Predict

预测
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19(PASC)的后遗症,也被称为长科维德,是急性COVID-19后一系列长期症状的广泛分组。这些症状可能发生在一系列生物系统中,导致在确定PASC的危险因素和该疾病的病因方面面临挑战。对预测未来PASC的特征的理解是有价值的,因为这可以为识别高风险个体和未来的预防工作提供信息。然而,目前有关PASC危险因素的知识有限。
    目的:使用来自国家COVID队列合作组织的55,257名患者(其中1名PASC患者与4名匹配对照)的样本,作为美国国立卫生研究院长期COVID计算挑战的一部分,我们试图从一组经筛选的临床知情协变量中预测PASC诊断的个体风险.国家COVID队列合作组织包括来自美国84个地点的2200多万患者的电子健康记录。
    方法:我们预测了个体PASC状态,给定协变量信息,使用SuperLearner(一种集成机器学习算法,也称为堆叠)来学习梯度提升和随机森林算法的最优组合,以最大化接收器算子曲线下的面积。我们基于3个级别评估了变量重要性(Shapley值):个体特征,时间窗口,和临床领域。我们使用一组随机选择的研究地点从外部验证了这些发现。
    结果:我们能够准确预测个体PASC诊断(曲线下面积0.874)。观察期长度的个体特征,急性COVID-19和病毒性下呼吸道感染期间卫生保健相互作用的数量对随后的PASC诊断最具预测性.暂时,我们发现基线特征是未来PASC诊断的最具预测性的,与之前的特征相比,during,或急性COVID-19后。我们发现医疗保健使用的临床领域,人口统计学或人体测量学,和呼吸因素是PASC诊断的最具预测性的因素。
    结论:这里概述的方法提供了一个开放源代码,使用超级学习者使用电子健康记录数据预测PASC状态的应用示例,可以在各种设置中复制。在个体预测因子和临床领域,我们一致发现,与医疗保健使用相关的因素是PASC诊断的最强预测因子.这表明,任何使用PASC诊断作为主要结果的观察性研究都必须严格考虑异质医疗保健的使用。我们的研究结果支持以下假设:临床医生可能能够在急性COVID-19诊断之前准确评估患者的PASC风险,这可以改善早期干预和预防性护理。我们的发现还强调了呼吸特征在PASC风险评估中的重要性。
    RR2-10.1101/2023.07.27.23293272。
    BACKGROUND: Postacute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC), also known as long COVID, is a broad grouping of a range of long-term symptoms following acute COVID-19. These symptoms can occur across a range of biological systems, leading to challenges in determining risk factors for PASC and the causal etiology of this disorder. An understanding of characteristics that are predictive of future PASC is valuable, as this can inform the identification of high-risk individuals and future preventative efforts. However, current knowledge regarding PASC risk factors is limited.
    OBJECTIVE: Using a sample of 55,257 patients (at a ratio of 1 patient with PASC to 4 matched controls) from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative, as part of the National Institutes of Health Long COVID Computational Challenge, we sought to predict individual risk of PASC diagnosis from a curated set of clinically informed covariates. The National COVID Cohort Collaborative includes electronic health records for more than 22 million patients from 84 sites across the United States.
    METHODS: We predicted individual PASC status, given covariate information, using Super Learner (an ensemble machine learning algorithm also known as stacking) to learn the optimal combination of gradient boosting and random forest algorithms to maximize the area under the receiver operator curve. We evaluated variable importance (Shapley values) based on 3 levels: individual features, temporal windows, and clinical domains. We externally validated these findings using a holdout set of randomly selected study sites.
    RESULTS: We were able to predict individual PASC diagnoses accurately (area under the curve 0.874). The individual features of the length of observation period, number of health care interactions during acute COVID-19, and viral lower respiratory infection were the most predictive of subsequent PASC diagnosis. Temporally, we found that baseline characteristics were the most predictive of future PASC diagnosis, compared with characteristics immediately before, during, or after acute COVID-19. We found that the clinical domains of health care use, demographics or anthropometry, and respiratory factors were the most predictive of PASC diagnosis.
