With fertility rates at an all-time low, children have become even more the \'treasures\' of their families. Progress in genetic selection technology has made preimplantation genetic diagnosis an increasingly common practice in clinics. However, the practice of purposively selecting genes for future children remains controversial. In this article, the process of preimplantation genetic diagnosis is introduced and related philosophical and social perspectives are reviewed. Finally, the ethics related to this practice are discussed in the contexts of obligation theory, utility theory, and four ethical principles. The authors hope this article sheds light on the diverse perspectives used to consider and discuss the ethical issues surrounding gene selection and, importantly, helps nurses provide care grounded in ethics and humanity in ethically uncertain circumstances.
BACKGROUND: 胚胎著床前基因診斷的倫理思辨.
少子化時代來臨，孩子成為家庭的寶貝，隨著基因選擇的技術進步，胚胎著床前基因診斷被廣泛應用於臨床，然而透過「人工」的方式為孩子選擇基因備受爭議。本文透過簡介胚胎著床前基因診斷，並回顧相關哲學及社會觀，最後使用義務論、效益論、生命醫學倫理四原則進行倫理思辨，期望藉此探討基因選擇的倫理議題，讓護理師面臨照護困境時，有多元的思維，提供以倫理人文為導向的關懷與照護。.

OBJECTIVE: α-thalassemia is an autosomal recessive monogenic blood disorder, affecting up to 5% of the world\'s population. The occurrence rate of the disease in Vietnam varies up to up to 51.5%, with high rate of mutation carriers, of couples consisting of two carriers at risk of bearing a child with fetal Hb Bart, which can develop into hydrops fetalis syndrome, threatening the well-being of the mother and the child. Our study aims to facilitate birth of healthy/asymptomatic children of α-thalassemia carrier couples who received reproductive service at our centre during the period of 2019-2022.
METHODS: 89 couples at risks of having α-thalassemia offsprings requested IVF procedures and PGD at Post Hospital during 2019-2022 were recruited for investigation. Couple and additional family members\' peripheral blood samples of couples and additional family members were subjected to haemoglobin electrophoresis, DNA extraction for α-thalassemia gene mutation detection and STRs linkage analysis. Data were observed and analysed on GeneMarker software.
RESULTS: 91 cycles of PGD for α-thalassemia were carried out for 89 couples. α-thalassemia large deletion (--SEA/αα) was the most common mutation identified in 88 couples, in which 4 cases also carried β-thalassemia point mutations. Combining results of PGS and PGD, 278/424 amplified embryos were transferable (HBA-mutation free or carriers of single heterozygous HBA mutation, without chromosomal abnormality). 64/89 couples have been transferred with the embryos (prioritizing mutation free ones over carriers), resulting in the birth of 36 α-thalassemia disease-free children, 17 ongoing pregnancies, and 11 with miscarriages.
CONCLUSIONS: Successful application of microsatellite-based method in PGD facilitated the birth of 36 healthy children and 17 ongoing pregnancies for 53/64 couples with embryo-transferred. All resulted clinical births displayed confirmation results in line with the PGD results, thus demonstrating the feasibility and credibility of the use of STR markers in PGD.

UNASSIGNED: Androgen resistance syndrome or androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS - Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome, OMIM 300068) is an X-linked recessive genetic syndrome causing disorders of sexual development in males. This disease is caused by mutations in the AR gene located on the X chromosome, which encodes the protein that structures the androgen receptor, with the role of receiving androgens. Mutation of the AR gene causes complete or partial loss of androgen receptor function, thereby androgen not being obtained and exerting its effect on target organs, resulting in abnormalities of the male reproductive system due to this organ system, differentiating towards feminization under the influence of estrogen. Disease prevention can be achieved by using pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, which enables couples carrying the mutation to have healthy offspring.
UNASSIGNED: To carry out preimplantation genetic diagnosis of androgen resistance syndrome.
UNASSIGNED: Sanger sequencing was used to detect the mutation in the blood samples of the couple, their son, and 01 embryo that were biopsied on the fifth day based on the findings of next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the affected son. We combined Sanger sequencing and linkage analysis using short tandem repeats (STR) to provide diagnostic results.
UNASSIGNED: We performed preimplantation genetic diagnosis for AIS on an embryo from a couple who had previously had an affected son. Consequently, one healthy embryo was diagnosed without the variant NM_000044: c.796del (p.Asp266IlefsTer30).
UNASSIGNED: We report on a novel variant (NM_000044: c.796del (p.Asp266IlefsTer30)) in the AR gene discovered in Vietnam. The developed protocol was helpful for the preimplantation genetic diagnosis process to help families with the monogenic disease of AIS but wish to have healthy children.

