背景:研究表明,尽管有关该主题的文献有限,但残疾儿童的受害风险较高。
目标:我们检查了攻击率,性受害,同辈兄弟姐妹受害,财产犯罪,虐待,以及美国有残疾和无残疾青年中的多重受害。我们检查了三个年龄组的这些比率(0-4岁的儿童,年龄5-11岁,年龄12-17岁)。
方法:我们使用来自全国儿童暴力暴露调查(NatSCEV)的数据,波浪I(2008)II(2011),和III(2014)。这些是具有全国代表性的1个月至17岁儿童和青少年样本(N=12,634)。
结果:考虑到所有年龄段的孩子,所有残疾类别的儿童,除了身体残疾,多重受害的风险较高。总体上,年龄较大的儿童的受害风险较高(发育或学习障碍的年幼儿童除外),尽管残疾儿童和非残疾儿童之间的差距通常随着儿童年龄的增长而缩小。孩子的年龄影响了残疾和受害之间的关系。身体残疾的年幼儿童受到大多数类型的伤害的风险更高,而内在性残疾的儿童受到攻击的风险更高,财产犯罪,以及童年中期和青春期的虐待。外部残疾的儿童在所有年龄段的大多数类型的受害风险都很高,而发育障碍似乎是非常年幼的儿童的风险因素,并且是以后年龄的潜在保护因素,尽管这些因素因受害类型而异。
结论:受害风险因受害和残疾类型而异。这项研究证明了控制人口统计学特征的重要性,特别是儿童的年龄在估计残疾儿童中受害的患病率,并确定按受害类型进行特定类型分析的重要性,残疾类型,和孩子的年龄。
Research has indicated that children with disabilities are at higher risk for victimization although the literature on this topic is limited.
We examined rates of assault, sexual victimization, peer-sibling victimization, property crime, maltreatment, and poly-victimization among youth in the United States with and without disabilities. We examined these rates for three age groups (children ages 0-4 years, ages 5-11 years, and ages 12-17 years).
We use data from the National Survey of Children\'s Exposure to Violence (NatSCEV), waves I (2008), II (2011), and III (2014). These are cross-sectional nationally representative samples of children and youth ages one month to 17 years (N = 12,634).
Considering children of all ages together, children in all disability categories, except for physical disability, were at higher risk for poly-victimization. Victimization exposure overall is higher among older children (except for assault among very young children with developmental or learning disabilities), though the disparity between children with and without disabilities generally narrows as children get older. Age of the child impacted the relationships between disability and victimization. Very young children with physical disabilities were at heightened risk for most types of victimization while children with internalizing disabilities were at heightened risk for assault, property crime, and maltreatment in middle childhood and adolescence. Children with externalizing disabilities were at heightened risk for most types of victimization across all ages while developmental disabilities appeared to be risk factor for very young children and a potentially protective factor at later ages though these varied by type of victimization.
Victimization risk varied by victimization and disability types. This study demonstrates the importance of controlling for demographic characteristics, especially age of the child in estimating the prevalence of victimization among children with disabilities and establishes the importance of type-specific analyses by victimization type, disability type, and age of the child.