    CONCLUSIONS: The methods outlined here provide an open-source, applied example of using Super Learner to predict PASC status using electronic health record data, which can be replicated across a variety of settings. Across individual predictors and clinical domains, we consistently found that factors related to health care use were the strongest predictors of PASC diagnosis. This indicates that any observational studies using PASC diagnosis as a primary outcome must rigorously account for heterogeneous health care use. Our temporal findings support the hypothesis that clinicians may be able to accurately assess the risk of PASC in patients before acute COVID-19 diagnosis, which could improve early interventions and preventive care. Our findings also highlight the importance of respiratory characteristics in PASC risk assessment.
    UNASSIGNED: RR2-10.1101/2023.07.27.23293272.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19保护行为是世界卫生组织(WHO)建议的预防COVID-19传播的关键干预措施。然而,实现遵守这一建议通常是具有挑战性的,特别是在社会弱势群体中。
    目的:我们制定了社会脆弱性指数(SVI),以预测个人遵守世卫组织关于COVID-19保护性行为建议的倾向,并确定随着Omicron在2022年1月至2022年8月期间在非洲国家和2021年8月至2022年6月期间在亚太国家的演变,社会脆弱性的变化。
    方法:在非洲国家,在第一次Omicron波期间,从14个国家(n=15,375)收集了基线数据,随访数据来自7个国家(n=7179)。在亚太国家,在第一次Omicron波之前,从14个国家(n=12,866)收集了基线数据,随访数据来自9个国家(n=8737)。从相关数据库检索国家的社会经济和健康概况。要为4个数据集中的每个数据集构建SVI,与COVID-19保护行为相关的变量被纳入使用多脉络线相关性和varimax旋转的因子分析中.对影响因素进行了基数调整,求和,和最小值-最大值从0归一化到1(最脆弱到最不脆弱)。遵守世卫组织建议的分数是使用个人自我报告的针对COVID-19的保护行为计算的。使用多元线性回归分析来评估SVI与对WHO建议的依从性评分之间的关联,以验证该指数。
    结果:在非洲,导致社会脆弱性的因素包括识字和媒体使用,对医护人员和政府的信任,国家收入和基础设施。在亚太地区,社会脆弱性是由识字决定的,国家收入和基础设施,和人口密度。该指数与非洲国家在两个时间点遵守世卫组织建议有关,但仅在亚太国家的后续行动期间。在基线,非洲国家的指数值在13个国家从0.00到0.31之间,1个国家的指数值为1.00。亚太国家的指数值在12个国家从0.00到0.23之间,2个国家的指数值为0.79和1.00。在后续阶段,7个非洲国家中的6个和2个最脆弱的亚太国家的指数值下降。两个区域最脆弱国家的指数值保持不变。
    结论:在这两个地区,在基线时观察到社会对遵守世卫组织建议的脆弱性存在显著不平等,在第一次Omicron波之后,间隙变得更大。了解影响社会对COVID-19保护性行为的脆弱性的维度可能会支持有针对性的干预措施,以增强对WHO建议的遵守,并减轻弱势群体未来大流行的影响。
    BACKGROUND: COVID-19 protective behaviors are key interventions advised by the World Health Organization (WHO) to prevent COVID-19 transmission. However, achieving compliance with this advice is often challenging, particularly among socially vulnerable groups.
    OBJECTIVE: We developed a social vulnerability index (SVI) to predict individuals\' propensity to adhere to the WHO advice on protective behaviors against COVID-19 and identify changes in social vulnerability as Omicron evolved in African countries between January 2022 and August 2022 and Asia Pacific countries between August 2021 and June 2022.
    METHODS: In African countries, baseline data were collected from 14 countries (n=15,375) during the first Omicron wave, and follow-up data were collected from 7 countries (n=7179) after the wave. In Asia Pacific countries, baseline data were collected from 14 countries (n=12,866) before the first Omicron wave, and follow-up data were collected from 9 countries (n=8737) after the wave. Countries\' socioeconomic and health profiles were retrieved from relevant databases. To construct the SVI for each of the 4 data sets, variables associated with COVID-19 protective behaviors were included in a factor analysis using polychoric correlation with varimax rotation. Influential factors were adjusted for cardinality, summed, and min-max normalized from 0 to 1 (most to least vulnerable). Scores for compliance with the WHO advice were calculated using individuals\' self-reported protective behaviors against COVID-19. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to assess the associations between the SVI and scores for compliance to WHO advice to validate the index.
