cascade were matched one-to-one on the propensity score and sex. The primary outcome was a serious adverse event (SAE), which was the composite of emergency room visits and hospitalizations in the 90-day follow-up period. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for SAE using an Andersen-Gill recurrent events regression model.
    Among 39,347 older adults with hypertension and no history of HF who were newly dispensed a CCB, 1881 (4.8%) had a new diuretic dispensed within 90 days after CCB initiation. Compared to the non-prescribing cascade group, those in the prescribing cascade group had higher rates of SAEs (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.02-1.43).
    The CCB-diuretic prescribing cascade was associated with an increased rate of SAEs, suggesting harm beyond prescribing a second drug therapy. Our study raises awareness of the downstream impact of the CCB-diuretic prescribing cascade at a population level and provides an opportunity for clinicians who identify this prescribing cascade to review their patients\' medications to determine if they can be optimized.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    老年人接受治疗以提高生活质量和寿命,但药物治疗的益处也伴随着药物不良事件(ADE)的可能性.避免使用ADE已成为国家卫生优先事项,对健康结果和医疗保健成本产生重大影响。多发病率的存在,生理功能的变化,和多重用药使老年人更容易受到药物相关的ADE。必须使用交互式支持工具,以老年友好的药物医嘱集和老年咨询的形式,以及由药剂师主导的药物审查和优化,以减少ADE的发生和不必要的处方级联。
    Older adults are given therapies to enhance the quality and longevity of life, but with the benefits of medication therapy also comes the potential for adverse drug events (ADEs). Avoiding ADEs has become a national health priority with substantial impact on health outcomes and health care costs. The presence of multimorbidity, changes in physiologic function, and polypharmacy make older adults more vulnerable to medication-related ADEs. Use of interactive support tools in the form of geriatric-friendly medication order sets and geriatric consultations along with pharmacist-led medication review and optimization are imperative to decrease the occurrence of ADEs and unnecessary prescribing cascades.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:他汀类药物是最普遍的处方药物之一,与可能提示额外治疗的不良事件相关(即,处方级联)。据我们所知,尚未对他汀类药物相关的处方级联进行全面评估。
    方法:我们利用序列对称性分析,根据成人他汀类药物起始剂的4级解剖治疗化学代码,迭代筛选所有治疗类(“标记”类)的处方序列,使用IBMMarketscan商业和医疗保险补充索赔数据库(2005-2019)。计算了每个他汀类药物标记类别二元组的起始顺序和长期趋势调整后的序列比,在标记类启动剂中,他汀类药物启动±90天。在分类为处方级联的信号中,我们计算了一年内伤害所需的自然数(NNTH),作为暴露者中额外风险的倒数。
    结果:我们确定了2,265,519种他汀类药物引发剂(平均±SD年龄,56.4±12.0岁;48.7%女性;7.5%患有心血管疾病)。辛伐他汀(他汀类药物引发剂的34.4%)和阿托伐他汀(33.9%)是最常见的他汀类药物。我们鉴定出160个显著的他汀类标记二重信号,其中35.6%(n=57)被归类为潜在处方级联。在前25个最强信号(最低NNTH)中,12个被归类为潜在的处方级联,包括渗透作用的泻药(NTH,44,95%CI43-46),阿片类药物+非阿片类药物联合镇痛药(81,95%CI74-91),和第一代头孢菌素(204,95%CI175-246)。
    结论:采用高通量序列对称性分析筛选,我们根据已知和未知的他汀类药物相关不良事件确定了以前已知的处方级联以及潜在的新处方级联.
    Statins are among the most prevalent medications prescribed and associated with adverse events that may prompt additional treatment (i.e., a prescribing cascade). No comprehensive assessment of statin-related prescribing cascades has been performed to our knowledge.
