BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with reduced elastin/collagen ratios exacerbating cardiac dysfunction due to collagen-rich scar tissue replacing necrotic myocardial cells. This study aims to evaluate pirfenidone\'s therapeutic effect on early cardiac function post-AMI and elucidate its impact on the elastin/collagen ratio.
METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four groups: Sham, AMI, AMI treated with PBS (AMI-PBS), and AMI treated with pirfenidone (AMI-PFD) (n=12 each). AMI was induced via coronary artery ligation. The AMI-PFD and AMI-PBS groups received pirfenidone and PBS for 14 days, respectively. Cardiac function, fibrosis, serum cytokines, collagen and elastin content, and their ratios were assessed. Cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) from neonatal rats were categorized into control, hypoxia-induced (LO), LO+PBS, and LO+PFD groups. ELISA measured inflammatory factors, and RT-PCR analyzed collagen and elastin gene expression.
RESULTS: The AMI-PFD group showed improved cardiac function and reduced serum interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β). Type I and III collagen decreased by 22.6 % (P=0.0441) and 34.4 % (P=0.0427), respectively, while elastin content increased by 79.4 % (P=0.0126). E/COLI and E/COLIII ratios rose by 81.1 % (P=0.0026) and 88.1 % (P=0.0006). CFs in the LO+PFD group exhibited decreased IL-1β, IL-6, TGF-β, type I and III collagen, with increased elastin mRNA, enhancing the elastin/collagen ratio.
CONCLUSIONS: Pirfenidone enhances cardiac function by augmenting the early elastin/collagen ratio post-AMI.

The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in dogs increases with age, and renal fibrosis is an important pathophysiological mechanism in this process. However, only a few drugs that can effectively inhibit fibrosis in the kidneys of dogs are currently available. In this study, we aimed to determine whether pirfenidone, a drug that has shown antifibrotic effects in various clinical studies, also exerts antifibrotic effects on canine renal tubular epithelial cells, Madin-Darby canine kidney cells (MDCK). To this end, we treated MDCK cells with various concentrations of pirfenidone, followed by transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-β1) to stimulate fibrotic conditions. A cell viability assay was performed to determine the effect of pirfenidone on cell survival. Fibrosis-related markers and TGF-β1 fibrotic pathway-related markers were assessed using qPCR, Western blot analysis and immunocytochemistry. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, followed by Tukey\'s post-hoc test for multiple comparisons. Pirfenidone treatment significantly reduced the expression of profibrotic markers such as α-smooth muscle actin, fibronectin, and collagen. Additionally, it upregulated the expression of E-cadherin, an epithelial marker. Furthermore, pirfenidone effectively inhibited the phosphorylation of key factors involved in the TGF-β1 signaling pathway, including Smad2/3 and ERK1/2. These results demonstrate that pirfenidone suppresses TGF-β1-induced fibrosis in MDCK cells by attenuating epithelial-mesenchymal transition and the relevant signaling pathways.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) occurs as an acute onset condition, and patients present with diffuse alveolar damage, refractory hypoxemia, and non-cardiac pulmonary edema. ARDS progresses through an initial exudative phase, an inflammatory phase, and a final fibrotic phase. Pirfenidone, a powerful anti-fibrotic agent, is known as an agent that inhibits the progression of fibrosis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. In this study, we studied the treatment efficiency of pirfenidone on lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and bleomycin-induced ARDS using rats. The ARDS rat model was created by the intratracheal administration of 3 mg/kg LPS of and 3 mg/kg of bleomycin dissolved in 0.2 mL of normal saline. The pirfenidone treatment group was administered 100 or 200 mg/kg of pirfenidone dissolved in 0.5 mL distilled water orally 10 times every 2 days for 20 days. The administration of LPS and bleomycin intratracheally increased lung injury scores and significantly produced pro-inflammatory cytokines. ARDS induction increased the expressions of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1/Smad-2 signaling factors. Additionally, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9/tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 imbalance occurred, resulting in enhanced fibrosis-related factors. Treatment with pirfenidone strongly suppressed the expressions of TGF-β1/Smad-2 signaling factors and improved the imbalance of MMP-9/TIMP-1 compared to the untreated group. These effects led to a decrease in fibrosis factors and pro-inflammatory cytokines, promoting the recovery of damaged lung tissue. These results of this study showed that pirfenidone administration suppressed inflammation and fibrosis in the ARDS animal model. Therefore, pirfenidone can be considered a new early treatment for ARDS.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is classified under fibrotic interstitial pneumonia, characterized by a chronic and progressive course. The predominant clinical features of IPF include dyspnea and pulmonary dysfunction.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of pirfenidone in the early treatment of IPF on lung function in patients.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 113 patients with IPF who were treated in our hospital from November 2017 to January 2023. These patients were divided into two groups: control group (n = 53) and observation group (n = 60). In the control group, patients received routine therapy in combination with methylprednisolone tablets, while those in the observation group received routine therapy together with pirfenidone. After applying these distinct treatment approaches to the two groups, we assessed several parameters, including the overall effectiveness of clinical therapy, the occurrence of adverse reactions (e.g., nausea, vomiting, and anorexia), symptom severity scores, pulmonary function index levels, inflammatory marker levels, and the 6-min walk distance before and after treatment in both groups.
RESULTS: The observation group exhibited significantly higher rates than the control group after therapy, with a clear distinction (P < 0.05). After treatment, the observation group experienced significantly fewer adverse reactions than the control group, with a noticeable difference (P < 0.05). When analyzing the symptom severity scores between the two groups of patients after treatment, the observation group had significantly lower scores than the control group, with a distinct difference (P < 0.05). When comparing the pulmonary function index levels between the two groups of patients after therapy, the observation group displayed significantly higher levels than the control group, with a noticeable difference (P < 0.05). Evaluating the inflammatory marker data (C-reactive protein, interleukin-2 [IL-2], and IL-8) between the two groups of patients after therapy, the observation group exhibited significantly lower levels than the control group, with significant disparities (P < 0.05). Comparison of the 6-min walking distance data between the two groups of patients after treatment showed that the observation group achieved significantly greater distances than the control group, with a marked difference (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Prompt initiation of pirfenidone treatment in individuals diagnosed with IPF can enhance pulmonary function, elevate inflammatory factor levels, and increase the distance covered in the 6-min walk test. This intervention is conducive to effectively decreasing the occurrence of adverse reactions in patients.