    RESULTS: In Africa, factors contributing to social vulnerability included literacy and media use, trust in health care workers and government, and country income and infrastructure. In Asia Pacific, social vulnerability was determined by literacy, country income and infrastructure, and population density. The index was associated with compliance with the WHO advice in both time points in African countries but only during the follow-up period in Asia Pacific countries. At baseline, the index values in African countries ranged from 0.00 to 0.31 in 13 countries, with 1 country having an index value of 1.00. The index values in Asia Pacific countries ranged from 0.00 to 0.23 in 12 countries, with 2 countries having index values of 0.79 and 1.00. During the follow-up phase, the index values decreased in 6 of 7 African countries and the 2 most vulnerable Asia Pacific countries. The index values of the least vulnerable countries remained unchanged in both regions.
    CONCLUSIONS: In both regions, significant inequalities in social vulnerability to compliance with WHO advice were observed at baseline, and the gaps became larger after the first Omicron wave. Understanding the dimensions that influence social vulnerability to protective behaviors against COVID-19 may underpin targeted interventions to enhance compliance with WHO recommendations and mitigate the impact of future pandemics among vulnerable groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:技术的使用对患者安全和护理质量产生了重大影响,并且在全球范围内有所增加。在文学中,据报道,人们每年因不良事件(AE)而死亡,并且存在用于调查和测量AE的各种方法。然而,有些方法的范围有限,数据提取,以及对数据标准化的需求。在巴西,关于触发工具的应用研究很少,这项研究是第一个在动态护理中创建自动触发因素的研究。
    目的:本研究旨在为巴西的门诊医疗机构开发基于机器学习(ML)的自动触发器。
    方法:将在设计思维框架内进行混合方法研究,并将这些原则应用于创建自动触发器,在(1)同情和定义问题的阶段之后,涉及观察和询问,以理解用户和手头的挑战;(2)构思,生成问题的各种解决方案;(3)原型设计,涉及构建最佳解决方案的最小表示;(4)测试,获得用户反馈以改进解决方案;以及(5)实施,在那里测试精制溶液,评估变化,并且考虑了缩放。此外,将采用ML方法开发自动触发器,与该领域的专家合作,根据当地情况量身定制。
    结果:该协议描述了一项处于初步阶段的研究,在任何数据收集和分析之前。该研究于2024年1月获得了该机构内组织成员的批准,并获得了圣保罗大学和该研究机构的道德委员会的批准。2024年5月。截至2024年6月,第一阶段开始于定性研究的数据收集。在本研究的第1阶段和第2阶段的结果之后,将考虑另一篇专注于解释ML方法的论文。
    结论:在门诊环境中开发自动触发因素后,将有可能更及时地预防和识别AE的潜在风险,提供有价值的信息。这项技术创新不仅促进了临床实践的进步,而且有助于传播与患者安全相关的技术和知识。此外,卫生保健专业人员可以采取循证预防措施,降低与不良事件和医院再入院相关的成本,提高门诊护理的生产力,并为安全做出贡献,质量,以及所提供护理的有效性。此外,在未来,如果结果成功,有可能在所有单位应用它,按照机构组织的计划。
    PRR1-10.2196/55466。
    BACKGROUND: The use of technologies has had a significant impact on patient safety and the quality of care and has increased globally. In the literature, it has been reported that people die annually due to adverse events (AEs), and various methods exist for investigating and measuring AEs. However, some methods have a limited scope, data extraction, and the need for data standardization. In Brazil, there are few studies on the application of trigger tools, and this study is the first to create automated triggers in ambulatory care.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop a machine learning (ML)-based automated trigger for outpatient health care settings in Brazil.
    METHODS: A mixed methods research will be conducted within a design thinking framework and the principles will be applied in creating the automated triggers, following the stages of (1) empathize and define the problem, involving observations and inquiries to comprehend both the user and the challenge at hand; (2) ideation, where various solutions to the problem are generated; (3) prototyping, involving the construction of a minimal representation of the best solutions; (4) testing, where user feedback is obtained to refine the solution; and (5) implementation, where the refined solution is tested, changes are assessed, and scaling is considered. Furthermore, ML methods will be adopted to develop automated triggers, tailored to the local context in collaboration with an expert in the field.
