Head injury is a potentially lethal and frequently occurring condition in the emergency department (ED). Reliable and fast diagnosis is important both for patients and flow in the ED. Circulating S100B is used to rule out the need for head computer tomography in low-risk patients with mild head injury. The flow of these patients through the ED would benefit from shorter turn-around time. Standard serum clotting tubes require 30-60 min clotting time, followed by an analysis time of 45 min. Here, we evaluated the performance of two alternative blood collection tubes; a rapid serum tube (RST) with a recommend clotting time of 5 min and a hirudin tube (HIR) for instant anticoagulation. S100B measurement was performed on paired blood samples from 221 subjects using a Roche Cobas 602 analyser. The performances of the alternative tubes were evaluated by method comparison to the standard serum clotting tube, repeatability and agreement of results obtained from alternative tubes compared with the standard clotting tube. Both alternative tubes had a minor positive bias (RST = 0.011 µg/L, HIR = 0.008 µg/L). The repeatability was 2% for RST and 10% for HIR, while being 4% for the standard clotting tube. In the agreement analysis, the positive and negative predictive values for RST were 62% and 100% while being 73% and 99% for HIR respectively. Our study suggests that RST is a feasible alternative to reduce laboratory turn-around time in S100b analysis.

Alzheimer\'s disease has escalated into a critical public health concern, marked by its neurodegenerative nature that progressively diminishes cognitive abilities. Recognized as a continuously advancing and presently incurable condition, AD underscores the necessity for early-stage diagnosis and interventions aimed at delaying the decline in mental function. Despite the proven efficacy of cerebrospinal fluid and positron emission tomography in diagnosing AD, their broader utility is constrained by significant costs and the invasive nature of these procedures. Consequently, the innovation of blood biomarkers such as Amyloid-beta, phosphorylated-tau, total-tau et al, distinguished by their high sensitivity, minimal invasiveness, accessibility, and cost-efficiency, emerges as a promising avenue for AD diagnosis. The advent of ultra-sensitive detection methodologies, including single-molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry, has revolutionized the detection of AD plasma biomarkers, supplanting previous low-sensitivity techniques. This rapid advancement in detection technology facilitates the more accurate quantification of pathological brain proteins and AD-associated biomarkers in the bloodstream. This manuscript meticulously reviews the landscape of current research on immunological markers for AD, anchored in the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer\'s Association AT(N) research framework. It highlights a selection of forefront ultra-sensitive detection technologies now integral to assessing AD blood immunological markers. Additionally, this review examines the crucial pre-analytical processing steps for AD blood samples that significantly impact research outcomes and addresses the practical challenges faced during clinical testing. These discussions are crucial for enhancing our comprehension and refining the diagnostic precision of AD using blood-based biomarkers. The review aims to shed light on potential avenues for innovation and improvement in the techniques employed for detecting and investigating AD, thereby contributing to the broader field of neurodegenerative disease research.

Pre-analytical factors in molecular oncology diagnostics are reviewed. Issues around sample collection, storage, and transport that might affect the stability of nucleic acids and the ability to perform molecular testing are addressed. In addition, molecular methods used commonly in clinical diagnostic laboratories, including newer technologies such as next-generation sequencing and digital droplet polymerase chain reaction, as well as their applications, are reviewed. Finally, we discuss considerations in designing a molecular test menu to deliver accurate and timely results in an efficient and cost-effective manner.

After the decline of the COVID-19 pandemic, health systems were challenged by the simultaneous prevalence of different respiratory viruses causing a wide overlap in symptoms. This increased the demand for multi-virus diagnostic tests which require suitable pre-analytical workflow solutions in order to receive valid diagnostic results. In this context, the effects of specimen storage duration and temperature on the RNA/DNA copy number stability of influenza A/B, RSV A/B, SARS-CoV-2 and adenovirus were examined for four commercially available transport swab systems and saliva collection devices. The respiratory viruses were more stable in the saliva collection devices than in the transport swab systems when stored at RT or 37 °C for up to 96 h. Moreover, no differences between viral nucleic acid stability of enveloped and non-enveloped viruses were observed. The infectivity of all enveloped viruses could be inactivated by the saliva collection device from PreAnalytiX. The Norgen saliva device completely inactivated influenza A/B, while RSV A/B were partially inactivated. The non-enveloped adenovirus was inactivated by a reduction factor of 10E+ 4 in both saliva collection devices. All respiratory viruses remained infectious in the transport swab systems. Two possible transport medium additives were tested which inactivated or strongly reduced viral replication of tested enveloped viruses but had no effect on the non-enveloped adenovirus. Finally the implementation of multi-target detection procedures involving a direct amplification approach was successfully tested by spike-in of all enveloped viruses simultaneously into transport swab systems. This fast and reproducible setup presents a valuable solution for future implementations in multi-virus testing strategies.