OBJECTIVE: Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) has attracted considerable ethical, legal, and social scrutiny, but academic debate often fails to reflect clinical realities.
METHODS: Addressing this disconnect, a review of 506 articles from 1999 to 2019 across humanities and social sciences was conducted to synthesize the Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) of PGT. This review mined PubMed, WoS, and Scopus databases, using both MeSH terms and keywords to map out the research terrain.
RESULTS: The findings reveal a tenfold increase in global research output on PGT\'s ELSI from 1999 to 2019, signifying rising interest and concern. Despite heightened theoretical discourse on selecting \"optimal\" offspring, such practices were scarcely reported in clinical environments. Conversely, critical issues like PGT funding and familial impacts remain underexplored. Notably, 86% of the ELSI literature originates from just 12 countries, pointing to a research concentration.
CONCLUSIONS: This review underscores an urgent need for ELSI research to align more closely with clinical practice, promoting collaborations among ethicists, clinicians, policymakers, and economists. Such efforts are essential for grounding debates in practical relevance, ultimately steering PGT towards ethical integrity, societal acceptance, and equitable access, aiming to harmonize PGT research with real-world clinical concerns, enhancing the relevance and impact of future ethical discussions.

BACKGROUND: Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), also referred to as preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), is an advanced reproductive technology used during in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles to identify genetic abnormalities in embryos prior to their implantation. PGT is used to screen embryos for chromosomal abnormalities, monogenic disorders, and structural rearrangements.
UNASSIGNED: Over the past few decades, PGT has undergone tremendous development, resulting in three primary forms: PGT-A, PGT-M, and PGT-SR. PGT-A is utilized for screening embryos for aneuploidies, PGT-M is used to detect disorders caused by a single gene, and PGT-SR is used to detect chromosomal abnormalities caused by structural rearrangements in the genome.
OBJECTIVE: In this review, we thoroughly summarized and reviewed PGT and discussed its pros and cons down to the minutest aspects. Additionally, recent studies that highlight the advancements of PGT in the current era, including their future perspectives, were reviewed.
CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive review aims to provide new insights into the understanding of techniques used in PGT, thereby contributing to the field of reproductive genetics.

This paper critically engages with how life not worth living (LNWL) and cognate concepts are used in the field of beginning-of-life bioethics as the basis of arguments for morally requiring the application of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and/or germline genome editing (GGE). It is argued that an objective conceptualization of LNWL is largely too unreliable in beginning-of-life cases for deriving decisive normative reasons that would constitute a moral duty on the part of intending parents. Subjective frameworks are found to be more suitable to determine LNWL, but they are not accessible in beginning-of-life cases because there is no subject yet. Conceptual and sociopolitical problems are additionally pointed out regarding the common usage of clear case exemplars. The paper concludes that a moral requirement for the usage of PGD and GGE cannot be derived from the conceptual base of LNWL, as strong reasons that can be reliably determined are required to limit reproductive freedom on moral grounds. Educated predictions on prospective well-being might still be useful regarding the determination of moral permissibility of PGD and/or GGE. It is suggested that due to the high significance of subjective experience in the normativity of beginning-of-life bioethics, the discipline is called to more actively realize the inclusion of people with disabilities. This regards for instance research design, citation practices, and language choices to increase the accessibility of societal debates on the reproductive ethics of genetic technologies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether insemination via intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) provides any benefit over in vitro fertilization (IVF) insemination for nonmale factor infertility with respect to preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) results and pregnancy outcome.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database.
METHODS: US-based fertility clinics reporting to the Society for Assisted Reprodcutive Technology.
METHODS: Patients undergoing IVF or ICSI inseminations in nonmale factor PGT for aneuploidy cycles.
METHODS: In vitro fertilization vs. ICSI inseminations.
METHODS: Primary outcomes were the percentage of embryos suitable for transfer and live birth rates (LBRs). Secondary outcomes included subgroup analysis for embryos suitable for transfer on cycles from patients ≥35-year-old vs. <35-year-old, ≤6 oocytes retrieved vs. >6 oocytes retrieved, and unexplained infertility. Additionally, gestational age at delivery and birth weight between IVF and ICSI inseminations were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 30,446 nonmale factor PGT diagnoses for aneuploidy cycles were evaluated, of which 4,867 were IVF inseminations and 25,579 were ICSI inseminations. Following exclusion criteria and adjustment for any necessary confounding variables, no significant differences existed in embryos suitable for transfer between IVF and ICSI treatment cycles, 41.6% (40.6%, 42.6%) vs. 42.5% (42.0%, 42.9%), respectively, or in LBRs, 50.1% (37.8, 62.4%) vs. 50.8% (38.5%, 62.9%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in the rates of embryos suitable for transfer and LBRs between IVF and ICSI inseminations in nonmale factor cycles undergoing PGT for aneuploidy.