    RESULTS: This protocol describes a research study in its preliminary stages, prior to any data gathering and analysis. The study was approved by the members of the organizations within the institution in January 2024 and by the ethics board of the University of São Paulo and the institution where the study will take place. in May 2024. As of June 2024, stage 1 commenced with data gathering for qualitative research. A separate paper focused on explaining the method of ML will be considered after the outcomes of stages 1 and 2 in this study.
    CONCLUSIONS: After the development of automated triggers in the outpatient setting, it will be possible to prevent and identify potential risks of AEs more promptly, providing valuable information. This technological innovation not only promotes advances in clinical practice but also contributes to the dissemination of techniques and knowledge related to patient safety. Additionally, health care professionals can adopt evidence-based preventive measures, reducing costs associated with AEs and hospital readmissions, enhancing productivity in outpatient care, and contributing to the safety, quality, and effectiveness of care provided. Additionally, in the future, if the outcome is successful, there is the potential to apply it in all units, as planned by the institutional organization.
    UNASSIGNED: PRR1-10.2196/55466.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:远程医疗和远程医疗是重要的家庭护理服务,用于支持个人在家中更独立地生活。历史上,这些技术对问题做出了反应。然而,最近一直在努力更好地利用这些服务的数据,以促进更积极和预测性的护理。
    目的:这篇综述旨在探索预测数据分析技术在家庭远程医疗和远程医疗中的应用方式。
    方法:PRISMA-ScR(系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查的荟萃分析扩展)清单与Arksey和O\'Malley的方法论框架一起遵循。在MEDLINE发表的英文论文,Embase,并考虑了2012年至2022年的社会科学保费收集,并根据纳入或排除标准对结果进行了筛选.
    结果:总计,这篇综述包括86篇论文。本综述中的分析类型可以归类为异常检测(n=21),诊断(n=32),预测(n=22),和活动识别(n=11)。最常见的健康状况是帕金森病(n=12)和心血管疾病(n=11)。主要发现包括:缺乏使用常规收集的数据;诊断工具占主导地位;以及存在的障碍和机会,例如包括患者报告的结果,用于未来的远程医疗和远程医疗预测分析。
    结论:这篇综述中的所有论文都是小规模的飞行员,因此,未来的研究应该寻求将这些预测技术应用到更大的试验中。此外,将常规收集的护理数据和患者报告的结局进一步整合到远程医疗和远程医疗的预测模型中,为改善正在进行的分析提供了重要的机会,应进一步探讨.使用的数据集必须具有合适的大小和多样性,确保模型可推广到更广泛的人群,并且可以进行适当的训练,已验证,和测试。
    BACKGROUND: Telecare and telehealth are important care-at-home services used to support individuals to live more independently at home. Historically, these technologies have reactively responded to issues. However, there has been a recent drive to make better use of the data from these services to facilitate more proactive and predictive care.
    OBJECTIVE: This review seeks to explore the ways in which predictive data analytics techniques have been applied in telecare and telehealth in at-home settings.
    METHODS: The PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist was adhered to alongside Arksey and O\'Malley\'s methodological framework. English language papers published in MEDLINE, Embase, and Social Science Premium Collection between 2012 and 2022 were considered and results were screened against inclusion or exclusion criteria.
    RESULTS: In total, 86 papers were included in this review. The types of analytics featuring in this review can be categorized as anomaly detection (n=21), diagnosis (n=32), prediction (n=22), and activity recognition (n=11). The most common health conditions represented were Parkinson disease (n=12) and cardiovascular conditions (n=11). The main findings include: a lack of use of routinely collected data; a dominance of diagnostic tools; and barriers and opportunities that exist, such as including patient-reported outcomes, for future predictive analytics in telecare and telehealth.