From the beginning of the COVID-19 epidemic, clinical laboratories around the world have been involved with tests for detection of SARS-CoV-2. At present, RT-PCR (real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay) is seen as the gold standard for identifying the virus. Many factors are involved in achieving the highest accuracy in this test, including parameters related to the pre-analysis stage. Having instructions on the type of sample, how to take the sample, and its storage and transportation help control the interfering factors at this stage. Studies have shown that pre-analytical factors might be the cause of the high SARS-CoV-2 test false-negative rates. Also, the safety of personnel in molecular laboratories is of utmost importance, and it requires strict guidelines to ensure the safety of exposed individuals and prevent the virus from spreading. Since the onset of the outbreak, various instructions and guidelines have been developed in this field by the institutions and the Ministry of Health of each country; these guidelines are seriously in need of integration and operation. In this study, we try to collect all the information and research done from the beginning of this pandemic in December 2019 - August 2022 concerning biosafety and protective measures, sample types, sampling methods, container, and storage solutions, sampling equipment, and sample storage and transportation for molecular testing of SARS-CoV-2.

BACKGROUND: Delayed time from collection to centrifugation may cause erroneously high lactate levels in vitro (from continued blood cell metabolism under anaerobic conditions in the collection tube) if not collected in appropriate collection devices, consequently increasing the risk for inappropriate patient care or harm. We undertook a study to determine the turnaround time for lactate testing in a tertiary care setting and also performed short- and long-term lactate stability studies in blood collected in sodium fluoride/potassium oxalate (NaF/KOx) collection tubes.
METHODS: The hospital lab information system was mined for 6 months to determine patient samples that may have exceeded the time from collection-to-receival in lab of 15-min. Lactate stability was evaluated in unspun NaF/KOx collection tubes at 15 min intervals for to 2 h; and separately at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48-h post-collection.
RESULTS: A total of 8,929 plasma samples were collected in 6 months, and 1/3 were not received in the lab within 15 min from collection. In NaF/KOx additive, lactate levels had minor increases over 2 h, and incremental increases at an average rate of 0.0035 mmol/L/h over 48 h with maximum increase of 9.8% at 48 h. However, the average change across all time points were within local allowable performance goals (at ≤4 mmol/L ± 0.5 mmol/L; at >4 mmol/L ± 12%).
CONCLUSIONS: A small proportion of lactate specimens may experience delay in processing. Although lactate levels may incrementally increase over 48-h at room temperature in unspun NaF/KOx collection tubes, the changes may not be clinically impactful.

BACKGROUND: Transgender people may avoid seeking medical care due to previous negative experiences and fear of discrimination. Clinical laboratories can contribute to a poor patient experience and clinical outcome when the design and functionality of laboratory information management systems (LIMS) do not consider the needs of transgender patients. This survey aimed to capture current practices in United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland clinical laboratories concerning how transgender patient data and test requests are managed throughout the total testing process.
METHODS: An anonymous survey was distributed to clinical laboratory professionals in November 2021. Thirty-three questions covered how gender variables are recorded for transgender patients and used to inform gender-specific calculations, test access, and reference intervals (RIs).
RESULTS: Of the 66 respondents, 70% were based in laboratories in England, with a majority of laboratories having ISO 15189 accreditation and processing 1000-10,000 blood samples daily. Eighty-five percent stated that their LIMS had a single field recording sex or gender information. Forty-three percent did not limit test access based on gender, but 68% did not append RIs for patients with unknown or indeterminate gender.
CONCLUSIONS: This survey was the first to quantify how clinical laboratories manage sex and gender information and report results for transgender and non-binary patients, and details several key recommendations based on the survey responses.