    We utilized sequence symmetry analysis to iteratively screen prescribing sequences of all therapeutic classes (\"marker\" classes) based on Level 4 Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes among adult statin initiators, using IBM Marketscan commercial and Medicare supplemental claims databases (2005-2019). Order of initiation and secular trend-adjusted sequence ratios were calculated for each statin-marker class dyad, among marker class initiators ±90 days of statin initiation. Among signals classified as prescribing cascades, we calculated naturalistic number needed to harm (NNTH) within 1 year as the inverse of the excess risk among exposed.
    We identified 2 265 519 statin initiators (mean ± SD age, 56.4 ± 12.0 years; 48.7% women; 7.5% with cardiovascular disease). Simvastatin (34.4% of statin initiators) and atorvastatin (33.9%) were the most commonly initiated statins. We identified 160 significant statin-marker class dyad signals, of which 35.6% (n = 57) were classified as potential prescribing cascades. Of the top 25 strongest signals (lowest NNTH), 12 were classified as potential prescribing cascades, including osmotically acting laxatives (NNTH, 44, 95% CI 43-46), opioids + non-opioid combination analgesics (81, 95% CI 74-91), and first-generation cephalosporins (204, 95% CI 175-246).
    Using high-throughput sequence symmetry analysis screening, we identified previously known prescribing cascades as well as potentially new prescribing cascades based on known and unknown statin-related adverse events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    重度抑郁症(MDD)的药物治疗通常包括试错和临床医生偏好的方法。在找到最佳治疗方案之前,患者通常会失败一种或多种抗抑郁药。药物基因组学(PGx)可以帮助开出合适的抗抑郁药,从而减少MDD缓解时间和药物不良事件的发生。由于许多抗抑郁药被细胞色素P450酶代谢和/或抑制细胞色素P450酶(例如,CYP2C19或CYP2D6),药物诱导的表型转换在服用抗抑郁药的患者中很常见。这种情况会影响对患者PGx结果的解释,由于多种药物相互作用导致的无效/不良药物反应的总体风险,和建议。这个复杂的病例描述了一个患有MDD的患者,广泛性焦虑障碍,和慢性疼痛,由于氟西汀的处方级联后过度镇静而跌倒,安非他酮,还有多塞平.这些抗抑郁药提供了显著的附加镇静作用,并与患者的氢可酮相互作用,可能导致不受控制的疼痛,向上剂量滴定氢可酮,和较高的整体镇静负担。此病例报告中描述的PGx结果和药物诱导的表型转换解释了患者过度镇静和可能无效/毒性的抗抑郁药和阿片类药物治疗。此病例报告还说明了更及时的多药物相互作用评估(最好与先发制人PGx测试相结合)如何告知不同的处方模式,减少/避免了处方级联,并有可能预防与毒品有关的跌倒。
    Pharmacotherapy for major depressive disorder (MDD) typically consists of trial-and-error and clinician preference approaches, where patients often fail one or more antidepressants before finding an optimal regimen. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) can assist in prescribing appropriate antidepressants, thereby reducing the time to MDD remission and occurrence of adverse drug events. Since many antidepressants are metabolized by and/or inhibit cytochrome P450 enzymes (e.g., CYP2C19 or CYP2D6), drug-induced phenoconversion is common in patients on antidepressant combinations. This condition influences the interpretation of a patient\'s PGx results, overall risk of ineffective/adverse medication response due to multi-drug interactions, and the recommendations. This complex case describes a patient with MDD, generalized anxiety disorder, and chronic pain who experienced a fall due to excessive sedation following a prescribing cascade of fluoxetine, bupropion, and doxepin. These antidepressants delivered a significant additive sedative effect and interacted with the patient\'s hydrocodone, potentially contributing to uncontrolled pain, upward dose titration of hydrocodone, and a higher overall sedative burden. The PGx results and drug-induced phenoconversion described in this case report explain the patient\'s excessive sedation and possibly ineffective/toxic antidepressant and opioid treatment. This case report also illustrates how a more timely multi-drug interaction assessment (preferably in conjunction with preemptive PGx testing) may have informed a different prescribing pattern, reduced/avoided a prescribing cascade, and potentially prevented a drug-related fall.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号