    CONCLUSIONS: All papers in this review were small-scale pilots and, as such, future research should seek to apply these predictive techniques into larger trials. Additionally, further integration of routinely collected care data and patient-reported outcomes into predictive models in telecare and telehealth offer significant opportunities to improve the analytics being performed and should be explored further. Data sets used must be of suitable size and diversity, ensuring that models are generalizable to a wider population and can be appropriately trained, validated, and tested.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)是小儿1型糖尿病(T1D)发病率和死亡率的主要原因,发生在大约20%的患者中,在美国的经济成本为51亿美元/年。尽管诊断后DKA有多种危险因素,仍然需要解释,临床就绪模型,可准确预测已建立的小儿T1D患者的DKA住院率。
    目的:我们旨在开发一种可解释的机器学习模型,以使用常规收集的时间序列电子健康记录(EHR)数据来预测T1D患儿诊断后DKA住院的风险。
    方法:我们进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究,使用2010年1月至2018年6月在美国儿科医疗体系接受大型三级治疗的3794例T1D患者中的1787例患者的EHR数据。我们训练了最先进的;可以解释的,具有44个定期收集的EHR特征的决策树的梯度增强集成(XGBoost)来预测诊断后DKA。我们使用接收器工作特性曲线下的面积-加权F1分数来测量模型的预测性能,加权精度,和回忆,在5倍交叉验证设置中。我们分析了Shapley值以解释学习的模型并深入了解其预测。
    结果:我们的模型将诊断后发生DKA的队列与未发生DKA的队列区分开(P<.001)。它预测诊断后DKA风险,接受者工作特征曲线下面积为0.80(SD0.04),加权F1评分为0.78(SD0.04),加权精度和召回率分别为0.83(SD0.03)和0.76(SD0.05),使用诊断后常规临床随访的相对较短的病史数据。在分析模型输出的Shapley值时,我们在队列和个体层面确定了预测诊断后DKA的关键危险因素.我们观察到诊断后DKA风险相对于2个关键特征(12个月时的糖尿病年龄和糖化血红蛋白)的急剧变化,潜在干预的产生时间间隔和糖化血红蛋白截止值。通过对模型生成的Shapley值进行聚类,我们自动将队列分为3组,占5%,20%,诊断后DKA的风险为48%。
    结论:我们建立了一个可解释的,预测性,具有集成到临床工作流程潜力的机器学习模型。该模型对儿科T1D患者进行风险分层,并使用从诊断开始的有限随访数据确定诊断后DKA风险最高的患者。该模型确定了关键时间点和风险因素,以指导个人和队列水平的临床干预。对来自多个医院系统的数据的进一步研究可以帮助我们评估我们的模型对其他人群的推广程度。我们工作的临床重要性在于,该模型可以预测诊断后DKA风险最大的患者,并基于缓解个性化风险因素确定预防性干预措施。
    BACKGROUND: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric type 1 diabetes (T1D), occurring in approximately 20% of patients, with an economic cost of $5.1 billion/year in the United States. Despite multiple risk factors for postdiagnosis DKA, there is still a need for explainable, clinic-ready models that accurately predict DKA hospitalization in established patients with pediatric T1D.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop an interpretable machine learning model to predict the risk of postdiagnosis DKA hospitalization in children with T1D using routinely collected time-series of electronic health record (EHR) data.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study using EHR data from 1787 patients from among 3794 patients with T1D treated at a large tertiary care US pediatric health system from January 2010 to June 2018. We trained a state-of-the-art; explainable, gradient-boosted ensemble (XGBoost) of decision trees with 44 regularly collected EHR features to predict postdiagnosis DKA. We measured the model\'s predictive performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve-weighted F1-score, weighted precision, and recall, in a 5-fold cross-validation setting. We analyzed Shapley values to interpret the learned model and gain insight into its predictions.
    RESULTS: Our model distinguished the cohort that develops DKA postdiagnosis from the one that does not (P<.001). It predicted postdiagnosis DKA risk with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 (SD 0.04), a weighted F1-score of 0.78 (SD 0.04), and a weighted precision and recall of 0.83 (SD 0.03) and 0.76 (SD 0.05) respectively, using a relatively short history of data from routine clinic follow-ups post diagnosis. On analyzing Shapley values of the model output, we identified key risk factors predicting postdiagnosis DKA both at the cohort and individual levels. We observed sharp changes in postdiagnosis DKA risk with respect to 2 key features (diabetes age and glycated hemoglobin at 12 months), yielding time intervals and glycated hemoglobin cutoffs for potential intervention. By clustering model-generated Shapley values, we automatically stratified the cohort into 3 groups with 5%, 20%, and 48% risk of postdiagnosis DKA.
