暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

We describe a 44-year-old man with a complaint of atonic seizures of the left upper limb, followed by generalized seizures. Brain MRI showed isolated juxtacortical white matter T2 hyperintensity with gadolinium (Gd) enhancement of the adjacent cortical gray matter and subcortical white matter in the right frontal convexity. Treatment with levetiracetam was effective for seizure suppression, and he had no other neurological abnormalities. Human leukocyte antigen typing revealed B54 and Cw1, which indicated the possibility of neuro-Sweet disease. However, a general examination, which included vital signs and eye and skin findings, was normal. A cerebrospinal fluid test showed a mild elevation in protein levels without pleocytosis and a normal range of interleukin-6. Electroencephalography showed intermittent slow waves without epileptic discharge in the bilateral temporal lobes. We detected subtle flow voids in the pia mater of the left frontal lobe, which suggested cerebrovascular disease, and specifically, the possibility of dural arteriovenous fistulas. Computed tomography angiography showed abnormally dilated perimedullary veins in the left frontal lobe. Cerebral angiography confirmed the existence of four dural arteriovenous fistulas, which included two retrograde leptomeningeal venous drainages in the right frontal cortical veins supplied by the anterior branch of the right middle meningeal artery. The other dural arteriovenous fistulas were retrograde leptomeningeal venous drainages in the left frontal cortical veins supplied by the anterior and posterior convexity branches of the left middle meningeal artery. The patient underwent successful endovascular embolization of all dural arteriovenous fistulas with Onyx injection. A follow-up MRI showed gradual improvement of the T2 hyperintensity and Gd enhancement. He remained seizure-free for 2 years following endovascular embolization.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: This multicenter prospective cohort study (registration no. ChiCTR2000032089) aimed to investigate the relationship between saliva and plasma levetiracetam concentrations to determine whether saliva could be used for routine monitoring of levetiracetam during pregnancy.
METHODS: The slot concentrations of levetiracetam in simultaneously obtained saliva and plasma samples were measured using UPLC-MS/MS. The correlations between saliva and plasma levetiracetam concentrations and the dose-normalized concentrations were compared among pregnant women in different stages and nonpregnant control participants with epilepsy.
RESULTS: In total, 231 patients with 407 plasma and saliva sample pairs were enrolled from 39 centers. Linear relationships between salivary and plasma levetiracetam concentrations were reported in the enrolled population (r = 0.898, p < 0.001), including pregnant (r = 0.935, p < 0.001) and nonpregnant participants (r = 0.882, p < 0.001). Plasma concentrations were moderately higher than saliva concentrations, with ratios of saliva to plasma concentrations of 0.98 for nonpregnant women, 0.98, 1, and 1.12 for pregnant women during the first trimester, the second trimester, the and third trimester, respectively. The effective range of saliva levetiracetam concentration was found to be 9.98 μg/mL (lower limit) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.937 (95% confidence intervals, 0.915-0.959), sensitivity of 88.9%, specificity of 86.8%, and p < 0.001, to 24.05 μg/mL (upper limit) with an AUC of 0.952 (0.914-0.99), sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 92.3%, and p = 0.007.
CONCLUSIONS: The saliva/plasma concentration ratio of levetiracetam remains constant during pregnancy and is similar to that in non-pregnant individuals. Monitoring levetiracetam concentration in saliva during pregnancy should be widely promoted.

OBJECTIVE: To explore mechanism of piracetam for the treatment of spinal cord injury in rats through mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway.
METHODS: Fifty-four healthy 6-week-old SD female rats with body weight of 80 to 100 g were divided into sham operation group, spinal cord injury group and piracetam group by random number table method, with 18 rats in each group. Spinal cord injury model was established in spinal cord injury group and piracetam group using percussion apparatus, while sham operation group did not damage spinal cord. Piracetam group was injected with piracetam injection through tail vein according to 5 ml·kg-1 standard, once a day for 3 days;the other two groups were injected with normal saline at the same dose, the same frequency and the same duration. The rats were sacrificed at 1, 3, and 7 days after surgery, and changes of Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan (BBB) locomotor rating scale was observed and compared. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect spinal cord inflammatory factors, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), interleukin-1β (interleukin-1β), necrosis factor-α (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α);HE staining was used to observe morphological changes of rats with spinal cord injury, and immunohistochemistry was used to observe expression level of aquaporin 4 (AQP4). The activation of MAPK signaling pathway in spinal cord of rats after spinal cord injury was observed by western blotting (WB).
RESULTS: BBB scores of sham operation group on 1, 3 and 7 day were 21 points. In spinal cord injury group, the scores were (1±1), (4±1) and (7±2);piracetam group was (1±1), (5±1), (9±2), respectively;the difference between spinal cord injury group and sham operation group was statistically significant (P<0.05). HE staining showed that no abnormality was found in sham operation group. In spinal cord injury group, bleeding and degeneration of spinal cord tissue appeared at 1 day after operation; flaky necrotic areas were appeared in spinal cord at 3 days after surgery, and spinal cord tissue began to slowly repair at 7 days after surgery. In piracetam group, the bleeding area was less than that of spinal cord injury group at 1 day after surgery;at 3 days after operation, the necrotic area was reduced and the range of nuclear disappearance was reduced; and the spinal cord began to recover slowly at 7 days after surgery. AQP4 staining of spinal cord of rats in sham operation group was weak at 1, 3 and 7 days after modeling, AQP4 staining was deepened and area increased in spinal cord injury group, AQP4 staining of piracetam group was lighter than that of spinal cord injury group, and the positive cells were slightly increased and the staining was slightly darker than that of sham operation group. At 1, 3 and 7 days, the level of IL-6, IL-10, IL-1β and TNF-α in spinal cord injury group were higher than those in sham operation group and piracetam group(P<0.05). Compared with spinal cord injury group, the area of spinal cord bleeding and necrosis were decreased by HE staining in piracetam group, and AQP4 staining was decreased by immunohistochemistry. WB results showed that P-ERK, P-JNK and P-P38 levels in spinal cord injury group at 3 days were higher than those in sham operation group and piracetam group(P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Piracetam not only showed significant effect in promoting motor function recovery after spinal cord injury, but also showed positive therapeutic potential in reducing lesion area, regulating AQP4 expression to reduce edema, and reducing inflammatory response by regulating MAPK signaling pathway.