Over the last decade, great advancements have been made in the field of liquid biopsy through extensive research and the development of new technologies that facilitate the use of liquid biopsy for cancer patients. This is shown by the numerous liquid biopsy tests that gained clearance by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in recent years. Liquid biopsy has significantly altered cancer treatment by providing clinicians with powerful and immediate information about therapeutic decisions. However, the clinical integration of liquid biopsy is still challenging and there are many critical factors to consider prior to its implementation into routine clinical practice. Lack of standardization due to technical challenges and the definition of the clinical utility of specific assays further complicates the establishment of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in liquid biopsy. Harmonization of laboratories to established guidelines is of major importance to overcome inter-lab variabilities observed. Quality control assessment in diagnostic laboratories that offer liquid biopsy testing will ensure that clinicians can base their therapeutic decisions on robust results. The regular participation of laboratories in external quality assessment schemes for liquid biopsy testing aims to promptly pinpoint deficiencies and efficiently educate laboratories to improve their quality of services. Accreditation of liquid biopsy diagnostic laboratories based on the ISO15189 standard in Europe or by CLIA/CAP accreditation procedures in the US is the best way to achieve the adaptation of liquid biopsy into the clinical setting by assuring reliable results for the clinicians and their cancer patients. Nowadays, various organizations from academia, industry, and regulatory agencies collaborate to set a framework that will include all procedures from the pre-analytical phase and the analytical process to the final interpretation of results. In this review, we underline several challenges in the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) concerning standardization of protocols, quality control assessment, harmonization of laboratories, and compliance to specific guidelines that need to be thoroughly considered before liquid biopsy enters the clinic.

The COVID-19 pandemic impacted delivery of health services. The aim of our study was to determine the impact of COVID-19 disease on pre-analytical blood sample haemolysis by modelling the daily haemolysis rates variations pre and post COVID-19 infections. Ethics approval was obtained prior to study commencing. Interrupted Time Series data analysis was conducted on UK National Health Service Acute Admissions Unit 25-month (1 February 2019 to 28 February 2021) biochemistry (total and haemolysed) blood sample dataset. Interruption was set on 23 March 2021, the start of the first UK lockdown. Daily haemolysis rate (% samples haemolysed) data were fitted with a spline curve to determine influence of haemolysis rates on short or medium-term temporal trends. Linear regression was performed so as to determine long-term temporal trends pre- and post-intervention. There were 32,316 biochemistry blood sample results: 19,058 pre and 13,258 (342 days) from the post-intervention period. Overall median daily haemolysis rate was 7.3% (range: 0-30.6%), 7.7% pre-intervention versus 6.5% post-intervention (p<0.0001). The proportion of haemolysis cases negatively correlated with the number of samples processed (rho=0.09; p=0.01). The pre-intervention slope was -1.70 %.y-1, y intercept 9.04%; post-intervention slope was -1.88%.y-1, y intercept was 10.2%; with no difference in either the slope (p=0.87) or intercept (p=0.16). There was no association between short-term variation in haemolysis rates with changes in practice due to COVID-19 disease and the disease itself. The negative correlation between haemolysis rate and the number of samples processed highlights the importance of continued venepuncture practice to facilitate haemolysis rate reduction.

The objective of our study is to evaluate the effect of storage temperature and time to analysis on arterial blood gas parameters in order to extend the CLSI recommendations.
Stability of 12 parameters (pH, pCO₂, pO₂, Na+, K+, Ca2+, glucose, lactate, hemoglobin, oxyhemoglobin, carboxyhemoglobin, methemoglobin) measured by GEM PREMIER™ 5000 blood gas analyzer was studied at room temperature and at +4 °C (52 patients). The storage times were 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min. Stability was evaluated on the difference from baseline, the difference from the analyte-specific measurement uncertainty applied to the baseline value, and the impact of the variation on the clinical interpretation.
At room temperature, all parameters except the lactate remained stable for at least 60 min. A statistically significant difference was observed for pH at T45 and T60 and for pCO2 at T60 without modification of clinical interpretation. For lactate, clinical interpretation was modified from T45 and values were outside the range of acceptability defined by the measurement uncertainty. All parameters except pO2 remained stable for at least 120 min at +4 °C.
A one-hour transport at room temperature is compatible with the performance of all the analyses studied except lactate. If the delay exceeds 30 min, the sample should be placed at +4 °C for lactate measurement. If the samples are stored in ice, it is important to note that the pO2 cannot be interpreted.