    CONCLUSIONS: We have built an explainable, predictive, machine learning model with potential for integration into clinical workflow. The model risk-stratifies patients with pediatric T1D and identifies patients with the highest postdiagnosis DKA risk using limited follow-up data starting from the time of diagnosis. The model identifies key time points and risk factors to direct clinical interventions at both the individual and cohort levels. Further research with data from multiple hospital systems can help us assess how well our model generalizes to other populations. The clinical importance of our work is that the model can predict patients most at risk for postdiagnosis DKA and identify preventive interventions based on mitigation of individualized risk factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:影像组学提供了非侵入性量化肿瘤表型的机会。这项研究提取了对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)的影像学特征,并评估了非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)骨转移的临床特征。结合显示的影像组学和临床特征,建立NSCLC骨转移预测模型。
    方法:2009年1月至2019年12月,天津医科大学肿瘤医院共纳入318例NSCLC患者,包括特征学习队列(n=223)和验证队列(n=95)。我们在来自特征学习队列的318个CECT图像中训练了一个影像组学模型,以提取NSCLC骨转移的影像组学特征。使用Kruskal-Wallis和最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归(LASSO)来选择骨转移相关特征并构建CT影像组学评分(Rad评分)。结合Rad评分和临床数据进行多因素logistic回归。随后开发了预测性列线图。
    结果:使用CECT扫描的Radiomics模型在预测NSCLC骨转移方面具有重要意义。通过将每个信息输入到模型中,模型性能得到了增强。在预测训练集中的骨转移时,影像组学列线图的AUC为0.745(95%置信区间[CI]:0.68,0.80),在验证集中的AUC为0.808(95%置信区间[CI]:0.71,0.88)。
    结论:显示的不可见图像特征对指导NSCLC骨转移预测具有重要意义。基于图像特征和临床特征的结合,建立了预测列线图。此列线图可用于NSCLC骨转移的辅助筛查。
    BACKGROUND: Radiomics provided opportunities to quantify the tumor phenotype non-invasively. This study extracted contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) radiomic signatures and evaluated clinical features of bone metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With the combination of the revealed radiomics and clinical features, the predictive modeling on bone metastasis in NSCLC was established.
    METHODS: A total of 318 patients with NSCLC at the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital was enrolled between January 2009 and December 2019, which included a feature-learning cohort (n = 223) and a validation cohort (n = 95). We trained a radiomics model in 318 CECT images from feature-learning cohort to extract the radiomics features of bone metastasis in NSCLC. The Kruskal-Wallis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO) were used to select bone metastasis-related features and construct the CT radiomics score (Rad-score). Multivariate logistic regression was performed with the combination of the Rad-score and clinical data. A predictive nomogram was subsequently developed.
    RESULTS: Radiomics models using CECT scans were significant on bone metastasis prediction in NSCLC. Model performance was enhanced with each information into the model. The radiomics nomogram achieved an AUC of 0.745 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68,0.80) on predicting bone metastasis in the training set and an AUC of 0.808(95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71,0.88) in the validation set.
    CONCLUSIONS: The revealed invisible image features were of significance on guiding bone metastasis prediction in NSCLC. Based on the combination of the image features and clinical characteristics, the predictive nomogram was established. Such nomogram can be used for the auxiliary screening of bone metastasis in NSCLC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:协调的护理系统有助于为疑似急性中风提供及时的治疗。在安大略省西北部(NWO),加拿大,社区分布广泛,几家医院提供各种诊断设备和服务。因此,资源有限,医疗保健提供者必须经常将中风患者转移到不同的医院,以确保在建议的时间范围内获得最适当的护理。然而,经常位于NWO的临时(locum)或在安大略省其他地区远程提供护理的医疗保健提供者可能在该地区缺乏足够的信息和经验,无法为具有时间敏感性的患者提供护理。次优决策可能会导致在获得明确的中风护理之前进行多次转移,导致不良结果和额外的医疗保健系统成本。
    目的:我们旨在开发一种工具来告知和协助NWO医疗保健提供者确定中风患者的最佳转移选择,以提供最有效的护理服务。我们旨在使用基于机器学习算法的综合地理映射导航和估计系统开发应用程序。这个应用程序使用与中风相关的关键时间线,包括患者最后一次被认为是好的,患者位置,治疗方案,以及不同医疗机构的成像可用性。