BACKGROUND: Anti-fibrotics can reduce restrictive impairment in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, its effectiveness in non-IPF progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (non-IPF PF-ILD) remains uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: We assess the efficacy and safety of anti-fibrotics pirfenidone and nintedanib versus placebo among non-IPF PF-ILD adult patients.
METHODS: Meta-analysis was performed using PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). At respective centers, non-IPF PF-ILD was defined as clinical and radiological findings inconsistent with IPF and greater than 5 % forced vital capacity (FVC) decline, worsening radiological fibrosis or respiratory symptoms.
RESULTS: Among seven RCTs involving 1,816 non-IPF PF-ILD patients, anti-fibrotics significantly reduced decline in FVC from baseline in milliliters (MD -66.80milliliters; P < 0.01) and percent predicted (MD -1.80 %; P < 0.01) compared to placebo. However, severity of FVC decline was less than 10 % (P = 0.33) in both groups. No significant difference in the decline of 6MWD from baseline in meters (P = 0.19) while on anti-fibrotics, although those on pirfenidone had less decline in 6MWD (MD -25.12 m; P < 0.01) versus placebo. The rates of all-cause mortality (P = 0.34), all-cause hospitalization (P = 0.44), and hospitalization for respiratory etiology (P = 0.06) were comparable in both groups. Adverse events of nausea/vomiting (54.2 % vs. 20.3 %; P < 0.01), diarrhea (65.2 % vs. 27.6 %; P = 0.02), anorexia/weight loss (23.0 % vs. 7.7 %; P < 0.01), neurological disorders (20.8 % vs. 12.6 %; P < 0.01), and events requiring therapy discontinuation were higher (18.4 % vs. 9.9 %; P < 0.01) in the anti-fibrotic group. Other adverse events of skin (P = 0.18) and respiratory disorders (P = 0.20) were equal.
CONCLUSIONS: The advent of anti-fibrotics offers alternative treatment to reduce lung function decline.

OBJECTIVE: Pooled analyses of previous randomized controlled trials reported that antifibrotics improved survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but the results were only based on short-term outcome data from selected patients who met strict criteria. Observational studies/meta-analyses also suggested that antifibrotics improve survival, but these studies failed to control for immortal time bias that considerably exaggerates drug effects. Therefore, whether antifibrotics truly improve long-term survival in patients with IPF in the real world remains undetermined and requires external validity.
METHODS: We used data from the Japanese National Claims Database to estimate the intention-to-treat effect of antifibrotics on mortality. To address immortal time bias, we employed models treating antifibrotic initiation as a time-dependent covariate and target trial emulation (TTE), both incorporating new-user designs for antifibrotics and treating lung transplantation as a competing event.
RESULTS: Of 30,154 patients with IPF, 14,525 received antifibrotics. Multivariate Fine-Gray models with antifibrotic initiation as a time-dependent covariate revealed that compared with no treatment, nintedanib (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.89) and pirfenidone (aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86-0.93) were associated with reduced mortality. The TTE model also replicated the associations of nintedanib (aHR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.65-0.74) and pirfenidone (aHR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.78-0.85) with reduced mortality. Subgroup analyses confirmed this association regardless of age, sex, and comorbidities, excluding certain subpopulations.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large-scale real-world analysis support the generalizability of the association between antifibrotics and improved survival in various IPF populations.

