这篇手稿探讨了积极心理学和政治哲学之间的关系,揭示了一种跨学科的方法,谈到了共同利益的关切。由于积极心理学已经扩展到社会和政治领域,它与哲学论证的关系值得探索。积极心理学与功利主义有关,以及享乐主义心理学的各个方面。然而,Eudaimonic幸福的另一个概念使这种心理学与其他政治哲学有联系。因此,这份手稿概述了当代政治哲学:首先,它讨论了自由主义和共产主义之间的争论,其次,它总结了自由主义完美主义的后续发展,能力方法,协商民主。然后,这些政治哲学的配置由“个人/集体”和“伦理/非伦理”两个轴的数字表示。“以下部分汇编了公民身份概念之间的相互关系,正义,和幸福,关于主要的政治哲学:利己主义,功利主义,自由主义,自由主义,共产主义,和保守主义。功利主义与幸福联系在一起,虽然自由主义和自由主义依赖于权利的概念,这几乎等同于正义的概念。因此,功利主义是一种幸福哲学,而自由主义和自由主义是正义的哲学。然而,在这些哲学中,幸福和正义之间几乎没有联系,因为这两种哲学是不相容的。后者批评前者,因为幸福的最大化会侵犯人们的权利。此外,这些哲学并不特别重视公民身份。相比之下,共产主义本质上是公民身份最适合增加福祉的政治哲学,它可以将正义与幸福联系起来。最后一部分提供了一个发展跨学科合作的框架。积极心理学可以为上述关于政治哲学的两个轴提供经验基础。另一方面,这种对应使政治哲学的特征更加清晰。虽然自由主义和自由主义照常与心理学相对应,功利主义和社群主义对应于积极心理学,后者可以被视为积极的政治哲学。这种认识导致了跨学科框架,实现多学科合作,包括与社会科学的合作,这可能有利于共同利益。
This manuscript explores the relationship between positive psychology and political philosophy, revealing an inter-disciplinary approach that speaks to the concerns of the common good. Since positive psychology has been expanding its reach into social and political spheres, its relationship to philosophical arguments has been worthy of exploration. Positive psychology is associated with utilitarianism, and aspects of hedonic psychology. However, an alternative concept of eudaimonic well-being has enabled this psychology to have links to other political philosophies. Therefore, this manuscript provides an overview of contemporary political philosophies: first, it discusses the debate between liberalism and communitarianism, and secondly, it summarizes the subsequent developments of liberal perfectionism, capability approach, and deliberative democracy. Then, the configuration of these political philosophies is indicated by the figure of two axes of \"individual/collective\" and \"ethical/non-ethical.\" The following section compiles the inter-relationships between the conceptions of citizenship, justice, and well-being, regarding the main political philosophies: egoism, utilitarianism, libertarianism, liberalism, communitarianism, and conservatism. Utilitarianism is associated with happiness, while liberalism and libertarianism rely on the concept of rights, which is almost equal to the idea of justice. Accordingly, utilitarianism is a philosophy of well-being, while liberalism and libertarianism are philosophies of justice. However, there is little connection between well-being and justice in these philosophies because the two kinds of philosophies are incompatible. The latter kind criticizes the former because the maximization of happiness can infringe on people\'s rights. Moreover, these philosophies do not particularly value citizenship. In contrast, communitarianism is intrinsically the political philosophy of citizenship most attuned to increasing well-being, and it can connect an idea of justice with well-being. The final part offers a framework to develop an inter-disciplinary collaboration. Positive psychology can provide the empirical basis of the two axes above concerning political philosophies. On the other hand, the correspondence makes the character of political philosophies clearer. While libertarianism and liberalism correspond to psychology as usual, utilitarianism and communitarianism correspond to positive psychology, and the latter can be regarded as positive political philosophies. This recognition leads to the interdisciplinary framework, enabling multi-disciplinary collaboration, including work with the social sciences, which could benefit the common good.