    方法:使用历史数据(2008-2020年),开发了一种使用机器学习方法的准确预测模型,并将其集成到移动应用程序中。这些数据包含有关空中(Ornge)和陆地医疗运输(3种服务)的参数,经过预处理和清洁。对于Ornge航空服务和陆地救护车医疗运输都涉及患者运输过程的情况,合并数据并确定运输旅程的时间间隔。数据被分发用于训练(35%),测试(35%),并对预测模型进行验证(30%)。
    结果:总计,从Ornge和陆地医疗运输服务的数据集中收集了70,623条记录,以开发预测模型。分析了各种学习模型;在预测输出变量方面,所有学习模型的性能均优于所有点的简单平均值。决策树模型提供了比其他模型更准确的结果。决策树模型表现非常好,根据测试的值,验证,和近距离内的模型。该模型用于开发“NWO导航中风”系统。该系统提供了准确的结果,并证明了移动应用程序可以成为医疗保健提供者在NWO中导航中风护理的重要工具,可能影响患者护理和结果。
    结论:NWO导航中风系统使用数据驱动,可靠,准确的预测模型,同时考虑所有变化,并同时与所有必需的急性卒中管理途径和工具相关联。使用历史数据进行了测试,下一步将涉及最终用户的可用性测试。
    BACKGROUND: A coordinated care system helps provide timely access to treatment for suspected acute stroke. In Northwestern Ontario (NWO), Canada, communities are widespread with several hospitals offering various diagnostic equipment and services. Thus, resources are limited, and health care providers must often transfer patients with stroke to different hospital locations to ensure the most appropriate care access within recommended time frames. However, health care providers frequently situated temporarily (locum) in NWO or providing care remotely from other areas of Ontario may lack sufficient information and experience in the region to access care for a patient with a time-sensitive condition. Suboptimal decision-making may lead to multiple transfers before definitive stroke care is obtained, resulting in poor outcomes and additional health care system costs.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a tool to inform and assist NWO health care providers in determining the best transfer options for patients with stroke to provide the most efficient care access. We aimed to develop an app using a comprehensive geomapping navigation and estimation system based on machine learning algorithms. This app uses key stroke-related timelines including the last time the patient was known to be well, patient location, treatment options, and imaging availability at different health care facilities.
    METHODS: Using historical data (2008-2020), an accurate prediction model using machine learning methods was developed and incorporated into a mobile app. These data contained parameters regarding air (Ornge) and land medical transport (3 services), which were preprocessed and cleaned. For cases in which Ornge air services and land ambulance medical transport were both involved in a patient transport process, data were merged and time intervals of the transport journey were determined. The data were distributed for training (35%), testing (35%), and validation (30%) of the prediction model.
    RESULTS: In total, 70,623 records were collected in the data set from Ornge and land medical transport services to develop a prediction model. Various learning models were analyzed; all learning models perform better than the simple average of all points in predicting output variables. The decision tree model provided more accurate results than the other models. The decision tree model performed remarkably well, with the values from testing, validation, and the model within a close range. This model was used to develop the \"NWO Navigate Stroke\" system. The system provides accurate results and demonstrates that a mobile app can be a significant tool for health care providers navigating stroke care in NWO, potentially impacting patient care and outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: The NWO Navigate Stroke system uses a data-driven, reliable, accurate prediction model while considering all variations and is simultaneously linked to all required acute stroke management pathways and tools. It was tested using historical data, and the next step will to involve usability testing with end users.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    老年心绞痛患者的再入院已经成为一个严重的问题,缺乏可用于再入院评估的预测工具。这项研究的目的是开发一种机器学习(ML)模型,该模型可以预测老年心绞痛患者180天的全因再入院。
    回顾性收集老年心绞痛患者的临床资料。使用五种ML算法来开发预测模型。接收器工作特性曲线下面积(AUROC),精确召回曲线下的面积(AUPRC),和Brier评分用于评估预测性能。通过Shapley加性解释(SHAP)进行分析以评估每个变量的贡献。
    总共1502名老年心绞痛患者(45.74%为女性)被纳入研究。极端梯度增强(XGB)模型对180天的再入院显示出良好的预测性能(AUROC=0.89;AUPRC=0.91;Brier评分=0.21)。SHAP分析显示,药物的数量,血细胞比容,和慢性阻塞性肺疾病是180天再入院相关的重要变量.