OBJECTIVE: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a serious complication with varied prevalence ranging from 4% to as high as 68%, with varied presentation. Immunosuppressants and antifibrotics are used in the management of RA ILD. The clinicodemographic profile and presentation in our country need to be further explored. We assessed the efficacy and safety profile of antifibrotic drugs in combination with immunosuppressants among RA ILD patients.
METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in the Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Clinic in the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur, India, between January 2022 to January 2023. RA patients with dyspnea and chronic cough were referred to us for evaluation of ILD. Patients underwent clinical examination, complete lung function study including spirometry, single breath diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), six-minute walk test, and high-resolution computed tomography of the thorax. Quality of life was assessed using the King\'s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (KBILD) questionnaire.
RESULTS: Two hundred eighteen RA patients were evaluated and out of these, 43 (20.8%) had features of ILD on high-resolution computed tomogram (HRCT) thorax. Twenty-six (2.18%) met the inclusion criteria for starting antifibrotics. The mean ± SD. age of the patients was 52.96 ± 14.04 and the majority (77%) were females. Fourteen (53.38%) patients had usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)/probable UIP pattern and 12 (46.22%) had nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) patterns on HRCT. Out of 26 patients, 24 (92.3%) were started on antifibrotics. Fourteen (53.8%) patients were on nintedanib and 10 (38.4%) were on pirfenidone. The mean ± SD forced vital capacity (FVC)% predictedwas 62.5 ± 20.04. The mean ± SD. The DLCO percentage predicted was 54.4 ± 22.8. Twenty-two (84.6%) patients did not experience any side effects. The mean ± SD. KBILD score was 59.9 ± 11.17 and was similar in both sexes.
CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the prevalence of RA ILD was nearly 20.8% and more common in females. Twenty-four (2%) patients were included for antifibrotic treatment. There was an improvement in lung function at the end of six months, but the change was not significant. All patients tolerated antifibrotics well without any serious adverse events.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rare and progressive interstitial lung disease characterized by irreversible distortion of lung architecture and subsequent loss of pulmonary function. Pirfenidone is an antifibrotic agent associated with increased progression-free survival and overall survival rates, but it carries multiple side effects. The aim of the study was to examine the efficacy and safety profile of pirfenidone in a real-life context, with a focus on the concomitant use of antithrombotic and/or anticoagulant treatments. The clinical and functional data (forced vital capacity [FVC], forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1], diffusing lung capacity for carbon monoxide [DLCO], and 6 min walking test distance [6MWD]) of all IPF patients treated with pirfenidone and referred to our two centers between 2019 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed at baseline, 6 and 12 months after the start of treatment. A total of 55 IPF subjects undergoing pirfenidone treatment were included in the analysis (45.5% females, median [IQR] age at disease onset 68.0 [10.0] years, median [IQR] age at baseline 69.0 [10.8] years). Compared to baseline, at 12 months, FVC (86.0% vs. 80.0%; p = 0.023) and DLCO (44.0% vs. 40.0%; p = 0.002) were significantly reduced, while FEV1 (p = 0.304) and 6MWD (p = 0.276) remained stable; no significant change was recorded at 6 months. Most of the reported adverse events were mild or moderate. Gastrointestinal intolerance (9.1%) was the main cause of treatment discontinuation. A total of 5% of patients reported at least one minor bleeding event, although all episodes occurred in those receiving concomitant antithrombotic or anticoagulant. Overall, this real-life experience confirms the efficacy and safety profile of pirfenidone in the case of the concomitant use of antithrombotic and/or anticoagulant drugs.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has traditionally been considered the archetype of progressive fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (f-ILDs), but several other f-ILDs can also manifest a progressive phenotype. Integrating genomic signatures into clinical practice for f-ILD patients may help to identify patients predisposed to a progressive phenotype. In addition to the risk of progressive pulmonary fibrosis, there is a growing body of literature examining how pharmacogenomics influences treatment response, particularly regarding the efficacy and safety profiles of antifibrotic and immunomodulatory agents. In this narrative review, we discuss current studies in IPF and other forms of pulmonary fibrosis, including systemic autoimmune disorders associated ILDs, sarcoidosis and hypersensitivity pneumonitis. We also provide insights into the future direction of research in this complex field.

UNASSIGNED: Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) is a manifestation of a heterogenous group of underlying interstitial lung disease (ILD) diagnoses, defined as non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) progressive fibrotic ILD meeting at least two of the following criteria in the previous 12 months: worsening respiratory symptoms, absolute decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) more than or equal to 5% and/or absolute decline in diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) more than or equal to 10% and/or radiological progression.
UNASSIGNED: The authors subjectively reviewed a synthesis of literature from PubMed to identify recent advances in the diagnosis and characterisation of PPF, treatment recommendations, and management challenges. This review provides a comprehensive summary of recent advances and highlights future directions for the diagnosis, management, and treatment of PPF.
UNASSIGNED: Recent advances in defining the criteria for PPF diagnosis and licensing of treatment are likely to support further characterisation of the PPF patient population and improve our understanding of prevalence. The diagnosis of PPF remains challenging with the need for a specialised ILD multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach. The evidence base supports the use of immunomodulatory therapy to treat inflammatory ILDs and antifibrotic therapy where PPF develops. Treatment needs to be tailored to the specific underlying disease and determined on a case-by-case basis.