BACKGROUND: Adolescents account for 15% of new HIV cases in Kenya. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) are highly effective prevention tools, but uptake is low among adolescents, particularly in resource-limited settings. We assessed awareness and acceptability of PrEP and PEP among Kenyan adolescents.
METHODS: Focus group discussions were conducted with 120 adolescent boys and girls ages 15 to 19 in Kisumu. Data were analyzed using the Framework Approach.
RESULTS: Adolescent participants often had not heard of or could not differentiate between PrEP and PEP. They also confused these HIV prevention tools with emergency contraceptives. Taking a daily pill to prevent HIV was perceived as analogous to taking a pill to treat HIV. Boys were aware of and willing to consider using PrEP and PEP due to their dislike for using condoms. Adolescents identified insufficient information, cost, and uncomfortableness speaking with healthcare workers about their HIV prevention needs due to sexuality stigma as barriers to using PrEP and PEP.
CONCLUSIONS: Low awareness and poor understanding of PrEP and PEP among adolescents reveal the need for increased education and sensitization about these HIV prevention options. Expanding access to sexual and reproductive health services that are tailored to the needs of adolescents and staffed with non-judgmental providers could help reduce sexuality stigma as a barrier to accessing care. New HIV prevention approaches such as long-acting injectables or implants, on-demand regimens, and multipurpose prevention technologies may encourage increased uptake of PrEP and PEP by adolescents.

Seroprevalence of lyssaviruses in certain bat species has been proven in the Republic of Croatia, but there have been no confirmed positive bat brain isolates or human fatalities associated with bat injuries/bites. The study included a retrospective analysis of bat injuries/bites, post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) and geographic distribution of bat injuries in persons examined at the Zagreb Antirabies Clinic, the Croatian Reference Centre for Rabies. In the period 1995-2020, we examined a total of 21,910 patients due to animal injuries, of which 71 cases were bat-related (0.32%). Of the above number of patients, 4574 received rabies PEP (20.87%). However, for bat injuries, the proportion of patients receiving PEP was significantly higher: 66 out of 71 patients (92.95%). Of these, 33 received only the rabies vaccine, while the other 33 patients received the vaccine with human rabies immunoglobulin (HRIG). In five cases, PEP was not administered, as there was no indication for treatment. Thirty-five of the injured patients were biologists or biology students (49.29%). The bat species was confirmed in only one of the exposure cases. This was a serotine bat (Eptesicus serotinus), a known carrier of Lyssavirus hamburg. The results showed that the bat bites were rather sporadic compared to other human injuries caused by animal bites. All bat injuries should be treated as if they were caused by a rabid animal, and according to WHO recommendations. People who come into contact with bats should be strongly advised to be vaccinated against rabies. Entering bat habitats should be done with caution and in accordance with current recommendations, and nationwide surveillance should be carried out by competent institutions and in close collaboration between bat experts, epidemiologists and rabies experts.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials showed a single oral dose of doxycycline taken after sex protects against STIs among men who have sex with men (MSM) but not women. Pharmacokinetic data at vaginal, rectal and penile sites of STI exposure are lacking. We examined vaginal, rectal and urethral doxycycline concentrations in men and women to better inform STI prevention.
METHODS: Doxycycline pharmacokinetics in male and female participants 18-59 years of age were evaluated in blood and urine and on rectal and vaginal swabs collected at 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 168 h after receiving a 200 mg oral doxycycline dose in a non-randomised single dose open label single centre study in Atlanta, Georgia. Rectal, vaginal, and cervical biopsies and male urethral swabs were collected 24 h after dosing (Trial registration: NCT04860505). Doxycycline was measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.
RESULTS: Eleven male and nine female participants participated in the study. Doxycycline concentrations on rectal and vaginal swabs collected up to 96 h after dosing were approximately twice those of plasma and remained above minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for at least four, three, and two days for Chlamydia trachomatis, Treponema pallidum, and tetracycline-sensitive Neisseria gonorrhoeae, respectively. Geometric mean doxycycline concentrations in male urethral secretions (1.166 μg/mL; 95% CI 0.568-2.394 μg/mL), male rectal (0.596 μg/g; 0.442-0.803 μg/g), vaginal (0.261 μg/g; 0.098-0.696 μg/g) and cervical tissue (0.410 μg/g; 0.193-0.870 μg/g) in biopsies collected 24 h after dosing exceeded MICs. Plasma and urine doxycycline levels defined adherence markers up to four and seven days postdosing, respectively. No adverse events were reported in this study.
CONCLUSIONS: Doxycycline efficiently distributes to the rectum, vagina and urethra. Findings can help explain efficacy of STI prevention by doxycycline.
BACKGROUND: Funded by CDC intramural funds, CDC contract HCVJCG-2020-45044 (to CFK).