    ML模型可以准确识别具有180天再入院高风险的老年心绞痛患者。用于识别个体风险因素的模型还可以提醒临床医生适当的干预措施,这些干预措施可能有助于防止患者再次入院。
    UNASSIGNED: Readmission of elderly angina patients has become a serious problem, with a dearth of available prediction tools for readmission assessment. The objective of this study was to develop a machine learning (ML) model that can predict 180-day all-cause readmission for elderly angina patients.
    UNASSIGNED: The clinical data for elderly angina patients was retrospectively collected. Five ML algorithms were used to develop prediction models. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC), and the Brier score were applied to assess predictive performance. Analysis by Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) was performed to evaluate the contribution of each variable.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 1502 elderly angina patients (45.74% female) were enrolled in the study. The extreme gradient boosting (XGB) model showed good predictive performance for 180-day readmission (AUROC = 0.89; AUPRC = 0.91; Brier score = 0.21). SHAP analysis revealed that the number of medications, hematocrit, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were important variables associated with 180-day readmission.
    UNASSIGNED: An ML model can accurately identify elderly angina patients with a high risk of 180-day readmission. The model used to identify individual risk factors can also serve to remind clinicians of appropriate interventions that may help to prevent the readmission of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究的目的是开发和验证预测急性血源性骨髓炎(AHO)患儿急性复杂病程风险的列线图。
    方法:基于82名儿科AHO患者的数据集开发了预测模型。临床数据,影像学发现,系统收集所有患者的实验室结果.随后,生物标志物指数是根据实验室结果计算的,以便于综合评估.进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定影响AHO早期不良结局的因素。基于独立因素构建了列线图模型,并通过bootstrap方法进行了内部验证。辨别能力,校准,使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估列线图模型的临床实用性,校准图,和决策曲线分析(DCA),分别。将开发的列线图模型与先前发布的A评分和Gouveia评分系统进行了比较。
    结果:Logistic回归分析确定延迟源控制,化脓性关节炎,入院时的白蛋白,血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)是儿童AHO患者早期不良结局的独立预测因子。逻辑回归模型表示为:Log(P)=7。667-1.752×延迟源控制-1.956×化脓性关节炎-入院时0.154×白蛋白+0.009×PLR。通过Bootstrap验证获得的列线图AUC为0.829(95%CI:0.740-0.918)。校准图显示预测和观察之间的良好一致性。决策曲线分析表明,该模型在所有阈值概率上都实现了净收益。我们的列线图模型对小儿AHO患者急性复杂病程的预测功效超过了A评分和Gouveia评分。
    结论:基于四个变量建立了小儿AHO急性复杂病程的预测模型:延迟源控制,化脓性关节炎,入院时的白蛋白,和PLR。这个模型是实用的,易于使用的临床医生,并有助于指导临床治疗决策。
    BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting the risk of an acute complicated course in pediatric patients with Acute Hematogenous Osteomyelitis (AHO).
    METHODS: A predictive model was developed based on a dataset of 82 pediatric AHO patients. Clinical data, imaging findings, and laboratory results were systematically collected for all patients. Subsequently, biomarker indices were calculated based on the laboratory results to facilitate a comprehensive evaluation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors influencing early adverse outcomes in AHO. A nomogram model was constructed based on independent factors and validated internally through bootstrap methods. The discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical utility of the nomogram model were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA), respectively. The developed nomogram model was compared with previously published A-score and Gouveia scoring systems.
    RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis identified delayed source control, suppurative arthritis, albumin on admission, and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as independent predictors of early adverse outcomes in pediatric AHO patients. The logistic regression model was formulated as: Log(P) = 7. 667-1.752 × delayed source control - 1.956 × suppurative arthritis - 0.154 × albumin on admission + 0.009 × PLR. The nomogram\'s AUC obtained through Bootstrap validation was 0.829 (95% CI: 0.740-0.918). Calibration plots showed good agreement between predictions and observations. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the model achieved net benefits across all threshold probabilities. The predictive efficacy of our nomogram model for acute complicated course in pediatric AHO patients surpassed that of the A-score and Gouveia scores.
    CONCLUSIONS: A predictive model for the acute complicated course of pediatric AHO was established based on four variables: delayed source control, suppurative arthritis, albumin on admission, and PLR. This model is practical, easy to use for clinicians, and can aid in guiding clinical treatment decisions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号