BACKGROUND: The process of gamete formation and early embryonic development involves rapid DNA replication, chromosome segregation and cell division. These processes may be affected by mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes. The aim of this study was to evaluate BRCA mutation inheritance and its effect on early embryonic development according to the parental origin of the mutation. The study question was approached by analyzing in vitro fertilization cycles (IVF) that included pre-implantation testing (PGT-M) for a BRCA gene mutation.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared cycles of pre-implantation genetic testing for mutations (PGT-M) between male and female patients diagnosed with BRCA 1/2 mutations (cases), to a control group of two other mutations with dominant inheritance (myotonic dystrophy (MD) and polycystic kidney disease (PKD)). Results were compared according to mutation type and through a generalized linear model analysis.
RESULTS: The cohort included 88 PGT-M cycles (47 BRCA and 41 non-BRCA) among 50 patients. Maternal and paternal ages at oocyte retrieval were comparable between groups. When tested per cycle, FSH dose, maximum estradiol level, oocytes retrieved, number of zygotes, and number of embryos available for biopsy and affected embryos, were not significantly different among mutation types. All together 444 embryos were biopsied: the rate of affected embryos was comparable between groups. Among BRCA patients, the proportion of affected embryos was similar between maternal and paternal mutation origin (p = 0.24). In a generalized linear model analysis, the relative oocyte yield in maternal BRCA patients was significantly lower (0.7, as related to the non BRCA group)(p < 0.001). Zygote formation and blastulation were not affected by the BRCA gene among paternal cases (P = 0.176 and P = 0.293 respectively), nor by paternal versus maternal BRCA carriage (P = 0.904 and P = 0.149, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: BRCA PGT-M cycles performed similarly compared to non-BRCA cycles. Inheritance rate and cycle parameters were not affected by the parental origin of the mutation.

UNASSIGNED: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD, ORPHA:98896) is a lethal X-linked recessive disease that manifests as progressive muscular weakness and wasting. Mutations in the dystrophy gene (DMD) are the main cause of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
UNASSIGNED: This study aims to determine novel mutations of DMD and help preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for family planning. Here present a 4-year-old Chinses boy with DMD, whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed to identify the molecular basis of the disease. It was confirmed that the boy carried a novel hemizygous mutation of NC_000023.11(NM_004006.3): c.5912_5922 + 19delinsATGTATG in DMD which inherited from his mother. This led to the aberrant splicing of DMD which demonstrated by a minigene splicing assay and further resulted in the impairment of the dystrophy protein.
UNASSIGNED: Our study discovered a novel splicing mutation of DMD in a DMD patient, which expands the variant spectrum of this gene and provide precise genetic diagnosis of DMD for timely therapy. Meanwhile, this finding will supply valuable information for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Hemophilia A (HA), a rare recessive X-linked bleeding disorder, is caused by either deficiency or dysfunction of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) resulting from deleterious mutations in the F8 gene encoding FVIII. Over the last 4 decades, the methods aimed at determining the HA carrier status in female relatives of HA patients have evolved from phenotypic studies based on coagulation tests providing merely probabilistic results, via genetic linkage studies based on polymorphic markers providing more accurate results, to next generation sequencing studies enabling highly precise identification of the causative F8 mutation. In parallel, the options for prenatal diagnosis of HA have progressed from examination of FVIII levels in fetal blood samples at weeks 20-22 of pregnancy to genetic analysis of fetal DNA extracted from chorionic villus tissue at weeks 11-14 of pregnancy. In some countries, in vitro fertilization (IVF) combined with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has gradually become the procedure of choice for HA carriers who wish to prevent further transmission of HA without the need to undergo termination of pregnancies diagnosed with affected fetuses. In rare cases, genetic analysis of a HA carrier might be complicated by skewed X chromosome inactivation (XCI) of her non-hemophilic X chromosome, thus leading to the phenotypic manifestation of moderate to severe HA. Such skewed XCI may be associated with deleterious mutations in X-linked genes located on the non-hemophilic X chromosome, which should be considered in the process of genetic counseling and PGD planning for the symptomatic HA carrier. Therefore, whole exome sequencing, combined with X-chromosome targeted bioinformatic analysis, is highly recommended for symptomatic HA carriers diagnosed with skewed XCI in order to identify additional deleterious mutations potentially involved in XCI skewing. Identification of such mutations, which may profoundly impact the reproductive choices of HA carriers with skewed XCI, is extremely important.