BACKGROUND: Specialty pharmacies service many different complex disease states that require high-cost medication, including the treatment of patients prescribed HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). PEP requires time-sensitive initiation and patient counseling for therapeutic efficacy.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine all PEP referrals received at a specialty pharmacy and demonstrate how they aided in interventions including assisting in obtaining financial assistance, making clinical interventions, and offering counseling to patients.
METHODS: This is an observational retrospective chart review of patients who received PEP from one specialty pharmacy. All patients that filled PEP at the pharmacy between January 1st, 2017-July 1st, 2022, were included. Information was collected from documentation provided in the electronic medication record utilized by the pharmacy. The PEP regimen prescribed were raltegravir (RAL) + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) and dolutegravir (DTG) + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF).
RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were treated with PEP during the measurement period. Patients who received a PEP regimen of RAL + FTC/TDF experienced a total cost-savings of $1,692.60 and $218.40 for those who were fully insured and uninsured, respectively. Patients who received a PEP regimen of DTG + FTC/TDF experienced a total cost-savings of $676.20 and $2,725.50 for those who were fully insured and uninsured, respectively. Counseling by a pharmacist was offered to all patients and 74.5% of patients accepted. Pharmacists made clinical interventions on 29.4% of PEP referrals.
CONCLUSIONS: PEP medications are expensive, time-sensitive, and can require clinical interventions and specific patient counseling. This study indicates that specialty pharmacies can provide and ensure access to care in the areas of financial assistance, patient counseling, and clinical interventions.

The uptake of HIV prevention services is lower among youth than adults in sub-Saharan Africa. Existing youth livelihood trainings offer a potential entry point to HIV prevention services. We determined feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of integrating HIV prevention into youth clubs implementing an empowerment and livelihood for adolescents (ELA) intervention in rural Uganda. Staff conducted community mobilization for youth (15-24 years) over one month. Clubs met (3×/week) over six months, with local peer mentors trained to teach life-skills and sexual/reproductive health education. We integrated mentor-led education on HIV prevention, including pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP/PEP). Clubs offered on-site HIV testing, a field trip to a local clinic and PrEP referrals after one month and six months. Surveys were conducted at baseline and six months. Forty-two participants (24 adolescent girls/young women (AGYW) and 18 adolescent boys/young men (ABYM)) joined the clubs. At baseline, no participants accepted referral for PrEP, whereas 5/18 (28%) sexually active, HIV-negative AGYW requested PrEP referral at follow-up. One ABYM requested PEP referral. Integration of HIV prevention services into an established ELA curriculum at mentor-led youth clubs in rural Uganda was feasible. PrEP uptake increased among sexually active AGYW. Evaluation of this approach for HIV prevention among youth merits further study.

HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is an evidence-based biomedical HIV prevention strategy consisting of a 28-day course of highly active antiretroviral therapy after recent potential exposure to HIV. However, awareness and uptake of PEP among men who have sex with men (MSM) are very low. Innovative and effective methods are needed to support PEP implementation among MSM. This work reports a protocol to design and evaluate an online-to-offline-based delivery model for HIV PEP uptake (O2O-PEP) in Chinese MSM.
This will be a two-phase study. In phase 1, we will develop an O2O-PEP model delivered through the WeChat mini-app (an app built into the WeChat platform). The O2O-PEP model initially includes four core components: a gamification-based education package for PEP, an online HIV risk assessment tool, a free online booking system for PEP initiation, and offline PEP prescription in the study hospitals. In phase 2, a two-arm pilot stratified randomized controlled trial comparing the O2O-PEP group with the standard care group will be designed to assess the feasibility, usability, and preliminary evidence of the efficacy of the O2O-PEP model in increasing PEP uptake among Chinese MSM. Model feasibility and usability will be further explored for broader model implementation.
The O2O-PEP model is one of the first interventions in China aiming to promote PEP initiation in Chinese MSM. Components in the O2O-PEP model could assist MSM in better understanding their HIV infection risk and increasing accessibility of PEP. Moreover, coupled with online and offline recruitment, the O2O-PEP model has great potential to reach and engage MSM who are not involved in care by traditional methods.
No. ChiCTR2200062538.

Mozambique introduced guidelines for integrated gender-based violence (GBV) services in 2012. In 2017, we trained providers on empathetic and supportive services to GBV survivors and introduced home-based services for survivors who are loss-to-follow up. Rate ratios of clinic visits were compared before and after intervention initiation, using exact significance tests. Data of 1,806 GBV survivors were reviewed, with a total of 2005 events. The median age was 23 years (IQR 17-30) and 89% were women. Among those reporting violence, 69% reported physical violence, 18% reported sexual violence (SV), and 12% reported psychological violence. Rates of care-seeking behavior were higher in the intervention period (rate ratio 1.31 [95%CI: 1.18-1.46]); p < 0.01. Among those eligible for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), 94% initiated PEP. Uptake of HIV retesting improved in percentage points by 34% (14% to 48%), 34% (8% to 42%) and 26% (5% to 31%) at 1-, 3- and 6-months, respectively. The intervention led to an increase in the rate of GBV survivors seeking health care services, and improved rates of follow-up care among SV survivors initiating PEP. Strengthening of PEP adherence counseling remains crucial for improving GBV services.