OBJECTIVE: Cisplatin (CDDP) is commonly employed as an antineoplastic agent, but its use is significantly limited by the occurrence of dose-dependent nephrotoxicity, the detailed mechanisms of which remain unclear. This research is aimed to explore the molecular mechanisms of Piracetam (PIR)\'s protective effects on nephrotoxicity resulting from CDDP exposure and to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for these effects.
METHODS: PIR was given in dosages of 100 and 300 mg/kg body weight for a duration of 15 days; concurrently, on the last day, a single 10 mg/kg dose of CDDP was delivered via intraperitoneal injection. Forty-eight hours post-CDDP injection, the animals were sacrificed to assess nephrotoxicity. Blood samples and renal tissues were taken for biochemical and histopathological investigations. Serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were measured. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), caspase-9 and nuclear factor kappa b p65 (NF-κB p65) were assessed by immunohistochemistry method. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis was employed to determine cytochrome c (Cyt. c), Bcl-2-associated X-protein (BAX), caspase-3, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), Heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), superoxide dismutase (SOD), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) levels in renal tissue homogenates. The mRNA levels of tumor protein P53 (TP53), phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K), protein kinase B (Akt), p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK), extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK), and c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK) were tested by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Additionally, histopathological evaluations of the renal tissues and the binding affinity of PIR to AMPK by molecular docking were also performed.
RESULTS: Pre-treatment with PIR enhanced renal function markers such as urea and creatinine, mitigated histological damage, and diminished inflammatory cell presence in renal tubules. PIR demonstrated antioxidant effects by reestablishing the equilibrium between pro-oxidants and antioxidants such as MPO, HO-1, Nrf2, as well as SOD. Furthermore, PIR inhibited the inflammatory pathways through the MAPK/NF-κB pathway. Additionally, PIR counteracted the CDDP-induced decline in PI3K/Akt activity and hindered caspase-dependent apoptotic processes.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, PIR appears to be an effective therapeutic strategy for reducing CDDP-induced nephrotoxicity, attributed to its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiapoptotic mechanisms. Consequently, PIR may serve as a complementary treatment alongside CDDP to alleviate nephrotoxicity associated with CDDP.

BACKGROUND: Factors affecting serum concentrations of levetiracetam in dogs are unknown and could affect the efficacy of levetiracetam in controlling seizures in dogs with epilepsy.
OBJECTIVE: Higher PO doses of levetiracetam will be needed in dogs to achieve serum concentrations shown to be effective in humans. Determine factors that could influence serum levetiracetam concentrations and justify dose adjustment in some epileptic dogs.
METHODS: Sixty-nine client-owned dogs with epilepsy treated with levetiracetam alone or in combination, based on 127 trough serum concentration measurements of levetiracetam.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. Linear mixed models were used to assess the effect of patient signalment and concurrent drug administration on serum concentrations of levetiracetam and the effect of serum concentration of levetiracetam on seizure frequency reduction.
RESULTS: The PO dose of levetiracetam significantly explained changes in serum levetiracetam concentration, and this causal link was stronger with monotherapy (R2 = 0.59, P < .001). Phenobarbital significantly decreased serum levetiracetam concentration in a dose dependent manner (R2 = 0.30, P = .003). Based on our model, a levetiracetam dosage of 99-216 mg/kg/day is necessary to obtain a serum levetiracetam concentration of 20 μg/mL when used alone or concurrently with 7 mg/kg/day of phenobarbital. No other factors were found to influence serum levetiracetam concentrations. No therapeutic range could be identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a dosage of 99-216 mg/kg/day of levetiracetam is needed to achieve a serum concentration known to be therapeutically effective in humans, especially when administered concomitantly with phenobarbital.

BACKGROUND: Piracetam, a widely recognized nootropic drug, is hypothesized to enhance memory function through its influence on synaptic plasticity and neurotransmitter levels. However, despite its popularity, there remains a lack of conclusive evidence regarding its impact on memory. Therefore, the present study aims to explore the effects of piracetam on memory in individuals with impaired cognitive function, comparing it to a placebo control group.
OBJECTIVE: This study will evaluate how piracetam affects memory function, compared to placebo in adults with impairment in this area.
METHODS: We carried out bibliographical research and meta-analysis of scientific clinical trials comparing memory function in people taking piracetam with those in the placebo group. The PubMed, Dimensions, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were used. Statistical analysis was performed in R Studio version 4.3.1.
RESULTS: In our analysis, 199 articles were identified, of which we included eighteen studies, comprising a total of 886 patients, of which Piracetam was the treatment option in 442 (49.88 %) patients. Memory enhancement (SMD 0.75; 95 % CI [-0.19; 1.69]; p=0.12; I²=96 %) had no clinical difference between the intervention and the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Upon the conclusion of this study, it is apparent that we cannot definitively ascertain the impact of piracetam on memory function. Further research is warranted to provide a clearer understanding of the cognitive effects of piracetam in individuals with memory impairment. This investigation serves as a significant contribution to the ongoing quest to elucidate the potential benefits of piracetam in the field of cognitive neuroscience.

暂无摘要。