Pelvic fractures are common after blunt trauma with patients\' presentation ranging from stable with insignificant fractures to life-threatening exsanguination from unstable fractures. Often, hemorrhagic shock from a pelvic fracture may go unrecognized and high clinical suspicion for a pelvic source lies with the clinician. A multidisciplinary coordinated effort is required for management of these complex patients. In the exsanguinating patient, hemorrhage control remains the top priority and may be achieved with external stabilization, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, preperitoneal pelvic packing, angiographic intervention, or a combination of therapies. These modalities have been shown to reduce mortality in this challenging population.

BACKGROUND: Open pelvic fractures are commonly associated with life-threatening, uncontrollable haemorrhages. Although management methods for pelvic injury-associated haemorrhage have been established, the early mortality rate associated with open pelvic fractures remains high. This study aimed to identify predictors of mortality and effective treatment methods for open pelvic fractures.
METHODS: We defined open pelvic fractures as pelvic fractures with an open wound directly connected to the adjacent soft tissue, genitals, perineum, or anorectal structures, resulting in soft tissue injuries. This study was performed on trauma patients (age ≥15 years) injured by a blunt mechanism between 2011 and 2021 at a single trauma centre. We collected and analysed the data on the Injury Severity Score (ISS), the Revised Trauma Score (RTS), the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit stay, transfusion, preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP), resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA), therapeutic angio-embolisation, laparotomy, faecal diversion, and mortality.
RESULTS: Forty-seven patients with blunt open pelvic fractures were included. The median age was 45 years (interquartile range, 27-57 years) and median ISS was 34 (24-43). The most frequently performed treatment methods were laparotomy (53%) and pelvic binder (53%), followed by faecal diversion (40%) and PPP (38%). PPP was the only method performed at a higher rate in the survival group for haemorrhagic control (41% vs. 30%). Haemorrhagic mortality was present in one case that received PPP. The overall mortality was 21%. In the univariate logistic regression analysis, initial systolic blood pressure (SBP), TRISS, RTS, packed red blood cell transfusion for the first 24 h, and base excess showed statistical significance (p<0.05). In the multivariate logistic regression model, initial SBP was identified as an independent risk factor for mortality (odds ratio, 0.943; 95% confidence interval, 0.907-0.980; p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: A low initial SPB may be an independent predictor of mortality in patients with open pelvic fractures. Our findings suggest that PPP might be a feasible method to decrease haemorrhagic mortality from open pelvic fractures, especially for haemodynamically unstable patients with low initial SBP. Further studies are required to validate these clinical findings.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is advocated for hemorrhage control in pelvic fracture patients in shock. We evaluated REBOA in patients undergoing preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) for pelvic fracture-related hemorrhage.
METHODS: Retrospective, single-institution study of unstable pelvic fractures (hemodynamic instability despite 2 units of red blood cells (RBCs) and fracture identified on x-ray). Management included the placement of a Zone III REBOA in the emergency department (ED) for systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg. All PPP patients were included and analyzed for injury characteristics, transfusion requirements, outcomes and complications. Additionally, patients who received REBOA (REBOA+) were compared to those that did not (REBOA-).
RESULTS: During the study period (January 2015 - January 2019), 652 pelvic fracture patients were admitted; 78 consecutive patients underwent PPP. Median RBCs at PPP completion compared to 24 h post-packing were 11 versus 3 units (p<0.05). Median time to operation was 45 min. After PPP, 7 (9%) patients underwent angioembolization. Mortality was 14%. No mortalities were due to ongoing pelvic fracture hemorrhage or physiologic exhaustion; all were a withdrawal of life sustaining support, most commonly due to neurologic insults (TBI/fat emboli = 6, stroke/spinal cord injury = 3). REBOA+ patients (n = 31) had a significantly higher injury severity score (45 vs 38, p<0.01) and higher heart rate (130 vs 118 beats per minute, p = 0.04) than REBOA-. The systolic blood pressure, base deficit, and number of RBCs transfused in the ED, and time spent in the ED were similar between groups. REBOA+ had a higher median transfusion of RBCs at PPP completion (11 units vs 5 units, p<0.01) but similar RBC transfusion in the 24 h after PPP (2 vs 1 units, p = 0.27). Mortality, pelvic infection, and ICU length of stay was not different between these cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: PPP with REBOA was utilized in more severely injured patients with greater physiologic derangements. Although REBOA patients required greater transfusion requirements, there were no deaths due to acute pelvic hemorrhage. This suggests the combination of REBOA with PPP provides life-saving hemorrhage control in otherwise devastating injuries.

Preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) is an important intervention for control of severe pelvic hemorrhage in blunt trauma patients. We hypothesized that PPP is associated with an increased incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE).
A retrospective cohort analysis of blunt trauma patients with severe pelvic fractures (AIS ≥4) using the 2015-2017 American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was performed. Patients who underwent PPP within four hours of admission were matched to patients who did not using propensity score matching. Matching was performed based on demographics, comorbidities, injury- and resuscitation-related parameters, vital signs at presentation, and initiation and type of prophylactic anticoagulation. The rates of DVT and PE were compared between the matched groups.
Out of 5129 patients with severe pelvic fractures, 157 (3.1%) underwent PPP within four h of presentation and were matched with 157 who did not. No significant differences were detected between the two matched groups in any of the examined baseline variables. Similarly, mortality and end-organ failure rates were not different. However, PPP patients were significantly more likely to develop DVT (12.7% versus 5.1%, P = 0.028) and PE (5.7% versus 0.0%, P = 0.003).
PPP in severe pelvic fractures secondary to blunt trauma is associated with an increased risk of DVT and PE. A high index of suspicion and a low threshold for screening for these conditions should be maintained in patients who undergo PPP.

UNASSIGNED: A common iliac vein injury in the absence of pelvic fractures due to blunt trauma is rare, with no treatment strategy established.
UNASSIGNED: A 48-year-old man, who was injured in a dumbwaiter accident, presented to the hospital with hemorrhagic shock. Computed tomography (CT) revealed active bleeding from the intercostal and hepatic arteries as well as the left common iliac vein. No pelvic fracture was noted. Preperitoneal pelvic packing was performed for the left common iliac vein injury as a damage control surgery. After the operation, endovascular embolization was performed to address the arterial bleeding. The patient became hemodynamically stable, and follow-up CT showed no signs of bleeding. The packing gauze was removed 3 days after the admission. The patient was discharged without complications.
UNASSIGNED: Preperitoneal pelvic packing provided temporary hemostasis in a hemodynamically unstable patient with common iliac vein injury but with no pelvic fractures.

BACKGROUND: The overall mortality of hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic trauma is high. Their management is controversial concerning places of arterioembolization and pelvic packing associated with pelvic stabilization. The aim of this study was to collect the pre-peritoneal pelvic packing (PPP) performed in our institution over 10years in order to propose a management algorithm.
METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2020, all patients with a hemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture who had PPP combined with pelvic stabilization were included. Data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. The main judgement criteria were early hemorrhage-induced mortality (<24h) and overall mortality (<30d).
RESULTS: Twenty patients had PPP out of 287 polytrauma patients with pelvic fracture. The first-line PPP proposed in our algorithm significantly reduced the number of red blood cells (RBCs) (P=0.0231) and improved systolic blood pressure (SBP) (P<0.001) within 24hours of first-line PPP (compared with preoperative). Six patients (30%) were embolized postoperatively for active bleeding not necessarily pelvic. The overall mortality at 30days was 50% (10/20).
CONCLUSIONS: PPP is a fast, easy, effective and safe procedure for venous, bone and sometimes arterial bleeding. PPP is part of damage control surgery and we propose it as a first-line procedure. AE remains complementary in a second step.
METHODS:

OBJECTIVE: Hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures still represent a challenge to trauma surgeons and have a very high mortality. This study was designed to explore the effect of the interventions of direct preperitoneal pelvic packing for the hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures.
METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 67 cases of severe pelvic fractures with unstable hemodynamics from October 2011 to December 2019. All patients presented in our emergency center and received preperitoneal pelvic packing were included in this study. The indication was persistent systolic blood pressure ≤90 mmHg during initial resuscitation and after transfusion of two units of red blood cells. Patients with hemodynamic stability who need no preperitoneal pelvic packing to control bleeding were excluded. Their demographic characteristics, clinical features, laboratory results, therapeutic interventions, adverse events, and prognostic outcomes were collected from digital information system of electronic medical records. Statistics were described as mean ± standard deviation or medium and analyzed using pair sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test.
RESULTS: The patients\' average age was 41.6 years, ranging from 10 to 88 years. Among them, 45 cases were male (67.2%) and 22 cases were female (32.8%). Significant difference was found regarding the systolic blood pressure (mmHg) in the emergency department (78.4 ± 13.9) and after preperitoneal pelvic packing in the surgery intensive care unit (100.1 ± 17.6) (p < 0.05). Simultaneously, the arterial base deficit (mmol/L) were significantly lower in the surgery intensive care unit (median -6, interquartile range -8 to -2) than in the emergency department (median -10, interquartile range -14 to -8) (p < 0.05). After preperitoneal pelvic packing, 15 patients (22.4%) underwent pelvic angiography for persistent hypotension or suspected ongoing haemorrhage. The overall mortality rate was 29.5% (20 of 67).
CONCLUSIONS: Preperitoneal pelvic packing, as a useful surgical technique, is less invasive and can be very efficient in early intra-pelvic bleed control.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with major pelvic fractures who undergo preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) has not been investigated. We hypothesized that patients who undergo PPP are at high risk for VTE, thus early prophylactic anticoagulation and screening duplex are warranted.
All patients requiring PPP from 2015 to 2019 were reviewed. Management and outcomes were analyzed.
During the study period, 79 patients underwent PPP. Excluding the early deaths, 17 patients had deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and 6 had pulmonary emboli (PE); 4 patients had both DVT/PE. Overall mortality was 15%. Thirty-two patients underwent screening duplex within 72 h of admission and 10 were positive for DVT.
Patients with complex pelvic trauma undergoing PPP have a 23% incidence of DVT and an additional 8% incidence of PE. 31% of screening ultrasounds are positive. The overall mortality was 15%. With a high incidence of VTE in this patient population, we recommend screening duplex ultrasounds.

Pelvic ring injuries presenting in hemorrhagic shock have historically had a mortality rate greater than 30%. To address this high mortality rate our institution has had a multi-disciplinary protocol for hemodynamically unstable pelvic ring injuries since 1993. In 2004, this protocol was revised to prioritize pre-peritoneal pelvic packing over angiography to rapidly control hemorrhage, reduce high-volume blood transfusions, and decrease the number of deaths from acute blood loss. This protocol has been successful in reducing deaths from hemorrhage by 30%. Despite the benefits of such a protocol, many trauma centers are not routinely stabilizing pelvic ring injuries or controlling pelvic hemorrhage. Subsequently, mortality rates remain high with a significant proportion of patients dying from acute blood loss. Trauma centers adhering to multi-disciplinary protocols that allow for rapid stabilization of the pelvis and simultaneous control of multiple sites of hemorrhage in hybrid operative suites are promising future directions for the management of patients with these lethal injuries.

Patients presenting with hemodynamic instability associated with pelvic fractures continue to have very high mortality and surgeons continue to seek damage control strategies that may improve survival. Strategies usually require massive transfusion, immediate pelvic stabilization and another adjunctive maneuver\'s such as angioembolization or preperitoneal pelvic packing to prevent hemorrhagic death. One current intervention that has regained some popularity in lieu of resuscitative thoracotomy is the Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA). This requires some manner of femoral arterial access to insert a balloon into the aorta and increase central blood pressure (cardiac and cerebral perfusion) and control active pelvic bleeding. Based on several animal models and an increasing number of publications, many US level I trauma centers have now opted to use REBOA in carefully selected patients showing signs of near cardiac arrest from non-compressible torso hemorrhage. Description of the current advances in aortic occlusion using catheter-based technology in the setting of severe shock for non-compressible torso hemorrhage from pelvic ring fracture is the purpose of this report.