Antiretroviral-based HIV prevention, including pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), is expanding in generalized epidemic settings, but additional prevention options are needed for individuals with periodic, high-risk sexual exposures. Non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is recommended in global guidelines. However, in Africa, awareness of and access to PEP for sexual exposures are limited. We assessed feasibility, acceptability, uptake and adherence in a pilot study of a patient-centred PEP programme with options for facility- or community-based service delivery.
After population-level HIV testing with universal access to PrEP for persons at elevated HIV risk (SEARCH Trial:NCT01864603), we conducted a pilot PEP study in five rural communities in Kenya and Uganda between December 2018 and May 2019. We assessed barriers to PEP in the population and implemented an intervention to address these barriers, building on existing in-country PEP protocols. We used community leaders for sensitization. Test kits and medications were acquired through the Ministry of Health supply chain and healthcare providers based at the Ministry of Health clinics were trained on PEP delivery. Additional intervention components were (a)PEP availability seven days/week, (b)PEP hotline staffed by providers and (c)option for out-of-facility medication delivery. We assessed implementation using the Proctor framework and measured seroconversions via repeat HIV testing. Successful \"PEP completion\" was defined as self-reported adherence over four weeks of therapy with post-PEP HIV testing.
Community leaders were able to sensitize and mobilize for PEP. The Ministry of Health supplied test kits and PEP medications; after training, healthcare providers delivered the 28-day regimen with high completion rates. Among 124 persons who sought PEP, 66% were female, 24% were ≤25 years and 42% were fisherfolk. Of these, 20% reported exposure with a serodifferent partner, 72% with a new or existing relationship and 7% from transactional sex. 12% of all visits were conducted at out-of-facility community-based sites; 35% of participants had ≥1 out-of-facility visit. No serious adverse events were reported. Overall, 85% met the definition of PEP completion. There were no HIV seroconversions.
Among individuals with elevated-risk exposures in rural East African communities, patient-centred PEP was feasible, acceptable and provides a promising addition to the current prevention toolkit.

Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is recommended to start within hours of needlestick injuries (NSIs) among healthcare workers (HCWs). Delays associated with awaiting the results of testing from the source patient (whose blood was involved in the NSI) can lead to psychological consequences for the exposed HCW as well as symptomatic toxicities from empiric PEP.
After developing a \'stat\' (immediate) workflow that prioritized phlebotomy and resulting of source patient bloodwork for immediate handling and processing, we retrospectively investigated whether our new workflow had (i) decreased HIV order-result interval times for source patient HIV bloodwork and (ii) decreased the frequency of HIV PEP prescriptions being dispensed to exposed HCWs.
We retrospectively analysed NSI records to identify source patient HIV order-result intervals and PEP dispensing frequencies across a 6-year period (encompassing a 54-month pre-intervention period and 16-month post-intervention period).
We identified 251 NSIs, which occurred at similar frequencies before versus after our intervention (means 3.54 NSIs and 3.75 NSIs per month, respectively). Median HIV order-result intervals decreased significantly (P < 0.05) from 195 to 156 min after our intervention, while the proportion of HCWs who received one or more doses of PEP decreased significantly (P < 0.001) from 50% (96/191) to 23% (14/60).
Using a \'stat\' workflow to prioritize source patient testing after NSIs, we achieved a modest decrease in order-result intervals and a dramatic decrease in HIV PEP dispensing rates. This simple intervention may improve HCWs\' physical and psychological health during a traumatic time.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) are highly efficacious biomedical prevention strategies, which significantly reduce the risk of HIV transmission. Yet, partnered sexual minority men (SMM) continue to exhibit poorer uptake rates especially those in a non-monogamous or serodiscordant relationship for whom PrEP is recommended. The purpose of the study was to identify factors that may facilitate or impede the uptake of PrEP or PEP among partnered SMM. This qualitative study conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 sexual minority male couples recruited from the New York City metropolitan area. Thematic analysis identified relationship-specific and structural-level factors, which influence motivation and willingness for biomedical prevention uptake. Specifically, results highlighted the tension between relationship functioning and HIV prevention. In addition, stigma and access to knowledgeable health care providers diminished interest in biomedical prevention. Findings suggest a need for interventions that frame biomedical prevention in ways that minimize social perceptions of mistrust between partners and improve access.